Search

Objective: The persistence of biologic (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs(DMARDs) in monotherapy versus in combination with conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs is still a controversial topic in rheumatic diseases. To clarify this issue, the retention of the initial treatment strategy of b/tsDMARD in combination with csDMARD versus monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients under real‐life conditions was evaluated. Factors associated with maintenance of the initial strategy were analysed. Methods: Nested cohort study within the Spanish BIOBADASER III registry. Bivariate comparisons and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used for the analyses. Results: A total of 2521 patients were included in the study. In the multivariate model, the initial strategy of combination therapy was associated with shorter persistence in patients with RA (hazard ratio [HR] 1.58;95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00–2.50; p =.049), PsA (HR 2.48; 95% CI 1.65–3.72) and AS (HR 16.77; 95% CI 7.37–38.16; p <.001), regardless of sex, time of disease progression, baseline disease activity, glucocorticoid use or type of b/tsDMARD. Overall, the combination strategy was associated with an increased incidence of adverse events (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.13; 95% CI 1.05–1.21). Conclusions: In this real‐life study, the strategy of combining a b/tsDMARD with a csDMARD is associated with lower persistence and worse safety profile compared to monotherapy in RA and especially in PsA and AS, suggesting that combination therapy should be rethought as first choice in RA patients, but especially in PsA and AS patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Axial osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of back and neck pain, however, few studies have examined its prevalence. The aim was to estimate the prevalence and the characteristics of symptomatic axial OA in Spain. Methods: EPISER2016 is a cross-sectional multicenter population-based study of people aged 40 years or older. Subjects were randomly selected using multistage stratified cluster sampling. Participants were contacted by telephone to complete rheumatic disease screening questionnaires. Two phenotypes were analyzed, patients with Non-exclusive axial OA (NEA-OA) and Exclusive axial OA (EA-OA). To calculate the prevalence and its 95% confidence interval (CI), the sample design was considered and weighting was calculated according to age, sex and geographic origin. Results: Prevalence of NEA-OA by clinical or clinical-radiographic criteria was 19.17% (95% CI: 17.82–20.59). The frequency of NEA-OA increased with age (being 3.6 times more likely in patients aged 80 s or more than in those between 40 and 49 years) and body mass index. It was significantly more frequent in women, as well as in the center of Spain. It was less frequent in those with a higher level of education. Lumbar OA was more frequent than cervical OA. This difference grew with increasing age and was not associated with gender. It was also greater in overweight and obese subjects. Conclusions: This is the first study on the prevalence of axial OA phenotypes in Europe describing the associated socio-demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle variables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

La Sociedad Española de Reumatología elaboró en el año 2000 el estudio EPISER2000 para conocer la prevalencia de la artrosis y otras enfermedades reumáticas en España. Los cambios sociodemográficos y en los hábitos de vida ocurridos en los últimos años en España justifican actualizar los datos de las enfermedades reumáticas (EPISER2016). Estimar la prevalencia de artrosis sintomática de columna cervical, columna lumbar, cadera, rodilla y mano, en población adulta en España. Estudio transversal de base poblacional. Se realizó un muestreo aleatorizado polietápico estratificado y por conglomerados. Los participantes fueron contactados por teléfono para cumplimentar un cuestionario de cribado de artrosis. El reumatólogo confirmaba o descartaba el diagnóstico. Se utilizaron los criterios-clínicos-ACR para diagnosticar artrosis de manos y los criterios clínico-radiológicos-ACR para diagnosticar la artrosis de rodilla y cadera. La prevalencia de artrosis en España en una o más de las localizaciones estudiadas fue de 29,35%. La prevalencia de artrosis-cervical fue del 10,10% y de artrosis-lumbar del 15,52%. Ambas son más frecuentes en mujeres y a mayor edad, así como en personas con niveles de estudios bajos y obesidad. La prevalencia de artrosis de cadera fue del 5,13% y la de artrosis de rodilla del 13,83%; estas se asocian con el sexo femenino, sobrepeso y obesidad, menor frecuencia en nivel de estudios alto y con la edad. La prevalencia de la artrosis de mano fue del 7,73%. Es más frecuente en mujeres, obesas, con bajo nivel de estudios y mayor edad. El estudio EPISER2016 es el primero que analiza la prevalencia de artrosis sintomática en 5 localizaciones (columna cervical, lumbar, rodilla, cadera y manos) en España. La artrosis de la columna lumbar es la más prevalente. The Spanish Society of Rheumatology carried out the EPISER2000 study in 2000 to determine the prevalence of osteoarthritis and other rheumatic diseases in the Spanish population. Recent sociodemographic changes and lifestyle habits in Spain justified updating the epidemiological data on osteoarthritis and other rheumatic diseases (EPISER2016-study). To estimate the prevalence of symptomatic osteoarthritis of the cervical spine, lumbar spine, hip, knee and hand in the adult population in Spain. Cross-sectional population-based study. A multistage and stratified random cluster sampling was carried out. The participants were contacted by telephone to complete an osteoarthritis screening questionnaire. A rheumatologist confirmed or discarded the diagnosis. The ACR-clinical-criteria were used to diagnose hand-osteoarthritis and the ACR-clinical-radiological criteria to diagnose knee- and hip-osteoarthritis. To estimate the prevalence and its 95% confidence interval, weights were calculated according to the probability of selection in each of the sampling stages. The prevalence of osteoarthritis in Spain in one or more of the locations studied was 29.35%. The prevalence of cervical-osteoarthritis was 10.10% and of lumbar-osteoarthritis 15.52%. Both are more frequent in women and at older ages, as well as in people with low levels of education and obesity. The prevalence of hip-osteoarthritis was 5.13%, that of knee-osteoarthritis 13.83%, these are associated with female sex, overweight and obesity. The prevalence of hand osteoarthritis was 7.73%. It is more frequent in women, who are obese, with a low educational level and who are older. The EPISER2016 study is the first to analyse the prevalence of symptomatic osteoarthritis in 5 locations (cervical, lumbar, knee, hip and hands) in Spain. Lumbar spine osteoarthritis is the most prevalent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Retention of biological treatment provides a marker of drug effectiveness and patient satisfaction. Retention of golimumab was high in clinical trial extensions and real-world studies up to 5 years in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. Objective: To assess the probability of real-world long-term retention of treatment with golimumab up to 7 years after treatment initiation. Methods: This retrospective noninterventional study involved analysis of the Spanish biological drugs registry, BIOBADASER. Adults who had ever received golimumab for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), or psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and had initiated it > 6 months before the analysis date, were included. Results: Among 685 patients (28.5% RA, 42.9% SpA, 28.6% PsA), the overall probability of retention of golimumab treatment since initiation was 71.7% (95% confidence interval 68.1–74.9) at year 1, 60.5% (56.5–64.2%) at year 2, 55.6% (51.5–59.5%) at year 3, 50.6% (46.2–54.8%) at year 4, 45.1% (40.1–50.0%) at year 5, 44.2% (39.0–49.3) at year 6, and 39.5% (32.8–46.2) at year 7. Retention was greater in patients with axial SpA or PsA versus RA (p < 0.001) and when golimumab was used as first-line treatment versus third or later lines (p < 0.001). Factors associated with greater golimumab retention in Cox regression included use as first-line biological therapy, having axial SpA or PsA rather than RA, and concomitant methotrexate therapy. Steroids were associated with lower retention. Conclusion: In this real-world study of RA, axial SpA, and PsA patients, the retention rate of golimumab was 39.5% at year 7. Key Points • Retention of biological treatment provides a marker of drug effectiveness and patient satisfaction. • This real-world study of 685 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) showed that golimumab treatment had a retention rate up to 39.5% at year 7. • Greater golimumab retention was associated with use as first-line biological therapy, having axial SpA or PsA rather than RA, and concomitant methotrexate therapy [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The better understanding of the safety of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs), as well as the emergence of new bDMARDs against different therapeutic targets and biosimilars have likely influenced the use patterns of these compounds over time. The aim of this study is to assess changes in demographic characteristics, disease activity and treatment patterns in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who started a first- or second-line biologic between 2007 and mid-2020. Patients diagnosed with RA, PsA or AS included in the BIOBADASER registry from January 2007 to July 2020 were included. According to the start date of a first- or second-line biologic therapy, patients were stratified into four time periods: 2007–2009; 2010–2013; 2014–2017; 2018–2020 and analyzed cross-sectionally in each period. Demographic and clinical variables, as well as the type of biologic used, were assessed. Generalized linear models were applied to study the evolution of the variables of interest over time periods, the diagnosis, and the interactions between them. A total of 4543 patients initiated a first biologic during the entire time frame of the study. Over the four time periods, disease evolution at the time of biologic initiation (p < 0.001), disease activity (p < 0.001), retention rate (p < 0.001) and the use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors as a first-line treatment (p < 0.001) showed a significant tendency to decrease. Conversely, comorbidities, as assessed by the Charlson index (p < 0.001), and the percentage of patients using bDMARDs in monotherapy (p < 0.001), and corticosteroids (p < 0.001) tended to increase over time. Over the entire period of the study's analysis, 3289 patients started a second biologic. The following trends were observed: decreased DAS28 at switching (p < 0.001), lower retention rates (p = 0.004), and incremental changes to the therapeutic target between the first and second biologic (p < 0.001). From 2007 until now rheumatic patients who started a biologic were older, exhibited less clinical activity, presented more comorbidities, and switched to a different biologic more frequently and earlier. