Search

Supplementary Material

PDF file - 109K, PCR Primer Sequences; Baseline Demographic and Clinical Characteristics for Patients With and Without Available Multigene Information; Mutations Identified In Available Patient Tumor Specimens

Purpose: To investigate whether EGF receptor (EGFR) pathway mutations predicted response to monotherapy with panitumumab, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, in a randomized phase III study of metastatic colorectal cancer.Experimental Design: Using massively parallel multigene sequencing, we analyzed 320 samples for 9 genes, with multigene sequence data from 288 (90%) samples.Results: Mutation rates were: KRAS (45%), NRAS (5%), BRAF (7%), PIK3CA (9%), PTEN (6%), TP53 (60%), EGFR (1%), AKT1 (CTNNB1 (2%). In the randomized study and open-label extension, 22 of 138 (16%) wild-type KRAS (codons 12/13/61) patients versus 0 of 103 mutant KRAS (codons 12/13) patients had objective responses. Of 6 mutant KRAS (codon 61) patients, 1 with a Q61H mutation achieved partial response during the extension. Among wild-type KRAS (codons 12/13/61) patients, 0 of 9 patients with NRAS mutations, 0 of 13 with BRAF mutations, 2 of 10 with PIK3CA mutations, 1 of 9 with PTEN mutations, and 1 of 2 with CTNNB1 mutations responded to panitumumab. No patients responded to best supportive care alone. Panitumumab treatment was associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) among wild-type KRAS (codons 12/13/61) patients [HR, 0.39; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.28–0.56]. Among wild-type KRAS patients, a treatment effect for PFS favoring panitumumab occurred in patients with wild-type NRAS (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.27–0.56) and wild-type BRAF (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.24–0.55) but not mutant NRAS (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 0.44–8.44).Conclusions: These results show the feasibility and potential clinical use of next-generation sequencing for evaluating predictive biomarkers. Clin Cancer Res; 19(7); 1902–12. ©2012 AACR.

Supplementary Tables S1-S4 from Clinical Usefulness of EGFR Gene Copy Number as a Predictive Marker in Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Cetuximab: A Fluorescent In situ Hybridization Study

PDF file - 57K, Summary of tumor response and tumor genotype among patients who received treatment with panitumuab plus BSC or BSC alone in either the randomized phase 3 study or the extension and who had multigene sequencing information available. For all patients enrolled, tumor response was based on investigator assessment. BSC, best supportive care.

Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness and the pitfalls inherent to the assessment of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number (GCN) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for outcome prediction to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. The value of testing KRAS mutation status, in addition to EGFR GCN, was also explored.Experimental Design: FISH analysis of 87 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab was done, recording individual GCN per cell and using different samples per tumor. Performances of published cutoff points and different summaries of EGFR GCN distribution were assessed for response prediction.Results: In our data set, two published cutoff points performed less well than in their training set, yielding positive predictive values and negative predictive values between 40.0% and 48.3% and between 81.0% and 86.5%, respectively. Among summaries of GCN distribution explored, mean and right-tailed distribution of GCN yielded the highest performances. A mean EGFR GCN ≥2.83 provided an area under the curve of 0.71. Important heterogeneity of repeated measures of mean EGFR GCN was observed within tumors (intraclass correlation, 0.61; within-class SD, 0.40), leading to potential misclassifications of FISH status in 7 of 18 (38.8%) patients if a cutoff point were used. In multivariable analysis, EGFR GCN testing provided significant information independent of the KRAS status to predict response (P = 0.016) and overall survival (P = 0.005).Conclusions: We confirm the association between increased EGFR GCN and outcome after cetuximab. However, because of reproducibility concerns, any decision making based on published cutoff points is not warranted.

Rearrangement of the ALK gene and overexpression of ALK seems to occur very rarely in neuroendocrine lung tumors, with only 3 cases of atypical carcinoid and 1 large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) reported in detail until now.1,2,3,4 Here, we report a case of an ALK-positive neuroendocrine lung tumor showing a variable phenotype during the course of treatment. A pulmonary lesion with mediastinal adenopathies was detected in a 69-year-old, non-smoking female of Turkish origin during work-up for back pain. A very small amount of tumoral tissue was obtained through fine needle aspiration of a lymph node and stainings performed on paraffin-embedded tissue showed a very limited amount of tumoral tissue with a well-differentiated cytological aspect with regular nuclei. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

AIM Nodal stage is a strong prognostic factor of oncological outcome of rectal cancer. To compensate for the variation in total number of harvested nodes, calculation of the lymph node ratio (LNR) has been advocated. The aim of the study was to compare the impact, on the long-term oncological outcome, of the LNR with other predictive factors, including the quality of total mesorectal excision (TME) and the state of the circumferential resection margin. METHOD Consecutive patients having elective surgery for nonmetastatic rectal cancer were extracted from a prospectively maintained database. Retrospective uni- and multivariate analyses were performed based on patient-, surgical- and tumour-related factors. The prognostic value of the LNR on overall survival (OS) and on overall recurrence-free survival (ORFS) was assessed and a cut-off value was determined. RESULTS From 1998 to 2013, out of 456 patients, 357 with nonmetastatic disease were operated on for rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was administered to 66.7% of the patients. The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved was 12.8 ± 8.78 per surgical specimen. A lower lymph node yield was obtained in patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (11.8 vs 14.2; P = 0.014). The 5-year ORFS was 71.8% and the 5-year OS was 80.1%. Multivariate analysis confirmed LNR, the quality of TME and age to be independent prognostic factors of OS. LNR, age and perineural infiltration were independently associated with ORFS. Low- and high-risk patients could be discriminated using an LNR cut-off value of 0.2. CONCLUSION LNR is an independent prognostic factor of OS and ORFS. In line with the principles of optimal surgical management, the quality of TME and lymph node yield are essential technical requirements.

