Search

Identifying online users' contexts can help researchers understand their needs. However, the validity of different methods for identifying the location of online users has been underexplored. This paper proposes using multiple methods and examining their impact on different research questions to determine their validity. It then demonstrates this approach using data from six Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) by examining whether different methods produce different results regarding the relationship between SES and participation and engagement in MOOCs. We found that the choice of method impacted the estimated SES of the sample; IP geolocation placed participants in lower SES districts in comparison with their self-reported districts. Using all geolocation methods, we found that our MOOCs' learners tended to be located in high-SES districts, but the results were inconclusive regarding the relationship between SES and course engagement. Based on this case study, we suggest that using multiple methods produces more robust findings. However, when methods diverge in findings, researchers should consider which method is most suitable for their specific purposes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The relationship between pricing and learning behavior is an important topic in research on massive open online courses (MOOCs). We report on two case studies where cohorts of learners were offered coupons for free certificates to explore how price reductions might influence behavior in MOOC-based online learning settings. In Case Study 1, we compare participation and certification rates between courses with and without free-certificate coupons. In the courses with a free-certificate track, participants signed up for the verified- certificate track at higher rates, and completion rates among verified students were higher than in the paid- certificate track courses. In Case Study 2, we compare learner behavior within the same courses by whether they received access to a free-certificate track. Access to free certificates was associated with lower certification rates, but overall, certification rates remained high, particularly among those who viewed the courses. These findings suggest that some incentives, other than simply the cost of paying for a verified- certificate track, may motivate learners to complete MOOCs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Massive open online courses (MOOCs) attract diverse student bodies, and course forums could potentially be an opportunity for students with different political beliefs to engage with one another. We test whether this engagement actually takes place in two politically-themed MOOCs, on education policy and American government. We collect measures of students’ political ideology, and then observe student behavior in the course discussion boards. Contrary to the common expectation that online spaces often become echo chambers or ideological silos, we find that students in these two political courses hold diverse political beliefs, participate equitably in forum discussions, directly engage (through replies and upvotes) with students holding opposing beliefs, and converge on a shared language rather than talking past one another. Research that focuses on the civic mission of MOOCs helps ensure that open online learning engages the same breadth of purposes that higher education aspires to serve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are often characterized as remedies to educational disparities related to social class. Using data from 68 MOOCs offered by Harvard and MIT between 2012 and 2014, we found that course participants from the United States tended to live in more-affluent and better-educated neighborhoods than the average U.S. resident. Among those who did register for courses, students with greater socioeconomic resources were more likely to earn a certificate. Furthermore, these differences in MOOC access and completion were larger for adolescents and young adults, the traditional ages where people find on-ramps into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) coursework and careers. Our findings raise concerns that MOOCs and similar approaches to online learning can exacerbate rather than reduce disparities in educational outcomes related to socioeconomic status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the impact that massive open online courses (MOOC) has had on the education system. It states that MOOC has not disrupted existing education systems but instead is allowing universities to outsource internet-based master's degrees for professionals. It examines data from MOOCs taught on MOOC provider edX which found soon after enrollment, most MOOC registrants leave with 52 percent never entering the courseware. It talks about high student attrition in the first two weeks.

As massive open online courses (MOOCs) shift toward professional degree and certificate programs, can they become a global on-ramp for increasing access to emerging fields for underrepresented groups? This mixed-methods study addresses this question by examining one of the first MOOC-based blended professional degree programs, which admitted students to an accelerated residential master's program on the basis of performance in MOOCs and a proctored exam. We found that male students and students with master's degrees were more likely to complete the online program and the blended program had more male students and more students with master's degrees than students in the existing residential program. Students who enrolled in the blended graduate program earned higher average grades than students in the residential program earned in their in-person courses (3.86 vs 3.75, p <.01). The findings of this study provide an example of how new online learning models can serve particular niches, but may not address broader equity challenges. • Male students and students with master's degrees were more likely to successfully complete the online courses • Time and use of self-regulated learning strategies were key factors in being able to complete the online courses. • Male students and students with master's degrees were also more likely to use certain self-regulated learning strategies. • Blended participants performed better in their residential courses than those who were in the traditional residential program [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) came into the educational ecosystem attracting the attention of the public media, businesses, teachers, and learners from all over the world. The original courses were completely open and free, targeting the worldwide population. However, current MOOC providers have pivoted towards more private directions, and we often find that MOOC materials are completely closed within their hosting platforms and cannot be retrieved from them by their learners. This diminishes the potential of MOOCs by making content available to a small proportion of learners and severely limits the reusability of the educational resources. In this paper, we present a process that we call 'unMOOCing', in which we transform the resources of a MOOC into OERs. We taught a MOOC on Open Education in the UNED Abierta platform, and we 'unMOOCed' all of its educational resources, making them available to download by the learners that are taking the course. The results of the unMOOCing were very encouraging: the possibility of downloading the course resources was the most highly rated component of the course. Additionally, the two unMOOCed materials that were considered as most useful (presentations and contents in a PDF) were downloaded by 90% of the learners. Now that the majority of MOOC providers are moving towards a more closed educational approach, we believe that this paper sends a powerful message for bringing back the original MOOC concept of 'Openness' with the unMOOCing process, thus contributing to the wider dissemination and democratization of education across the globe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author discusses the use of and research about the effectiveness of Massive Open Online courses (MOOCs). Topics discussed include analysis of student clicks correlated with academic success to evaluate the instructional value of MOOCs, the lack of information and assessment data on student learning, and experimental designs of MOOC courses such as "A/B tests" and plug-in experiments.

The article discusses efforts to close global achievement gaps in free massive open online courses (MOOCs).

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) remarkably attracted global media attention, but the spotlight has been concentrated on a handful of English-language providers. While Coursera, edX, Udacity, and FutureLearn received most of the attention and scrutiny, an entirely new ecosystem of local MOOC providers was growing in parallel. This ecosystem is harder to study than the major players: they are spread around the world, have less staff devoted to maintaining research data, and operate in multiple languages with university and corporate regional partners. To better understand how online learning opportunities are expanding through this regional MOOC ecosystem, we created a research partnership among 15 different MOOC providers from nine countries. We gathered data from over eight million learners in six thousand MOOCs, and we conducted a large-scale survey with more than 10 thousand participants. From our analysis, we argue that these regional providers may be better positioned to meet the goals of expanding access to higher education in their regions than the better-known global providers. To make this claim we highlight three trends: first, regional providers attract a larger local population with more inclusive demographic profiles; second, students predominantly choose their courses based on topical interest, and regional providers do a better job at catering to those needs; and third, many students feel more at ease learning from institutions they already know and have references from. Our work raises the importance of local education in the global MOOC ecosystem, while calling for additional research and conversations across the diversity of MOOC providers. • MOOC research has understudied the role and trends of regional MOOC providers. • We perform a large-scale study with 15 different MOOC providers and more than eight million learners. • Regional MOOC providers attract larger local populations, with more inclusive demographic profiles. • Regional MOOC providers might be better positioned to fulfil learners' needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]