Search

Introduction. High-resolution manometry (HRM) is one of the most notable recent advances in the field of esophageal function. In the absence of organic lesions, HRM provides measurements of esophageal function, identifies the pathology and guides the treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the HRM particularities of diagnosis, clinical features and therapeutic management in patients evaluated for esophageal motor dysfunction. Material and Methods. Our study included all patients suspected of esophageal motility disorders, admitted in our tertiary referral center in North-Eastern Romania between July 2022 and March 2023. Demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics were carefully collected from the patients' medical charts. All patients were investigated by upper digestive endoscopy and barium esophagogram prior to HRM. Patients diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis were excluded from the study. An ISOLAB HR® system from Standard Instruments, with a 36-pressure channels solid-state catheter was used. The HRM diagnosis of esophageal motor diseases was established based on Chicago 4 protocol and classification. Results. Out of the 38 patients included in the study, 15 (39.5%) were female and 23 (60.5%) male, with a mean age of 61.2±11.9. Regarding clinical features, the majority of patients presented with dysphagia (80.4%). Seven (18.4%) patients associated significant weight loss and 6 (15.8%) reported non-cardiac chest pain. Esophageal motility disorders were found in 29 patients (76.3%), 9 patients (23.6%) having a normal HRM aspect. Achalasia was identified in 15 patients (39.5%), with type I in 3 patients (7.9%), type II in 7 patients (18.4%) and type III in 5 patients (13.2%). Distal esophageal spasm was found in 4 patients (10.5%), hypercontractile esophagus in 2 patients (5.3%), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) in 2 patients (5.3%), ineffective esophageal motility in 1 patient (2.6%), absent contractility in 4 patients (10.5%) and dyshagia lusoria was identified in only one patient (2.6%). Regarding therapeutic management, endoscopic dilation was performed in 10 patients (26.3%) and 3 patients (7.8%) were referred to surgery. Conclusion. Esophageal HRM remains an important tool for assessing esophageal motor dysfunction. The esophageal motility disorders still represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction. High-resolution manometry (HRM) is one of the most notable recent advances in the field of esophageal function. In the absence of organic lesions, HRM provides measurements of esophageal function, identifies the pathology and guides the treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the HRM particularities of diagnosis, clinical features and therapeutic management in patients evaluated for esophageal motor dysfunction. Material and Methods. Our study included all patients suspected of esophageal motility disorders, admitted in our tertiary referral center in North-Eastern Romania between July 2022 and March 2023. Demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics were carefully collected from the patients' medical charts. All patients were investigated by upper digestive endoscopy and barium esophagogram prior to HRM. Patients diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis were excluded from the study. An ISOLAB HR® system from Standard Instruments, with a 36-pressure channels solid-state catheter was used. The HRM diagnosis of esophageal motor diseases was established based on Chicago 4 protocol and classification. Results. Out of the 38 patients included in the study, 15 (39.5%) were female and 23 (60.5%) male, with a mean age of 61.2±11.9. Regarding clinical features, the majority of patients presented with dysphagia (80.4%). Seven (18.4%) patients associated significant weight loss and 6 (15.8%) reported non-cardiac chest pain. Esophageal motility disorders were found in 29 patients (76.3%), 9 patients (23.6%) having a normal HRM aspect. Achalasia was identified in 15 patients (39.5%), with type I in 3 patients (7.9%), type II in 7 patients (18.4%) and type III in 5 patients (13.2%). Distal esophageal spasm was found in 4 patients (10.5%), hypercontractile esophagus in 2 patients (5.3%), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) in 2 patients (5.3%), ineffective esophageal motility in 1 patient (2.6%), absent contractility in 4 patients (10.5%) and dyshagia lusoria was identified in only one patient (2.6%). Regarding therapeutic management, endoscopic dilation was performed in 10 patients (26.3%) and 3 patients (7.8%) were referred to surgery. Conclusion. Esophageal HRM remains an important tool for assessing esophageal motor dysfunction. The esophageal motility disorders still represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]