We examined how the immune microenvironment molds tumor evolution at different metastatic organs in a longitudinal dataset of colorectal cancer. Through multiplexed analyses, we showed that clonal evolution patterns during metastatic progression depend on the immune contexture at the metastatic site. Genetic evidence of neoantigen depletion was observed in the sites with high Immunoscore and spatial proximity between Ki67+ tumor cells and CD3+ cells. The immunoedited tumor clones were eliminated and did not recur, while progressing clones were immune privileged, despite the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Characterization of immune-privileged metastases revealed tumor-intrinsic and tumor-extrinsic mechanisms of escape. The lowest recurrence risk was associated with high Immunoscore, occurrence of immunoediting, and low tumor burden. We propose a parallel selection model of metastatic progression, where branched evolution could be traced back to immune-escaping clones. The findings could inform the understanding of cancer dissemination and the development of immunotherapeutics.

Background: The Panitumumab Randomized trial In combination with chemotherapy for Metastatic colorectal cancer to determine Efficacy (PRIME) demonstrated that panitumumab-FOLFOX4 significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus FOLFOX4 as first-line treatment of wild-type (WT) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the primary end point of the study. Patients and methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to panitumumab 6.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks + FOLFOX4 (arm 1) or FOLFOX4 (arm 2). This prespecified final descriptive analysis of efficacy and safety was planned for 30 months after the last patient was enrolled. Results: A total of 1183 patients were randomized. Median PFS for WT KRAS mCRC was 10.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.3-11.4 months] for arm 1 and 8.6months (95% CI 7.5-9.5 months) for arm 2; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.80; 95% CI 0.67-0.95; P = 0.01. Median overall survival (OS) forWT KRAS mCRC was 23.9 months (95%CI 20.3-27.7 months) for arm 1 and 19.7 months (95% CI 17.6-22.7 months) for arm 2; HR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.73-1.06; P=0.17 (68%OS events). An exploratory analysis of updated survival (>80%OS events) was carried out which demonstrated improvement in OS; HR = 0.83; 95%CI 0.70-0.98; P=0.03 forWT KRASmCRC. The adverse event profile was consistent with the primary analysis. Conclusions: In WT KRAS mCRC, PFS was improved, objective response was higher, and there was a trend toward improved OS with panitumumab-FOLFOX4, with significant improvement in OS observed in an updated analysis of survival in patients with WT KRAS mCRC treated with panitumumab + FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4 alone (P = 0.03). These data support a positive benefit-risk profile for panitumumab-FOLFOX4 for patients with previously untreated WT KRAS mCRC. KRAS testing is critical to select appropriate patients for treatment with panitumumab. © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer that harbors KRAS mutations in exon 2 do not benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. Other activating RAS mutations may also be negative predictive biomarkers for anti-EGFR therapy.In this prospective-retrospective analysis, we assessed the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) as compared with FOLFOX4 alone, according to RAS (KRAS or NRAS) or BRAF mutation status. A total of 639 patients who had metastatic colorectal cancer without KRAS mutations in exon 2 had results for at least one of the following: KRAS exon 3 or 4; NRAS exon 2, 3, or 4; or BRAF exon 15. The overall rate of ascertainment of RAS status was 90%.Among 512 patients without RAS mutations, progression-free survival was 10.1 months with panitumumab-FOLFOX4 versus 7.9 months with FOLFOX4 alone (hazard ratio for progression or death with combination therapy, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.90; P=0.004). Overall survival was 26.0 months in the panitumumab-FOLFOX4 group versus 20.2 months in the FOLFOX4-alone group (hazard ratio for death, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.99; P=0.04). A total of 108 patients (17%) with nonmutated KRAS exon 2 had other RAS mutations. These mutations were associated with inferior progression-free survival and overall survival with panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment, which was consistent with the findings in patients with KRAS mutations in exon 2. BRAF mutations were a negative prognostic factor. No new safety signals were identified.Additional RAS mutations predicted a lack of response in patients who received panitumumab-FOLFOX4. In patients who had metastatic colorectal cancer without RAS mutations, improvements in overall survival were observed with panitumumab-FOLFOX4 therapy. (Funded by Amgen and others; PRIME ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00364013.).

BACKGROUND Regorafenib is the first small-molecule multikinase inhibitor which showed survival benefits in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Beside classical adverse events of this drug class, hepatotoxicity has been described as a frequent side effect. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with refractory mCRC treated with regorafenib in our institution were reviewed. Severe treatment-related liver toxicity was investigated. Clinical history, liver histology and genetic assessment (sequence analysis) of cytochrome P 3A4 (CYP3A4) and uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase 1A9 (UGT1A9) involved in regorafenib metabolization were here reported for patients with severe hepatotoxicity. RESULTS Among the 93 reviewed patients, 3 presented severe and icteric toxic hepatitis which was fatal for 1 patient. Histopathological liver lesions were different depending on the onset of hepatotoxicity (acute or subacute): acinar zone 3 necrosis in case of acute symptoms and portal tract inflammation with porto-central bridging and fibrosis in the delayed presentation. None patients had CYP3A4 gene mutations. Similar polymorphisms in UGT1A9 gene promoter region (UGT1A9 variant -118T9>10 (rs3832043)) were found in both patients who presented acute hepatitis. Moreover, it appears retrospectively that both of them already experienced significant toxicity under irinotecan-based chemotherapy. CONCLUSION This is the first report of severe hepatotoxicity with available liver histology and genetic assessment of enzymes involved in regorafenib metabolization. This report also reminds the importance of a close liver tests monitoring during regorafenib treatment. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is a rare cancer of the liver. Surgery offers the only chance for cure. When surgery is unfeasible, chemotherapy is the backbone of treatment. The combined administration of cisplatin and gemcitabine is considered standard of care. Human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) is the major transporter responsible for gemcitabine uptake into cells. hENT1 expression is associated with an increased survival for patients receiving gemcitabine after pancreatic cancer surgery, suggesting that hENT1 is predictive of response to gemcitabine. AIM: To determine whether there is a correlation between the expression of hENT1 and disease outcome in CC. METHODS: A retrospective study on 43 patients treated at our centre with a locally advanced or metastatic CC, who received first line treatment with gemcitabine, was performed. RESULTS: For the whole population, median Progression Free Survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.0 (95% Confidence Interval 2.7-5.3 months) and 10.0 months (95%CI 6.8-13.2 months), respectively. From the 26 samples available for hENT1 staining, 18 (69%) and 8 (31%) patients had high and low hENT1 immunostaining, respectively. The median PFS were 2.0 versus 6.0 months for low versus high staining respectively (p = 0.012). The median OS were 5.0 versus 11.0 months for low versus high staining, respectively (p = 0.036). On multivariate analysis, hENT1 expression was the single independent predictive factor associated with prolonged PFS (HR 0.35, p = 0.023) and OS (HR 0.41, p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: In this study we show the potential of hENT1 expression as a predictor of outcome in CC treated with gemcitabine. Larger studies are necessary to confirm these promising results.

