Search

The Darjiling-Sikkim Himalaya (DSH) is located over the Dharan-Gorubathan salient-recess pair and moderate thrust and strike-slip earthquake occur here. The hypocentres cluster not only near the location of the Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT) or the basal decollement of the Himalayan wedge, but also well above and below it. The epicentres cluster over the mapped location of the Lesser Himalayan Duplex (LHD), suggesting that both MHT and LHD are active structures in DSH. The earthquakes below MHT can be related to transverse strike-slip faulting in DSH associated with salient-recess transition on both flanks of the Dharan salient. The 18 September 2011 (Mw 6.9) strike-slip event suggests that the western flank of the Dharan salient is also likely to contain an active transverse strike-slip fault like the Gish Transverse Fault (GTF) on its eastern flank. High-precision Global Positioning System measurements (1997-2006) indicate that a maximum of ~4 mm/year convergence is being accommodated in the Tista Half-Window or LHD west of the surface trace of GTF and DSH is locked south of 27°N both east and west of GTF about 10 km north of the Himalayan mountain front. About 3-4 mm/year sinistral strike-slip is postulated on GTF north of 27?N. Dislocation based forward modelling using two thrust dislocations with oblique slip and a sinistral strike-slip dislocation generated velocities that were closest to the measured back-slip velocity field in DSH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study evaluates the impact of multi-GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) signals on the estimation of precise position with millimetre accuracy. Compared to standalone satellite systems like the Global Positioning System (GPS), multi-GNSS improves start-up time, performance, satellite visibility, accuracy, spatial geometry and reliability. However, on the flip side it increases the noise, signal interference, hardware complexity of the receiver, intersystem interference and computation complexity which may degrade its performance. Though GNSS is similar at fundamental levels, differences exist in signal structures, reference frames and timing standards. Compatibility and interoperability between the different constellations of the highest order is required to achieve the best results. At present, GPS and Glonass navigation systems are fully functional with global coverage and comparable precision. Glonass satellite constellation, signal structure is slightly different when compared to GPS, whereas major differences exist in the reference frame and epoch time. Combined GPS–Glonass solution significantly improves the accuracy in navigation applications with increased satellite signal observations and spatial distribution of visible satellites. For precise geodetic studies using static post-processing, combined solution may degrade the accuracy, if these differences are not handled carefully. Currently for geodetic studies, only GPS observations are majorly used worldwide. For the first time, daily precise position is estimated for continuous GNSS stations located in India using static postprocessing with standalone GPS, Glonass as well as combined GPS–Glonass to study the impact of multiGNSS signals for geodetic studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]