Search

Background and Purpose: Poverty, despite being a multifaceted concept, is commonly measured in either absolute or relative monetary terms. However, it can also be measured subjectively, as people form perceptions on their relative income, welfare, and life satisfaction. Poverty measurement based on objective indicators such as official poverty lines is often used to orient and prioritize policy actions. However, such 'standard' poverty measures based on household consumption or income aggregates have several shortcomings. This objective indicator does little to inform policy makers about public preferences. The main goal of this paper is to investigate multifaceted poverty measurement by combining objective and subjective measures to provide useful insights into poverty in Malaysia. In addition, this study explored the multifaceted poverty incidence among the low-income household from the perspective of zakat applicants. Methodology: Data was collected using a survey and interviews of zakat applicants under the category of poor and needy in the State Islamic Religious Council (SIRC) of Melaka, one of the states in Malaysia. Three poverty measurements, i.e., Poverty Line Income (PLI), Haddul Kifayah and Subjective Poverty Index (SPI), are utilized in this study. Findings: The PLI and Haddul Kifayah are categorized as objective poverty measures, while SPI is categorized as a subjective poverty measure. The different measures of poverty would produce different analytical results that, in turn, call for a different set of policy interventions. Contributions: These findings point to the needs of tailor-made strategies for the society to cope with multifaceted poverty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper reports on living arrangements predict poor older Malaysians by sex disaggregation. The respondents in this paper are 60 years old and above in 2016, to a total n=2467 (50.8% men, and 49.2% female) from 91 districts in Malaysia. The majority poor male (64.92%), and female (60.3%) respondents are living with children. Three types of significant (p<0.05) living arrangements predict poor male respondents are living with-spouse-only (odd=8.357) with children (odd=5.141), and with relative (odd=2.514). Three types of significant (p<0.05) living arrangements predict poor female respondents are living with-spouse-only (odd=53.333) with children (odd=8.69), and with relative (odd=3.257). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Low levels of education and low income are often associated with communities located in rural areas. This is because rural communities have many constraints in obtaining education, employment opportunities, and earning a high income. This study aims to examine the factors that cause poverty in rural communities and investigate the socio-economic position and level of educational achievement of parents and children in rural communities in Bera District, Pahang, Malaysia. This study used a quantitative method for data collection. Questionnaires were administered to 100 respondents from the community living in the Bera district. Data obtained from respondents were analysed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS software through the Chi-square method. The study found that almost 51 percent of respondents agreed that the factors that drive poverty in rural families are the low education of household heads and the income earned by household heads based on their education level. In addition, a total of 59 respondents agreed with the issue of low education standards affecting the low level of income; 74 respondents agreed with the lack of employment opportunities in rural areas; and 59 respondents agreed that the education of the household heads makes it difficult for the children to get a good and higher education. As a result, the emphasis and opportunities on education, income, and employment opportunities, particularly in rural areas, must be increased more precisely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Non-communicable diseases and associated risk factors, such as obesity, are prevalent and increasing in Malaysia. To address this burden and the heightened vulnerability of low-income communities to these risk factors, the Better Health Programme Malaysia conducted a partial-profile discrete choice experiment (DCE) to inform the design of a community-based obesity-prevention programme. The DCE survey was conducted with community members (n = 1453) from three publicly supported low-cost, high-rise flat complexes in urban Kuala Lumpur. In the survey, community members were asked to choose between different sets of potential evidence-based interventions for obesity prevention. Their responses to these choice tasks were analysed to quantify preferences for these different health interventions using a random utility maximization model. Based on these results, we determined participants' relative prioritization of the different options. The most preferred interventions were those that reduced the price of fruit and vegetables; altered cooking practices at restaurants and food vendors to reduce salt, sugar and oil; and offered reward incentives for completing online educational activities. Community members did not prioritize several evidence-based interventions, including changes to product placement or product labelling, suggesting that these effective approaches may be less familiar or simply not preferred by respondents. The DCE enabled the clear articulation of these community priorities for evidence-based interventions that focus on the supply and promotion of affordable healthy foods within the local food environment, as well as community demand for healthier food options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The reported poverty situation in Malaysia is described as unrealistic when the poverty line income (PLI) used only measures poverty through the income dimension. At the same time, many other dimensions need to be taken into account to describe the actual poverty in the country, even though the national PLI has increased from RM 980 in 2005 to RM 2,208 in 2019. However, the PLI is still important to determine who is eligible for assistance. Thus, this article aims to discuss the methods of determining poverty from conventional and Islamic perspectives. This study uses a qualitative approach that involves data collection methods by documentation and library research. In analysing, this study uses a descriptive approach method. The data collected is then analysed and clarified. This study found that the assessment of poverty according to both perspectives is the same, where the income aspect is the main criterion in determining poverty. At the same time, the multidimensional poverty index is used to look at other dimensions of poverty more holistically. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The actual poverty situation in Malaysia is described as unrealistic when the poverty line income (PLI) is used only measures poverty through the income dimension. At the same time, many other dimensions need to be taken into account to describe the actual poverty in the country, even though the original PLI rate has increased from RM 980 (2005) to RM 2,208 (2019). However, the PLI rate is still important to determine who is eligible for assistance. Thus, this article aims to discuss the approach of measuring poverty from Malaysian perspectives. This study uses a qualitative approach that involves data collection methods by documentation and library research. In analysing, this study uses a descriptive approach method. The data collected is then analysed and clarified. This study found that the measurement of poverty indicator in Malaysia use the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) developed by Alkire Foster as the basic framework for measuring multidimensional poverty. This study suggested that poverty needs to be seen holistically, not only depending on income-based measurement but also multidimensional. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]