Purpose Panitumumab, a fully human anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody that improves progression-free survival (PFS), is approved as monotherapy for patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The Panitumumab Randomized Trial in Combination With Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to Determine Efficacy (PRIME) was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as initial treatment for mCRC. Patients and Methods In this multicenter, phase III trial, patients with no prior chemotherapy for mCRC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2, and available tissue for biomarker testing were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive panitumumab-FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4. The primary end point was PFS; overall survival (OS) was a secondary end point. Results were prospectively analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis by tumor KRAS status. Results KRAS results were available for 93% of the 1,183 patients randomly assigned. In the wild-type (WT) KRAS stratum, panitumumab-FOLFOX4 significantly improved PFS compared with FOLFOX4 (median PFS, 9.6 v 8.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.97; P = .02). A nonsignificant increase in OS was also observed for panitumumab-FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4 (median OS, 23.9 v 19.7 months, respectively; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.02; P = .072). In the mutant KRAS stratum, PFS was significantly reduced in the panitumumab-FOLFOX4 arm versus the FOLFOX4 arm (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.62; P = .02), and median OS was 15.5 months versus 19.3 months, respectively (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.57; P = .068). Adverse event rates were generally comparable across arms with the exception of toxicities known to be associated with anti-EGFR therapy. Conclusion This study demonstrated that panitumumab-FOLFOX4 was well tolerated and significantly improved PFS in patients with WT KRAS tumors and underscores the importance of KRAS testing for patients with mCRC.

BACKGROUND: Hepatotoxicity from neoadjuvant chemotherapy before liver resection for colorectal metastases (CRLM) has been recently reported. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence and the clinical relevance of this phenomenon. It was a retrospective study conducted at an academic secondary referral hospital. METHODS: One hundred patients suffering from CRLM and having undergone the resection of at least 1 liver segment (114 hepatectomies; 100 first, 13 second, 1 third) were enrolled. The surgical specimens were reviewed using standardized criteria for diagnosis and grading of pathological liver changes. Their impact on perioperative bleeding, transfusion, morbidity, and mortality rates after liver resection was studied. RESULTS: Sinusoidal congestion was the single hepatotoxic lesion significantly more frequently encountered in patients having received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = .0014), even in patients having received chemotherapy more than 6 months before liver resection, but was not related to the type of chemotherapy. Despite a significant increase in perioperative blood losses, the presence of sinusoidal lesions, even severe, had no clinically significant effect on postoperative mortality, morbidity, and transfusion rates. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before operation for CRLM is significantly associated to sinusoidal congestion, irrespective of the type of chemotherapy but without any significant impact on postoperative clinical outcome. Sinusoidal lesions may persist more than 6 months after the end of chemotherapy.

Purpose To study the power of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) epiregulin (EREG) and amphiregulin (AREG) ligands' expression in primary tumors to predict the outcome in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (cmCRC) treated with the combination of cetuximab and irinotecan. Patients and Methods Gene expression measurements and KRAS mutation analysis were performed on archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumors of 220 cmCRC patients. Response was measured using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria. The relation between ligand expression levels and outcome was evaluated using logistic regression for response and Cox regression for survival data. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed for response and survival data. CIs for the performance indices were obtained with a nonparametric bootstrap procedure. Findings were externally validated on a series of 67 samples treated in a similar setting. Results In KRAS wild type (WT) patients, there was a significant association between log-transformed ligand expression and response for EREG (odds ratio for objective response, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.83; P = .0005; concordance index [c-index], 0.681) and for AREG (odds ratio for objective response, 1.862; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.72; P = .0017; c-index, 0.673). In a Cox regression model, dichotomized ligand expression was significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). EREG PFS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.274 to 0.609; P < .001; time-dependent c-index [Cτ index], 0.640), and AREG PFS HR was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.64; P < .001; Cτ index, 0.627). EREG OS HR was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.63; P < .0001; Cτ index, 0.639), and AREG OS HR was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.64; P < .0001; Cτ index, 0.625). There was no predictive power of ligand expression in patients with KRAS mutation. Conclusion Expression of EGFR ligands in primary tumors significantly predicts outcome in KRAS WT cmCRC treated with cetuximab and irinotecan.

