Search

The potential for pheromone-based mating disruption of the Brassica pest Contarinia nasturtii was tested, both in small-scale plots with Brussels sprouts and in commercial-scale fields with either broccoli or cauliflower. Experiments in the small-scale plots used laboratory-reared insects released into a previously uninfested area, whereas large-scale experiments used a high natural population of C. nasturtii. Effectiveness of mating disruption was evaluated by the reduction of male captures in pheromone traps, and by reduction of crop damage caused by C. nasturtii. Dental cotton rolls (small-scale experiment) and polyethylene caps (large-scale experiment), containing 50 μg (2 S, 9S)-diacetoxyundecane, 100 μg (2 S,10 S)-diacetoxyundecane, and 1 μg (2 S)-acetoxyundecane, spaced 2 m apart, served as dispensers in the test plots. In both experiments, mean catches of C. nasturtii males in pheromone traps were reduced to near zero in treated plots, with control plots averaging 71 males/trap. In the large-scale experiments, no males were caught in pheromone traps over a period of 41 days after mating disruption was applied; one male was caught from days 42-60. In the small-scale trials, crop damage was reduced by 59 %, compared to the untreated control plot. In the large-scale experiments, damage was reduced on average by 91 %. This study shows successful field application of the mating disruption technique for control of a member of the dipteran family Cecidomyiidae, and demonstrates that pheromone-based mating disruption has potential for management of C. nasturtii populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Parasitoid host location in nature is facilitated by simultaneously using different information sources. How multisensory orientation on the same spatial scale is influenced by environmental conditions is however poorly understood. Here we test whether changes in reliability of cues can cause parasitoids to alter multisensory orientation and to switch to cues that are more reliable under extreme temperatures. In the ichneumonid wasp Pimpla turionellae, multisensory use of thermally insensitive vision and thermally sensitive mechanosensory host location by vibrational sounding (echolocation on solid substrate) was investigated with choice experiments on plant-stem models under optimum temperature (18°C), at high- (28°C) and low-temperature limits (8°C) of vibrational sounding. Temperature affected relative importance of vibrational sounding whereas visual orientation did not vary. At 18°C, parasitoids used visual and vibrational cues with comparable relative importance. At 8 and 28°C, the role of vibrational sounding in multisensory orientation was significantly reduced in line with decreased reliability. Wasps nearly exclusively chose visual cues at 8°C. The parasitoids switch between cues and sensory systems depending on temperature. As overall precision of ovipositor insertions was not affected by temperature, the parasitoids fully compensate the loss of one cue provided another reliable cue is available on the same spatial scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Because of the low number of observation points per animal attainable in insect movement studies, linear parameters are frequently used to quantify the data. These linear parameters are evaluated, as well as several home range estimators, by means of an empirical study of the bush cricket Phaneroptera falcata (Insecta: Ensifera) and a Monte Carlo simulation model. The examination of differences between complete and artificially reduced data sets, as well as between the “real” (i.e. simulated) data set and the data recorded by a simulated observer, allows us to quantify robustness and bias of the evaluated parameters. We show that nearly all tested methods are strongly influenced by the resight number of the investigated individuals. Hence, those parameters should be used cautiously in studies with few resights, i.e. in insect studies as well as studies on vertebrates. Results of earlier studies should be reconsidered and some comparisons between different studies are questionable. Estimates of home range using a 95% ellipse with fewer than five locations are extremely unreliable (overestimation). The minimum convex polygon leads to a clear underestimation. The robustness of both parameters is low. Among the home range parameters the kernel method is most robust, but it leads to an overestimating bias. The harmonic mean method is the only home range parameter whose results are comparable to the area actually used. However, this method requires a minimum number of 11 observation points per individual. Evaluating the linear parameters, the mean daily movement and the total recorded movement are inappropriate for statistical analyses, because of their high sensitivity to the resight number. Maximum activity radius and dispersal range are much more robust. They are not as sensitive to sample size and deviate little from the “real” values of the parameters. However, this bias is statistically significant. The mean activity radius of an individual is the most useful linear parameter. This measure is very robust down to a sample size of four individual locations and compares well with the real parameter values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]