Search

Geriatric psychosocial problems are prevalent and significantly affect the physical health and overall well-being of older adults. Geriatrics fellows require psychosocial education, and yet to date, geriatrics fellowship programs have not developed a comprehensive geriatric psychosocial curriculum. Fellowship programs in the New York tristate area collaboratively created the New York Metropolitan Area Consortium to Strengthen Psychosocial Programming in Geriatrics Fellowships in 2007 to address this shortfall. The goal of the Consortium is to develop model educational programs for geriatrics fellows that highlight psychosocial issues affecting elder care, share interinstitutional resources, and energize fellowship program directors and faculty. In 2008, 2009, and 2010, Consortium faculty collaboratively designed and implemented a psychosocial educational conference for geriatrics fellows. Cumulative participation at the conferences included 146 geriatrics fellows from 20 academic institutions taught by interdisciplinary Consortium faculty. Formal evaluations from the participants indicated that the conference: a) positively affected fellows' knowledge of, interest in, and comfort with psychosocial issues; b) would have a positive impact on the quality of care provided to older patients; and c) encouraged valuable interactions with fellows and faculty from other institutions. The Consortium, as an educational model for psychosocial learning, has a positive impact on geriatrics fellowship training and may be replicable in other localities. (Contains 1 figure and 2 tables.)

This article reviews the literature and presents some new preliminary findings on physician-older patient communication about psychosocial issues in primary care medical visits. The authors examine the importance of psychosocial talk in medical encounters, the barriers to these discussions, and the prevalence and specific content of psychosocial discussions in primary care medical encounters. The research suggests that the preponderance of talk in the medical encounter is biomedical, with little attention to psychosocial topics. The differential attention to the biomedical sphere may be more common and more problematic with the elderly. A research agenda in three areas is proposed. Investigations are needed on: (a) the determinants, outcomes, and nature of physician-older patient communication about psychosocial issues; (b) the psychosocial factors that are problematic in older patients' lives and have relevance for their medical care; and (c) the psychosocial issues that arise when the older patient is sick or disabled.

This paper reviews the conceptual frameworks of several research approaches to the study of medical interactions. Two methods are discussed: process analysis and microanalysis. Adapted from Robert Bales's study of the behavior of small groups, process analysis sorts and tallies such interviewing processes as questioning and informing, achieving analysis of large numbers of interviews at the expense of attention to the content or context of the interview. When used in medical interaction research, process analysis seeks correlation between processes documented in the interview and outcomes of the interview. The method of conversation analysts and discourse analysts, microanalyses subject medical conversations to close linguistic study and contextualization. This review focuses on the underlying assumptions, generalizability of findings, and the types of subjective judgment applied by the methods. It then describes the Multi-Dimensional Interaction Analysis (MDIA) system, a linguistic analytic instrument that combines features of process analysis and microanalysis to capture content, process, and context of medical conversations. The MDIA's validity and reliability are reported and implications for future research are outlined.

There has been extensive research on the factors associated with patient satisfaction with communication during medical encounters, however, little attention has been paid to satisfaction among subgroups of patients, including the elderly. It is inappropriate to assume that all patients have the same physician-patient relationship needs, and thus, they will all be satisfied with the same communication approaches during medical visits. In this study, we examine the interactional correlates of older patient satisfaction with an initial visit with a general internist. A multidisciplinary team composed of social scientists and physicians used the Multi-dimensional Interaction Analysis system to code audiotapes. Patients and physicians completed post-visit satisfaction questionnaires. Older patient satisfaction was positively correlated with the following variables: physician questioning and supportiveness on patient-raised topics; patient information-giving on patient-raised topics; the length of the visit; the physician's use of questions worded in the negative; shared laughter between the physician and the patient; and physician satisfaction. These findings suggest that older patients prefer encounters in which: (1) there is physician supportiveness and shared laughter; (2) they are questioned about and given an opportunity to provide information on their own agenda items; and (3) physicians provide some structure for the first meeting through their use of questions worded in the negative. The authors caution that although this sample of older patients appears to be satisfied with a communication style usually considered characteristic of the traditional model of the physician-patient relationship (i.e. a warm interpersonal style and physician-generated structure for the visit), older patients in other settings and future cohorts of elderly patients may prefer other communication approaches. It is also suggested that aspects of communication which provide satisfaction to patients in first visits may be different than aspects of communication associated with patient satisfaction in follow-up visits.

To examine the content of physician-elderly patient medical primary care encounters, audiotapes of 66 routine follow-up general medical visits were analyzed. Using the Multi-dimensional Interaction Analysis system, coders determined which content areas were discussed, which interactive participant initiated the discussion, and the quality of physician responsiveness in the different content areas. As hypothesized, physicians initiated discussion of the majority of subjects. Both physicians and patients were most likely to initiate discussion of medical topics. Physicians were more responsive to those topics that they initiated compared to the topics that older patients initiated. Implications of the research for physicians and elderly patients are discussed.