Background: Vandetanib (ZACTIMA (TM); ZD6474) is a once-daily, oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling. The safety and tolerability of vandetanib plus pemetrexed was assessed in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods: Patients with previously treated NSCLC (stage IIIB/IV) received once-daily oral vandetanib (100 or 300 mg) with pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2) i.v. infusion every 21 days). Results: Patients received vandetanib 100 mg + pemetrexed (n = 10) or vandetanib 300 mg + pemetrexed (n = 11). The protocol definition of a tolerable dose [vandetanib-related dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in less than 2 patients] was met in both dose cohorts, with one DLT reported in each: asymptomatic QTc prolongation (> 100 ms increase from baseline, but absolute QTc < 500 ms) in the 100 mg cohort and interstitial lung disease, which resolved after steroid therapy, in the 300 mg cohort. The most common adverse events were rash, anorexia, fatigue and diarrhea (all n = 10). Conclusion: Vandetanib and pemetrexed in combination were generally well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in Western countries. Despite the progress achieved with the introduction of new cytotoxic agents, CRC recurrence rates for patients with resected stage II and/or stage III disease remain higher than 20%. Furthermore, for patients diagnosed with metastatic CRC, the median survival time remains below 2 years and cure is often an elusive goal. These data highlight the need for more-effective systemic therapies. The EGFR is frequently overexpressed in CRC and has been associated with the malignant phenotype. Numerous clinical trials are now investigating the role of EGFR-targeted agents in CRC and have produced some encouraging results. Panitumumab is a fully human IgG(2) monoclonal antibody that in a randomized phase III trial was shown to increase efficacy when added to best supportive care in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic CRC. In phase I-III trials, panitumumab was safe and well tolerated, with most of its adverse effects related to some form of skin toxic effect. Early studies assessing the safety and efficacy of panitumumab alongside chemotherapy have also yielded promising results, and this combination is now being investigated in the first-line and second-line settings in randomized clinical trials.

This analysis compared the cost-effectiveness in Belgium of cetuximab plus irinotecan with current current care in the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) that has failed irinotecan-containing therapy. Treatment outcomes and medical resource use data for patients receiving cetuximab plus irinotecan from the BOND study were compared with those from a matched group of patients (current care) (n = 66). Two scenarios were considered in which cetuximab was discontinued either at 6 weeks or at 12 weeks if there was no tumour response at those time points. Cost-effectiveness was expressed in Euros as the additional cost per additional life year gained (LYG) (referred to as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)). For the 6-week rule, the ICERs were is an element of 17000 compared with current care. For the 12-week rule, the ICER was:is an element of 40000 /LYG. Sensitivity analyses revealed that, in the worst case, considering all assumptions against the cetuximab combination, the maximum ICER is:is an element of 30000 or is an element of 59000. In conclusion, cetuximab plus irinotecan for patients with metastatic CRC, after failure on irinotecan-containing chemotherapy, is rather cost-effective compared with current care in both scenarios tested.

In a randomised phase 3 trial, panitumumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This analysis characterises the association of PFS with CRC symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and overall survival (OS). CRC symptoms (NCCN/FACT CRC symptom index, FCSI) and HRQoL (EQ-5D) were assessed for 207 panitumumab patients and 184 best supportive care (BSC) patients who had at least one post-baseline patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment. Patients alive at week 8 were included in the PRO and OS analyses and categorised by their week 8 progression status as follows: no progressive disease (no PD; best response of at least stable disease) vs progressive disease (PD). Standard imputation methods were used to assign missing values. Significantly more patients were progression free at weeks 8–24 with panitumumab vs BSC. After excluding responders, a significant difference in PFS remained favouring panitumumab (HR=0.63, 95% CI=0.52–0.77; P

Purpose This phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of cetuximab combined with standard oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin [FOLFOX-4]) in the first-line treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor–expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and Methods The activity of cetuximab plus oxaliplatin was investigated in colon cancer cell lines and xenograft models. In the clinical study, patients with mCRC received on day 1 of a 14 day cycle, cetuximab (initial dose 400 mg/m2 during week 1, then 250 mg/m2 weekly) followed by FOLFOX-4 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1; leucovorin 200 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2, followed by fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus then 600 mg/m2 intravenous infusion during 22 hours on days 1 and 2). Results The preclinical studies confirmed the supra-additive activity of cetuximab to oxaliplatin. In the clinical study, 43 patients were included, with a median age of 65 years (range, 43 to 78 years). Response rates (RRs) were 79% (unconfirmed) and 72% (confirmed), with 95% disease control. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median duration of response were 12.3 and 10.8 months, respectively. Ten patients (23%) underwent resection with curative intent of previously unresectable metastases. After a median follow-up of 30.5 months, median overall survival (mOS) was 30.0 months. Cetuximab did not increase the characteristic toxicity of FOLFOX-4 and was generally well tolerated. Conclusion Cetuximab in combination with FOLFOX-4 is a highly active first-line treatment for mCRC, showing encouraging RR, mPFS, and mOS values. The treatment resulted in a high resectability rate, which could potentially result in an improved cure rate. This combination is under phase III development.

AIMS: This report describes three patients suffering from nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH). METHODS: These patients have received six, 16 and 20 cycles of neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy before planned extended hepatectomy. Two patients underwent uneventful portal vein embolization to hypertrophy the future remnant liver. RESULTS: At the end of chemotherapy, liver function tests deteriorated and portal hypertension appeared in two patients, including ascites, splenomegaly and oesophageal varices. Liver biopsy was performed through a percutaneous (two patients) or a transjugular approach (one patient) and allowed the diagnosis of NRH, which was considered to be a contraindication for major liver resection in all three patients, associated with extrahepatic disease progression in one patient. All patients died from neoplastic disease progression despite further chemotherapy at 6, 17 and 31 months following the diagnosis of NRH. One patient developed liver failure and ascites at the time of death. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should be aware of the potential occurrence and therapeutic impact of NRH in patients suffering from CRLM and treated by neoadjuvant 5FU-oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy before major liver surgery.

