Search

ImportanceInappropriate prescribing and prescribing omissions are major drivers of healthcare-related harm. Medication review may help improve pharmacotherapy.ObjectiveTo study the effects of a primary care medication review intervention centered around an electronic clinical decision support system (eCDSS) on medication appropriateness and the number of prescribing omissions in older adults with multimorbidity and polypharmacy compared to usual care.Design and SettingThe “Optimising PharmacoTherapy In the multimorbid elderly in primary Care” (OPTICA) trial is a cluster randomized clinical trial conducted with general practitioners (GPs) and older multimorbid patients with polypharmacy in Swiss primary care settings, between January 2019 and February 2020. The 12-month follow-up was completed in February 2021.ParticipantsEligible patients had to be ≥65 years of age with ≥3 chronic conditions and ≥5 long-term medications.InterventionThe intervention to optimize pharmacotherapy centered around an eCDSS compared to usual care.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe two primary outcomes were the improvement in the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) and the Assessment of Underutilization (AOU) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the number of medications, number of falls and fractures and quality of life.ResultsIn 43 GP clusters, 323 patients were recruited (median age: 77 years (IQR: 73-83), 45% were female). 21 GPs with 160 patients were assigned to the intervention group and 22 GPs with 163 patients to the control group. On average, 1 recommendation to stop or start a medication were reported to be implemented per patient. At 12 months, there were no group differences in the improvement of medication appropriateness (Odds ratio (OR): 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59 to 1.87) nor the number of prescribing omissions (OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.96) in the intention-to-treat analysis. The per-protocol analysis showed no statistically significant group difference and there were no group differences in the secondary outcomes either.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized trial of GPs and older adults, medication reviews based on the eCDSS reduced inappropriate prescriptions but did not lead to higher appropriateness of patients’ medications. The intervention could be safely delivered to patients without causing any detriment to their health.FundingSwiss National Science Foundation (407440_167465)Key pointsQuestionWhat is the effect of a GP administered medication review intervention supported by an electronic clinical decision support system on medication appropriateness in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy?FindingsThis cluster randomized controlled trial included 43 general practitioners and 323 patients. At the end of the 12-month follow-up period, medication appropriateness and the number of prescribing omissions did not differ between patients who received the intervention and those who received usual care.MeaningThe intervention to optimize pharmacotherapy was feasible and safe to implement in primary care but did not improve overall medication appropriateness nor reduce the number of prescribing omissions.

To reduce inappropriate polypharmacy, deprescribing should be part of patients' regular care. Yet deprescribing is difficult to implement, as shown in several studies. Understanding patients' attitudes towards deprescribing at the individual and country level may reveal effective ways to involve older adults in decisions about medications and help to implement deprescribing in primary care settings. In this study we aim to investigate older adults' perceptions and views on deprescribing in different European countries. Specific objectives are to investigate the patients' willingness to have medications deprescribed by medication type and to have herbal or dietary supplements reduced or stopped, the role of the Patient Typology (on medication perspectives), and the impact of the patient-GP relationship in these decisions.This cross-sectional survey study has two parts: Part A and Part B. Data collection for Part A will take place in nine countries, in which per country 10 GPs will recruit 10 older patients (≥65 years old) each (n = 900). Part B will be conducted in Switzerland only, in which an additional 35 GPs will recruit five patients each and respond to a questionnaire themselves, with questions about the patients' medications, their willingness to deprescribe those, and their patient-provider relationship. For both Part A and part B, a questionnaire will be used to assess the willingness of older patients with polypharmacy to have medications deprescribed and other relevant information. For Part B, this same questionnaire will have additional questions on the use of herbal and dietary supplements.The international study design will allow comparisons of patient perspectives on deprescribing from different countries. We will collect information about willingness to have medications deprescribed by medication type and regarding herbal and dietary supplements, which adds important information to the literature on patients' preferences. In addition, GPs in Switzerland will also be surveyed, allowing us to compare GPs' and patients' views and preferences on stopping or reducing specific medications. Our findings will help to understand patients' attitudes towards deprescribing, contributing to improvements in the design and implementation of deprescribing interventions that are better tailored to patients' preferences.

AIM OF THIS STUDY: The Swiss primary care sector faces a lack in its workforce and the Canton of Bern - the second largest canton (i.e. federal state) – is believed to be more affected than others. To be able to predict a shortage in the overall workforce, reliable numbers for the workforce of all general practitioners (GPs) and paediatricians (primary care physicians, PCPs) actively working in the Canton of Bern are needed. Switzerland has no registry of active PCPs; therefore, our goal was to (1) define the number and characteristics of all PCPs in the Canton of Bern, (2) to establish the workforce density for the whole canton and its administrative districts, and (3) to forecast the next five years with respect to the PCP workforce development. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we contacted all potential PCPs of the Canton of Bern. We included all board-certified physicians in general internal medicine, paediatrics and physicians with the title “Praktischer Arzt (practical doctor)” with a professional license from the available registers (MedReg and the FMH register). All potential PCPs received a questionnaire to assess their involvement in the primary care setting, their personal characteristics including workload (current and in 5 years to allow us to estimate the projected workforce per projected population size in 2025), type of practice, administrative district, and additional questions on their acceptance of new patients and their perception of a shortage in their region. The data from non-responders were collected via follow-up letters, emails and phone calls. The density was calculated as full-time equivalent PCPs per 1000 inhabitants in total and per district. RESULTS: From all potential PCPs (n = 2217), we identified 972 working in the Canton of Bern, 851 as GPs (88%) and 121 as paediatricians (12%). From these physicians, we had a response rate of 95%. The mean age was 53 years for GPs and 50 years for paediatricians. Thirteen percent of all PCPs were aged 65 or older. The average workload was 7.6 half-days (GPs) and 6.9 half-days (paediatricians). We found a density of 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69–0.81) full-time equivalents per 1000 inhabitants for the total of the Canton of Bern, and a regional variability with densities between 0.59 to 0.93. Without new PCPs, the workforce density of PCPs will drop to 0.56 (95% CI 0.49–0.62) within the next 5 years. CONCLUSION: This is the first study in which 95% of active PCPs participated and it demonstrated that within the next 5 years there will be a shortage in the workforce of PCPs that can only be improved by higher numbers of new domestic PCPs – even after accounting for the current inflow of foreign PCPs.

Promising Future in General Internal Medicine for the Next Generation of Physicians Abstract. We are facing a lack of specialists in general internal medicine in general practitioners' practices as well as in hospitals, while at the same time the population ages and usually displays several chronic diseases (multimorbidity). Thanks to more university places, an improved job description for general internal medicine and new further education offers (curricula), interest in general internal medicine increased again, as surveys of students indicate. The young generation of family doctors and generalists in hospitals wishes flexible working conditions in order to reconcile work, family and spare time in the best possible way. Working atmosphere and colleagues have a high priority. These wishes must now be incorporated into attractive further training with flexible curricula and mentoring offers so that young talents can successfully be promoted.

Additional file 1.

Managing the growing number of oldest-old patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in primary health care poses an increasing public health challenge. Since inappropriate polypharmacy can harm patients’ health, general practitioners (GPs) should regularly review patients’ medications and, if necessary, deprescribe. This case vignette study evaluates the deprescribing decisions of GPs from 31 countries and compares the factors influencing GPs’ deprescribing decisions. We invited GPs to participate in an online survey, containing a) three cases of increasingly dependent oldest-old multimorbid patients with potentially inappropriate polypharmacy and b) Likert-scale questions assessing the importance of factors influencing deprescribing. We presented each case with and without history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). For each case, we asked whether GPs would deprescribe any medication and, if so, which one(s). We calculated percentages of GPs deprescribing at least one medication in each case, compared cases with/without CVD history and different levels of dependency in activities of daily living, and calculated the percentage of factors rated as important or very important. Of 3175 invited GPs from 31 countries, 53% responded (N = 1’706) with a mean age of 50 years and 60% females. Results are preliminary, but despite some differences across GP characteristics (male/female, age) and across countries, GPs generally showed a high willingness to deprescribe in oldest-old patients (>80 years) with polypharmacy. GPs were more likely to deprescribe in patients with a higher level of dependency, in the absence of history of CVD, and when patients are on statins, proton-pump inhibitors or potentially inappropriate pain medication. Factors GPs rated as important or very important for the deprescribing decision were patients’ quality of life, risks and benefits of medications, patients’ life expectancy, and potential negative health outcomes resulting from deprescribing. Key messages Despite international differences, most GPs report they would deprescribe in older multimorbid patients with polypharmacy. The results will facilitate the development of interventions supporting general practitioners to deprescribe.

BACKGROUND Switzerland lacks future general practitioners (GPs). Residents who wished to specialize as general practitioners were formerly trained solely in hospital settings. To better prepare and also attract more young doctors to become GPs, the canton of Bern (equivalent to a state) has implemented a partly state-funded vocational training program in GP practices. Our study examines the efficacy of this 10-year program, identifies factors that positively influence residents in their decision to become a GP and the distribution of new GPs in the canton of Bern, who had taken part in the traineeship. METHODS This cross-sectional survey among all residents, who participated in a traineeship in general practice from 2008 to 2017 in the canton of Bern asked if residents had taken a subsequent career choice as a GP and if so in which region. Residents scored the importance of their traineeship and their mentor's influence on becoming a GP. By using zip codes of work area of respondents already working as GPs and matching it with population census data, we could obtain the distribution of GPs on a per capita basis. RESULTS Out of 165 residents who participated in a traineeship, 151 (92%) completed our survey. 81% had chosen a career as a GP or were on track to become a GP. Almost half of the participants became GPs in the offices of their mentors or in the area. Our respondents emphasized the importance of their mentors' influence as well as the training program in their decision-making to become a GP. Most mentioned benefits of being a GP were broad field of medical care (37%) and a fulfilling doctor-patient relationship (34%). We could show an increase in GP practices in the canton of Bern, not only in urban but also accordingly in rural areas. CONCLUSIONS Most residents continued subsequent careers as general practitioners after having completed a GP traineeship, with almost half of them in the region of their training. A vocational training program helped motivating young doctors to become GPs and underserved regions of the canton of Bern to gain new GPs.

The survey used in the LESS Study. (DOCX 21 kb)

Additional file 1. Appendix 1-3.