Search

Background: While representing the largest fraction of women diagnosed with primary breast cancer, older postmenopausal women with ER+, HER2-- tumors are less responsive to chemoendocrine therapy than younger women and have been underrepresented in molecular profiling of randomized trials. IBCSG Trial IX, a randomized controlled trial in postmenopausal women, median age 61y, with node negative disease, failed to demonstrate the benefit of preceding tamoxifen (T) by 3 cycles of CMF for ER+ tumors. We sought to determine if MS, a proliferation score, could identify a subset of women who differentially benefit from addition of chemotherapy to T in this trial. Methods: From 1988-1999, 1669 eligible patients (1040 with ER+, HER2-- tumors) were randomized to CMF ->T vs T. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary trial endpoint; breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) which excludes second (non-breast) malignancies and censors deaths without prior cancer event was also evaluated. Analysis was limited to the first 7 years of follow-up. From 671 (ER+, HER2--) available subjects, 568 were successfully profiled by RT-PCR. The mRNA expression levels of 14 equally-weighted proliferation genes and 3 normalization genes were used to generate MS; predetermined binary categorization of MS was used. Analysis of this post hoc, pre-specified study used results from centralized laboratory IHC and Cox models to assess the predictive value of MS on DFS and BCFI, adjusting for traditional risk factors of local treatment, age, ER, PR, Ki67, tumor size and grade. Results: Subgroups of MS (low, 169 samples (30%) and high, 399 samples (70%)) were identified. MS by treatment interaction was significant for DFS and BCFI (each p ≤ 0.004). Among patients with low MS, CMF -> T improved DFS (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06-0.59) and BCFI (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.72) vs T; 7y DFS was 95% vs 83% with CMF -> T vs T. Among patients with high MS, CMF T did not improve DFS (HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.79-2.05) or BCFI (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.80-2.33) and 7y DFS of 81% for CMF T and T. Continuous MS was moderately correlated with log Ki67 (r = 0.47) but not correlated with ER or PR. The MS by treatment interaction remained significant with Ki67 in the model. Conclusions: Low MS was associated with differential benefit favoring those women receiving CMF -> T vs T alone for both DFS and BCFI in the first 7 years. The effect was independent of traditional risk factors including Ki67. Hence this study, which is unconfounded by chemotherapy-induced ovarian ablation in younger women, identifies a subset of postmenopausal women with ER+, HER2- tumors that benefit from CMF chemotherapy. This seemingly incongruous observation is consistent with a) the prior observation that only the lowproliferation subgroup by PAM50 11-gene signature benefits from the addition of weekly paclitaxel to adjuvant FEC (GEICAM/9906), b) the ability of MS to identify a subset of women with tumors with disseminated luminal progenitor cells activated through the agonistic activity of tamoxifen, and c) the repetitive dosing of cyclophosphamide and taxol being hypothesized to act via tumor stroma/anti-angiogenesis. The relative contribution of these factors is under investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The ETOP 10-16 BOOSTER study was a randomized phase II trial of osimertinib and bevacizumab therapy versus osimertinib therapy in patients with an acquired EGFR T790M mutation. The mechanisms of acquired resistance to osimertinib and bevacizumab have not been described previously., Experimental Design: Next-generation sequencing (Guardant360) was conducted in serial plasma samples. The association between ctDNA and efficacy outcomes was explored, and molecular alterations at progression were described., Results: A total of 136 patients (88% of 155 randomized) had plasma samples at baseline (68 per arm), 110 (71%) at week 9, and 65 (42%) at progression. In a multivariable model for progression-free survival (PFS), the treatment effect was found to differ by smoking status (interaction P = 0.046), with the effect of smoking also differing by baseline EGFR T790M (interaction P = 0.033), whereas both TP53 at baseline and the tissue EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation were significantly associated with worse PFS outcome. Smokers (current/former) without baseline EGFR T790M showed a significant improvement in PFS under combination treatment, albeit with small numbers (P = 0.015). Week-9 EGFR T790M clearance was associated with improved PFS in the osimertinib arm (P = 0.0097). Acquired EGFR C797S mutations were detected in 22% and 13% of patients in the combination and osimertinib arms, respectively., Conclusions: The differential effect of treatment by smoking was not explained by TP53 mutations or other molecular alterations examined. Molecular mechanisms of acquired resistance were detected, but no novel molecular alterations were identified in the combination arm., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Importance: Adjuvant ovarian function suppression (OFS) with oral endocrine therapy improves outcomes for premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer but adds adverse effects. A genomic biomarker for selecting patients most likely to benefit from OFS-based treatment is lacking., Objective: To assess the predictive and prognostic performance of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI) for OFS benefit in premenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer., Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective-retrospective