BACKGROUND: To assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of concurrent radiotherapy, capecitabine, and cetuximab in the preoperative treatment of patients with rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with rectal cancer (T3-T4, and/or N+, endorectal ultrasound) received preoperative radiotherapy (1.8 Gy, 5 days/week for 5 weeks, total dose 45 Gy, three-dimensional conformal technique) in combination with cetuximab [initial dose 400 mg/m(2) intravenous given 1 week before the beginning of radiation followed by 250 mg/m(2)/week for 5 weeks] and capecitabine for the duration of radiotherapy (650 mg/m(2) orally twice daily, first dose level; 825 mg/m(2) twice daily, second dose level). RESULTS: Four and six patients were treated at the first and second dose level of capecitabine, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred. Thirty additional patients were treated with capecitabine at 825 mg/m(2) twice daily. The most frequent grade 1/2 side-effects were acneiform rash (87%), diarrhea (65%), and fatigue (57%). Grade 3 diarrhea was found in 15%. Three grade 4 toxic effects were recorded: one myocardial infarction, one pulmonary embolism, and one pulmonary infection with sepsis. Two patients (5%) had a pathological complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative radiotherapy in combination with capecitabine and cetuximab is feasible with some patients achieving pathological downstaging.

The authors report the case of a 29-year-old woman with partially calcified stage cT4N2M0 mucoid adenocarcinoma of the mid-rectum. Concomitant neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was administered. Preoperative CT scan and MRI demonstrated stable disease with a marked increase of its mineralized component. Histology confirmed a mucoid adenocarcinoma with ossified matrix. Osteocytes were identified in the tumor. TNM (5th edition) staging was ypT3N2M1. This case illustrates heterotopic ossification of a rectal tumor, a fairly uncommon finding. The mechanism of heterotopic bone formation within gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma has not been fully elucidated. The impact of this particular feature on patient outcome is unknown.

The aim of this post hoc analysis of the VELOUR study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00561470) was to investigate the treatment effect of adding aflibercept to second-line infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who had failed any prior oxaliplatin-containing regimen. Adjuvant rapid relapsers (ARR), who were enrolled directly following relapse during or within 6 months of completion of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy (N = 124, including 17 patients who also received bevacizumab as part of their adjuvant therapy), were excluded from the original VELOUR intention-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 1226). After exclusion of the ARR, overall survival (OS) in the ITT minus ARR (ITT-ARR) population (N = 1102) was longer in the aflibercept plus FOLFIRI arm than in the placebo plus FOLFIRI arm [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.68–0.90; median survival difference 1.87 months]. In the subgroup of patients assigned to the prior bevacizumab stratum at randomization, OS was numerically longer in the aflibercept plus FOLFIRI arm than in the placebo plus FOLFIRI arm (HR 0.81; 95 % CI 0.63–1.04; median survival difference 2.14 months). Comparison of the post hoc analysis results with the primary analysis from VELOUR suggests that the inclusion of the directly enrolled ARR may have understated the aflibercept treatment benefit for both bevacizumab-pretreated and bevacizumab-naive patients in the strictly second-line setting although no definitive conclusion may be inferred. The benefit associated with the addition of aflibercept to second-line FOLFIRI in patients with mCRC was observed whatever the timing of first-line disease progression. There were no unexpected safety concerns.

background The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which participates in signaling pathways that are deregulated in cancer cells, commonly appears on colorectal-cancer cells. Cetuximab is a monoclonal antibody that specifically blocks the EGFR. We compared the efficacy of cetuximab in combination with irinotecan with that of cetuximab alone in metastatic colorectal cancer that was refractory to treatment with irinotecan. methods We randomly assigned 329 patients whose disease had progressed during or within three months after treatment with an irinotecan-based regimen to receive either cetuximab and irinotecan (at the same dose and schedule as in a prestudy regimen [218 patients]) or cetuximab monotherapy (111 patients). In cases of disease progression, the addition of irinotecan to cetuximab monotherapy was permitted. The patients were evaluated radiologically for tumor response and were also evaluated for the time to tumor progression, survival, and side effects of treatment. results The rate of response in the combination-therapy group was significantly higher than that in the monotherapy group (22.9 percent [95 percent confidence interval, 17.5 to 29.1 percent] vs. 10.8 percent [95 percent confidence interval, 5.7 to 18.1 percent], P=0.007). The median time to progression was significantly greater in the combination-therapy group (4.1 vs. 1.5 months, P

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to report our experience and the feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. METHODS: Forty-five patients with primarily unresectable advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer were treated in our center between 1995 and 2002 by platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Their files were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: At the end of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, according to RECIST criteria, 1 patient (2.2%) had achieved a clinical complete response (CR), 33 (73.4%) a partial response (PR), and 8 (17.8%) had stable disease (SD). Only 3 (6.6%) patients showed disease progression (PD). Surgery was performed in patients with objective response or SD after a median number of 4 courses (range: 2-6) of induction chemotherapy. A complete macroscopic debulking was achieved in 24 (53.3%) out of 39 patients in whom cytoreductive surgery was performed. For the entire group, median overall survival was 29 months. Survival was significantly improved in patients with optimal debulking compared to patients with persistent tumor after surgery: 41 months versus 23 months (P = 0.0062). Median survival for patients responding to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CR and PR) was 44 months compared to 27 months for patients with SD or PD after initial chemotherapy (P = 0.01). Neither treatment-related deaths nor significant toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by optimal debulking may be a safe and valuable treatment alternative in patients with primarily unresectable advanced-stage bulky ovarian cancer. Patients with an objective response to chemotherapy or absence of macroscopic residual tumor after surgery have a better outcome. This approach is currently being tested in large, prospective randomized clinical trials.

