Search

It is time to move beyond education about qualitative research theory and methods to using them to understand and improve psychiatric practice. There is a good fit between this agenda and current thinking about research use that broadens definitions of evidence beyond the results of experiments. This paper describes a qualitative program evaluation to illustrate what kind of useful knowledge is generated and how it can be created through a clinician-researcher partnership. The linkage and exchange model of effective knowledge translation described involves interaction between clinicians and researchers throughout the research process and results in mutual learning through the planning, disseminating, and application of existing or new qualitative research in decision making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As part of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) biennial strategy, the provincial survey component of the first CCHS cycle (Cycle 1.2) focused on different aspects of the mental health and well-being of Canadians living in private dwellings. Moreover, the survey collected data on prevalences of specific mental disorders and problems, use of mental health services, and economic and personal costs of having a mental illness. Data collection began in May 2002 and extended over 8 months. More than 85% of all interviews were conducted face-to-face and used a computer-assisted application. The survey obtained a national response rate of 77%. This paper describes several key aspects of the questionnaire content, the sample design, interviewer training, and data collection procedures. A brief overview of the CCHS regional component (Cycle 1.1) is also given. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article focuses on the new editor and new policy of the "Canadian Journal of Psychiatry." With the change of editorship. The journal will introduce several other changes. The journal's mission is to publish papers of the highest scientific quality that are relevant for the theory and practice of psychiatry. All the articles in the journal are either empirical studies or systematic reviews. As a result, our impact factor has steadily gone up. While Canada is small in relation to its larger neighbor country, one do not see why one cannot have an impact similar to that of journals from Britain and Scandinavia.