Search

Considerable evidence indicates that patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at greater risk of developing atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Recent studies support the predictive ability of endothelial function measures for subsequent atherosclerotic events. We have investigated the effects of infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibody, on endothelial vasodilation, measured by brachial ultrasonography and on the levels of inflammatory biomarkers and adhesion molecules in ten consecutive patients with severe long-standing RA, despite methotrexate therapy, during the loading phase of infliximab therapy. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in RA patients at baseline was significantly impaired compared with healthy controls (7.71 ± 2.78% vs 14.91 ± 6.41%; p = 0.008) and improved significantly after infliximab infusion (12.63 ± 1.63% vs 7.71 ± 2.78%; p = 0.005). At baseline, a statistically significant correlation between C-reactive protein levels and FMD was found ( r = −0.69, p = 0.026). However, this improvement was transitory, as FMD values returned to baseline values before each infliximab infusion at weeks 2, 6 and 14. There were no significant differences in baseline brachial artery diameter between visits, although at each time, the diameter was increased. According to European League Against Rheumatism response criteria, all ten patients were good responders. No significant differences were observed in intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, vascular endothelial growth factor and E-selectin plasma levels before and after each infusions. This study demonstrates that endothelial dysfunction is a reversible phenomenon in RA. The addition of anti-TNFα treatment reduces inflammatory symptoms in patients with severe RA. The improvement of endothelial function during the loading phase of therapy is transitory, suggesting an enhanced and persistent TNF-α generation within the arterial wall. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion is the gold standard in the management of interstitial lung disease (ILD). The rheumatologist is not routinely involved in MDT, even if up to 20% of ILD are related to systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD). The study aims to assess the agreement and its variation over time between rheumatologists and pulmonologists in the screening of SARD and between rheumatologists and an MDT extended to rheumatologists (eMDT) in evaluating the progression of SARD. We computed the agreement between the pulmonologist and rheumatologist in the identification of red flags for SARDs of 81 ILD cases and between the rheumatologist alone and eMDT in the confirmation of 70 suspected SARD-ILD progressions. The agreement between rheumatologists and pulmonologists was moderate for the detection of autoimmunity test positivity (κ = 0.475, p < 0.001) and family history of SARD (κ = 0.491, p < 0.001) and fair for the identification of extrapulmonary symptoms (κ = 0.225, p = 0.064) or routine laboratory abnormalities consistent with SARD. The average agreement between the rheumatologist and eMDT in the identification of ILD progression was moderate (κ = 0.436, p < 0.001). The class of agreement improved from the first to the third semester. The average agreement with the rheumatologist ranged from fair to moderate, suggesting that a shared evaluation of SARD-ILD in eMDT could improve the diagnostic work-up and the evaluation of ILD progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]