Search

The comparator can be described as one of the basic building blocks in electronics. It is implemented both as a discrete device and as a constituent of a complex circuit. In both cases, the circuits usually operate in conditions, where useful and unwanted (noise) signals are present at the same time. In order to maintain the validity of output data, a hysteresis parameter is introduced to the comparator's circuit. This article presents the results of a CMOS comparator with hysteresis design -- the schematic, topology and simulation results are analyzed. The designed comparator is implemented in a zero voltage offset compensation circuit ADC in a multi-standard transceiver IC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, two LC Voltage-Controlled Oscillators (LC-LCVCO1 and LC-VCO2) are designed using TSMC 65 nm LP/MS/ RF CMOS technology. Two arrays, one of which is a 6-bit capacitor array and the other -- an array of MOS varactors, provide a wide LC-VCO frequency tuning range. Post-layout simulation results unveiled that at 1.8 V supply voltage the tuning range of LC-VCO1 spans from 5.17 GHz to 6.76 GHz and for LC-VCO2 the range spans from 6.33 GHz to 8.08 GHz. The phase noise at 1 MHz offset frequency is about -123.1 dBc/Hz for LC-VCO1 and -121.6 dBc/Hz for LC-VCO2. The power dissipation at maximum carrier is 30.47 mW for LC-VCO1 and 30.5 mW for LC-VCO2. The layout area is 285x335 μm and 255x305 μm, respectively for LC-VCO1 and LC-VCO2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Development of 5G networks requires a substantial increase to both spectral and power efficiency of transmitters. It is known that these two parameters are subjected to a mutual trade-off. To increase the linearity without losing power efficiency, linearization techniques are applied to power amplifiers. This paper aims to compare most popular linearization techniques to date and evaluate their applicability to upcoming 5G networks. The history of each respective linearization technique is followed by the main principle of operation, revealing advantages and disadvantages supported by concluding the latest research results. Three main groups of linearization methods currently known are feedforward, feedback, and predistortion, each with its own tradeoffs. Although digital predistortion seems to be the go-to method currently, other techniques with less research attention are still non-obsolete. A generalized discussion and a direct comparison of techniques analyzed are presented at the end of this paper. The article offers a systematic view on PA linearization problems which should be useful to researchers of this field. It is concluded that there are still a lot of problems that need to be addressed in every linearization technique in order to achieve 5G specifications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]