Search

Highlights • Parameters of 60 electricity-saving measures and 16 abatement measures are compiled. • Synergies of electricity use in China's chemical sector at grid level are assessed. • Efficient use of power can cut 154 Mt CO 2eq , 295 kt SO 2 , 322 kt NO x and 64 kt PM 2.5. • North and Northwest grids have the largest economic benefits on emissions reduction. • Grid with high electricity price is more sensitive to price change than other grids. Abstract Industry is a large electricity user. China's chemical industry (globally the largest based on sales) contributes 7% to China's GDP, while it consumes 11% of the total electricity consumption in industry and is responsible for 40% of total CO 2eq , 40% of SO 2 , 59% of NO x and 18% of PM-emissions of the chemical industry emissions. The heterogeneity of GHG and air pollutant emissions across electricity grids (within a country) is rarely included in analyses. In this paper, electricity conservation supply curves are developed (distinguishing the grids) to estimate the cost-effective and technical potentials of electricity conservation in China's chemical industry. The emission factors per grid for GHG (i.e. CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O) and air pollutants (i.e. SO 2 , NO x and PM 2.5) are calculated and used to quantify the emissions mitigation achieved by electricity saving technologies in the chemical industry for the period 2012–2035. Results show that significant multiple benefits can be obtained by implementing electricity efficiency measures. There are large differences among the six grids in terms electricity savings and emissions abatement of GHG and air pollutants. 83% of the total electricity saving potential is contributed by the North, Northwest and Central grids, equal to 32% of baseline electricity consumption in 2035. In 2035, 129 Mt of CO 2 , 33 kt CO 2eq of CH 4 , 571 kt CO 2eq of N 2 O, 235 kt of SO 2 , 275 kt of NO x and 52 kt of PM 2.5 in these three grids can be avoided as a result of electricity savings (a reduction of 31–33% compared to baseline emissions). When decision-makers set targets for energy saving and emission reduction, the multiple benefits and grid heterogeneity should not be ignored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Distributed energy resources present opportunities to serve grid and customer need through two-way power flow. New values, methods, and planning are required to efficiently interconnect and utilize DERs. This paper analyzes New York’s and California’s DER proceedings to provide a comparison of the similarities and differences between these and other states that will result in different levels of deployments and valuations of DERs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Electric and hydrogen vehicles can help decarbonize heavy duty vehicles (HDV). Few studies examine how to meet energy requirements of decarbonized HDVs, and all assume electricity will come from centralized systems. However, decarbonized HDVs could significantly increase energy demands in areas with limited transmission access, potentially favoring deployment of distributed energy resources (DERs). In this paper, we develop an optimization-based techno-economic model that minimizes costs of meeting HDV energy demands by optimizing investments in and operations of DERs, investments in transmission interconnections, and wholesale electricity purchases. We apply it to a modeled U.S. dataset of electric HDV charging demands to quantify the deployment and value potential of three DERs — solar, batteries, and nuclear small modular reactors (SMRs) in the year 2040. For fleets of 100% electric HDVs to 60% electric and 40% hydrogen HDVs, DERs are deployed at 78% to 95% of all charging stations and meet between 24% to 30% of total HDV energy demand. Investments in DERs reduce annual costs by $647 million to $1.9 billion across all stations, while individual stations can save $20 million to over $100 million annually. SMRs make up over 99% of total deployed DER capacity, indicating significant potential for SMR deployment in this emerging market. Widespread DER deployment is robust to capital cost uncertainty in SMRs and transmission lines, wholesale electricity prices, and other factors. [Display omitted] • We create a model to quantify the value of distributed energy resources for meeting decarbonized heavy duty vehicle energy demand. • Distributed energy resources are deployed at 78% to 95% of all charging stations. • Annual cost savings from distributed energy resources investments can be as high as $1.9 billion nation-wide, and $104 million at an individual station. • Small modular microreactors supply approximately between 24% and 30% of heavy duty vehicle energy demand annually. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This review deals with organic Rankine cycle powered by geothermal resource which is one favorable substitute for conventional fossil energy. Organic Rankine cycle power plants are suitable for utilization of low-temperature energy sources (low grade energy) such as geothermal resource having low temperature (below 150 ᵒC). The applications of organic Rankine cycle for electricity production from geothermal energy resource was reviewed first, where the choice of geothermal energy resources and organic fluids was discussed for different ORC configurations and operating conditions. Hybrid optimization approaches for the purpose of maintaining long term performance of enhanced geothermal system reservoirs were also summarized. Furthermore, an in-depth review of energy and exergy efficiencies of ORCs was conducted. Key factors that influence the energy and energy efficiencies of organic Rankine cycle were discussed in detail. Then, the economic indexes such as electricity production cost and levelized cost of electricity for different organic Rankine cycle configurations were compared with other conventional power generation systems to examine the commercialization of the Organic Rankine cycle. Finally, life cycle assessment that evaluates the whole life performance of geothermal organic Rankine cycle energy systems was reviewed. The Environmental impacts of geothermal ORC were also considered. Compared with other review papers on geothermal organic Rankine cycle s, the present review provides the latest materials for more systematically surveying the geothermal organic Rankine cycle, which will be a valuable source of guidance and directions for engineers and researchers in this field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]