Search

Climate model evaluation work has made progress both in theory and practice, providing strong support for better understanding and predicting climate change. However, at the weather scale, there is relatively little assessment of climate models in terms of daily-scale climate phenomena, such as storm frequency and intensity. These weather-scale variables are of significant importance for our understanding of the impacts of climate change. In order to assess the capability of climate models to simulate weather-scale climate patterns, this study employs Self-Organizing Maps (SOMs) for weather pattern classification. By combining different evaluation metrics, varying the number of SOM types, changing the size of the study area, and altering the reference datasets, the climate models are evaluated to ensure the robustness of the assessment results. The results demonstrate that the size of the study area is positively correlated with observed differences, and there are correlations among different evaluation metrics. The highest correlation is observed between evaluation metrics in large-scale and small-scale spatial domains, while the correlation with SOM size is relatively low. This suggests that the choice of evaluation metrics has a minor impact on model ranking. Furthermore, when comparing the correlation coefficients calculated using the same evaluation metrics for different-sized regions, a significant positive correlation is observed. This indicates that variations in the size of the study area do not significantly affect model ranking. Further investigation of the relationship between model performance and different SOM sizes shows a significant positive correlation. The impact of dataset selection on model ranking is also compared, revealing high consistency. This enhances the reliability of model ranking. Taking into account the influence of evaluation metric selection, SOM size, and reanalysis data selection on model performance assessment, significant variations in model ranking are observed. Based on cumulative ranking, the top five models identified are ACCESS1-0, GISS-E2-R, GFDL-CM3, MIROC4h, and GFDL-ESM2M. In conclusion, factors such as evaluation metric selection, study area size, and SOM size should be considered when assessing model ranking. Weather pattern classification plays a crucial role in climate model evaluation, as it helps us better understand model performance in different weather systems, assess their ability to simulate extreme weather events, and improve the design and evaluation methods of model ensemble predictions. These findings are of great significance for optimizing and strengthening climate model evaluation methods and provide valuable insights for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using the self-organizing maps (SOM) method, we ranked and compared the simulation results of atmospheric circulation and precipitation for 32 global climate models (GCMs) in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) over China, and found that the ranking of the GCM's ability to simulate the frequency of sea level pressure (SLP) weather patterns (WPs) was not correlated with the ranking of its ability to simulate annual precipitation WPs. Then, we attributed the precipitation simulation differences and identified three main components for the differences in the multi-model simulation results: internal variability, frequency differences, and the combined term of the two, with internal variability being the largest of the three components. These three deviations depend ultimately on two factors: the ability to simulate the frequency of WPs and the ability to simulate the corresponding average daily precipitation generated by these WPs, with the second factor playing a decisive role. Then, to address the drawback that the model ensemble results cannot be effectively improved when each single model that makes up the ensemble model is dry or wet, a solution was proposed to correct for the simulation differences: the nodal precipitation differences of each WP were corrected. After the correction of the simulation differences, the simulation capability of all the individual models was greatly improved, which increases our confidence in using the CMIP5 models for future weather patterns and precipitation simulation and forecasting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Linking sinuosity, a fairly recently developed metric, with high temperature extremes (HTEs) can be both useful and insightful to better understand the physical mechanisms behind HTEs. However, it is not clear whether there exists a relationship between the sinuosity changes and HTE changes in present and future climate conditions over southeastern China. In this paper, the anomalous characteristics of the atmospheric circulation are quantified by sinuosity. Three sinuosity metrics are used in this study: individual sinuosity (SIN), aggregate sinuosity (ASIN), and comprehensive sinuosity (CSIN). Furthermore, we examine the relationship between sinuosity changes and HTE changes in present and future climate conditions. ASIN is strongly correlated with surface air temperature (SAT). We find that the influence of individual sinuosity (SIN) at different latitudes on the SAT of southeastern China is different. The SIN of low (middle) latitude isohypses has significant positive (negative) correlations with the SAT of southeastern China. The SIN of high-latitude isohypses is rather limited and can therefore be ignored. The projected relationship between the sinuosity changes and HTE changes in the late 21st century suggests similar results. The change in SAT is related to the changes in climate variables over southeastern China in the future, and these changes increase with the increase in Z500 or V850 and the decrease in U500. Moreover, the frequencies of large (small) comprehensive sinuosity (CSIN) values at low (mid) latitudes will increase. At the end of the 21st century, Z500 isohypses at different latitudes will have an obvious poleward shift. Our results indicate that measuring the aggregate waviness of the midtropospheric flow (via sinuosity) can provide insight regarding HTEs, and the climate model output can be used to examine the future likelihood of increased HTE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Extreme precipitation has often occurred in Southeastern China, while the possible mechanism is not clear. In order to bridge the scale gap between large-scale circulation and extreme precipitation, in this paper, the k-means clustering technique—a common method of weather-type (WT) analysis—was applied to regional 850-hPa wind fields. The reasonable determination of k values can make the later WT analyses more reliable. Thus, the Davies–Bouldin (BD) criterion index is used in the clustering process, and the optimal value of the k was determined. Then, we obtain and analyze the frequency, persistence, and progression of WTs. The rule of transitions from one WT to another may help explain some of the physical processes in winter. We found a special evolutionary chain (WT3→WT1→WT2→WT5→WT3) that can be used to explain the cold wave weather process in winter. Different WTs in the evolutionary chain correspond well to different stages of the cold wave weather process (gestation (WT3), outbreak (WT1), eastward withdrawal (WT2), and extinction (WT5)). In addition, we found that there are obvious differences in precipitation between December and February. After reassembling five kinds of WTs, two modes are formed: dry WTs and wet WTs. Our research shows that the intraseasonal variation of precipitation can be attributed to the fluctuation between the wet and dry WTs, and the different phases of teleconnection can correspond well with it. For example, the relative frequencies of wet WTs are higher in February. These WTs correspond to the positive phase of the WP and ENSO, the negative phase of the EA and EU, and the strong MJO state of the second, third, and eighth phase. Our work has well established the relationship between synoptic scale and large-scale circulation, which provides a reference for climate model simulation and future climate prediction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]