Search

The plot-level decisions of land managers (i.e., farmers, ranchers, and forest owners) influence landscape-scale environmental outcomes for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. The impacts of their decisions often develop in complex, non-additive ways that unfold over time and space. Behavioral science offers insights into ways decision-makers manage complexity, uncertainty, choice over time, and social influence. We review such insights to understand the plot-level conservation actions of farmers that impact biodiversity. To make these connections concrete, we provide a case study of the decision to adopt biodiversity management practices in the heavily cultivated region of the Central Valley, California, USA. We use results from a survey of 122 farmers in the region to test whether adoption is related to farm tenure arrangements or peer influence. We find farmers who are more sensitive to peer influence are three times more likely to adopt practices that support biodiversity, including wildflowers, native grasses, cover crops, hedgerows, and wetlands. This relationship could have important implications for how plot-level decisions aggregate to landscape-scale outcomes. Finally, we suggest priorities for future research and program design to integrate behavioral science into biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes. By considering land managers' plot-level conservation decisions with the lens of behavioral science, we identify barriers and opportunities to promote environmental benefits.

Human activities are degrading ecosystems worldwide, posing existential threats for biodiversity and humankind. Slowing and reversing this degradation will require profound and widespread changes to human behaviour. Behavioural scientists are therefore well placed to contribute intellectual leadership in this area. This Perspective aims to stimulate a marked increase in the amount and breadth of behavioural research addressing this challenge. First, we describe the importance of the biodiversity crisis for human and non-human prosperity and the central role of human behaviour in reversing this decline. Next, we discuss key gaps in our understanding of how to achieve behaviour change for biodiversity conservation and suggest how to identify key behaviour changes and actors capable of improving biodiversity outcomes. Finally, we outline the core components for building a robust evidence base and suggest priority research questions for behavioural scientists to explore in opening a new frontier of behavioural science for the benefit of nature and human wellbeing.

We argue that the existence of species as distinct and relatively homogeneous groupings of individuals is a consequence of the nonlinear dynamics inherent in sexual reproduction. This approach provides an answer to two interrelated problems which Darwin posed and tried to solve. Why are there missing links (i.e. gaps) between species in habitat space, and why are there missing links between species in time as evidenced in the fossil record? A crucial difference between outcrossing sexual organisms (i.e. organisms in which mating is between different individuals) and obligate selfers or parthenogens lies in the dynamic of the underlying replication process. Replication is a linear function of density for obligate selfers or parthenogens but nonlinear for outcrossing sexuals. The non-linearity stems from the simple fact that with outcrossing, two individuals must come together to mate. We argue that this fact leads to density dependent fitness (per capita rate of increase) with an intrinsic disadvantage of low population density. This cost of rarity results in a distribution of distinct species. By establishing the causal connections in evolution between outcrossing sex and the very existence of species as distinct collections of organisms, our account lends theoretical support to a unitary concept of species with interbreeding as the fundamental defining property.

We have argued that sexual reproduction arose very early in the evolution of life as a way of overcoming informational damage or loss through recombinational repair. As organisms became more complex and genome information content expanded, diploidy, at first transient, became the predominant way of coping with increased vulnerability to mutation. This allowed further genome expansion. Once such expansion had occurred, however, diploidy became essentially irreversible, since reversion to haploidy would lead to expression of accumulated deleterious recessive alleles. This expression of recessive alleles also imposes a stiff penalty on organisms that experiment with close inbreeding forms of recombinational repair. A consequence of sex is that fitness (defined as per capita rate of increase) is density dependent. At low population density, fitness declines due to increased costs of finding a mate. This fundamental constraint on population increase can inhibit evolutionary success of the best adapted species if it is small in numbers. Sexual reproduction also tends to eliminate new coadapted genotypes within a species by breaking up their coadapted gene complexes; this also contributes to the cohesion of species. In general, we think the existence of species and their characteristic cohesion and stability over time are direct consequences of sex; and sex in turn is a consequence of the need to overcome gene damage through recombinational repair while at the same time masking the deleterious effects of mutation.

The two fundamental aspects of sexual reproduction, recombination and outcrossing, appear to be maintained respectively by the advantages of recombinational repair and genetic complementation. Genetic variation is produced as a by-product of recombinational repair, but it may not be the function of sexual reproduction.

The competitive advantage of sex consists in being able to use redundancy to recover lost genetic information while minimizing the cost of redundancy. We show that the major selective forces acting early in evolution lead to RNA protocells in which each protocell contains one genome, since this maximizes the growth rate. However, damages to the RNA which block replication and failure of segregation make it advantageous to fuse periodically with another protocell to restore reproductive ability. This early, simple form of genetic recovery is similar to that occurring in extant segmented single stranded RNA viruses. As duplex DNA became the predominant form of the genetic material, the mechanism of genetic recovery evolved into the more complex process of recombinational repair, found today in a range of species. We thus conclude that sexual reproduction arose early in the evolution of life and has had a continuous evolutionary history. We cite reasons to reject arguments for gaps in the evolutionary sequence of sexual reproduction based on the presumed absence of sex in the cyanobacteria. Concerning the maintenance of the sexual cycle among current organisms, we take care to distinguish between the recombinational and outbreeding aspects of the sexual cycle. We argue that recombination, whether it be in outbreeding organisms, self-fertilizing organisms or automictic parthenogens, is maintained by the advantages of recombinational repair. We also discuss the role of DNA repair in maintaining the outbreeding aspects of the sexual cycle.