Search

Background: The goal of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide 2 (anti-CCP2) assay in patients with autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. Methods: We tested the specificity and sensitivity of anti-CCP2 antibodies measured by ELISA in 787 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 1024 patients with other autoimmune/inflammatory rheumatic disease and 401 subjects without autoimmune rheumatic disease. The optimal cut-off value was defined as the value with the highest diagnostic accuracy (receiver operating characteristic curve analysis). Interval-specific likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated for each range bounded by defined anti-CCP2 values. Results: To distinguish between patients with RA and controls, the cut-off value with the highest diagnostic accuracy for anti-CCP2 was 2.8 U/mL. Comparing the optimal cut-off value for anti-CCP2 to that recommended by the manufacturer (5.0 U/mL), an increase in prevalence between the proportions of test-positive patients was found for RA, undifferentiated connective tissue disease and undifferentiated arthritis. Evaluating interval-specific LRs for the selected ranges bound by two anti-CCP2 values, in RA and diseased controls, the LRs were 0.40 for values <5.0 U/mL, 6.66 for 5.0–15.0 U/mL, 27.01 for 15.1–30.0 U/mL and 28.89 for >30.0 U/mL. Conclusions: The cut-off value of 2.8 U/mL for anti-CCP2 has the highest diagnostic accuracy. A value of anti-CCP2 >15 U/mL is associated with an increase in the likelihood of RA disease. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:829–34. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion is the gold standard in the management of interstitial lung disease (ILD). The rheumatologist is not routinely involved in MDT, even if up to 20% of ILD are related to systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD). The study aims to assess the agreement and its variation over time between rheumatologists and pulmonologists in the screening of SARD and between rheumatologists and an MDT extended to rheumatologists (eMDT) in evaluating the progression of SARD. We computed the agreement between the pulmonologist and rheumatologist in the identification of red flags for SARDs of 81 ILD cases and between the rheumatologist alone and eMDT in the confirmation of 70 suspected SARD-ILD progressions. The agreement between rheumatologists and pulmonologists was moderate for the detection of autoimmunity test positivity (κ = 0.475, p < 0.001) and family history of SARD (κ = 0.491, p < 0.001) and fair for the identification of extrapulmonary symptoms (κ = 0.225, p = 0.064) or routine laboratory abnormalities consistent with SARD. The average agreement between the rheumatologist and eMDT in the identification of ILD progression was moderate (κ = 0.436, p < 0.001). The class of agreement improved from the first to the third semester. The average agreement with the rheumatologist ranged from fair to moderate, suggesting that a shared evaluation of SARD-ILD in eMDT could improve the diagnostic work-up and the evaluation of ILD progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]