Search

Background and Objective: Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP), caused by the anti‐programmed cell death‐1 (PD‐1)/programmed cell death ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) antibody, can be a fatal adverse event in cancer patients. However, no predictive biomarkers for CIP have been identified. Because high‐mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) can aggravate lung injury and potentially increase the immune response, it was investigated as a predictive blood marker. Methods: Blood samples, prospectively stored before anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 monotherapy between December 2015 and October 2020, were obtained at two university hospitals from 87 and 43 non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (discovery and validation cohorts, respectively). We retrospectively evaluated the association of serum HMGB1 levels with the incidence of CIP developed within 3 months of initiating anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 therapy. Results: CIP was observed in 9 (10.3%) and 6 (14.0%) patients in the discovery and validation cohorts, respectively. In each cohort, serum HMGB1 levels were significantly and reproducibly higher in patients with CIP. In the discovery cohort, an HMGB1 cut‐off level of 11.24 ng/ml was identified by receiver operating characteristic analysis. CIP incidence in the HMGB1high subgroup was significantly higher than that in the HMGB1low subgroup in the discovery (41.2% vs. 2.9%) and validation cohorts (36.4% vs. 6.3%). In an exploratory pooled analysis, three patients died of grade 5 CIP; a 19.29 ng/ml HMGB1 cut‐off level detected grade 5 CIP with 100% sensitivity and 96.85% specificity. Conclusion: Our results suggest that HMGB1 may be a potential blood marker to predict the development and severity of CIP in NSCLC patients. CIP incidence in the patients with high levels of serum HMGB1 (≥ 11.24 ng/ml) was significantly and reproducibly higher than in those with its low levels (< 11.24 ng/ml) in patients with NSCLC. Our results suggest that HMGB1 may be a potential blood marker for the prediction of CIP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is a pro-inflammatory protein associated with the pathophysiology of lung injury and lung tumorigenesis. Here, we investigated the predictive potential of serum HMGB1 levels for radiation pneumonitis in patients with lung cancer. Methods: This was a retrospective biomarker study of 73 patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive thoracic radiotherapy between August 2007 and January 2021. We measured HMGB1 levels in serum stored before treatment, and analyzed its association with the development of grade ≥ 2 or grade ≥ 3 radiation pneumonitis. Additionally, baseline characteristics affecting HMGB1 levels were identified. Results: Of the 73 patients, 21 (28.8%) and 6 (8.2%) patients experienced grade 2 and ≥ 3 radiation pneumonitis, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that higher baseline levels of serum HMGB1 were significantly associated with a higher risk of grade ≥ 3, but not grade ≥ 2, radiation pneumonitis. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 radiation pneumonitis was higher in patients with HMGB1 levels ≥ 6.2 ng/mL than in those with levels < 6.2 ng/mL (25.0% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.019). Baseline serum levels of HMGB1 were independently and positively associated with gross tumor volume. Conclusions: Higher serum HMGB1 levels were significantly associated with the risk of grade ≥ 3 radiation pneumonitis in patients with lung cancer, and therefore, HMGB1 could be a potential blood biomarker for predicting severe radiation pneumonitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Anti-programmed cell death receptor (PD)-1 antibody treatment results in better prognosis than standard chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially those with high PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. However, several studies have reported a lack of antitumor effect of PD-1 antibody, even in patients with high PD-L1 expression. Therefore, reliable predictors of treatment response are urgently needed. The albumin–globulin ratio (AGR) is associated with prognosis in several cancers. We aimed to determine whether AGR is a predictive biomarker of anti-PD-1 antibody response in patients with NSCLC. Patients and methods: Seventy-four NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1 antibody were retrospectively enrolled. Patients with driver mutations were excluded. Results: The mean AGR was significantly higher in the disease control (DC) group than in the progressive disease (PD) group (p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an AGR cutoff value for dividing patients into the DC or PD groups of 1.17. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a high AGR (≥1.17, cutoff value) was an independent predictor of DC (p = 0.001). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in the high-AGR group than in the low-AGR group (p = 0.008, p = 0.002, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis of PFS and OS showed that high AGR was an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.020, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Pretreatment serum AGR may be a useful predictor for DC and prognostic factor of anti-PD-1 antibody in patients with NSCLC. The clinical utility of AGR still needs to be confirmed in a prospective analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Osimertinib cannot be used for T790M-negative NSCLC after 1st/2nd generation EGFR-TKI. • This study was initiated at the request of a dedicated network for patients with lung cancer in Japan. • We demonstrated that osimertinib had modest antitumor activity against those patients. Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that is an established standard treatment option for chemotherapy-naive patients with EGFR mutation-positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, of such patients who have received prior treatment with a first- or second-generation EGFR TKI, only approximately half are eligible for osimertinib therapy because its indication as second-line treatment and beyond is limited to metastatic NSCLC that is positive for the T790M resistance mutation of the EGFR gene. This study was initiated at the request of a dedicated network for patients with lung cancer in Japan. We conducted a phase II study to assess the efficacy of osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC in whom systemic disease (T790M-negative) progressed after treatment with first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs and platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary end point was response rate (assessed by a central imaging reviewer). From August 2020 to February 2021, 55 patients from 15 institutions were enrolled in the study. The overall response for primary analysis was achieved in 16 patients (29.1 %; 95 % CI, 17.6–42.9), which exceeded the threshold response rate necessary for analysis. Stable disease was found in 16 patients (29.1 %), and progressive disease, in 18 (32.7 %). The median length of progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.07 months (95 % CI 2.10–4.30), and the rate of 12-month PFS was 17.3 %. Osimertinib demonstrated modest antitumor activity against progressive EGFR T790M-negative disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The incidence of central nervous system metastasis is known to be high among patients with lung cancer. The frequency of brain metastasis and carcinomatous meningitis during the entire clinical course of non-small cell lung cancer is reported to be about 40% and 5%, respectively. In contrast, the incidence of cranial nerve metastasis is extremely rare, and detailed reports of its clinical course remain limited. Herein, we report 2 patients diagnosed with cranial nerve metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma and treated with radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy. Both patients had cranial nerve symptoms, and brain magnetic resonance imaging showed cranial nerve enhancement. However, no evidence of carcinomatous meningitis was noted on magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid cytology. Based on these observations, these patients were diagnosed with cranial nerve metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy were performed in both cases. In both cases, neurological symptoms had not worsened and imaging findings did not indicate any deteriorations. Therefore, radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy should be considered when treating cranial nerve metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma. Early therapeutic intervention may lead to attenuation of the cranial nerve dysfunction resulting from cranial nerve metastasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine agent used for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although S-1 monotherapy has been reported to exhibit lesser hematotoxicity compared with other third-generation chemotherapeutics, digestive toxicity was also frequently observed. Alternate-day administration of S-1 has shown a lower rate of severe digestive toxicity than the daily standard administration in patients with NSCLC. However, the safety of alternate-day S-1 therapy in elderly patients aged 75 years or older has not been investigated. The present study was a multi-center and prospective feasibility study aimed to evaluate the safety of alternate-day S-1 therapy in elderly patients with NSCLC. The patients received S-1 orally twice daily for 4 days (Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday) every week until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety, which was evaluated as the number of grade ≥3 adverse events, and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), 1-year survival, and disease control rate (DCR). A total of 10 patients were enrolled, but 2 patients failed to initiate the treatment protocol. Finally, 8 patients were treated with the study protocol regimen. No grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed. Four (50%) and 1 (12.5%) patient had grade 2 or lower digestive symptoms such as anorexia, diarrhea, or stomatitis and grade 1 lacrimation, respectively. Moreover, 2 (25%), 1 (12.5%), and 1 (12.5%) patients had grade 2 renal dysfunction, grade 2 ileus, and elevated blood bilirubin, respectively. The median PFS was 1.5 months (95% confidence interval: 0.9–1.8), and the 1-year survival rate was 42.9%. The DCR was 12.5%. In conclusion, alternate-day S-1 administration can be a safe treatment regimen for elderly patients with NSCLC, but its therapeutic efficacy and safety for elderly patients with NSCLC should be compared against the standard S-1 administration in a large-scale study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]