Search

Background: Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultra-rare, vascular sarcoma with clinical presentation ranging from an indolent to an aggressive form. Over 50% of patients present with metastatic disease, requiring systemic therapy, although no systemic therapies are specifically approved for EHE. Retrospective evidence supports the activity of mTOR inhibitors (e.g. sirolimus), although available only off-label. EHE patients and advocates are therefore working to support approval of effective treatments by collecting data on patient perspectives and experiences. Materials and methods: In February 2023, the EHE Rare Cancer Charity (UK) and The EHE Foundation (US), with other advocates, conducted a survey of perspectives and experiences of EHE patients regarding the use and accessibility of sirolimus. The survey consisted of 20 questions designed for individuals undergoing treatment, those who had been treated, or had never been treated with the drug. Widely promoted within the patient community, the online survey categorized patients into three cohorts for the analysis: liver transplant patients, non-transplant patients who had ever taken sirolimus and sirolimus-naïve non-transplant patients. Results: The survey evaluated data from 129 patient responses from 21 countries, mostly from USA, UK, Australia, and Canada (70%). The liver transplant, sirolimus and non-sirolimus cohorts were 16%, 25% and 59%, respectively. In the sirolimus group 66% reported treatment durations exceeding one year, with 16% exceeding five years, indicating the drug's efficacy. In the non-sirolimus group, the drug was not available for 42% and for 11% sirolimus was available but not selected for treatment because of its off-label status. Overall, 87% of all patients across all cohorts expressed the importance of the drug's availability as hugely or very important. Conclusion: The survey responses highlight the activity of sirolimus for EHE and the importance of securing a label extension for the drug delivering equitable access to this treatment for patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: After a huge efficacy of imatinib in treating patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) was proven, a maximum effort was made to make a differential diagnosis between GISTs and gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas (GI‐LMS), showing the latter to be an extremely rare tumor entity. Limited data on GI‐LMS biology, clinical behavior and drug‐sensibility are available, and the clinical decision‐making in this subgroup of patients is usually challenging. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective observational study on patients with diagnosed GI‐LMS from 2004 to 2020 within six high‐volume referral centers in Italy. Results: Thirty‐three patients had diagnosis of KIT‐negative GI‐LMS confirmed by sarcoma‐expert pathologist. The most common site of origin was the intestine. Twenty‐two patients had localized disease and underwent surgery: with a median follow‐up of 72 months, median disease‐free survival was 42 months. Overall survival (OS)‐rate at 5 years was 73% and median OS was 193 months. Five out of 10 patients with local relapse received a salvage surgery, and 2/5 remained with no evidence of disease. Thirteen patients received neoadjuvant (6) or adjuvant (7) chemotherapy, and 2/13 patients remained free from relapse. The median OS for patients with metastatic LMS was 16.4 months. Conclusion: GI‐LMS is very rare and extremely aggressive subgroup of sarcomas with a high tendency to systemic spread. Localized GI‐LMS at diagnosis may be cured if treated with adequate surgery with or without (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy, while de‐novo metastatic disease appeared to have a poor prognosis. Clinical effort to understand GI‐LMS biology and clinical behavior and to develop active treatment strategy, especially for metastatic‐disease, is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We aimed to investigate changes in volume and MRI T2‐weighted intensity in desmoid‐type fibromatosis (DF) receiving methotrexate plus vinca‐alkaloids (MTX‐VA) at Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan. Methods: All cases of sporadic DF treated with MTX‐VA from 1999 to 2019 were reviewed. MRIs at baseline, 6 and 12 months of chemotherapy and at treatment withdrawal were retrospectively reviewed, contouring the tumor lesion and measuring diameters, volume, and mean T2‐signal intensity (normalized to muscle) changes. These parameters were also evaluated according to clinical variables. Results: Thirty‐two DF patients were identified. Best RECIST response was: 25% partial response, 69% stable disease, 6% progression. A ≥65% tumor volume reduction was observed in 38%, <65% reduction in 53%, an increase in 9%. 