Search

Your search keyword '"Ferrè, F"' showing total 156 results
Start Over Author "Ferrè, F" Publication Type Academic Journals
156 results on '"Ferrè, F"'

5. Multicentre, prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial comparing different non-opioid analgesic combinations with morphine for postoperative analgesia: the OCTOPUS study

Author

Bedague, D., Blanié, A., Casez, M., Chanques, G., Chaize, C., Dessertaine, G., Ferré, F., Gaide Chevronnay, L., Hébrard, A., Hespel, A., Jaber, S., de Jong, A., Lahjaouzi, A., Marino, M.R., Moury, P.H., Neau, A.C., Protar, D., Rhem, D., Rineau, E., Robin, S., Rossignol, E., Soucemarianadin, M., Veaceslav, S., Beloeil, H., Albaladejo, P., Sion, A., Durand, M., Martinez, V., Lasocki, S., Futier, E., Verzili, D., Minville, V., Fessenmeyer, C., Belbachir, A., Aubrun, F., Renault, A., and Bellissant, E.

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. A multicentre observational study on management of general anaesthesia in elderly patients at high-risk of postoperative adverse outcomes

Author

Bruder, N., Vaisse, C., Bechis, C., Bernard, L., Leone, M., Poirier, M., Vincent, A., Abdelkrim, N., Paugam, C., Lion, F., Montravers, P., Langeron, O., Raux, M., Baussier, M., Xu, K., Bart, F., Dagois, S., Plaud, B., Rabuel, C., Roland, E., Biais, M., Nouette-Gaulain, K., Cabart, A., Hanouz, J.L., Lambert, C., Godet, T., Thibault, S., Bouhemad, B., Chambade, E., Bouzat, P., Garot, M., Lebuffe, G., Lallemant, F., Lemery, C., Tavernier, B., de Jong, A., Jaber, S., Verzilli, D., Delannoy, M., Meistelman, C., Carles, M., Tran, L., Bertran, S., Cuvillon, P., Ripart, J., Simon-Pene, S., Boisson, M., Debaene, B., Beloeil, H., Godet, G., Collange, O., Mertes, P.M., Diemunsch, P., Joganah, D., Oehlkern, L., Baulieu, M., Beauchesne, B., Beraud, A.M., Berthier-Berrada, S., Bien, J.Y., Dupont, G., Gavory, J., Lambert, P., Lanoiselée, J., Zufferey, P., Ferré, F., Martin, C., Minville, V., Planté, B., Baffeleuf, B., Ben Abdelkarim, M., David, J.S., Incagnoli, P., Khaled, M., Laplace, M.C., Lefevre, M., Piriou, V., Aubrun, F., Cero, V., Delsuc, C., Faulcon, C., Meuret, P., Rimmelé, T., Truc, C., Molliex, Serge, Passot, Sylvie, Morel, Jerome, Futier, Emmanuel, Lefrant, Jean Yves, Constantin, Jean Michel, Le Manach, Yannick, and Pereira, Bruno

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

26. PROMs in post-mastectomy care: Patient self-reports (BREAST-Q™) as a powerful instrument to personalize medical services.

Author

Ghilli, M., Mariniello, M.D., Camilleri, V., Murante, A.M., Ferrè, F., Colizzi, L., Gennaro, M., Caligo, M.A., Scatena, C., Del Re, M., Nuti, S., Caramella, D., and Roncella, M.

Subjects
MEDICAL equipment, PATIENT reported outcome measures, MAMMAPLASTY, ESOPHAGECTOMY, POSTOPERATIVE period, PATIENT satisfaction
Abstract

One of the goals of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is to satisfy the patient's outcome. Recent studies therefore tended to focus on the patient's perception of the care and on the impact on quality of life using patients-reported-outcome-measures (PROMs), able to measure the health status directly without the clinician's interposition. We present a preliminary prospective study on 333 patients who underwent mastectomy with IBR in a two-year period, in a single Italian centre, using a dedicated PROMs, the BREAST-Q™, to determine the patient's satisfaction. We studied two groups of IBR: Group A (two-step with tissue-expander) and Group B (one-step: prosthesis/mesh) and conducted a pre- and post-operative comparison for each group to evaluate score-gain over time, and a group-score comparison to determine whether differences were significant between reconstruction types. Two-hundred-and-nine were actually enrolled and 132 completed all the questionnaires. The response rate was 62.8% and the compliance rate (completion of all the questionnaires) was 63.1%. In both groups all the analyzed domains worsened comparing the pre and post-operative period; the differences were statistically significant only for physical and sexual-wellbeing. In the comparison between the two groups, none of the detected differences reached the statistical significance. According to our experience, we can state that PROMs could improve the health concept redefining the variables to be monitored even if data is still insufficient to draw any definitive conclusion. PROMs can help surgeons and patients decide the most appropriate surgery for a particular patient-profile and to identify those who require further support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

39. Improving Provision of Preanesthetic Information Through Use of the Digital Conversational Agent 'MyAnesth': Prospective Observational Trial

Author

Ferré, Fabrice, Boeschlin, Nicolas, Bastiani, Bruno, Castel, Adeline, Ferrier, Anne, Bosch, Laetitia, Muscari, Fabrice, Kurrek, Matt, Fourcade, Olivier, Piau, Antoine, and Minville, Vincent

Subjects
Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics, R858-859.7, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
Abstract

BackgroundDue to time limitations, the preanesthetic consultation (PAC) is not the best time for patients to integrate information specific to their perioperative care pathway. ObjectiveThe main objectives of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness of a digital companion on patients' knowledge of anesthesia and their satisfaction after real-life implementation. MethodsWe conducted a prospective, monocentric, comparative study using a before-and-after design. In phase 1, a 9-item self-reported anesthesia knowledge test (Delphi method) was administered to patients before and after their PAC (control group: PAC group). In phase 2, the study was repeated immediately after the implementation of a digital conversational agent, MyAnesth (@+PAC group). Patients’ satisfaction and their representations for anesthesia were also assessed using a Likert scale and the Abric method of hierarchized evocation. ResultsA total of 600 tests were distributed; 205 patients and 98 patients were included in the PAC group and @+PAC group, respectively. Demographic characteristics and mean scores on the 9-point preinformation test (PAC group: 4.2 points, 95% CI 3.9-4.4; @+PAC: 4.3 points, 95% CI 4-4.7; P=.37) were similar in the two groups. The mean score after receiving information was better in the @+PAC group than in the PAC group (6.1 points, 95% CI 5.8-6.4 points versus 5.2 points, 95% CI 5.0-5.4 points, respectively; P

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results