Search

Objective: The irrational use of antibiotics is a leading contributor to antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic stewardship (AS) interventions predominantly focus on prescribers. This study investigated the influence and participation of inpatients in infection‐related care, including antibiotic decision‐making, within and across two tertiary hospitals in South Africa (Cape Town) and India (Kerala). Methods: Through ethnographic enquiry of clinical practice in surgical pathways, including direct nonparticipant observation of clinical practices, healthcare worker (HCW), patient and carer interactions in surgical ward rounds and face‐to‐face interviews with participants (HCWs and patients), we sought to capture the implicit and explicit influence that patients and carers have in infection‐related care. Field notes and interview transcripts were thematically coded, aided by NVivo 12® Pro software. Results: Whilst observational data revealed the nuanced roles that patients/carers play in antibiotic decision‐making, HCWs did not recognize these roles. Patients and carers, though invested in patient care, are not routinely involved, nor are they aware of the opportunities for engagement in infection‐related decision‐making. Patients associated clinical improvement with antibiotic use and did not consider hospitalization to be associated with infection acquisition or transmission, highlighting a lack of understanding of the threat of infection and antibiotic resistance. Patients' economic and cultural positionalities may influence their infection‐related behaviours. In the study site in India, cultural norms mean that carers play widespread but unrecognized roles in inpatient care, participating in infection prevention activities. Conclusion: For patients to have a valuable role in AS and make informed decisions regarding their infection‐related care, a mutual understanding of their role in this process among HCWs and patients is crucial. The observed differences between the two study sites indicate the critical need for understanding and addressing the contextual drivers that impact effective patient‐centred healthcare delivery. Patient or Public Contribution: Ethnographic observations and interviews conducted in this study involved patients as participants. Patients were recruited for interviews after obtaining signed informed consent forms. Patients' identities were completely anonymized when presenting the study findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine the prevalence and correlates of tobacco use during pregnancy in a rural area of India.Methods: In the present cross-sectional study, 400 women who gave birth between June 20, 2011, and June 19, 2012, were enrolled in the district of Pakur in Jharkhand, using multistage cluster sampling. Information on tobacco use, awareness of associated adverse health effects, and exposure to secondhand smoke was collected by interview. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to find correlates of tobacco use.Results: Overall, 59 (14.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11.0%-18.7%) women reported tobacco use during pregnancy. Awareness of the adverse health effects of tobacco during pregnancy was poor for 213 (53.3%) women. Tobacco use during pregnancy was significantly associated with an age of 25 years or older (odds ratio [OR] 8.20, 95% CI 2.48-27.15; P = 0.001) and poor awareness of adverse health effects (OR 4.48, 95% CI 2.03-9.90; P < 0.001).Conclusion: There is an urgent need to prevent tobacco use among pregnant women in India and to offer tobacco cessation services during prenatal checkups to those who continue tobacco use during pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]