Working with cognitive concepts and propositions when encountering knowledge has become a key component in personalized skill development in higher education, which relies heavily on text (Heßdörfer, Hachmann, & Zaft, 2021; Pirnay-Dummer, 2020; Pirnay-Dummer, Haehnlein, Hachmann, & Umber, 2019). This study investigates the process of incremental text comprehension when reading new text and stepwise deepening of understanding, using two crossed factors: first, the re-representation of knowledge models derived from text as visually available artifacts to encounter in addition to text and second, tasks of stepwise conceptualization. This paradigm is designed to enable an insight into the gradual, cognitive processes characterized by increasing depth of elaboration culminating in the possible recursive reflection of text and knowledge model comprehension (possibly model revision, see Clark et al., 2012; Gentner & Stevens, 2014) at the level of single concepts and propositions (associative connections between concepts). To provide knowledge artifacts from text that have a basis in human knowledge processing (first factor), we use the knowledge modeling software T-MITOCAR (Pirnay-Dummer, 2015; Pirnay-Dummer, Ifenthaler, & Spector, 2010; Pirnay-Dummer & Lachner, 2008). This computational linguistic heuristic uses the written language’s syntax to track the associations of concepts from a text according to mental model theory (Seel, Ifenthaler, & Pirnay-Dummer, 2009; Strasser, 2010) and outputs a mathematical graph which can then be visualized as a network (Pirnay-Dummer, 2010). This factor is used to investigate whether encountering the knowledge network alone alongside text fosters text comprehension (Ballod, 2007; Mahn & Meyer, 2020). Arguably, though, for most people it should be more beneficial to be guided through the process of working with concepts and propositions (in prep.). Accordingly, we designed tasks (second factor) that directly target comprehension processes in building, shaping and re-shaping cognitive concepts and knowledge propositiones. Based on a Grounded Theory approach to interviews with experts of diverse disciplines who encountered their personal expertise text and knowledge model (in prep.), we deduced hypotheses about the exploratory and incremental comprehension process in knowledge models. They resulted in 5 stepwise concept tasks that cascade from forced-choice recognition of single concepts and single propositions through active production of concepts and propositions with a single-item contextualization until providing propositions and a short sentence to describe the knowledge context. In a 2x2 between subjects control-group design, the use of knowledge networks (network yes/no) is crossed with the stepwise concept tasks (yes/no) to predict text comprehension as measured in a comprehension task (see also Dori, Avargil, Kohen, & Saar, 2018). With the use of stepwise concept tasks, the benefit of knowledge networks should increase and interact with the benefit of concept tasks, because the networks become a visual re-representation for the task and text content at hand. In addition to immediate text comprehension questions during the same session, participants answer a delayed text comprehension task after about 2 weeks in a follow-up session. Benefits for deepended text comprehension should increase over time with consolidation, while benefits from immediate recall cease. All participants (N=80) also fulfill the MaK-adapt (reading), a test for general reading comprehension skills (Seeber, Ziegler, Frey, Balkenhol, Bernhardt, & Ebermann, 2017), the CVLT, a test for verbal learning and retention (California Verbal Learning Test; Niemann, Sturm, Thöne-Otto, & Willmes, 2008), and the CFT-20-R, a test for general fluid cognitive ability (Culture Fair Test; Weiß, 2006), as control variables. Further tasks that this sample fulfilled are the focus of investigations that go beyond this study. This study represents the main group analysis of the paradigm.