Search

This paper presents a demonstrative application of a forward model-driven approach to structural health monitoring (SHM), incorporating hierarchical validation methods. A key tenet of the approach is that an SHM system can be constructed that is capable of diagnosing damage at the full system level, without full system damage-state data having been used in its development; achieving this would be highly impactful as the system-level damage state data is generally not feasible to acquire (previous SHM methods such as data-driven SHM have been hindered by their dependence on these data). This is achieved by carrying out validation activities on the damage model at the subassembly level of the structure. The particular focus of the present paper is on damage detection and assessment, although the approach offers a natural basis for extension to other damage identification activities such as damage location and prognosis. The present study focuses on two of the key elements of the model-driven approach: validation of the predictive substructure models and their application in the assembled model. The ideas discussed are demonstrated in a case study based on a laboratory-scale truss bridge structure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sensor placement optimization (SPO) is usually applied during the structural health monitoring sensor system design process to collect effective data. However, the failure of a sensor may significantly affect the expected performance of the entire system. Therefore, it is necessary to study the optimal sensor placement considering the possibility of sensor failure. In this article, the research focusses on an SPO giving a fail-safe sensor distribution, whose sub-distributions still have good performance. The performance of the fail-safe sensor distribution with multiple sensors placed in the same position will also be studied. The adopted data sets include the mode shapes and corresponding labels of structural states from a series of tests on a glider wing. A genetic algorithm is used to search for sensor deployments, and the partial results are validated by an exhaustive search. Two types of optimization objectives are investigated, one for modal identification and the other for damage identification. The results show that the proposed fail-safe sensor optimization method is beneficial for balancing the system performance before and after sensor failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Structural health monitoring (SHM) is often approached from a statistical pattern recognition or machine learning perspective with the aim of inferring the health state of a structure using data derived from a network of sensors placed upon it. In this paper, two SHM sensor placement optimisation (SPO) strategies that offer robustness to environmental effects are developed and evaluated. The two strategies both involve constructing an objective function (OF) based upon an established damage classification technique and an optimisation of sensor locations using a genetic algorithm (GA). The key difference between the two strategies explored here is in whether any sources of benign variation are deemed to be observable or not. The relative performances of both strategies are demonstrated using experimental data gathered from a glider wing tested in an environmental chamber, with the structure tested in different health states across a series of controlled temperatures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]