Search

Abstract: There has been a resurgence of interest in forward osmosis (FO) as a potential means of desalination, dewatering and in pressure retarded osmosis, which Sidney Loeb was advocating over 3decades ago. This paper describes the characteristics and potential applications of a newly developed FO hollow fiber membrane, which was fabricated by interfacial polymerization on the inner surface of a polyethersulfone (PES) hollow fiber. This FO membrane presents excellent intrinsic separation properties, with a water flux of 42.6L/m2 h using 0.5M NaCl as the draw solution and DI water as the feed with the active layer facing the draw solution orientation at 23°C. The corresponding ratio of salt flux to water flux was only 0.094g/L, which is superior to all other FO membranes reported in the open literature. To evaluate different application scenarios, various NaCl solutions (500ppm (8.6mM), 1wt.% (0.17M) and 3.5wt.% (0.59M)) were used as the feed water to test the performance of the FO membrane. The membrane can achieve a water flux of 12.4L/m2 h with 3.5wt.% NaCl solution as the feed and 2M NaCl as the draw solution, suggesting it has good potential for seawater desalination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The emerging thin film composite (TFC) forward osmosis (FO) and pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) membranes generally have better separation properties compared with their cellulose triacetate (CTA) counterparts. Nevertheless, their scaling performance has been rarely reported. In the current study, the phenomenon of membrane integrity loss as a result of scaling is reported for the first time for osmotically driven membrane processes (ODMPs). The results show that the TFC membrane suffered marked flux reduction during the scaling in the active-layer-facing-feed-solution (AL-FS) orientation, accompanied with the severe damage of the membrane active layer. The membrane integrity loss is attributed to the scale formation and growth in the confined space between the membrane and the feed spacer. Compared with the CTA membrane, the TFC was more prone to scaling and membrane damage due to its unfavorable physiochemical properties (presence of Ca 2 + binding sites and ridge-and-valley roughness). Although antiscalant addition was shown to be effective for scaling control in AL-FS, it was ineffective in the active-layer-facing-draw-solution orientation. The current study reveals the critical need for scaling control in ODMP processes with respect to the membrane integrity and flux stability. The results also have far-reaching implications for FO and PRO membrane design and process operation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Polyamide thin film composite (TFC) membranes with tailored porous substrate and rejection layer are promising for forward osmosis (FO) applications. The current study investigates the effect of rejection layer synthesis conditions on the performance of the resulting TFC polyamide FO membranes. The influence of monomer concentrations (i.e., m-phenylenediamine (MPD) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC) concentrations) on the membrane separation properties as well as FO performance was systematically studied. A strong trade-off between the water permeability and salt rejection was observed, where increasing the TMC concentration or reducing the MPD concentration resulted in higher membrane permeability but lower salt rejection. In FO tests, membranes with poor salt rejection had severe solute reverse diffusion, which enhanced the internal concentration polarization (ICP). It was found that the FO water flux was governed by both the membrane water permeability and its solute rejection. For a membrane with higher water permeability but lower solute rejection, the reduced membrane frictional resistance was compensated by the simultaneously more severe solute-reverse-diffusion-induced ICP. The net effect on the FO water flux depends on the competition of these two opposing mechanisms. Under conditions where solute reverse diffusion may cause severe ICP (e.g., high draw solution concentration and high water flux level), membranes need be optimized to achieve a high salt rejection even if this is at the expense of lower water permeability. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]