Search

Objectives Methods Results Conclusion The endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) is an endoscopic diagnostic system utilized for evaluation of lower esophageal sphincter function. Although previous studies have determined that EPSIS was effective as a tool for the diagnosis of achalasia, it remains uncertain if EPSIS can detect significant changes before and after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), which is the premier treatment for achalasia. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of EPSIS as an objective diagnostic tool for assessing the clinical effect of POEM.We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent POEM from January 2022 to December 2023. The patients underwent EPSIS preoperatively and 2 months postoperatively. Intragastric pressure (IGP) parameters, including the maximum IGP, IGP difference, and waveform gradient were compared pre‐ and post‐POEM. These parameters also were compared between two groups: the postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) group and the non‐GERD group.A total of 50 patients were analyzed. The mean maximum IGP was significantly lower postoperatively than preoperatively (15.0 mmHg vs. 19.8 mmHg, P < 0.001). The mean IGP difference and waveform gradient were also significantly lower postoperatively than preoperatively (8.0 mmHg vs. 12.2 mmHg, P < 0.001; and 0.26 mmHg/s vs. 0.43 mmHg/s, P < 0.001, respectively). The mean postoperative waveform gradient was significantly lower in the GERD group (17 patients, 34%) than in the non‐GERD group (33 patients, 66%) (0.207 mmHg vs. 0.291 mmHg, P = 0.034).The results supported the use of EPSIS as an effective diagnostic tool for assessing the effect of POEM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: High‐resolution manometry (HRM) and esophagography are used for achalasia diagnosis; however, achalasia phenotypes combining esophageal motility and morphology are unknown. Moreover, predicting treatment outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in treatment‐naïve patients remains an unmet need. Methods: In this multicenter cohort study, we included 1824 treatment‐naïve patients diagnosed with achalasia. In total, 1778 patients underwent POEM. Clustering by machine learning was conducted to identify achalasia phenotypes using patients' demographic data, including age, sex, disease duration, body mass index, and HRM/esophagography findings. Machine learning models were developed to predict persistent symptoms (Eckardt score ≥3) and reflux esophagitis (RE) (Los Angeles grades A–D) after POEM. Results: Machine learning identified three achalasia phenotypes: phenotype 1, type I achalasia with a dilated esophagus (n = 676; 37.0%); phenotype 2, type II achalasia with a dilated esophagus (n = 203; 11.1%); and phenotype 3, late‐onset type I–III achalasia with a nondilated esophagus (n = 619, 33.9%). Types I and II achalasia in phenotypes 1 and 2 exhibited different clinical characteristics from those in phenotype 3, implying different pathophysiologies within the same HRM diagnosis. A predictive model for persistent symptoms exhibited an area under the curve of 0.70. Pre‐POEM Eckardt score ≥6 was the greatest contributing factor for persistent symptoms. The area under the curve for post‐POEM RE was 0.61. Conclusion: Achalasia phenotypes combining esophageal motility and morphology indicated multiple disease pathophysiologies. Machine learning helped develop an optimal risk stratification model for persistent symptoms with novel insights into treatment resistance factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) is a novel diagnostic tool used to evaluate lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function. EPSIS allows the measurement of intragastric pressure (IGP) during gastric insufflation through esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and records its pressure waveform. This study aimed to assess the usefulness and applicability of EPSIS as an adjunct diagnostic modality for achalasia. Methods: This case–control study was conducted using a database of patients who underwent EGD, barium swallow (BS), high‐resolution manometry (HRM), and EPSIS between January 2022 and December 2022. The achalasia (experimental) group (n = 35) consisted of patients with a definitive diagnosis of achalasia. The control group (n = 34) consisted of patients with no abnormalities in EGD, BS, or HRM and no abnormal acid reflux confirmed with 24‐h pH‐impedance monitoring. EPSIS findings were compared between the two groups and characterized by the waveform pattern (uphill or flat), maximum IGP (IGP‐Max), pressure difference, and the gradient of the waveform. Results: All patients in the achalasia group showed an uphill pattern, in contrast to 21 patients (61.8%) in the control group. IGP‐Max demonstrated the best diagnostic accuracy for achalasia, with a cut‐off value of 15.8 mmHg (100% sensitivity, 58.8% specificity, and area under the curve [AUC] 0.78). The pressure gradient also demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy, with a cut‐off value of 0.40 mmHg/s (80% sensitivity, 61.8% specificity, and AUC 0.76). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that EPSIS can be applied as a diagnostic modality in patients with achalasia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Reports on learning curve for peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in therapeutic endoscopy nonexperts are limited. We aimed to assess the number of cases required to achieve POEM proficiency for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) experts and nonexperts. Methods: This is a retrospective study at the largest POEM referral center in Japan. POEM between April 2014 and December 2020 were included. Nonexperts and ESD experts were divided by training phases: A, 1–20; B, 21–40; C, 41–60; D, 61–80; and E, 81–100 cases. Primary outcome was operation time, and the phase to reach target time (83 min) was investigated. Secondary outcomes were clinical success rate, adverse events, and post‐POEM gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Results: Five hundred and sixty‐six cases were performed by 14 nonexperts, and 555 cases by 15 ESD experts. As the primary outcome, operation time in nonexperts was: A, 95 (79–115.8); B, 86.5 (71–105); C, 80 (70–100); D, 73 (64.5–100.5); and E, 73.5 (57.8–88.8) min, while in ESD experts: A, 90 (74–128); B, 77 (70–92); and C, 77 (70–93.5) min (median [interquartile range]). Operation time decreased significantly as experience increased in both groups (P < 0.001), and nonexperts required 41–60 cases to achieve proficiency, while experts required 21–40 cases. As secondary outcomes, in nonexperts, clinical success was 96.9–100%, adverse events were 5.0–9.2%, symptomatic GERD was 11.8–26.5%, and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) intake was 11.5–18.7% in each phase. While in experts, clinical success was 96.2–100%, adverse events were 3.0–5.8%, symptomatic GERD was 14.6–22.0%, and PPI intake was 12.6–17.9%. There were no significant differences among training phases. Conclusions: Non‐ESD experts require more cases to achieve proficiency in POEM. These results are useful for establishing POEM training programs and institutional implementation of the procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Third‐space endoscopy, also known as submucosal endoscopy, allows for a wide range of therapeutic interventions within the submucosal layer and even into the muscular or subserosal layers of the gastrointestinal lumen. The technical development of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia has revolutionized the field of therapeutic endoscopy and the method has been continuously refined and modified. Although POEM has been applied to treat primary achalasia, it shows a favorable clinical response in other esophageal motility disorders and as a salvage treatment after previously failed intervention. Gastroesophageal reflux after POEM has drawn considerable attention and there have been major advancements in its prevention and management. POEM has led to advantageous derivatives such as peroral endoscopic tumor resection or submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for resection of subepithelial lesions, Zenker POEM for hypopharyngeal diverticula, diverticular POEM for epiphrenic esophageal diverticula, and gastric POEM for refractory gastroparesis. These techniques have a similar concept, which constitutes submucosal tunneling with a mucosal flap valve and secure mucosal incision closure. The submucosal tunneling technique is widely accepted and continues to evolve. This study aimed to review in detail the indications, outcomes, and technical variations in POEM and explore several emerging submucosal tunneling procedures. This review will benefit future studies by providing a summary of recent developments in this field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Indications for peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with achalasia concomitant with esophageal carcinoma (EC) are unclear. This study aimed to clarify the role of POEM in cases of achalasia concomitant with EC and to elucidate the indications for ESD and efficient surveillance for EC. Methods: We conducted a multicenter cohort study at 14 hospitals in Japan, including 3707 cases of achalasia‐related esophageal motility disorders (EMDs). Factors contributing to EC risk, the characteristics of EC, and clinical outcomes of POEM/ESD were analyzed. Results: In patients undergoing POEM, screening and surveillance endoscopy throughout a 1‐year period resulted in diagnosis of 72.1% new EC cases. Of 62 patients with 123 ECs, 40.3% had multiple or metachronous lesions within 37.5 months. EC was predominantly observed in the middle thoracic esophagus (58.5%) and posteriorly (73.2%). POEM had comparable safety and efficacy in cases of concomitant EC even after ESD. Endoscopic en bloc resection was performed in 95.8% and 89.3% of ECs diagnosed before and after POEM, respectively (P = 0.351); however, ESD on the POEM‐line was impaired by fibrosis. Multivariate analysis revealed risk factors for EC, including regular alcohol consumption, a history of smoking, advanced age, and extended disease duration. Alcohol intake and smoking had a synergistic effect on EC development. Conclusions: Screening and surveillance of POEM help in detecting EC. ESD is feasible in