Search

This article examines the occurrence of liver complications in patients with myelofibrosis who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The study found that liver adverse events (AEs) were more common than expected, with 64% of patients experiencing liver AEs within the first 100 days after HSCT. The most common liver AEs were caused by the conditioning regimen. Risk factors for liver toxicity included worse performance status, higher comorbidity index, and higher prognostic scoring system score. The study also found that hyperbilirubinemia and hepatic graft-versus-host disease were associated with increased mortality. The text emphasizes the importance of monitoring liver complications in HSCT patients and suggests using imaging and biopsies to determine the cause and guide treatment. The study included various factors in the analysis and was approved by the appropriate ethics committee. [Extracted from the article]

• The DIPSS was not predictive of survival in myelofibrosis secondary to essential thrombocythemia or polycythemia vera after stem cell transplantation. • The MYSEC-PM predicted survival and showed improved prognostic ability. • Although performance of the MYSEC-PM was still moderate, risk stratification may be improved by incorporating clinical, mutational, and transplant-related factors. We aimed to validate the MYelofibrosis SECondary to PV and ET prognostic model (MYSEC-PM) in 159 patients with myelofibrosis secondary to polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry undergoing transplantation from matched siblings or unrelated donors. Furthermore, we aimed to test its prognostic performance in comparison with the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS). Score performance was analyzed using the concordance index (C): the probability that a patient who experienced an event had a higher risk score than a patient who did not (C >.5 suggesting predictive ability). Median follow-up of the total cohort was 41 months (range, 34 to 54), 45 months in post-PV and 38 months in post-ET myelofibrosis. Survival at 1, 2, and 4 years was 70% (95% CI, 63% to 77%), 61% (95% CI, 53% to 69%), and 52% (95% CI, 43% to 61%) for the total cohort; 70% (95% CI, 59% to 80%), 61% (95% CI, 49% to 73%), and 51% (95% CI, 38% to 64%) for post-PV; and 71% (95% CI, 61% to 81%), 61% (95% CI, 50% to 72%), and 54% (95% CI, 42% to 66%) for post-ET myelofibrosis (P =.78). Overall, the DIPSS was not significantly predictive of outcome (P =.28). With respect to the MYSEC-PM, overall survival at 4 years was 69% for the low-risk, 55% for the intermediate 1-risk, 47% for the intermediate 2-risk, and 22% (0% to 45%) for the high-risk groups. The prognostic model was predictive of survival overall (P =.05), whereas groups with intermediate 2 and high risk showed no significant difference (P =.44). Assessment of prognostic utility yielded a C-index of.575 (95% CI,.502 to.648) for the DIPSS, whereas assessment of the MYSEC-PM resulted in a C-statistics of.636 (95% CI,.563 to.708), indicating improvement in prediction of post-transplant survival using the new MYSEC-PM. In addition, transplantations from an unrelated donor in comparison with an HLA-identical sibling showed worse outcome (P =.04), and transplant recipients seropositive for cytomegalovirus in comparison with seronegative recipients (P =.01) showed worse survival. In conclusion, incorporating transplant-specific and clinical and mutational information together with the MYSEC-PM may enhance risk stratification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights • We performed a retrospective review of 56 myelofibrosis patients transplanted from mismatched family donors. • Neutrophil engraftment at a median of 20days was observed in 82%. • Low rates of acute GVHD grades II to IV were observed in 28% (16% to 40%) and grades III to IV in 9% (2% to 16%). • Chronic GVHD at 1 year was found in 45% (32% to 58%). • Overall survival at 2years was 56% (41% to 70%). Abstract This analysis included 56 myelofibrosis (MF) patients transplanted from family mismatched donor between 2009 and 2015 enrolled in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation database. The median age was 57years (range, 38 to 72); 75% had primary MF and 25% had secondary MF. JAK2 V617F was mutated in 61%. Donors were HLA mismatched at 2 or more loci. Stem cells were sourced from bone marrow in 66% and peripheral blood in 34%. The median CD34+ cell dose was 4.8 × 106/kg (range, 1.7 to 22.9; n = 43). Conditioning was predominantly myeloablative in 70% and reduced intensity in the remainder. Regimens were heterogeneous with thiotepa, busulfan, fludarabine, and post-transplant cyclophosphamide used in 59%. The incidence of neutrophil engraftment by 28days was 82% (range, 70% to 93%), at a median of 21days (range, 19 to 23). At 2years the cumulative incidence of primary graft failure was 9% (95% CI 1% to 16%) and secondary graft failure was 13% (95% CI 4% to 22%). The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II to IV and III to IV was 28% (95% CI 16% to 40%) and 9% (95% CI 2% to 17%) at 100days. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 1 year was 45% (95% CI 32% to 58%), but the cumulative incidence of death without chronic GVHD by 1 year was 20% (95% CI 10% to 31%). With a median follow-up of 32 months, the 1- and 2-year overall survival was 61% (95% CI 48% to 74%) and 56% (95% CI 41% to 70%), respectively. The 1- and 2- year progression-free survival was 58% (95% CI 45% to 71%) and 43% (95% CI 28% to 58%), respectively, with a 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse of 19% (95% CI 7% to 31%). The 2-year nonrelapse mortality was 38% (95% CI 24% to 51%). This retrospective study of MF allo-SCT using family mismatched donors demonstrated feasibility of the approach, timely neutrophil engraftment in over 80% of cases, and acceptable overall and progression-free survival rates with relapse rates not dissimilar to the unrelated donor setting. However, strategies to minimize the risk of graft failure and the relatively high nonrelapse mortality need to be used, ideally in a multicenter prospective fashion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]