Search

Mobile health is the "medical and public health practice supported by mobile devices, such as mobile phones, patient monitoring devices, personal digital assistants, and other wireless devices." For example, mobile apps (such as MASK‐Air, Allergy.Monitor, Pollen, and others) have proven useful in the management of patients with allergic rhinitis. These apps can be used in the context of broader clinical decision support systems (CDSS) for enhancing allergy‐related decisions and actions with pertinent, organized clinical knowledge and patient information to improve allergy care. A CDSS targeted to control rhinitis with drugs and other interventions guiding the patient in his/her self‐ and doctor‐driven management is currently being produced and investigated by the MACVIA network. Another one, called @IT‐2020, is targeted to support etiologic diagnostics and allergen immunotherapy (AIT) prescriptions for patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Intensive investigation is necessary to better define the advantages and limitations of mobile‐health technology in allergology and establish guidelines for their proper use in daily practice in the context of a rapidly evolving European regulatory environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In vitro immunoglobulin E (IgE) tests can be better standardized if based on molecules rather than extracts. However, singleplex screening tests for respiratory or food allergies are still based on extracts only. Target: To validate a novel singleplex IgE screening test for respiratory allergies, based on a mix of major allergenic molecules Der p 1, Der p 2, Fel d 1, Can f 1, Can f 2, Can f 3, Can f 5, Bet v 1, Phl p 1, and Art v 1 (Molecular SX01, NOVEOS, HYCOR, USA), and requiring only four microliters (μl) of serum. Methods: We examined six subsets of sera from participants of the German Multicenter Allergy Study (MAS) birth cohort enrolling 1314 newborns during 1990: (1) monosensitized (n = 58); (2) polysensitized (n = 24); (3) nonsensitized, with total IgE levels above (n = 24) or (4) below (n = 24) 300 kU/L; (5) sensitized to milk and/or egg but not to airborne allergens (n = 24); and (6) sera of children aged ≤5 years at their earliest IgE monosensitization to airborne allergens (n = 41). Sera were analyzed with the novel molecular SX01 test (NOVEOS) and with three categories of comparators: ImmunoCAP Phadiatop SX01, extracts, and molecules of D. pteronyssinus, cat, dog, grass, and birch. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Quantitative interrelationships were determined using Spearman's rank‐order correlation coefficient and Bland–Altmann plots. Results: The molecular SX01 test predicted the outcome of IgE tests based on molecules, extracts, or Phadiatop in 188 (96.4%), 171 (87.7%), and 171 (87.7%) of the 195 sera, respectively. Accordingly, sensitivity was 93.5%, 89.0%, and 82.4%, whereas specificity was 100%, 97.6%, and 96.1% when compared with molecular, extract, and Phadiatop tests, respectively. Inconsistent outcomes were largely confined to sera with IgE‐Ab levels around the cutoff value of 0.35 kU/L, except for 5/195 (2.5%) sera, containing high levels of IgE to Phl p 5 and/or Alt a 1 only. IgE levels measured by the molecular SX01 test and with IgE tests to molecules, extracts, and Phadiatop were highly correlated (rho 0.90; p <.001), (rho 0.87, p <.001), (rho 0.84, p <.001), respectively. The novel molecular SX01 test detected IgE‐Ab in 27/28 (sensitivity 96.4%) of the sera of preschool children at their earliest IgE sensitization to the same molecules. Discussion Our study validates the prototype of a novel category of IgE test, based on molecular mixes. The test's rather good precision and accuracy in early screening IgE sensitization to airborne allergens in German children may be further improved by adding a few other molecules, such as Phl p 5 and Alt a 1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease‐modifying treatment in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SAR). Its efficacy depends on the precise identification of the triggering allergen. However, diagnostics based on retrospective clinical history and sensitization to whole extracts (SWE) often leads to equivocal results. Objectives: To assess the usability and impact of a recently established algorithm for a clinical decision support system (@IT2020‐CDSS) for SAR and its diagnostic steps [anamnesis, SWE (skin prick test or serum IgE), component resolved diagnosis, CRD, and real‐time digital symptom recording, eDiary] on doctor's AIT prescription decisions. Methods: After educational training on the @IT2020‐CDSS algorithm, 46 doctors (18 allergy specialists, AS, and 28 general practitioners, GP) expressed their hypothetical AIT prescription for 10 clinical index cases. Decisions were recorded repeatedly based on different steps of the algorithm. The usability and perceived impact of the algorithm were evaluated. Results: The combined use of CRD and an eDiary increased the hypothetical AIT prescriptions, both among AS and GP (p <.01). AIT prescription for pollen and Alternaria allergy based on anamnesis and SWE was heterogeneous but converged towards a consensus by integrating CRD and eDiary information. Doctors considered the algorithm useful and recognized its potential in enhancing traditional diagnostics. Conclusions and clinical implications: The implementation of CRD and eDiary in the @IT2020‐CDSS algorithm improved consensus on AIT prescription for SAR among AS and GP. The potential usefulness of a CDSS for aetiological diagnosis of SAR and AIT prescription in real‐world clinical practice deserves further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Detection of allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) is important for the diagnosis of allergy. IgE sensitization is commonly demonstrated in vivo by skin prick testing (SPT), or in vitro utilizing automated systems. Recently, HYCOR® Biomedical launched its new system for allergen sIgE testing called the NOVEOS™ Immunoanalyzer. This study aims to evaluate the analytical performance of the NOVEOS system in a bi-center study at Philipps-University Marburg (Site-1) and Charité Medical University Berlin (Site-2), respectively. Methods: The analytical performance was evaluated based on the guidelines I/LA20-A3, EP5-A3, EP17-A2, EP6-A, EP7-A3, and EP9-A3 of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Results: The conducted repeatability and within-laboratory precision tests provided acceptable