3599 Background: Pre-operative CRT followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) is nowadays the standard of care for patient with LARC (cT3-T4N0 or cTxN+). Currently, pathologic complete response occurs in +/- 15% after CRT. Colorectal cancer T-cell infiltration is a strong prognostic factor for survival after primary tumor resection. Our aim was to determine whether T-cell infiltration in PTB could be predictive of tumor response and relapse after CRT + TME. Methods: Between 1999 and 2012, patients with LARC who underwent CRT + TME and with available clinical follow-up and PTB (with sufficient tumor cells density) were identified at the Cliniques universitaires St-Luc. The density of CD3 (T cells) and CD8 (cytotoxic) was quantified on immunostained PTB slides and analyzed with a dedicated image analysis software on whole-slide imaging. Comparisons were made using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Cumulative disease-free survival (DFS) was performed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and compared by log-rank tests. Cox regression we used for uni- and multi-variate analysis. P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 154 patients (sex ratio M/F 1.8; mean age 65 years-old; upper (20%), mid (29%) and low rectum (51%), synchronous metastases (11%)) were analyzed. High CD3 and CD8 PTB densities were significantly associated with a higher pathological response (Dworak 3-4) and lower ypTNM stage after CRT +TME (p < 0,05). Higher CD3 and CD8 PTB densities were associated with higher patient DFS (CD3: HR = 2,30 (CI95%:1,15-4,59) p = 0,02; CD8: HR = 1,95 (CI95%: 1,01-3,75) p = 0,04). These results were confirmed in uni and multivariate analysis. CD3 and CD8 PTB densities added to pathological response (ypTNM/Dworak) but also clinical response (ycTNM) after CRT + TME increases significantly the accuracy prediction of tumor relapse. Conclusions: Pretherapeutic T-cell infiltration of LARC is predictive of tumor response and relapse after CRT +TME. This biomarker could be helpful for patient treatment decision. It must be validated in larger patient cohorts.

Summary Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine in a phase ll study in patients with progressive metastatic andro-gen-independent prostate cancer. Patients and methods Forty-seven men with progressive metastatic prostate cancer refractory to first-line or second-line hormonal therapy were treated with vinorelbine, a semi-synthetic vinca-alkaloid. Vinorelbine was given, on an outpatient schedule, at 25 mg/m2 weekly for at least eight weeks or until progression or excessive toxicity. Results Forty-seven patients were included in the study, 33 being evaluable for tumour response, 36 for response to PSA, 21 for clinical benefit and 45 for toxicity. Median actual weekly dose was 19 mg/m2 (range 12.0–26.2 mg/m2). Six of thirty-six patients (17%) demonstrated a biologic response with a 50% or more decline in serum PSA on two consecutive measurements taken at least two weeks apart. The median duration of biologic response was 2.7 months. Two of three patients with measurable disease obtained an objective response but remained unconfirmed. No change disease was reported in 23 patients (49%). On entry into the study, 30 patients had symptomatic bone pain and required narcotic or non-narcotic analgesics. Clinical benefit from vinorelbine was achieved in 15 patients out of 21 (32% of the intent to treat analysis population and 71% of the assessable patients). Due to the low number of questionnaires (QLQ-C30) filled in, it was insufficient to allow any statistical analysis. The median survival was 10.2 months. Toxicity was mainly haematologic with 51% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia. Three patients developed deep vein thrombosis. Non-haematologic toxicity, mainly nausea and neurotoxicity, was mild. Conclusions The administration of weekly vinorelbine appears to be a safe treatment for those patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer and poor prognosis features who require chemotherapy. These results provide data for future investigation of vinorelbine in combination regimens.

A total of 101 cancer patients with 121 febrile neutropenia episodes were randomised to receive empirical treatment with i.v. meropenem (1g/8 h) or ceftazidime (2 g/8 h). After 3 days, 89% of patients were on unmodified therapy in the meropenem group, compared with 83% in the ceftazidime group. Of the evaluable episodes (n = 106), the success rate with unmodified empirical therapy until the end of the treatment course was slightly higher with meropenem than with ceftazidime (48% vs 38%, P=0.39). Furthermore, initial success with further infections was observed in 22% of episodes treated with meropenem and in 13% of episodes treated with ceftazidime. Glycopeptides were used as first modification in 28% and 39% of meropenem and ceftazidime recipients, respectively. Both treatments were well tolerated and there were no reports of drug-related nausea/vomiting or seizures. No significant differences in response rate or in tolerability were observed when analysing only the first febrile episodes. In conclusion, meropenem seems to be as efficacious and well tolerated as ceftazidime and may be associated with a lesser requirement for the addition of glycopeptides.

Thirty-nine tumor-bearing patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with 3 subcutaneous injections of the MAGE-3.A1 peptide at monthly intervals. No significant toxicity was observed. Of the 25 patients who received the complete treatment, 7 displayed significant tumor regressions. All but one of these regressions involved cutaneous metastases. Three regressions were complete and 2 of these led to a disease-free state, which persisted for more than 2 years after the beginning of treatment. No evidence for a cytolytic T lymphocyte (CTL) response was found in the blood of the 4 patients who were analyzed, including 2 who displayed complete tumor regression. Our results suggest that injection of the MAGE-3.A1 peptide induced tumor regression in a significant number of the patients, even though no massive CTL response was produced.

Our goal was to optimize the radiosensitizing potential of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies, when given concomitantly with preoperative radiotherapy in KRAS wild-type locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Based on pre-clinical studies conducted by our group, we designed a phase II trial in which panitumumab (6 mg/kg/q2 weeks) was combined with preoperative radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions) to treat cT3-4/N + KRAS wild-type LARC. The primary endpoint was complete pathologic response (pCR) (H0 = 5 %, H1 = 17 %, α = 0.05, β = 0.2). From 19 enrolled patients, 17 (89 %) were evaluable for pathology assessment. Although no pCR was observed, seven patients (41 %) had grade 3 Dworak pathological tumor regression. The regimen was safe and was associated with 95 % of sphincter-preservation rate. No NRAS, BRAF, or PI3KCA mutation was found in this study, but one patient (5 %) showed loss of PTEN expression. The quantification of plasma EGFR ligands during treatment showed significant upregulation of plasma TGF-α and EGF following panitumumab administration (p

1Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Montville, NJ, USA; 2University Hospital Gasthuisberg/Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; 3San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy; 4Ospedale Niguarda Ca’ Granda, Milan, Italy; 5University Hospital, Pisa, Italy; 6CRLC Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; 7St-Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium; 8Robert Debre University Hospital, Reims, France; 9Institut Sainte-Catherine, Avignon, France; 10Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy; 11Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; 12Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; 13National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; 14University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 15Ohio State University School of Medicine, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA; 16Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; 17Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany

Background This phase III study investigated the addition of aflibercept to gemcitabine, in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients and methods Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous (i.v.) aflibercept, 4 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or matching placebo combined with gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for 7 weeks out of 8, then weekly for 3 weeks out of 4 until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. The primary objective was to demonstrate an improvement in overall survival (OS) between the treatment arms. Results The study was stopped for futility following a planned interim analysis of OS in 427 randomised patients. With a median follow-up of 7.9 months, based on the 546 patients at study termination, median OS was 7.8 months in the gemcitabine plus placebo arm (n = 275) versus 6.5 months in the gemcitabine plus aflibercept arm (n = 271), which was not significant (hazard ratio 1.165, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.921-1.473, p = 0.2034). Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months in both arms. Treatment discontinuations due to adverse events were more frequent in the aflibercept than in the placebo-containing arm (23% versus 12%). Conclusion Adding aflibercept to gemcitabine did not improve OS in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Recombinant human interleukin-6 (IL-6) has previously been shown to increase platelet counts in normal and sublethally irradiated mice, dogs, and primates. To assess its tolerance and efficacy in clinical use, we performed a randomized phase Ib study in patients with ovarian carcinoma. IL-6 was administered during an initial 7-day cycle before any chemotherapy. Beginning 7 days later, six cycles of chemotherapy containing carboplatin were administered every 3 weeks. During chemotherapy cycles 2 to 6, IL-6 was administered from day 4 through day 17 at escalating dose levels from 0.5 to 10 micrograms/kg/d. At each level, three patients received IL-6 and one patient received a placebo. During the prechemotherapy cycle of IL-6, a dose-dependent increase in platelet count was observed from day 12 to 15 and was maximal on day 15 (r = .77; P < .01). The median ploidy of bone marrow megakaryocytes shifted from 16 N to 32 N after 7 days of the initial prechemotherapy IL-6 administration. Dose-dependent increases in C-reactive protein (CRP) and fibrinogen levels were observed on day 8 (P < .0001 for both). A significant decrease in hemoglobin level occured rapidly after initiation of IL-6 therapy and was maximal on day 8 (P < .001). When given after chemotherapy, IL-6 accelerated platelet recovery after chemotherapy cycles 2 to 6. Postponements of scheduled chemotherapy due to thrombocytopenia were less frequent in patients treated with IL-6. No difference in either neutrophils or peripheral blood progenitor assays was observed during or after IL-6 treatment. Toxicity of IL-6 appeared mild and was not dose-limiting up to 10 micrograms/kg/d. Systemic symptoms such as fever, headache, and myalgia were the main side effects and were easily relieved by acetaminophen administration. No biologic toxicity was observed. The data indicate that IL-6 is a well-tolerated cytokine and capable of accelerating platelet recovery in patients receiving chemotherapy.

3618Background: Pre-operative CRT followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) is nowadays the standard for LARC (cT3-T4N0 or cTxN+). TME could be avoided for patients with pathologic complete respo...

Following autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT), both impaired T cell activation and defective production of the principal T cell growth factor, interleukin-2 (IL-2), has been observed. These processes are dependent on a rise of intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]i), a step which follows binding of T cell receptor (TCR) and transduction of signal via the generation of cytoplasmic second messengers. In order to better understand the nature of defective cellular immunity in ABMT, in the present study we investigated the rise of [Ca2+]i in T cells of recipients of ABMT. By concomitant labelling lymphocytes with anti-CD4 antibody and addition of fluo-3 as fluorescent calcium indicator, we have selected for the T cell subset which is the principal source of IL-2. Short-term (less than 1 year post-transplantation) recipients of ABMT show a statistically significant blunted rise in [Ca2+]i in response to concanavalin A as compared to normal controls not accounted for solely by a decreased percentage of CD4+ cells in these patients. The [Ca2+]i response of CD4+ cells from long-term (greater than 1 year post-transplant) recipients was lower than that of the normal group although not to a statistically significant level. These findings suggest that following ABMT is a defect in the early stages of T cell activation involving either T cell receptor binding or early signal transduction ultimately resulting in depressed transcription of IL-2 mRNA. These defects are analogous to findings in both allogeneic transplantation where factors of histoincompatibility and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) come into play, as well as in the defective T cell activation of the normal ageing process.