22% had RECIST stable disease with a ≥65% tumor volume reduction. T2‐signal intensity decreased by ≥50% in 47%, <50% in 41% and increased in 12%. In patients with symptomatic improvement while on therapy and in patients maintaining symptomatic improvement during follow‐up, median T2‐signal intensity showed a reduction along the time points (3.0, 1.9, 1.2, 1.1; 2.9, 2.0, 1.2, 1.2, respectively); in patients without symptomatic improvement and in those clinically progressing during follow‐up, a reduction was not observed. High T2‐signal intensity at baseline was observed in patients showing RECIST progression during follow‐up. Conclusions: In this series, RECIST detected a lower proportion of responses as compared to volumetric and T2‐signal changes. T2‐signal reduction seemed to better reflect symptomatic improvement. High T2‐signal intensity at baseline was related to a higher proportion of further progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to review the activity of cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) treated at nine European sarcoma reference centers. Materials and Methods: Patients of any age, with histologically proven IMT, treated with anthracycline‐based methotrexate plus/minus vinorelbine/vinblastine (MTX‐V) or other chemotherapeutic regimens between 1996 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Diagnosis was confirmed at the local level by an expert pathologist. Response was retrospectively assessed by local investigators by RECIST v1.1. Progression‐free survival (PFS), relapse‐free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were computed by Kaplan‐Meier method. Results: Thirty‐eight patients were included. Twenty‐five patients (8 localized, 17 advanced disease) received an anthracycline‐based regimen; 21 were evaluable for response. Overall response rate (ORR) was 10/21 (47.6%). At a 70.8‐month median follow‐up (FU), median RFS and median OS were not reached (NR) in patients with localized disease; median PFS and median OS were 6.3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.9–13.4) and 21.2 (IQR: 7.7–40.7) months in patients with advanced disease. Thirteen patients received MTX‐V (4 localized, 9 advanced disease), all evaluable for response. ORR was 7/13 (53.8%). At a 56.6‐month median FU, median RFS and median OS were 42.5 (IQR: 12.9–61.2) months and NR (no death events) in patients with localized disease, and NR (IQR: 24.9 to NR) and 83.4 months (IQR: 83.4 to NR) in patients with advanced disease. In the "other‐regimens group," responses were seen in 3/4 patients treated with oral cyclophosphamide and 1/2 with docetaxel/gemcitabine. Conclusion: Anthracycline‐based and MTX‐V regimens are very effective in IMT, with a similar ORR in both groups. MTX‐V achieved a prolonged disease control. Responses were also seen with oral cyclophosphamide and docetaxel/gemcitabine, but few patients were treated with these schedules. Implications for Practice: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is an ultrarare sarcoma with known sensitivity to anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors in ALK‐fused cases, although ALK inhibitors are not licensed in the disease. The current knowledge on the activity of cytotoxic chemotherapy is limited. This multi‐institutional retrospective study on pediatric and adult patients with IMT shows that cytotoxic chemotherapy, and in particular anthracycline‐based and methotrexate plus/minus vinorelbine/vinblastine regimens, represents a treatment option and can be considered in IMT patients irrespectively from ALK status. This study provides a benchmark for future studies on new medical therapies. This article reports on the activity of cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors, focusing on anthracycline‐based regimens, the front‐line standard treatment in sarcomas, and methotrexate and/or vinorelbine or vinblastine. Data available on other cytotoxic regimens are also reported. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although elderly patients (≥70 years) represent 30% of new diagnoses of soft tissue sarcoma (STS), they are underrepresented in clinical trials and are often unfit to receive standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Trabectedin is registered as a second-line treatment for advanced STS and is characterized by a favorable safety profile.Methods: The aim of this single-arm, phase 2 study was to investigate trabectedin (scheduled dose, 1.3-1.5 mg/m2 ) as a first-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced stage STS who are inoperable and are unfit to receive standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The coprimary endpoints were progression-free survival at 3 months (PFS3) and the rate of clinically limiting toxicities (CLTs). We also conducted an ancillary study on pharmacokinetics.Results: Twenty-four patients (12 men and 12 women) with a median age of 79 years (interquartile range [IQR], 74-83 years) were enrolled. The histological subtype was leiomyosarcoma in 46%, liposarcoma in 33%, and other histotypes in 21%. The median number of trabectedin courses was 4 (IQR, 3-6), with 7 patients (29%) receiving ≥6 cycles. Eight patients (33%) required dose reductions. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia in 9 patients (38%), fatigue in 5 patients (21%), and aminotransferase elevation in 5 patients (21%). PFS3, median PFS, and overall survival were 71% (80% CI, 57%-81%), 4 months, and 12 months, respectively. Ten patients (42% [80% CI, 28%-57%]) experienced CLTs. Trabectedin Cmax , half-life, clearance, and distribution volume were 1.28 ng/mL (standard deviation [SD], 0.58 ng/mL), 26.70 hours (SD, 9.09 hours), 39.98 L/h/m2 (SD, 14.08 L/h/m2 ), and 1460 L/m2 (SD, 561 L/m2 ), respectively.Conclusion: Trabectedin can be administered safely to elderly patients with STS who are unfit to receive anthracyclines. Pharmacokinetics in the elderly population was superimposable to historical data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a benign mesenchymal tumor arising from the synovium of tendon sheats and joints, driven by colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) over-expression. Standard treatment is surgery, but local recurrences are frequent, especially in diffuse TGCT subtype, rarely cured with surgery. When TGCT becomes a chronic condition, which may severely compromise joint function and quality of life, patients may need a systemic therapy. Areas covered: We reviewed the drugs on clinical development in TGCT, focusing on the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and toxicity profile of pexidartinib, the first drug approved in the US for TGCT, and on the open questions about its optimal use in clinical practice. CSFR1 inhibitors have opened a new avenue for treatment of TGCT patients. Pexidartinib is the first-in-class FDA approved agent for symptomatic locally advanced TGCT, based on a phase III study where pexidartinib showed high anti-tumor activity, improved patient symptoms, and functional outcome. A few cases of potentially life-threatening hepatic toxicity were observed. TGCT patients candidate to pexidartinib need to be carefully selected by the multidisciplinary board of center of expertise, balancing the expected risk-benefit ratio. Close monitoring of liver function and adequate education on the approved indication is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an osteolytic, locally aggressive, rarely metastazing bone tumor. This is a retrospective study evaluating a large series of GCTB patients treated with denosumab in routine practice in 6 European reference centers. Methods Patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic GCTB, treated with denosumab outside clinical trials were eligible. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients; secondary end-points were: type of surgery, relapse rate and event-free survival for patients after preoperative denosumab + surgery. Results We identified 138 patients treated in the period 2011–2016. In 40/43 cases the diagnosis was confirmed by H3F3A gene mutation. Median follow-up time was 23 months (range 6–48). Primary tumor was located in lower limb (38%) - mostly in femur and tibia, in upper limb (34%), and in pelvis/axial skeleton/ribs (28%). 110 (80%) patients had primary tumors, 28 (22%) recurrent tumors after previous surgical procedures (+/− radiotherapy). 89/138 patients had locally advanced GCTB and underwent neoadjuvant denosumab. The median denosumab treatment duration was 8 months (median number of cycles 11), 98% had clinical benefit from therapy. 39 (44%) had wide en-bloc resection - WE (+implantation of the prosthesis in 17 cases), the other 50 (56%) cases had intralesional curettage - C. Progression after surgical treatment was observed in 19 patients, 16 of them after C (32%); 13 patients underwent denosumab re-challenge, and all responded. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS; from denosumab start) rate was 81%; 2-year EventFS (from surgery) was significantly better in WE group (93%) vs 55% in C group (p = 0.006). Treatment was well tolerated with only 2 cases of grade 3 toxicity and one osteonecrosis of the jaw. Conclusion Our retrospective study confirms that denosumab is extremely efficient in unresectable/metastatic disease as well as in a neoadjuvant setting. Our data confirm excellent efficacy and short-term tolerability of this drug. Our data suggest that neoadjuvant therapy with denosumab is the option for treatment of initially locally advanced tumors to facilitate complete surgical resection or avoid mutilating surgery. The risk of recurrences after curettage of GCTB following denosumab raises questions about the optimal management of such cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose. Several studies have suggested that KRAS somatic mutations may predict resistance to cetuximab- and panitumumab-based treatments in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Nevertheless, most experiences were conducted on samples from primaries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the grade of concordance in terms of KRAS status between primaries and related metastases. Patients and Methods. We analyzed KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations from formalin-fixed sections of 107 CRC primaries and related metastases. Eight pairs were excluded from the analysis because of the low amount