1. Investigation of Triple Symmetric Non-halogen Benzene Derivative Solvent for Spray-Coated Polymer Solar Cells
- Author
-
Yang Tang, Hua Tang, Youjun Bai, Rong Hu, Xinwu Yan, Lu Li, and Jiang Cheng
- Subjects
Materials science ,ultrasonic spray coating ,02 engineering and technology ,010402 general chemistry ,01 natural sciences ,Polymer solar cell ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy ,Phase (matter) ,Molecule ,Benzene ,QD1-999 ,Original Research ,Energy conversion efficiency ,active layers ,morphologies ,General Chemistry ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,0104 chemical sciences ,Solvent ,Chemistry ,Chemical engineering ,chemistry ,Chlorobenzene ,solvent engineering ,0210 nano-technology ,polymer solar cells - Abstract
The performance of spray-coated polymer solar cells could be largely improved via morphologies and phase optimization by solvent engineering. However, there is still a lack of fundamental knowledge and know-how in controlling blend morphology by using various solvents. Here, the effect of adding low polar benzene and non-halogen benzene derivatives with triple symmetric molecular has been systematically investigated and discussed. It is found that the triple symmetric non-halogen benzene could promote the formation of preferential face-on molecule orientation for PBDB-T-2Cl:IT4F films by grazing incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy shows that PBDB-T-2Cl could be transported to the surface of the blend film during drying process. A 3D opt-digital microscope shows that triple symmetric non-halogen benzene could also improve the morphologies of active layers by reducing the coffee ring or other micro-defects. Due to the appropriate vapor pressures, devices with mixing 20% benzene or the triple symmetric non-halogen in spray solution could significantly improve the device performance. Device prepared using 20% 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (TMB) and 80% chlorobenzene (CB) mixture solvent has the best morphology and phase structure, and the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the device was increased nearly 60 to 10.21% compared with the device using CB as the only solvent.
- Published
- 2021