Search

In digital circuit designs, sequential components such as flip-flops are used to synchronize signal propagations. Logic computations are aligned at and thus isolated by flip-flop stages. Although this fully synchronous style can reduce design efforts significantly, it may affect circuit performance negatively, because sequential components can only introduce delays into signal propagations but never accelerate them. In this article, we propose a new timing model, VirtualSync+, in which signals, specially those along critical paths, are allowed to propagate through several sequential stages without flip-flops. Timing constraints are still satisfied at the boundary of the optimized circuit to maintain a consistent interface with existing designs. By removing clock-to-q delays and setup time requirements of flip-flops on critical paths, the performance of a circuit can be pushed even beyond the limit of traditional sequential designs. In addition, we further enhance the optimization with VirtualSync+ by fine-tuning with commercial design tools, e.g., design compiler from Synopsys, to achieve more accurate result. To achieve this fine-tuning, we first optimize the circuits by reallocating sequential components with sequential and combinational components as delay units. Afterward, the removal locations of flip-flops with respect to the circuits under optimization are extracted and the corresponding wave-pipelining timing constraints compatible with commercial design tools are established. These timing constraints are then incorporated into the optimization flow of commercial tools to generate the optimized circuits. The experimental results demonstrate that circuit performance can be improved by up to 4% (average 1.5%) compared with that after extreme retiming and sizing, while the increase of area is still negligible. This timing performance is enhanced beyond the limit of traditional sequential designs. It also demonstrates that compared with those after retiming and sizing, the circuits with VirtualSync+ can achieve better timing performance under the same area cost or smaller area cost under the same clock period, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

At submicrometer manufacturing technology nodes, process variations affect circuit performance significantly. To counter these variations, engineers are reserving more timing margin to maintain yield, leading to an unaffordable overdesign. Most of these margins, however, are wasted after manufacturing, because process variations cause only some chips to be really slow, while other chips can easily meet given timing specifications. To reduce this pessimism, we can reserve less timing margin and tune failed chips after manufacturing with clock buffers to make them meet timing specifications. With this post-silicon clock tuning, critical paths can be balanced with neighboring paths in each chip specifically to counter the effect of process variations. Consequently, chips with timing failures can be rescued and the yield can thus be improved. This is specially useful in high-performance designs, e.g., high-end CPUs, where clock binning makes chips with higher performance much more profitable. In this paper, we propose a method to determine where to insert post-silicon tuning buffers during the design phase to improve the overall profit with clock binning. This method learns the buffer locations with a Sobol sequence iteratively and reduces the buffer ranges afterward with tuning concentration and buffer grouping. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method can achieve a profit improvement of about 14% on average and up to 26%, with only a small number of tuning buffers inserted into the circuit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]