of tumor tissue in the available samples. The main characteristics were: 50 men, 49 women; median age at diagnosis, 71 years (range, 41-84). The metastatic sites analyzed were the liver in 80 patients (80.8%), lung in seven patients (7.1%), and other sites in 12 patients (12.1%). Results. A KRAS mutation was found in 38 (38.4%) primary tumors and in 36 (36.4%) related metastases. The rate of concordance was 96.0% (95% confidence interval, 90.0%-98.9%). Discordance was observed in only four (4%) patients. Conclusions. Our results indicate that the detection of KRAS mutations in either primary or metastatic tumors from patients with CRC is concordant and this assessment could be used to predict response to targeted therapies such as cetuximab and panitumumab. The Oncologist 2008;13:1270-1275 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This letter to the editor responds to questions about the results of the authors' recently reported study of chemotherapy in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the biological basis of pathogenesis and current research in extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC), together with the state of the art of treatment for localized and advanced disease. EMC is an ultra-rare sarcoma sub-type, more often arising from the soft tissues, marked by specific molecular features consisting in rearrangement of the NR4A3 gene, identified in recent years and very useful to distinguish EMC from other mimics. Available pharmacological treatments in particular are discussed, with a focus on the most recent results and future perspectives. Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC) is an ultra-rare mesenchymal neoplasm with uncertain differentiation, which arises mostly in the deep soft tissue of proximal extremities and limb girdles. EMC is marked by a translocation involving the NR4A3 gene, which can be fused in-frame with different partners, most often EWSR1 or TAF1. Although EMC biology is still poorly defined, recent studies have started shedding light on the specific contribution of NR4A3 chimeric proteins to EMC pathogenesis and clinical outcome. Standard treatment for localized disease is surgery, plus or minus radiation therapy with an expected prolonged survival even though the risk of relapse is about 50%. In advanced cases, besides the standard chemotherapy currently used for soft tissue sarcoma, antiangiogenic agents have recently shown promising activity. The aim of this review is to provide the state of the art of treatment for localized and advanced disease, with a focus on pharmacological treatments available for EMC. The biological basis of current research and future perspectives will be also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a rare, locally aggressive, mesenchymal tumor arising from the joints, bursa and tendon sheaths. TGCT comprises a nodular- and a diffuse-type, with the former exhibiting mostly indolent course and the latter a locally aggressive behavior. Although usually not life-threatening, TGCT may cause chronic pain and adversely impact function and quality of life (QoL). CSFR1 inhibitors are effective with benefit on symptoms and QoL but are not available in most countries. The degree of uncertainty in selecting the most appropriate therapy and the lack of guidelines on the clinical management of TGCT make the adoption of new treatments inconsistent across the world, with suboptimal outcomes for patients. A global consensus meeting was organized in June 2022, involving experts from several disciplines and patient representatives from SPAGN to define the best evidence-based practice for the optimal approach to TGCT and generate the recommendations presented herein., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: We surveyed the natural history of bone metastases in patients affected by soft tissue sarcoma (STS)., Methods: This multicenter retrospective observational study included 135 patients. Histological subtype, characteristics of bone metastases, treatment, skeletal related events (SREs) and disease outcome were recorded., Results: The most represented histological subtypes were leiomyosarcoma (27%) angiosarcoma (13%) and undifferentiated sarcoma (8%). Axial skeleton was the most common site for bone involvement (70%). In 27% of cases, bone metastases were present at the time of diagnosis. Fifty-four (40%) patients developed SREs and the median time to first SRE was 4 months (range 1-9). The most common SRE was the need for radiotherapy (28%) followed by pathological fracture (22%). Median survival after bone progression was 6 months (range 1-14). SREs were associated with decreased overall survival (OS) (P = 0.04). A subgroup analysis revealed that bisphosphonates significantly prolonged median time to first SRE (5 versus 2 months; P = 0.002) while they did not determine an improvement in OS, although a favourable trend was identified (median: 7 versus 5 months; P = 0.105)., Conclusions: This study illustrates the burden of bone disease from STS and supports the use of bisphosphonates in this setting.

