1. Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units
- Author
-
Salai Jeyseelan Annamalai, Sivakumar Balasubramanian, Anju Kuruvilla, Sankaralingam Gayathri, Skm Varadhan, StephenSukumaran ReethaJanetSureka, Selvaraj Samuelkamleshkumar, Henry Prakash Magimairaj, and Ann David
- Subjects
Stroke rehabilitation ,030506 rehabilitation ,arm use measurement ,Inertial frame of reference ,Computer science ,business.industry ,inertial measurement unit ,Sensorimotor assessment ,03 medical and health sciences ,Units of measurement ,0302 clinical medicine ,Hemiparesis ,wearable technology ,Inertial measurement unit ,medicine ,In patient ,Computer vision ,Original Article ,Artificial intelligence ,hemiparesis ,medicine.symptom ,0305 other medical science ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Wearable technology - Abstract
Introduction Accelerometry-based activity counting for measuring arm use is prone to overestimation due to non-functional movements. In this paper, we used an inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based gross movement (GM) score to quantify arm use. Methods In this two-part study, we first characterized the GM by comparing it to annotated video recordings of 5 hemiparetic patients and 10 control subjects performing a set of activities. In the second part, we tracked the arm use of 5 patients and 5 controls using two wrist-worn IMUs for 7 and 3 days, respectively. The IMU data was used to develop quantitative measures (total and relative arm use) and a visualization method for arm use. Results From the characterization study, we found that GM detects functional activities with 50–60% accuracy and eliminates non-functional activities with >90% accuracy. Continuous monitoring of arm use showed that the arm use was biased towards the dominant limb and less paretic limb for controls and patients, respectively. Conclusions The gross movement score has good specificity but low sensitivity in identifying functional activity. The at-home study showed that it is feasible to use two IMU-watches to monitor relative arm use and provided design considerations for improving the assessment method. Clinical trial registry number: CTRI/2018/09/015648
- Published
- 2020