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Describir los objetivos, la metodología y los resultados del primer año de la nueva versión del registro español de acontecimientos adversos de terapias biológicas y fármacos sintéticos con diana identificable en enfermedades reumáticas (BIOBADASER III). Registro prospectivo multicéntrico de pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias reumáticas en tratamiento con terapia biológica o fármacos sintéticos con diana identificable y atendidos en servicios de Reumatología en España. El objetivo principal de BIOBADASER Fase III es la recogida y análisis de acontecimientos adversos al que se ha añadido como objetivo secundario la evaluación de la efectividad mediante la recogida de índices de actividad. Los pacientes que entran en el registro son evaluados al menos una vez cada año y cada vez que presenten un acontecimiento adverso o se produzcan modificaciones en el tratamiento. La recogida de datos de la fase iii se inició el 17 de diciembre del 2015. Durante el primer año han participado 35 centros. El número de pacientes incluidos en esta nueva fase en diciembre del 2016 era de 2.664. La edad media era de 53,7 años, con una mediana de duración de la enfermedad hasta el inicio de tratamiento de 8,1 años. Un 40,4% de los pacientes estaban diagnosticados de artritis reumatoide. Los acontecimientos adversos más frecuentes eran las infecciones e infestaciones. La fase iii de BIOBADASER se ha puesto en marcha para responder a un entorno farmacológico cambiante con la aparición de los biosimilares y las pequeñas moléculas en el tratamiento de la patología reumática. Esta nueva etapa se adapta a los cambios normativos en la comunicación de acontecimientos adversos y amplía la información recogida incluyendo los índices de actividad. Describe the objectives, methods and results of the first year of the new version of the Spanish registry of adverse events involving biological therapies and synthetic drugs with an identifiable target in rheumatic diseases (BIOBADASER III). Multicenter prospective registry of patients with rheumatic inflammatory diseases being treated with biological drugs or synthetic drugs with an identifiable target in rheumatology departments in Spain. The main objective of BIOBADASER Phase III is the registry and analysis of adverse events; moreover, a secondary objective was added consisting of assessing the effectiveness by means of the registry of activity indexes. Patients in the registry are evaluated at least once every year and whenever they experience an adverse event or a change in treatment. The collection of data for phase iii began on 17 December 2015. During the first year, 35 centers participated. The number of patients included in this new phase in December 2016 was 2,664. The mean age was 53.7 years and the median duration of treatment was 8.1 years. In all, 40.4% of the patients were diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis. The most frequent adverse events were infections and infestations. BIOBADASER Phase III has been launched to adapt to a changing pharmacological environment, with the introduction of biosimilars and small molecules in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. This new stage is adapted to the changes in the reporting of adverse events and now includes information related to activity scores. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of gout in Spain.Methods: Cross-sectional, population-based study of people aged 20 years or older. First, randomly selected individuals were contacted by telephone and rheumatic disease screening questionnaires were conducted. If the first screening was positive, medical records were then reviewed and/or a phone questionnaire was conducted by a rheumatologist, followed by an appointment if necessary. Newly diagnosed cases had to fulfil the ACR/EULAR 2015 criteria. To calculate the prevalence and its 95% CI, the sample design was taken into account and weighing was calculated according to age, sex and geographic origin.Results: In all, 4916 individuals were included, 1361 had a positive screening result for gout (59 of them reported a prior diagnosis). Of these, 51 were classified as missing and 95 were classified as gout cases. An additional case was detected through a positive screening for fibromyalgia and Sjögren's syndrome, although a previous gout diagnosis was confirmed by a review of the medical records. Of the 96 gout cases, 31 (32%) were de novo diagnoses. The estimated weighted prevalence of gout was 2.4% (95% CI 1.95-2.95), with a higher prevalence in men (4.55% [95%CI 3.65-5.65]) than women (0.38% [95%CI 0.19-0.76]).Conclusion: EPISER2016 is the first population-based study to estimate the prevalence of gout in Spain. Undiagnosed patients accounted for a substantial proportion of cases, highlighting the need for population-approaches when estimating the prevalence of infra-diagnosed diseases. Reliable national approaches are key to obtaining accurate estimates of diseases to better aid healthcare and workforce planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]