Background and Aim: Translational data suggest that nucleoside transporters, in particular human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1), play an important role in predicting clinical outcome after gemcitabine chemotherapy for several types of cancer. The aim of this study was to retrospectively determine patients' outcome according to the expression of hENT1 in tumoral cells of patients receiving gemcitabine-based therapy., Materials and Methods: The immunohistochemistry analysis was performed on samples from thirty-one patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC) consecutively treated with first line gemcitabine-based regimens., Results: Positive hENT1 staining patients were 21 (67.7%); negative hENT1 staining patients were 10 (32.3%). Statistical analysis revealed no association between baseline characteristics, toxicities and tumor response to gemcitabine and hENT1 levels. In the univariate analysis, HENT1 expression was significantly correlated with time to progression (TTP) (p=0.0394; HR 2.902, 95%CI 1.053-7.996). The median TTP was 6.33 versus 2.83 months, respectively in patients with positive versus negative hENT1 staining. Moreover, patients with positive hENT1 expression showed a longer median overall survival when compared with patients with low hENT1 expression (14 versus 7 months, respectively), but this difference did not reach the statistical significance (p=0.128)., Conclusions: Therefore, hENT1 may be a relevant predictive marker of benefit from gemcitabine-based therapies in patients with advanced BTC.

Background: NF-kappaB is one of the nuclear effectors of EGFR activation. There are reports showing that NF-kappaB expression and activity is enhanced after nicotine treatment. Some data demonstrated that NF-kappaB activation plays a role in the induction of resistance to cetuximab and irinotecan in advanced colorectal tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cigarette smoking on cetuximab efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer patients., Methods: We retrospectively analysed the smoking habits of 200 patients treated with a variety of anticancer regimens containing cetuximab for advanced colorectal cancer. All patients were irinotecan-resistant and received an oxaliplatin-based first line treatment. We divided our patient population as follows: no previous smoking habit, previous smokers (any number of cigarettes), current smokers of less of 10 cigarettes/day, current smokers of more than 10 cigarettes/day., Results: Out of 200 patients 58 declared a history of cigarette smoking, 108 patients never smoked and the remaining 44 patients were cigarette smokers during cetuximab-based anticancer therapy. Of the 44 smokers, 18 smoked more than 10 cigarettes per day. No statistically significant differences in terms of response rate (RR) and time to progression (TTP) were identified between previous smokers and never smokers. RR in actual smokers was 13.6% and was lower than RR reported for non-smokers (27.1%; p = 0.023). In addition, the median TTP was 5.5 months in the non-smokers versus 2.8 months in the current smokers (p < 0.0001). A difference in terms of overall survival (OS) was detected between the two groups (p = 0.03). Comparing smokers of more than 10 cigarettes per day and smokers of less than 10 cigarettes per day no differences were detected in RR, TTP or OS., Conclusions: Our results suggest that cigarette smoking during anticancer treatment with a cetuximab-based regimen may be responsible for a decrease in RR and lead to a lower TTP.