Search

Several hardware Trojan (HT) detection techniques are available today to ensure the security of hardware systems. However, the existing pre-silicon HT detection techniques have problems such as difficulties in capturing HT path features and poor applicability. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a gate-level HT detection scheme based on a deep learning model. We parse the circuit gate-level netlist and develop an algorithm to extract circuit path sentences based on the signal propagation rule. Path sentences consisting of gate names are extracted as experimental datasets. We apply the theory of natural language processing (NLP) to the task of HT detection and use three neural networks to filter the length of path sentences. Then, based on the deep learning model text convolutional neural network (TextCNN), we propose PS-TextCNN for HT detection. Our approach is verified on seven benchmark circuits of the RS232-series and eight benchmark circuits of the s-series. We achieve an average true positive rate (TPR) of 88.9%. The TPR of the RS232-series reaches a high score of 99.5%. The TPR of the s-series is 79.5%, which is significantly higher than that of the existing gate-level HT detection techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Deep neural network has made surprising achievements in natural language processing, image pattern classification recognition, and other domains in the last few years. It is still tough to apply to hardware-constrained or mobile equipment because of the huge number of parameters, high storage as well as computing costs. In this paper, a new sparse iteration neural network architecture is proposed. First, the pruning method is used to compress the model size and make the network sparse. Then the architecture is iterated on the sparse network model, and the network performance is improved without adding additional parameters. Finally, the hybrid deep learning model was carried out on CV tasks and NLP tasks on ANN, CNN, and Transformer. Compared with the sparse network architecture, we finally found that the accuracy of the MINST, CIFAR10, PASCAL VOC 2012, and SQuAD datasets is improved by 0.47%, 0.64%, 3.75%, and 15.06%, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]