Using a newly developed coding method, the Geriatric Interaction Analysis system, the interactions of doctors with a matched sample of older and younger patients were audiotaped and scored. Patients and doctors raised fewer psychosocial issues in interviews with older patients than with younger patients. Doctors also responded less well to these issues when elderly patients raised them. (Author)

Examined agreements between physicians and patients on major goals and topics discussed during outpatient medical visit. Found concordance to be significantly greater for younger patients and their physicians than for older patients and their physicians on major goals and major medical topics discussed during primary care interview. (Author/NB)

Objective: Iatrophobia - fear of doctors, medical care, or the medical care system - is common among patients and can negatively impact their health-seeking behaviors and relationships with health care professionals. Despite this, academic literature on iatrophobia often fails to explore its nuanced causes.Methods: We establish a conceptual framework of iatrophobia, categorizing sources of fear that may create barriers to accessing medical care, and recommend a research agenda to address this phenomenon and understand its role in medical care.Results: The framework includes three categories of determinants of iatrophobia: patient fear of illness and the medical exam, patient fear of physician reaction, and patient fear related to barriers to care. These categories represent influences from individual to more system-related factors associated with the physician-patient relationship. Research examining iatrophobia should focus on understanding its prevalence, how patients cope with their fear, discussing iatrophobia in the physician-patient encounter, the sociopolitical contribution to iatrophobia, and how iatrophobia can be reduced.Conclusions: Iatrophobia can be categorized into three primary domains, but it remains poorly understood.Practice Implications: A more thorough understanding of iatrophobia will help to contextualize its role amid other barriers to care and patient health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary care physicians are the first medical contact for most patients with early-stage dementia. However, little is known about older patients' desire for discussions about cognitive problems or the frequency of discussions about cognitive status during primary care visits. To investigate this question, older patients and accompanying individuals were interviewed separately following the first visit with a primary care physician in an outpatient geriatric medical practice. Patients indicated that memory was discussed in 62 percent of visits. When memory was not discussed, almost one-third of patients stated that they would have wanted to discuss it. Physicians were more likely than patients to initiate discussions about memory. Patient factors, including age, gender, the presence o fan accompanying individual number of diagnoses, and the patient's statement that cognitive function was a main goal of the visit, were examined as predictors of the likelihood of discussion of memory during the first visit. Patients who identified discussing cognitive function as a goal of the visit were more likely to have a discussion about memory than those who did not. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancer is frequently a disease of older individuals. Communication between physicians and older patients about cancer prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment and care is complicated by a variety of factors including patients’ beliefs, perceptions, and knowledge about cancer. In addition, other older patient factors such as possible sensory deficits, cognitive impairment, functional limitations and accompaniment by significant others to the medical encounter influence communication. Physicians’ attitudes about aging may also affect recommendations for cancer screening, treatment regiments and care of older cancer patients. To understand communication as a complex, multidimensional human enterprise requires knowledge of older patients’ lived experience of cancer and their need for honest and compassionate care. Research findings on physician–older patient communication about cancer need to be translated into medical education, training and practice to improve the care of the older cancer patient. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

One characteristic which distinguishes the physician-geriatric patient medical encounter is that often the elderly patient is accompanied to the visit by a third person. Discussed is the literature on the physician-elderly patient-companion triad and proposed is a conceptual framework and methodological approach for understanding the third person's presence during the geriatric visit. Then, an agenda for both clinical and social science research is suggested. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Examines the perception of older patients and families on the medical information in the emergency department. Level of medical information obtained by the patients and family members; Failure of patients to raise complaints on the lack of medical information; Demand of family members for more medical information.

Examines the dimensions of physician support to older patients in medical encounters. Keys to the establishment of physician-older patient relationship; Promotion of an understanding on the role of human and interpersonal aspects of medical care play in the lives of older patients; Symmetry of the physician-older patient relationship.

This cross-sectional observational study examined the frequency of older patient-physician discussions about exercise, who initiates discussions, and the quality of questioning, informing, and support about exercise. The study used a convenience sample of 396 follow-up visits at 3 community-based practice sites, with 376 community-dwelling older patients and 43 primary-care physicians. Audiotapes were analyzed using the Multi-Dimensional Interaction Analysis coding system. Results demonstrate that exercise was discussed in 13% of visits and the subject was raised equally by patients and physicians. Exercise was significantly more likely to be discussed in dyadic visits (14.7%) than in triadic visits (4.1%). Patient level of education, patient overall physical health, and the physician's being female were significant predictors of the occurrence of exercise discussion. Given the importance of exercise for maintaining health and independence in older adults, more clinical and research attention is needed to address barriers to effective discussions in this area.