Search

This briefing addresses an urgent issue for engineering innovators, institutions and journals: how can the spread of infrastructure innovation for sustainability be speeded up? It discusses the challenges and the reasons why innovation can be hard and slow, and focuses on a key innovation sequence: doing the 'first use' project, and early reporting of it, which 'enables' the first copying of the idea - the 'first follower project'. This starts to validate the new idea for the sector. The briefing finishes with some suggested questions to be answered by a good report paper on a 'first use' case study; and calls for more such papers to be submitted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past few years, the Building Research Establishment environmental assessment method (Breeam) has increasingly been used for building projects in the UK. This presents design teams with numerous challenges, not the least of which is the need to manage and accommodate the Breeam requirements in their design. This paper examines the impact of the Breeam assessment process on the design of building projects in the UK using eight case studies. The main effects were found to be in the areas of building features, materials and water services. This impact varied from project to project depending on the building type, location, targeted/required Breeam rating, date of assessment and the assessor's role, as well as the team's knowledge of the assessment process. There were significant design changes in the cases aiming to achieve the highest Breeam rating. The results suggest in some cases that Breeam may limit design teams in their design by drawing their attention to achieving Breeam credits rather than the building in its entirety. For instance, Breeam tends to dictate design solutions rather than focusing on the intention - as an example, a designer may focus more on major leak detection than saving water. The paper also discusses potential incorporation of Breeam requirements into building regulations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Thames Tideway tunnel is a large sewer running up to 66 m below the tidal river Thames in London, UK. Its construction, started in 2016, was urgently needed to protect the tidal Thames from pollution due to the combined sewer overflows of untreated sewage that every year are spilled into the river. This paper reports on an exercise for evaluating the environmental impact associated with the construction process of the east section of the tunnel quantified by means of a life-cycle assessment, which not only primarily considered carbon dioxide emissions, but also took into account a wider series of impact categories. Operational and decommissioning impacts were not included. The results indicated the processes with the greatest effects on the environmental performance of the east sector construction and hence where alternatives on the design or materials used needed to be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over last 15 years it has been increasingly important to understand the sustainability performance of buildings across a broad range of considerations. This has stimulated the development of a number of sustainability assessment tools intended to measure objectively a project's impact in sustainability terms and so encourage designers and planners to improve a building's performance. This paper examines the nature and contribution, as well as the limitations, of current sustainability rating assessment tools in evaluating building sustainability in different countries. Two yardsticks are used to review the current tools: first, how well they relate to the goal of sustainable development, and second, how adequately they adhere to the principles of objective assessment. Scope for further development of sustainability assessment tools is identified - in particular, the need for tools to assess more adequately how buildings provide well-being, and to expand how assessment systems capture qualitative information. The paper proposes that methodology and procedures of assessment methods should feature the broad participation of user groups drawn from the public. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]