Search

Objectives - To provide preliminary data on practice of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in a single center in Romania. Methods - We retrospectively reviewed the clinical files and CMR reports of patients who underwent stress perfusion CMR in our institution between January 2018 and December 2020. Results - A total of 1036 patients underwent CMR examinations during this period in our institution. Of these, 120 patients had stress perfusion CMR. The most common indication was the assessment of myocardial ischaemia in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD) (77 patients, 64.16%), with either a history of myocardial infarction or previous coronary revascularization, or with intermediate lesions on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The other indications consisted in detection of ischaemia in patients with suspected CAD (36 patients, 30%), characterization of the substrate of ventricular arrhythmia (5 patients, 4.16%) and assessment of the etiology of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (4 patients, 3.33%). All patients had vasodilator stress with adenosine and an adequate stress response was obtained in 113 patients (94.16%). There were 21 patients (18.58%) with an abnormal stress test and patients with intermediate lesions on ICA had the highest prevalence of positive reports (24.32%). Sixty-three patients had myocardial fibrosis (52.5%): 49 patients (40.83%) had subendocardial (ischaemic) scars, while 14 patients (11.66%) had non-ischaemic scars. There were no serious adverse events related to the procedure. Conclusions - This is the first report in Romania on the use of stress perfusion CMR in clinical practice. We report our experience on stress efficiency, acquisition protocol, artifacts, prevalence of positive tests and safety. Most stress CMRs were requested in patients with established CAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interferon alpha (IFN-α) is the approved standard of care for chronic hepatitis C and B. Unfortunately, it has neuropsychiatric side-effects that have a major impact upon the quality of life and the drug adherence. The mechanism of IFN-α-induced behavioral changes is complex, involving interactions between the immune system, the endocrine system, the monoaminergic systems and the opioid receptors. Recent studies support the neurodegeneration hypothesis as a possible mechanism of IFN-α-induced depressive behavior. Although a meta-analysis showed that antidepressant pretreatment effectively reduces the incidence and severity of depressive symptoms, irrespective of pre-existing psychiatric disorders, it is not approved for prophylactic use. The "on demand" treatment strategy is justified as the majority of patients have only mild depressive symptoms. Patients with risk factors for depression undergoing IFN-α therapy need to be regularly screened and followed-up by a psychiatric specialist. Further studies should be conducted to show which therapy is the most appropriate to reduce the neuropsychiatric symptoms that are related to the use of IFN-α and to investigate the clinical significance of IFN-α-induced neurodegeneration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To analyze the predictive value of new cardiovascular (CV) risk factors for CV risk assessment in the adult Romanian hypertensive (HT) population., Methods: Hypertensive adults aged between 40-65 years of age, identified in national representative SEPHAR II survey were evaluated by anthropometric, BP and arterial stiffness measurements: aortic pulse wave velocity (PWVao), aortic augmentation index (AIXao), revers time (RT) and central systolic blood pressure (SBPao), 12 lead ECGs and laboratory workup. Values above the 4th quartile of mean SBP' standard deviation (s.d.) defined increased BP variability. Log(TG/HDL-cholesterol) defined atherogenic index of plasma (AIP). Serum uric acid levels above 5.70 mg/dl for women and 7.0 mg/dl for males defined hyperuricemia (HUA). CV risk was assessed based on SCORE chart for high CV risk countries. Binary logistic regression using a stepwise likelihood ratio method (adjustments for major confounders and colliniarity analysis) was used in order to validate predictors of high and very high CV risk class., Results: The mean SBP value of the study group was 148.46±19.61 mmHg. Over forty percent of hypertensives had a high and very high CV risk. Predictors of high/very high CV risk category validated by regression analysis were: increased visit-to-visit BP variability (OR: 2.49; 95%CI: 1.67-3.73), PWVao (OR: 1.12; 95%CI: 1.02-1.22), RT (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93-0.98), SBPao (OR: 1.01; 95%CI: 1.01-1.03) and AIP (OR: 7.08; 95%CI: 3.91-12.82)., Conclusion: The results of our study suggests that the new CV risk factors such as increased BP variability, arterial stiffness indices and AIP are useful tools for a more accurate identification of hypertensives patients at high and very high CV risk.