1. Body surface area, height, and body fat percentage as more sensitive risk factors of cancer and cardiovascular disease
- Author
-
Xiaokang Ji, Xiaoyu Dai, Zhiheng Wang, Marlvin Anemey Tewara, Wang Yongchao, Shucheng Si, Fuzhong Xue, and Yanxun Liu
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,0301 basic medicine ,China ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,physical measurements ,Body Surface Area ,lcsh:RC254-282 ,Risk Assessment ,Body fat percentage ,Gastroenterology ,Body Mass Index ,Cohort Studies ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,cardiovascular disease ,Risk Factors ,Neoplasms ,Internal medicine ,cancer ,Humans ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Myocardial infarction ,Original Research ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Body surface area ,business.industry ,Incidence ,Hazard ratio ,Cancer ,Middle Aged ,lcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,Prognosis ,medicine.disease ,body fat percentage ,030104 developmental biology ,Oncology ,Cardiovascular Diseases ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Heart failure ,Cohort ,Female ,Skin cancer ,business ,Cancer Prevention ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Background Limited studies have compared the association between various physical measurements and the risk of cancer or cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aim to explore the best‐individualized indicators of cancer and CVD risk assessment. Methods From May 2004 to December 2017, a community‐based cohort in China involving 100 280 participants were enrolled. BMI, height, body surface area (BSA), and body fat percentage (BFP) were compared in parallel about cancer and CVD risk with the multivariable‐adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression model. Results Within the follow‐up period, 3107 (3.10%) were diagnosed with cancer and 3721 (3.71%) had CVD. Per‐level increased (in tertile: T1, T2, and T3 level) BSA, height, and BFP was positively associated with the risk of overall cancer [HR (95% CI): 1.10 (1.05‐1.15), 1.12 (1.07‐1.18), and 1.10 (1.03‐1.16), respectively], whereas BMI was insignificant. Compared with the reference group (T2), the highest BSA level (T3) was positively associated with overall cancer incidence for both male [HR (95% CI): 1.28 (1.13‐1.45)] and female [HR (95% CI): 1.13 (1.00‐1.28)]. The BSA, height, and BFP also significantly associated with some site‐specific cancers including thyroid, stomach, breast, urinary system, and skin cancer. Meanwhile, BFP presented a strong positive association with overall CVD [HR (95% CI): 1.22 (1.15‐1.30) in trend] in both gender and associated with nearly all CVD subtypes especially the myocardial infarction and heart failure. Conclusion BSA, height, and BFP have more sensitivity in assessing cancer risk and BFP shows the largest hazard ratios for CVD incident. We provided valuable evidence for the application of height, BSA, and BFP in routine healthcare practice. These encouraging findings should be tested in more well‐defined studies for risk prediction., Body surface area, height, and body fat percentage has higher sensitivity in assessing cancer risk than BMI. Body fat percentage shows the largest hazard ratios in all cardiovascular events. BSA, height, and BFP have considerable application value in routine healthcare practice.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF