Search

Your search keyword '"de Vries, E. G. E"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Author "de Vries, E. G. E" Language undetermined
3 results on '"de Vries, E. G. E"'

1. Other Radiopharmaceuticals for Imaging GEP-NET

Author

Koopmans, K P, Dierckx, Rudi, Elsinga, Philip H., Links, Thera, Kema, Ido, Fiebrich, Helle Brit, Walekamp, A M E, de Vries, E. G. E., Brouwers, Adrienne, Hubalewska‐Dydejczyk, Alicja, Signore, Alberto, de Jong, Marion, Dierckx, Rudi A., Buscombe, John, Van de Wiele, Christophe, Molecular Neuroscience and Ageing Research (MOLAR), Guided Treatment in Optimal Selected Cancer Patients (GUTS), Damage and Repair in Cancer Development and Cancer Treatment (DARE), Lifestyle Medicine (LM), and ​Basic and Translational Research and Imaging Methodology Development in Groningen (BRIDGE)

Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty, education.field_of_study, business.industry, Population, medicine.disease, Serotonin pathway, Functional imaging, Endocrinology, Somatostatin, Internal medicine, Radionuclide therapy, medicine, Cancer research, Catecholamine, business, education, Receptor, Progressive disease, medicine.drug
Abstract

In GEP‐NETs, especially the catecholamine and serotonin biosynthetic pathways are upregulated. Therefore, increased biosynthesis of these specific amines in GEP‐NETs enables imaging with specific amine precursors. For the catecholamine pathway, 6‐18F ‐l‐3,4‐dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F‐DOPA) is available, while for the serotonin pathway, carbon‐11‐labeled 5‐hydroxy‐l‐tryptophan ([11C]‐5‐HTP) is available as tracer. 11C‐5‐HTP PET and 18F‐DOPA PET are excellent functional imaging techniques for evaluating patients with proven pancreatic islet cell tumors and carcinoids. For both tracers, the combination with CT further improves the detection rate of NET, which shows that performing PET scans with these tracers in PET/CT scanners is beneficial for patients.Since well‐differentiated GEP‐NETs generally have a low glucose metabolism, 18F‐fluorodexyglucose (18F‐FDG) PET scanning has limited value for the primary staging of patients with well‐differentiated GEP‐NETs. However, in patients with rapidly progressive disease, dedifferentiation of GEP‐NET tumors can lead to a higher glucose metabolism in tumor cells. In these patients, 18F‐FDG PET can be of benefit for tumor staging. Also, 18F‐FDG PET can be of value when other malignancies are suspected in patients with GEP‐NETs, since these patients experience a higher incidence of these malignancies compared to the general population.Nowadays, (GEP)‐NETs can also be imaged with 68Ga‐labeled analogues of somatostatin, which are also PET tracers. Advantages of 68Ga‐labeled somatostatin analogues are the relatively easy generator‐based synthesis and the possibility to evaluate whether peptide (somatostatin) receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for NETs can be considered.

Published
2015
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials

Author

Abe, O., Abe, R., Enomoto, K., Kikuchi, K., Koyama, H., Masuda, H., Nomura, Y., Sakai, K., Sugimachi, K., Tominaga, T., Uchino, J., Yoshida, M., Haybittle, J. L., Davies, C., Harvey, V. J., Holdaway, T. M., Kay, R. G., Mason, B. H., Forbes, J. F., Wilcken, N., Gnant, M., Jakesz, R., Ploner, M., Yosef, H. M. A., Focan, C., Lobelle, J. P., Peek, U., Oates, G. D., Powell, J., Durand, M., Mauriac, L., Di Leo, A., Dolci, S., Piccart, M. J., Masood, M. B., Parker, D., Price, J. J., Hupperets, P. S. G. J., Jackson, S., Ragaz, J., Berry, D., Broadwater, G., Cirrincione, C., Muss, H., Norton, L., Weiss, R. B., Abu-Zahra, H. T., Portnoj, S. M., Baum, M., Cuzick, J., Houghton, J., Riley, D., Mansel, R. E., Gordon, N. H., Davis, H. L., Beatrice, A., Mihura, J., Naja, A., Lehingue, Y., Romestaing, P., Dubois, J. B., Delozier, T., Mace Lesec'h, J., Rambert, P., Petruzelka, L., Pribylova, O., Owen, J. R., Harbeck, N., Jänicke, F., Meisner, C., Meier, P., Howell, A., Ribeiro, G. C., Swindell, R., Burrett, J., Clarke, M., Collins, R., Darby, S., Elphinstone, P., Evans, V., Godwin, J., Gray, R., Harwood, C., Hicks, C., Jackson, D., James, S., Mackinnon, E., Mcgale, P., Mchugh, T., Mead, G., Morris, P., Oulds, J., Peto, R., Taylor, C., Wang, Y., Albano, J., De Oliveira, C. F., Gervásio, H., Gordilho, J., Johansen, H., Mouridsen, H. T., Gelman, R. S., Harris, J. R., Henderson, I. C., Shapiro, C. L., Christiansen, P., Ejlertsen, B., Møller, S., Overgaard, M., Carstensen, B., Palshof, T., Trampisch, H. J., Dalesio, O., De Vries, E. G. E., Rodenhuis, S., Van Tinteren, H., Comis, R. L., Davidson, N. E., Robert, N., Sledge, G., Tormey, D. C., Wood, W., Cameron, D., Chetty, U., Forrest, P., Jack, W., Rossbach, J., Klijn, J. G. M., Treurniet-Donker, A. D., Van Putten, W. L. J., Costa, A., Veronesi, U., Bartelink, H., Duchateau, L., Legrand, C., Sylvester, R., Van Der Hage, J. A., Van De Velde, C. J. H., Cunningham, M. P., Catalano, R., Creech, R. H., Bonneterre, J., Fargeot, P., Fumoleau, P., Kerbrat, P., Namer, M., Jonat, W., Kaufmann, M., Schumacher, M., Von Minckwitz, G., Bastert, G., Rauschecker, H., Sauer, R., Sauerbrei, W., Schauer, A., De Schryver, A., Vakaet, L., Belfiglio, M., Nicolucci, A., Pellegrini, F., Sacco, M., Valentini, M., Mcardle, C. S., Smith, D. C., Galligioni, E., Boccardo, F., Rubagotti, A., Dent, D. M., Gudgeon, C. A., Hacking, A., Erazo, A., Medina, J. Y., Izuo, M., Morishita, Y., Takei, H., Fentiman, I. S., Hayward, J. L., Rubens, R. D., Skilton, D., Scheurlen, H., Von Fournier, D., Dafni, U., Fountzilas, G., Klefstrom, P., Blomqvist, C., Saarto, T., Margreiter, R., Asselain, B., Salmon, R. J., Vilcoq, J. R., Arriagada, R., Hill, C., Laplanche, A., M. G., Lê, Spielmann, M., Bruzzi, P., Montanaro, E., Rosso, R., Sertoli, M. R., Venturini, M., Amadori, D., Benraadt, J., Kooi, M., Van De Velde, A. O., Van Dongen, J. A., Vermorken, J. B., Castiglione, M., Cavalli, F., Coates, A., Collins, J., Forbes, J., Gelber, R. D., Goldhirsch, A., Lindtner, J., Price, K. N., Rudenstam, C. M., Senn, H. J., Bliss, J. M., Chilvers, C. E. D., Coombes, R. C., Hall, E., Marty, M., Borovik, R., Brufman, G., Hayat, H., Robinson, E., Wigler, N., Bonadonna, G., Camerini, T., De Palo, G., Del Vecchio, M., Formelli, F., Valagussa, P., Martoni, A., Pannuti, F., Cocconi, G., Colozza, A., Camisa, R., Aogi, K., Takashima, S., Ikeda, T., Inokuchi, K., Sawa, K., Sonoo, H., Korzeniowski, S., Skolyszewski, J., Ogawa, M., Yamashita, J., Bonte, J., Christiaens, R., Paridaens, R., Van Den Bogaert, W., Martin, P., Geniez, ROMAIN SYLVAIN JEAN, Hakes, T., Hudis, C. A., Wittes, R., Giokas, G., Kondylis, D., Lissaios, B., De La Huerta, R., Sainz, M. G., Altemus, R., Cowan, K., Danforth, D., Lichter, A., Lippman, M., O'Shaughnessy, J., Pierce, L. J., Steinberg, S., Venzon, D., Zujewski, J. A., Paradiso, A., De Lena, M., Schittulli, F., Myles, J. D., Pater, J. L., Pritchard, K. I., Whelan, T., Anderson, S., Bass, G., Brown, A., Bryant, J., Costantino, J., Dignam, J., Fisher, B., Redmond, C., Wieand, S., Wolmark, N., Jackson, I. M., Palmer, M. K., Ingle, J. N., Suman, V. J., Bengtsson, N. O., Jonsson, H., Larsson, L. G., Lythgoe, J. P., Kissin, M., Erikstein, B., Hannisdal, E., Jacobsen, A. B., Varhaug, J. E., Gundersen, S., Hauer-Jensen, M., Høst, H., Nissen-Meyer, R., Blamey, R. W., Mitchell, A. K., Morgan, D. A. L., Robertson, J. F. R., Di Palma, M., Mathé, G., Misset, J. L., Clark, R. M., Levine, M., Morimoto, K., Takatsuka, Y., Crossley, E., Harris, A., Talbot, D., Taylor, M., Di Blasio, B., Ivanov, V., Semiglazov, V., Brockschmidt, J., Cooper, M. R., Ueo, H., Falkson, C. I., A'Hern, R., Ashley, S., Powles, T. J., Smith, I. E., Yarnold, J. R., Gazet, J. C., Corcoran, N., Deshpande, N., Di Martino, L., Douglas, P., Lindtner, A., Notter, G., Bryant, A. J. S., Ewing, G. H., Firth, L. A., Krushen-Kosloski, J. L., Foster, L., George, W. D., Stewart, H. J., Stroner, P., Malmström, P., Möller, T. R., Rydén, S., Tengrup, I., Tennvall-Nittby, L., Carstenssen, J., Dufmats, M., Hatschek, T., Nordenskjöld, B., Söderberg, M., Carpenter, J. T., Albain, K., Crowley, J., Green, S., Martino, S., Osborne, C. K., Ravdin, P. M., Glas, U., Johansson, U., Rutqvist, L. E., Singnomklao, T., Wallgren, A., Maibach, R., Thürlimann, B., Brenner, H., Hercbergs, A., Yoshimoto, M., Deboer, G., Paterson, A. H. G., Meakin, J. W., Panzarella, T., Shan, Y., Shao, Y. F., Wang, X., Zhao, D. B., Chen, Z. M., Pan, H. C., Bahi, J., Reid, M., Spittle, M., Deutsch, G. P., Senanayake, F., Kwong, D. L. W., Bianco, A. R., Carlomagno, C., De Laurentiis, M., De Placido, S., Buzdar, A. U., Smith, T., Bergh, J., Holmberg, L., Liljegren, G., Nilsson, J., Seifert, M., Sevelda, P., Zielinsky, C. C., Buchanan, R. B., Cross, M., Royle, G. T., Dunn, J. A., Hills, R. K., Lee, M., Morrison, J. M., Spooner, D., Litton, A., Chlebowski, R. T., Caffier, H., Clarke, M, Collins, R, Darby, S, Davies, C, Elphinstone, P, Evans, E, Godwin, J, Gray, R, Hicks, C, James, S, MacKinnon, E, McGale, P, McHugh, T, Peto, R, Taylor, C, and Wang, Y

Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty, Time Factors, medicine.medical_treatment, Breast Neoplasms, Rate ratio, Breast Conservation Treatment, Disease-Free Survival, Breast cancer, Cause of Death, Breast-conserving surgery, Medicine, Humans, Lung cancer, Aged, Probability, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, business.industry, Female, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Medicine (all), General Medicine, medicine.disease, Surgery, Radiation therapy, Unilateral Breast Neoplasms, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, business, Mastectomy
Abstract

Background In early breast cancer, variations in local treatment that substantially affect the risk of locoregional recurrence could also affect long-term breast cancer mortality. To examine this relationship, collaborative meta-analyses were undertaken, based on individual patient data, of the relevant randomised trials that began by 1995. Methods Information was available on 42 000 women in 78 randomised treatment comparisons (radiotherapy vs no radiotherapy, 23 500; more vs less surgery, 9300; more surgery vs radiotherapy, 9300). 24 types of local treatment comparison were identified. To help relate the effect on local (ie, locoregional) recurrence to that on breast cancer mortality, these were grouped according to whether or not the 5-year local recurrence risk exceeded 10% (10%, 25 000 women). Findings About three-quarters of the eventual local recurrence risk occurred during the first 5 years. In the comparisons that involved little (10%) differences, however, 5-year local recurrence risks were 7% active versus 26% control (absolute reduction 19%), and 15-year breast cancer mortality risks were 44·6% versus 49·5% (absolute reduction 5·0%, SE 0·8, 2p These 25 000 women included 7300 with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in trials of radiotherapy (generally just to the conserved breast), with 5-year local recurrence risks (mainly in the conserved breast, as most had axillary clearance and node-negative disease) 7% versus 26% (reduction 19%), and 15-year breast cancer mortality risks 30·5% versus 35·9% (reduction 5·4%, SE 1·7, 2p=0·0002; overall mortality reduction 5·3%, SE 1·8, 2p=0·005). They also included 8500 with mastectomy, axillary clearance, and node-positive disease in trials of radiotherapy (generally to the chest wall and regional lymph nodes), with similar absolute gains from radiotherapy; 5-year local recurrence risks (mainly at these sites) 6% versus 23% (reduction 17%), and 15-year breast cancer mortality risks 54·7% versus 60·1% (reduction 5·4%, SE 1·3, 2p=0·0002; overall mortality reduction 4·4%, SE 1·2, 2p=0·0009). Radiotherapy produced similar proportional reductions in local recurrence in all women (irrespective of age or tumour characteristics) and in all major trials of radiotherapy versus not (recent or older; with or without systemic therapy), so large absolute reductions in local recurrence were seen only if the control risk was large. To help assess the life-threatening side-effects of radiotherapy, the trials of radiotherapy versus not were combined with those of radiotherapy versus more surgery. There was, at least with some of the older radiotherapy regimens, a significant excess incidence of contralateral breast cancer (rate ratio 1·18, SE 0·06, 2p=0·002) and a significant excess of non-breast-cancer mortality in irradiated women (rate ratio 1·12, SE 0·04, 2p=0·001). Both were slight during the first 5 years, but continued after year 15. The excess mortality was mainly from heart disease (rate ratio 1·27, SE 0·07, 2p=0·0001) and lung cancer (rate ratio 1·78, SE 0·22, 2p=0·0004). Interpretation In these trials, avoidance of a local recurrence in the conserved breast after BCS and avoidance of a local recurrence elsewhere (eg, the chest wall or regional nodes) after mastectomy were of comparable relevance to 15-year breast cancer mortality. Differences in local treatment that substantially affect local recurrence rates would, in the hypothetical absence of any other causes of death, avoid about one breast cancer death over the next 15 years for every four local recurrences avoided, and should reduce 15-year overall mortality.

3. EHA evaluation of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) for haematological malignancies

Author

Kiesewetter, B., Cherny, N. I., Boissel, Nicolas, Cerisoli, F., Dafni, U., De Vries, Elisabeth G. E., Ghia, Paolo, Gökbuget, N., González-Calle, Verónica, Huntly, B., Jäger, U., Latino, N. J., Douillard, Jean-Yves, Malcovati, L., Mateos, M. V., Ossenkoppele, G. J., Porkka, K., Raderer, M., Ribera, Jose-Maria, Scarfò, L., Wester, R., Zygoura, P., Sonneveld, P., Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Hematology, Radiotherapy, CCA - Cancer Treatment and quality of life, Guided Treatment in Optimal Selected Cancer Patients (GUTS), Kiesewetter, Barbara [0000-0002-5490-2371], Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, Kiesewetter, B., Cherny, N. I., Boissel, N., Cerisoli, F., Dafni, U., De Vries, E. G. E., Ghia, P., Gokbuget, N., Gonzalez-Calle, V., Huntly, B., Jager, U., Latino, N. J., Douillard, J. -Y., Malcovati, L., Mateos, M. -V., Ossenkoppele, G. J., Porkka, K., Raderer, M., Ribera, J. -M., Scarfo', L., Wester, R., Zygoura, P., Sonneveld, P., HUS Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hematologian yksikkö, and Helsinki University Hospital Area

Subjects
Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, 3122 Cancers, value frameworks, ESMO-MCBS, Haematologic malignancies, Chronic lymphatic leukemia, Clinical benefit, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, QUALITY-OF-LIFE, Rating scale, Chronic leukaemia, REFRACTORY MULTIPLE-MYELOMA, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, medicine, Hematologic malignancy, Humans, ddc:610, Intensive care medicine, Grading (tumors), Societies, Medical, Original Research, 030304 developmental biology, RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES, Solid tumour, 0303 health sciences, haematologic malignancies, business.industry, CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC-LEUKEMIA, Value frameworks, Myelodysplastic syndromes, clinical benefit, STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION, medicine.disease, LITY-OF-LIFE, 3. Good health, Clinical trial, LOW-DOSE CYTARABINE, Oncology, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Hematologic Neoplasms, BORTEZOMIB-MELPHALAN-PREDNISONE, TRANSFUSION-DEPENDENT PATIENTS, OBINUTUZUMAB PLUS BENDAMUSTINE, business, NON-HODGKIN-LYMPHOMA
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Value frameworks in oncology have not been validated for the assessment of treatments in haematological malignancies, but to avoid overlaps and duplications it appears reasonable to build up experience on existing value frameworks, such as the European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS).METHODS: Here we present the results of the first feasibility testing of the ESMO-MCBS v1.1 for haematological malignancies based on the grading of 80 contemporary studies for acute leukaemia, chronic leukaemia, lymphoma, myeloma and myelodysplastic syndromes. The aims were (1) to evaluate the scorability of data, (2) to evaluate the reasonableness of the generated grades for clinical benefit using the current version and (3) to identify shortcomings in the ESMO-MCBS v1.1 that require amendments to improve the efficacy and validity of the scale in grading new treatments in the management of haematological malignancies.RESULTS: In general, the ESMO-MCBS v1.1 was found to be widely applicable to studies in haematological malignancies, generating scores that were judged as reasonable by European Hematology Association (EHA) experts. A small number of studies could either not be graded or were not appropriately graded. The reasons, related to the differences between haematological and solid tumour malignancies, are identified and described.CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this study, ESMO and EHA are committed to develop a version of the ESMO-MCBS that is validated for haematological malignancies. This development process will incorporate all of the usual stringencies for accountability of reasonableness that have characterised the development of the ESMO-MCBS including field testing, statistical modelling, evaluation for reasonableness and openness to appeal and revision. Applying such a scale will support future public policy decision-making regarding the value of new treatments for haematological malignancies and will provide insights that could be helpful in the design of future clinical trials.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results