Introduction: Recent approval and introduction into clinical practice of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors such as the chimeric monoclonal antibody cetuximab and the fully human monoclonal antibody panitumumab have provided new treatment options for chemotherapy-refractory patients. Here, we report a case of a 47-year-old man with metastatic, chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer who achieved long-term partial remission during panitumumab therapy. Case presentation: A 41-year-old male patient presented with a 24-hour history of abdominal pain and fever. A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a voluminous and perforated abscess with a suspected tumour lesion in the sigmoid colon. The patient underwent sigmoidectomy and was diagnosed with a poorly differentiated necrotic carcinoma of the sigmoid colon with invasion in 13 of 19 tested lymph nodes. A colonoscopy revealed multiple tubular adenomas and a positron emission tomography CT scan showed multiple and bilateral hyperfixating lumbar-aortic lymph nodes leading to a final tumour classification of T4 N2 M1. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was elevated. The patient achieved a partial response following six cycles of FOLFIRI (irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin), then progressed and was enrolled in a trial where he received treatment with FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil) with or without a vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor (PTK787/ZK 222584 [valatinib]). Eight months later he progressed again and was included in a panitumumab (6 mg/kg every 2 weeks) monotherapy trial. A partial response was noted after 8 weeks of therapy along with a rapid CEA reduction and decrease in lymph node size. The patient is continuing panitumumab treatment and is still in partial remission after 65 months' treatment. He has non-mutated KRAS and no human-anti-human antibodies have been detected. During treatment the patient has on occasion experienced grade 1-2 diarrhoea as well as folliculitis and acne-like rash up to grade 3 in severity. Cutaneous toxicity was managed with a combination dose interruption/reduction and the use of topical agents. No eye or nail toxicities occurred. Conclusion: This case shows that long-term responses are possible during panitumumab therapy and that this agent may be an effective long-term treatment option for selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The associated skin toxicities can be successfully managed. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness and the pitfalls inherent to the assessment of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number (GCN) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for outcome prediction to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. The value of testing KRAS mutation status, in addition to EGFR GCN, was also explored. Experimental Design: FISH analysis of 87 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab was done, recording individual GCN per cell and using different samples per tumor. Performances of published cutoff points and different summaries of EGFR GCN distribution were assessed for response prediction. Results: In our data set, two published cutoff points performed less well than in their training set, yielding positive predictive values and negative predictive values between 40.0% and 48.3% and between 81.0% and 86.5%, respectively. Among summaries of GCN distribution explored, mean and right-tailed distribution of GCN yielded the highest performances. A mean EGFR GCN ≥2.83 provided an area under the curve of 0.71. Important heterogeneity of repeated measures of mean EGFR GCN was observed within tumors (intraclass correlation, 0.61; within-class SD, 0.40), leading to potential misclassifications of FISH status in 7 of 18 (38.8%) patients if a cutoff point were used. In multivariable analysis, EGFR GCN testing provided significant information independent of the KRAS status to predict response (P = 0.016) and overall survival (P = 0.005). Conclusions: We confirm the association between increased EGFR GCN and outcome after cetuximab. However, because of reproducibility concerns, any decision making based on published cutoff points is not warranted.

A 64-year-old woman was admitted with fever and cough. At admission, she had jaundice, hepatomegaly, and green-stained sputum. Computed tomography (CT) showed an intrahepatic abscess located near the dome, multiple hepatic metastases, biliary tract dilatation, and a right pleural effusion. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography demonstrated a communication between the intrahepatic biliary ducts and the bronchial tree. The patient was treated with antibiotic therapy, pleural and biliary drainages and a percutaneous drainage of the hepatic abscess.

Carboplatin, a second generation platinum complex, is less nephrotoxic and emetogenic than its parent compound. We have tested the objective response to and the toxicity of the combination carboplatin 330 mg m-2 on day 1 with etoposide 120 mg m-2 on days 1, 3 and 5, administered every 3 weeks in histologically proven inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with a good performance status. Thirty-one patients entered the study; 29 were evaluable for response, 24 after 3 courses and 5 after 2 courses of chemotherapy. An overall response rate of 21% was found including zero complete response and 6 partial responses. In addition, 3 minor responses (10%), 12 stable diseases (38%), and 9 progressive diseases (39%) were observed. The median survival was 48 weeks, including 68 weeks for non-metastatic (M0) patients and 27 weeks for metastatic (M+) patients. This regimen was well tolerated. Gastrointestinal toxicity never exceeded WHO grade II and renal function remained in the normal range for all cases. Haematological toxicity was low in the majority of the cases; nevertheless it proved to be the dose limiting toxicity as illustrated by two grade III anemia, one grade III leucopenia, one grade III and one grade IV thrombocytopenia. Carboplatin-etoposide combination is not more active, but clearly much less toxic than cisplatin-etoposide in NSCLC.

Background: KRAS mutation status is a candidate marker for predicting survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with cetuximab (CTX). Patients and methods: We studied the KRAS mutation status of 113 patients with irinotecan refractory mCRC treated with CTX in clinical trials. A predictive model for objective response (OR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was constructed using logistic and Cox regression. Results: OR was seen in 27 of 66 KRAS wild-type (WT) patients versus 0 of 42 in KRAS mutants. Median OS was significantly better in KRAS WT versus mutants (43.0 versus 27.3 weeks; P = 0.020). Decrease in tumor sizes was significantly larger at all time points in WT patients. KRAS WT patients with an initial relative decrease of tumor size > 9.66% at week 6 had a significantly better median OS compared with all other patients (74.9 versus 30.6 weeks; P = 0.0000025). Within KRAS WT patients OS was significantly better in patients with an initial decrease compared with those without [median OS: 74.9 versus 30.6 weeks (P = 0.00000012)]. Conclusions: KRAS WT status is associated to survival benefit in CTX treated mCRC. This benefit is even more pronounced in those patients with early radiological response. These characteristics may be exploited for response prediction.

Background: A phase 3 study demonstrated that panitumumab, a human monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody, significantly prolonged progression-free survival versus best supportive care (BSC) in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients and methods: This open-label extension study evaluated panitumumab monotherapy in BSC patients with radiographically documented disease progression in the phase 3 study. Patients received panitumurnab 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks. The primary end point was safety; efficacy was also evaluated. Results: One hundred and seventy-six patients were randomly assigned to the BSC arm of the phase 3 study received >= 1 panitumumab dose in this extension study. Panitumumab was well tolerated. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were skin toxic effects. Three (2%) patients had a grade 4 treatment-related adverse event. There were no infusion reactions. One (0.6%) patient had a complete response; 19 (11%) patients had a partial response; and 58 (33%) patients had stable disease. Median progression-free survival time was 9.4 [95% confidence interval (Cl): 8.0-13.4) weeks. Median overall survival time was 6.3 (95% Cl: 5.1-6.8) months. Anti-panitumumab antibodies were detected in 3 (4.2%) of 71 patients with a post-baseline sample. Conclusions: These findings are comparable to those from the phase 3 study and support panitumumab monotherapy for chemorefractory colorectal cancer.