Search

Abstract Background Glioblastoma is a highly malignant disease with limited treatment options. Ibrutinib, a covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is an oral agent with manageable side effects used for hematological diseases including Waldenström macroglobulinemia. We present the case of a 69-year-old Caucasian male patient treated with ibrutinib for suspected Bing–Neel syndrome (BNS), which following a biopsy, was reclassified as glioblastoma. Case presentation In December 2018, a 69-year-old Caucasian male patient was diagnosed with Waldenström macroglobulinemia. As the patient was asymptomatic, without bone marrow failure or high M-component count, watchful waiting was initiated. Due to increasing neurological symptoms, the patient, based on magnetic resonance imaging, was diagnosed with Bing–Neel syndrome in May 2019. The patient received different treatments before starting ibrutinib monotherapy in August 2019 due to disease progression, both on magnetic resonance imaging and clinically. The patient remained clinically stable for 7 months. In March 2020, the patient developed headaches, and both magnetic resonance imaging and a biopsy revealed glioblastoma IDH-wildtype. Treatment was changed in line with the new diagnosis, but the patient died at the end of 2020. Conclusion We present a case in which a patient with glioblastoma IDH-wildtype remained clinically stable for 7 months when treated with ibrutinib monotherapy, which is similar to what would be expected for the standard treatment for glioblastoma. To our knowledge, this is the first patient receiving ibrutinib for a glioblastoma IDH-wildtype with a meaningful clinical outcome. Our case may therefore support previous nonclinical findings, indicating a therapeutic value of ibrutinib in patients with glioblastoma and support for further investigation of ibrutinib as a possible treatment for glioblastoma.

Abstract Background Multiple myeloma often presents with vague and non-specific symptoms. Many patients are diagnosed in unplanned rather than elective (planned) diagnostic pathways. This study investigates the diagnosis of multiple myeloma in unplanned pathways and the association with patient characteristics, disease profile, and survival. Methods We conducted a nationwide register-based study, including all patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma in Denmark in 2014–2018. Patients were categorised as diagnosed in an unplanned pathway if registered with an acute admission within 30 days prior to the multiple myeloma diagnosis and no other previously registered pathway to this diagnosis. Unplanned pathways were compared to all other pathways combined. Results We included 2,213 patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma, hereof 32% diagnosed in an unplanned pathway. Comorbidity, no prior cancer diagnosis, a history of few visits to the general practitioner (GP), multiple myeloma complications at diagnosis, high-risk cytogenetics, and advanced cancer stage were associated with a higher probability of being diagnosed in an unplanned pathway. For example, 24.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 21.8–27.0) of patients with low comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score 0) were diagnosed in an unplanned pathway as were 50.9% (95% CI: 45.6–56.1) of patients with high comorbidity (CCI score 3+). For patients with dialysis need at the time of diagnosis the probability was 66.0% (95% CI 54.2–77.8) and 30.9% (95% CI: 28.9–32.9) for patients with no dialysis need. Patients diagnosed in an unplanned pathway had inferior survival (hazard ratio 1.44 (95% CI: 1.26–1.64)). However, this association was not seen in analyses restricted to patients surviving for more than three years. Conclusions High comorbidity level, few usual GP visits, advanced disease status at diagnosis, and complications were associated with diagnosis in an unplanned pathway. Further, patients diagnosed in an unplanned pathway had inferior survival. Promoting earlier diagnosis and preventing unplanned pathways may help improve survival in multiple myeloma.

Abstract Background The objective of this randomized placebo-controlled study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of clarithromycin in combination with bortezomib–cyclophosphamide–dexamethasone (VCD) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma eligible for high-dose therapy. Methods Patients were randomized to receive tablet clarithromycin 500 mg or matching placebo tablet twice daily during the first 3 cycles of VCD induction therapy. Primary endpoint was to compare the rate of very good partial response (VGPR) or better response after three cycles of VCD combined with clarithromycin or placebo. Results The study was prematurely stopped for safety reasons after the inclusion of 58 patients (36% of the planned study population). The patients were randomly assigned to clarithromycin (n = 27) or placebo (n = 31). VGPR or better response after the VCD induction therapy was obtained in 12 patients (44.4%, 95% CI 25.5–64.7) and in 16 patients (51.6%, 33.1–69.8) (p = 0.59) in the clarithromycin group and the placebo group, respectively. Seven patients (25.9%) in the clarithromycin group developed severe gastrointestinal complications (≥ grade 3) comprising pain, neutropenic enterocolitis, paralytic ileus or peptic ulcer. These complications occurred in only one patient in the placebo group. Septicemia with Gram negative bacteria was observed in 5 patients in the clarithromycin group in contrast to one case of pneumococcal septicemia in the placebo group. Patient-reported QoL were negatively affected in the clarithromycin group compared to the placebo group. Conclusion The study was prematurely stopped due to serious adverse events, in particular serious gastrointestinal complications and septicemia. The response data do not suggest any effect of clarithromycin when added to the VCD regimen. The combination of clarithromycin and bortezomib containing regimens is toxic and do not seem to offer extra anti-myeloma efficacy. Trial registration EudraCT (no. 2014-002187-32, registered 7 October 2014, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2014-002187-32/DK) and ClinicalTrials.gov (no NCT02573935, retrospectively registered 12 October 2015, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02573935?term=Gregersen&cntry=DK&rank=9)

Abstract Chemerin is a recently discovered adipokine shown to be involved in both inflammatory and metabolic processes. Here, we demonstrate that chemerin serum levels are elevated in patients with multiple myeloma and that it increases with disease progression. We found that chemerin is expressed by stromal cells and preadipocytes, whereas its receptor CCRL2 is expressed by primary myeloma cells, suggesting a paracrine signaling loop between bone marrow stromal cells/adipocytes and myeloma cells. This is the first study exploring chemerin and its receptors in multiple myeloma.