Search

Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been demonstrated to be a good alternative to surgery for treating severe aortic stenosis (AS) across the whole range of surgical risk patients. Whereas most periprocedural TAVR complications have significantly decreased over time, conduction disturbances remain high. Approaches to decrease this shortcoming are under continuous investigation. Areas covered: Overview of the actual evidence regarding conduction disturbances in the TAVR setting, focusing on modifiable factors. PubMed and Embase databases were used for literature search. Expert opinion: Several factors have been associated with an increased risk of conduction disturbances post-TAVR, and some of them may be modifiable. While some transcatheter valve systems have been associated with higher rates of conduction disturbances, additional randomized data are needed to draw definite conclusions about newer generation transcatheter valve systems. Nowadays, good hemodynamic valve function can be obtained without excessive valve oversizing, which has been associated with an increased risk of conduction disturbances in some studies. Also, contemporary data regarding valve implantation depth and new anatomical landmarks such as membranous septum length have provided valuable insights for procedural planning. Finally, homogenization of the management of conduction abnormalities post-TAVR should be emphasized to allow a better understanding and generalization of available evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Transcatheter aortic replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the treatment of aortic stenosis during the last years. Despite improvements in transcatheter heart valve systems, the rate of conduction disturbances after TAVR, particularly new-onset left bundle branch block (new-onset LBBB), has not decreased over time. Areas covered: Overview of the current data regarding new-onset LBBB post-TAVR focusing on clinical outcomes. Expertopinion: New-onset LBBB remains the most common complication after TAVR, occurring in 6–77% of cases with the use of newer generation transcatheter valve systems. The most consistent factor determining new-onset LBBB post-TAVR has been prosthesis implantation depth. The potential evolution to high degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) and the chronic effect on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may impact the clinical outcomes in this subset of patients. New-onset LBBB has been associated with an increased risk of PPM after TAVR. Conversely, inconsistent results have been reported regarding the impact of LBBB on hospitalization for heart failure and mortality. Current data do not support an indication for 'prophylactic' PPM in all new-onset LBBB patients. However, a specific subset of patients (those with either a very long PR or wide QRS) may benefit from a PPM to prevent HAVB or sudden death. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis and intermediate-to-high surgical risk. The increasing clinical experience along with technical and design iterations of transcatheter valve systems have contributed to reducing adverse events and improving clinical outcomes. Areas covered: Overview of the latest generation transcatheter heart valves (THVs), focusing on early safety and efficacy outcomes. Expert commentary: Improvements in valve repositionability, reducing the size of valve delivery systems, and antiparavalvular leak iterations have contributed to improving the safety and clinical outcomes following TAVR. However, while certain complications like major vascular events and residual paravalvular leaks have significantly decreased with the arrival of newer generation THVs, no major changes in thromboembolic events (particularly stroke) have been observed, whereas other complications like conduction disturbances requiring pacemaker implantation have slightly increased over time. Also, no major progress on device retrievability has been observed in the last years. The expansion of TAVR toward the treatment of younger and lower risk patients, as well as newer indications (e.g. asymptomatic patients) will likely require an extra-effort involving additional device iterations and complementary therapies (e.g. embolic protection, newer vascular closure devices) to further improve safety and clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite the widespread use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to guide structural cardiac interventions, studies evaluating safety in this context are lacking.Objectives: This study sought to determine the incidence, types of complications, and factors associated with esophageal or gastric lesions following TEE manipulation during structural cardiac interventions.Methods: This was a prospective study including 50 patients undergoing structural cardiac interventions in which TEE played a central role in guiding the procedure (mitral and tricuspid valve repair, left atrial appendage closure, and paravalvular leak closure). An esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was performed before and immediately after the procedure to look for new injuries that might have arisen during the course of the intervention. Patients were divided in 2 cohorts according to the type of injury: complex lesions (intramural hematoma, mucosal laceration) and minor lesions (petechiae, ecchymosis). The factors associated with an increased risk of complications were assessed.Results: Post-procedural EGD showed a new injury in 86% (n = 43 of 50) of patients, with complex lesions accounting for 40% (n = 20 of 50) of cases. Patients with complex lesions presented more frequently with an abnormal baseline EGD (70% vs. 37%; p = 0.04) and had a higher incidence of post-procedural dysphagia or odynophagia (40% vs. 10%; p = 0.02). Independent factors associated with an increased risk of complex lesions were a longer procedural time under TEE manipulation (for each 10-min increment in imaging time, odds ratio: 1.27; 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 1.59) and poor or suboptimal image quality (odds ratio: 4.93; 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 22.02).Conclusions: Most patients undergoing structural cardiac interventions showed some form of injury associated with TEE, with longer procedural time and poor or suboptimal image quality determining an increased risk. Imaging experts performing this technique should be aware of the nature of potential complications, to take the necessary precautions to prevent their occurrence and facilitate early diagnosis and treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

About one-half of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) candidates have coronary artery disease (CAD), and controversial results have been reported regarding the effect of the presence and severity of CAD on clinical outcomes post-TAVR. In addition to coronary angiography, promising data has been recently reported on both the use of computed tomography angiography and the functional invasive assessment of coronary lesions in the work-up pre-TAVR. While waiting for the results of ongoing randomized trials, percutaneous revascularization of significant coronary lesions has been the routine strategy in TAVR candidates with CAD. Also, scarce data exists on the incidence, characteristics, and management of coronary events post-TAVR, and increasing interest exist on potential coronary access challenges in patients requiring coronary angiography/intervention post-TAVR. This review provides an updated overview of the current landscape of CAD in TAVR recipients, focusing on its prevalence, clinical impact, pre- and post-procedural evaluation and management, unresolved issues and future perspectives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been shown to be a good alternative to surgery for treating severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) across the whole range of surgical risk patients. Whereas most periprocedural TAVR complications have significantly decreased over time, conduction disturbances remain high. Approaches to decrease this shortcoming are under continuous investigation., Methods: We conducted a systematic review focusing on modifiable factors impacting post-TAVR conduction disturbances, such as balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV), type of new-generation transcatheter valve and implantation depth (ID). Search strategies were based on the best available evidence from each study. Primary endpoints were post-TAVR need of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) and new onset left bundle branch block (NOLBBB)., Results: Data from 35 studies with a total of 29,982 patients were analyzed. BAV did not negatively impact PPI rates after TAVR. In propensity-matched and randomized trials, the Evolut R valve was associated with higher rates of PPI compared to the Sapien 3 valve (25% vs. 19.2% in propensity-matched studies; 22.9% vs. 19% in a randomized trial). The Acurate Neo valve was associated with the lowest PPI rate in observational studies (10.4%), but a PPI rate similar to Sapien 3 was reported in a randomized trial (10% vs. 9%). The Portico valve system was associated with a higher PPI risk (PPI rate of 21.9% and 27.7% in propensity-matched and randomized studies, respectively). ID and its relation with the membranous septum (MS) length predicted post-TAVR conduction disturbances, particularly with Evolut R and Sapien 3 valves., Conclusions: Pre-TAVR BAV did not increase the risk of conduction disturbances post-TAVR. Among the new-generation transcatheter valve systems, Sapien 3 and Acurate Neo valves were associated with the lowest PPI rates followed by the Evolut and Portico valves. A deeper valve implantation and a shorter MS length determined an increased risk of conduction disturbances post-TAVR., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: AA, GMC, DDV and LJ have been supported by grants from Martin Escudero foundation. JRC has received Institutional research grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic and Boston Scientific. LF has received grants from Institut Servier; and has received research grants from Biotronik, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed., (2020 Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the position of balloon-expandable valves in relation to the coronary ostia using an angiographic- and computed tomography (CT)-based analysis, and to determine the impact of valve position on coronary angiography (CA)/percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) feasibility and results., Methods: A total of 533 patients who received a Sapien XT or Sapien 3 valve were included in the angiographic analysis. Of these, 49 benefited from an opportunistic electrocardiography-gated CT after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and were included in the CT analysis., Results: Regarding the left coronary artery (LCA) ostium, the top of the transcatheter heart valve (THV) frame was infraostial in 49% of cases, and the valve totally covered the LCA ostium in 27% of patients. The stent frame of the Sapien 3 valve completely covered the LCA ostium more frequently than the Sapien XT valve (43% vs 12%, respectively; P<.001) and the relative implantation depth was significantly less ventricular in the Sapien 3 group than in the Sapien XT group (28.0 ± 12.3% vs 36.8 ± 12.6%, respectively; P<.001). The CT evaluation found similar results to angiographic evaluation. A total of 53 patients (10%) underwent CA (± PCI) following TAVR, and valve position did not influence CA performance/quality and PCI results., Conclusions: The stent frame of balloon-expandable Sapien valves exceeded the coronary ostia in about one-fourth of patients, and this percentage was >40% with the new-generation Sapien 3 valve. However, THV position did not affect the feasibility, quality, and results of CA/PCI post TAVR.

Objectives: We sought to assess the position of the CoreValve Evolut R/Pro (Medtronic) with respect to the left coronary artery (LCA) ostium and evaluate the impact of implantation depth on this relationship., Methods: One hundred consecutive patients who received an Evolut R/Pro valve and had an adequate angiography following valve implantation were included. Angiographic measurements included valve implantation depth, the position of the Evolut R/Pro with respect to the LCA, and the distance between the neo-valve cusp and the LCA ostium. Coronary access issues following TAVR were also recorded., Results: Regarding the LCA ostium, the neo-valve of the Evolut R/Pro was supraostial, at the ostial level, and infraostial in 3%, 12%, and 85% of cases, respectively. When beneath the LCA ostium, the mean distance between the neo-valve and the floor of the LCA ostium was 4.1 ± 5.2 mm. An implantation depth ≤6 mm was associated with a higher rate of neo-valve at the ostial level or above (25% vs 4% for implantation depth >6 mm; P=.01). Accessing the coronary arteries was required in 10% of the patients at 12 ± 8 months post TAVR, and selective coronary angiography of the left and right coronary arteries was achieved in 60% and 40% of the cases, respectively., Conclusions: The Evolut R/Pro neo-valve was positioned below the LCA ostium in the vast majority of cases (85%), but an implantation depth ≤6mm was associated with a higher rate of neo-valve positioning at or above the coronary ostia level. Considering the current tendency of very high (aortic) valve implants to avoid conduction disturbances, future studies should determine the impact of high Evolut R/Pro positioning on coronary access issues post TAVR.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a relatively new technology that has grown exponentially over the past decade. Although it was initially restricted to elderly patients at very high or prohibitive surgical risk, it is currently being evaluated as a treatment option in younger and lower risk patients. The increasing experience of the Heart Teams, along with the continued refinement of transcatheter valve technology has resulted in TAVR achieving results comparable to those of surgery for treating intermediate-risk patients. Furthermore, promising preliminary results have been obtained from observational and propensity matched studies in low risk patients, and a small randomized trial showed the non-inferiority of TAVR vs. SAVR regarding early and late (up to 6 years) outcomes. Three ongoing randomized trials will provide the definite response about the safety and efficacy of TAVR for treating low risk patients with severe aortic stenosis in the near future. The (expected) positive results of these studies would establish the basis for TAVR as the preferred treatment for the majority of patients with aortic stenosis. However, continuous research efforts for better determining valve durability among TAVR recipients, as well as reducing some of the genuine and frequent complications of TAVR (e.g. conduction disturbances) are important in this final effort for making TAVR the default treatment for aortic stenosis.