achalasia, although on the POEM‐line is challenging. Surveillance endoscopy for EC is recommended for cases with specific risks and a history of ECs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To elucidate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) on the practice of high‐resolution manometry (HRM) and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in Japan. Methods: We utilized a large‐scale database involving 14 high‐volume centers in Japan to investigate changes in the numbers of HRM and POEM procedures performed and outcomes of POEM between 2019 and 2020. A questionnaire survey was also conducted to analyze pandemic‐associated changes in the HRM and POEM protocols. Results: Compared to that in 2019, the number of HRM and POEM procedures decreased by 17.2% (1587–1314) and 20.9% (630–498), respectively. These declines were prominent during the state of emergency from April to May 2020, particularly in pandemic areas. HRM and POEM in nonpandemic areas were relatively unaffected. From 2019 to 2020, there was a 0.4% (254–248) decrease in POEM cases within the prefecture, but the number outside the prefecture decreased by 33.6% (372–247). During the pandemic, the safety and efficacy of POEM were maintained. The implementation of personal protective equipment (PPE) measures varied among facilities, and PPE for POEM was relatively insufficient compared to that for HRM. Conclusion: The COVID‐19 pandemic influenced HRM and POEM practices in Japan. It is necessary to establish a sufficient system for HRM and POEM in each hospital as well as countrywide to overcome the effects of the pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: The perioperative management and clinical course of per‐oral endoscopic myotomy for patients receiving antithrombotic therapy remains unknown. This study aimed to clarify the status of antithrombotic therapy in per‐oral endoscopic myotomy and to determine its safety and efficacy. Methods: Patients treated with per‐oral endoscopic myotomy from 2010 to 2019 in seven high‐volume centers in Japan were retrospectively investigated. The patients' characteristics and antithrombotic agent management were analyzed; clinical outcomes were compared with those without antithrombotic agents. Results: Of 2752 patients who underwent per‐oral endoscopic myotomy, 120 patients on antithrombotic therapy (mean age 71.0 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists class II–IV [67.5%]) were identified. Antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and a combination of antithrombotic agents were used in 82, 30, and 8 patients, respectively. The perioperative management adhered to the therapeutic endoscopy guidelines published by the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Endoscopy in most patients (88.3%). A poorer clinical baseline status (American Society of Anesthesiologists class II–IV; 67.0% vs 24.3%) and the sigmoid type (40.7% vs 22.3%) were more frequently observed in patients with achalasia on antithrombotic therapy. However, the clinical success (Eckardt score ≤ 3; 97.6% vs 94.6) and adverse event rates, such as bleeding and thromboembolic events (5.5% vs 4.7%), did not show inferiority. Conclusions: Per‐oral endoscopic myotomy on antithrombotic therapy is safe and effective. However, caution is required as patients on antithrombotic therapy tend to have poorer baseline health and achalasia statuses. Our experience should help establish perioperative management with antithrombotic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: Achalasia is a rare disease, with an incidence of one in 100 000. Genetic factors and autoimmune involvement have been reported in its etiology, and their involvement is strongly suspected, especially in patients with familial achalasia and those with comorbid hereditary or autoimmune diseases. However, these special types of achalasia are rare, and their frequency and clinical characteristics remain unclear. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included Japanese patients with a diagnosis of achalasia, treated between 2010 and 2019 across six tertiary centers in Japan. The frequency and clinical characteristics of special types of achalasia, namely, familial achalasia, achalasia with a comorbid hereditary disease, and achalasia with a comorbid autoimmune disease, were retrospectively investigated using a large‐scale multicenter database. Results: During the study period, 1115 patients were treated for achalasia at six tertiary centers. Familial achalasia, achalasia with a comorbid hereditary disease, and achalasia with a comorbid autoimmune disease occurred in 7 (0.63%), 11 (0.99%), and 27 (2.4%) patients, respectively. Familial achalasia had a slightly younger age of onset (37.6 ± 12.1 years old) and a higher incidence in male patients (six patients; 85.7%). Down's syndrome was the most common hereditary comorbidity, and thyroid disease was the most common autoimmune comorbidity. Conclusions: We clarified the frequency and clinical characteristics of special types of achalasia. Although special types of achalasia are rare, these comorbidities should be considered when treating patients with achalasia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]