performance with 3.0%–11.9% coefficient of variation across both sites. The limit of blank (LoB) and limit of detection (LoD) were <0.1 kU/L at both centers. A within-parameter linearity for all tested allergens was reported at both sites. Of note, no significant interference was observed for high levels of biotin, methylprednisolone, diphenhydramine, omalizumab, or ranitidine. Method comparison between the NOVEOS calibration and the latest World Health Organization (WHO) reference standard showed good agreement at both sites. Conclusions: The results from the analytical performance of the NOVEOS allergen sIgE assay and instrument testing at both sites were comparable. Overall, a good precision and linearity as well as a detection limit <0.1 kU/L were observed, with minimal impact of common interfering substances on patient recoveries. The NOVEOS is calibrated to the latest WHO reference standard and adds benefits like a small sample size and para-magnetic microparticles that improve upon third-generation allergen sIgE assays' design and performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Allergen immunotherapy is a cornerstone in the treatment of allergic children. The clinical efficiency relies on a well‐defined immunologic mechanism promoting regulatory T cells and downplaying the immune response induced by allergens. Clinical indications have been well documented for respiratory allergy in the presence of rhinitis and/or allergic asthma, to pollens and dust mites. Patients who have had an anaphylactic reaction to hymenoptera venom are also good candidates for allergen immunotherapy. Administration of allergen is currently mostly either by subcutaneous injections or by sublingual administration. Both methods have been extensively studied and have pros and cons. Specifically in children, the choice of the method of administration according to the patient's profile is important. Although allergen immunotherapy is widely used, there is a need for improvement. More particularly, biomarkers for prediction of the success of the treatments are needed. The strength and efficiency of the immune response may also be boosted by the use of better adjuvants. Finally, novel formulations might be more efficient and might improve the patient's adherence to the treatment. This user's guide reviews current knowledge and aims to provide clinical guidance to healthcare professionals taking care of children undergoing allergen immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Previous studies of serum total IgE (t-IgE) were not able to discriminate well-enough atopic from non-atopic subjects, that is, with or without serum-specific IgE antibodies to allergens. Objectives To model growth curves of the total IgE levels in children without atopic sensitization (hereafter defined as 'normal' t-IgE levels) and to test their usefulness in predicting atopic sensitization. Methods The German Multicentre Allergy Study ( MAS), a birth cohort with 1314 recruited newborns, began in 1990 and examined the participants until age 20 years. Total and specific IgE (t-IgE, s-IgE) were analyzed with a fluorescent enzyme immunoassay Immuno CAP ( TFS, Sweden) at ages 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 13, and 20 years. Participants were classified as 'never atopic' if all their available serum samples had negative response (cutoff: <0.35 kUA/L) for s-IgE to the nine common foodborne and airborne allergenic extracts (milk, egg, soy, wheat, house dust mite, cat, dog, birch, and grass) tested in the MAS birth cohort. By contrast, participants were defined as atopic if they had, for at least at one available serum sample, s-IgE≥0.35 kUA/L to at least one allergenic extract tested. The evolution of t-IgE levels in the 'never atopic' children was described by growth curves, estimated by exploiting a quantile regression model. A 'reference' percentile, based on the t-IgE value measured at age 5 years, was assigned to each child with no IgE sensitization at that age. Upward deviations from the own 'reference' quantile of t-IgE in atopic and 'never atopic' children were calculated and a ROC analysis was used to identify the best cutoff point for predicting atopic sensitization. Results Overall, 1113 of 1314 children were included in this analysis. Of these, 469 were 'never atopic' and 644 atopic. Quantile trajectories of t-IgE levels in 'never atopic' subjects were stable from 5 years of age, increased to a plateau at age 10-13 years, and decreased slightly afterward. The onset of atopic s-IgE responses was characterized by an upward deviation of serum t-IgE levels from their 'reference' trajectory. T-IgE quantiles predicted the onset of atopy with high efficiency ( AUC>80%). ROC analysis showed that deviations from the t-IgE level 'reference' quantile above 0.32, 0.41, 0.42, 0.30, and 0.58 kU/L (log-units) at 6, 7, 10, 13, and 20 years of age, respectively, predicted an atopic sensitization. Conclusion The growth curves of 'normal' serum t-IgE concentrations were estimated in 'never atopic' children; for each individual who was non-atopic at 5 years of age a 'reference' quantile was identified that represented the individual's 'normal' level of t-IgE production. Upward deviations of observed t-IgE levels from the own 'reference' quantile, from 6 to 20 years of age, predicted at each year the occurrence of atopic sensitization. Clinical Implications The trajectory of t-IgE levels can be elaborated since age 5 years in non-atopic children. A child whose t-IgE levels are consistently higher than those predicted by his/her growth curve may have developed atopic sensitization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology ( EAACI) is in the process of developing the EAACI Guidelines for Allergen Immunotherapy ( AIT) for the Prevention of Allergic Disease. We seek to critically assess the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and safety of AIT in the prevention of allergic disease. Methods We will undertake a systematic review, which will involve searching international biomedical databases for published, in progress and unpublished evidence. Studies will be independently screened against pre-defined eligibility criteria and critically appraised using established instruments. Data will be descriptively and, if possible and appropriate, quantitatively synthesized. Discussion The findings from this review will be used to inform the development of recommendations for EAACI's Guidelines on AIT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]