Search

Artifacts cause distortion and fuzziness in electroencephalographic (EEG) signal and hamper EEG analysis, so it is necessary to remove them prior to the analysis. Particularly, artifact removal becomes a critical issue in experimental protocols with significant inherent recording noise, such as mobile EEG recordings and concurrent EEG-fMRI acquisitions. In this paper, we proposed a unified framework based on canonical correlation analysis for artifact removal. Raw signals were reorganized to construct a pair of matrices, based on which sources were sought through maximizing autocorrelation. Those sources related to artifacts were then removed by setting them as zeros, and the remaining sources were used to reconstruct artifact-free EEG. Both simulated and real recorded data were utilized to assess the proposed framework. Qualitative and quantitative results showed that the proposed framework was effective to remove artifacts from EEG signal. Specifically, the proposed method outperformed independent component analysis method for mitigating motion-related artifacts and had advantages for removing gradient artifact compared to the classical method (average artifacts subtraction) and the state-of-the-art method (optimal basis set) in terms of the combination of performance and computational complexity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The brain is a complex system consisting of regions dedicated to different brain functions, and higher cognitive functions are realized via information flow between distant brain areas communicating with each other. As such, it is natural to shift towards brain network analysis from mapping of brain functions, for deeper understanding of the brain system. The graph theoretical network metrics measure global or local properties of network topology, but they do not provide any information about the intermediate scale of the network. Community structure analysis is a useful approach to investigate the mesoscale organization of brain network. However, the community detection schemes are yet to be established. In this paper, we propose a method to compare different community detection schemes for neuroimaging data from multiple subjects. To the best of our knowledge, our method is the first attempt to evaluate community detection from multiple-subject data without 'ground truth' community and any assumptions about the original network features. To show its feasibility, three community detection algorithms and three different brain atlases were examined using resting-state fMRI functional networks. As it is crucial to find a single group-based community structure as a representative for a group of subjects to allow discussion about brain areas and connections in different conditions on common ground, a number of community detection schemes based on different approaches have been proposed. A non-parametric permutation test on similarity between group-based community structures and individual community structures was used to determine which algorithm or atlas provided the best representative structure of the group. The Normalized Mutual Information (NMI) was computed to measure the similarity between the community structures. We also discuss further issues on community detection using the proposed method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Generally, the training evaluation methods consist in experts supervision and qualitative check of the operator's skills improvement by asking them to perform specific tasks and by verifying the final performance. The aim of this work is to find out if it is possible to obtain quantitative information about the degree of the learning process throughout the training period by analyzing neuro-physiological signals, such as the electroencephalogram, the electrocardiogram and the electrooculogram. In fact, it is well known that such signals correlate with a variety of cognitive processes, e.g. attention, information processing, and working memory. A group of 10 subjects have been asked to train daily with the NASA multi-attribute-task-battery. During such training period the neuro-physiological, behavioral and subjective data have been collected. In particular, the neuro-physiological signals have been recorded on the first (T1), on the third (T3) and on the last training day (T5), while the behavioral and subjective data have been collected every day. Finally, all these data have been compared for a complete overview of the learning process and its relations with the neuro-physiological parameters. It has been shown how the integration of brain activity, in the theta and alpha frequency bands, with the autonomic parameters of heart rate and eyeblink rate could be used as metric for the evaluation of the learning progress, as well as the final training level reached by the subjects, in terms of request of cognitive resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]