translational study used all available tumor tissue samples from female patients from the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT). These individuals were randomized to receive 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen alone, tamoxifen plus OFS, or exemestane plus OFS. BCI testing was performed blinded to clinical data and outcome. The a priori hypothesis was that BCI HOXB13/IL17BR ratio (BCI[H/I])-high tumors would benefit more from OFS and high BCI portended poorer prognosis in this population. Settings spanned multiple centers internationally. Participants included premenopausal female patients with HR+ early breast cancer with specimens in the International Breast Cancer Study Group tumor repository available for RNA extraction. Data were collected from December 2003 to April 2021 and were analyzed from May 2022 to October 2022., Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end points were breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) for the predictive analysis and distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) for the prognostic analyses., Results: Tumor specimens were available for 1718 of the 3047 female patients in the SOFT intention-to-treat population. The 1687 patients (98.2%) who had specimens that yielded sufficient RNA for BCI testing represented the parent trial population. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 12 (10.5-13.4) years, and 512 patients (30.3%) were younger than 40 years. Tumors were BCI(H/I)-low for 972 patients (57.6%) and BCI(H/I)-high for 715 patients (42.4%). Patients with tumors classified as BCI(H/I)-low exhibited a 12-year absolute benefit in BCFI of 11.6% from exemestane plus OFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48 [95% CI, 0.33-0.71]) and an absolute benefit of 7.3% from tamoxifen plus OFS (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.48-0.97]) relative to tamoxifen alone. In contrast, patients with BCI(H/I)-high tumors did not benefit from either exemestane plus OFS (absolute benefit, -0.4%; HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.70-1.53]; P for interaction = .006) or tamoxifen plus OFS (absolute benefit, -1.2%; HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.72-1.54]; P for interaction = .11) compared with tamoxifen alone. BCI continuous index was significantly prognostic in the N0 subgroup for DRFI (n = 1110; P = .004), with 12-year DRFI of 95.9%, 90.8%, and 86.3% in BCI low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk N0 cancers, respectively., Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective-retrospective translational study of patients enrolled in SOFT, BCI was confirmed as prognostic in premenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer. The benefit from OFS-containing adjuvant endocrine therapy was greater for patients with BCI(H/I)-low tumors than BCI(H/I)-high tumors. BCI(H/I)-low status may identify premenopausal patients who are likely to benefit from this more intensive endocrine therapy.

Background: ROS1 fusion is a relatively low prevalence (0.6-2.0%) but targetable driver in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Robust and low-cost tests, such as immunohistochemistry (IHC), are desirable to screen for patients potentially harboring this fusion. The aim was to investigate the prevalence of ROS1 fusions in a clinically annotated European stage I-III LUAD cohort using IHC screening with the in vitro diagnostics (IVD)-marked clone SP384, followed by confirmatory molecular analysis in pre-defined subsets., Methods: Resected LUADs constructed in tissue microarrays, were immunostained for ROS1 expression using SP384 clone in a ready-to-use kit and Ventana immunostainers. After external quality control, analysis was performed by trained pathologists. Staining intensity of at least 2+ (any percentage of tumor cells) was considered IHC positive (ROS1 IHC + ). Subsequently, ROS1 IHC + cases were 1:1:1 matched with IHC0 and IHC1 + cases and subjected to orthogonal ROS1 FISH and RNA-based testing., Results: The prevalence of positive ROS1 expression (ROS1 IHC + ), defined as IHC 2+/3+, was 4 % (35 of 866 LUADs). Twenty-eight ROS1 IHC + cases were analyzed by FISH/RNA-based testing, with only two harboring a confirmed ROS1 gene fusion, corresponding to a lower limit for the prevalence of ROS1 gene fusion of 0.23 %. They represent a 7 % probability of identifying a fusion among ROS1 IHC + cases. Both confirmed cases were among the only four with sufficient material and H-score ≥ 200, leading to a 50 % probability of identifying a ROS1 gene fusion in cases with an H-score considered strongly positive. All matched ROS1 IHC- (IHC0 and IHC1 + ) cases were also found negative by FISH/RNA-based testing, leading to a 100 % probability of lack of ROS1 fusion for ROS1 IHC- cases., Conclusions: The prevalence of ROS1 fusion in an LUAD stage I-III European cohort was relatively low. ROS1 IHC using SP384 clone is useful for exclusion of ROS1 gene fusion negative cases., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To explore whether specific triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) molecular subtypes are predictive for a benefit from maintenance low-dose cyclophosphamide and methotrexate (CM) in the adjuvant IBCSG 22-00 phase III clinical trial., Experimental Design: RNA sequencing was performed on a selection of 347 TNBC formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples following a case-cohort-like sampling. TNBC subtypes were computed on gene expression data. The association between TNBC subtypes and treatment outcome was assessed using a Cox proportional-hazards interaction test., Results: Immunomodulatory (IM) and basal-like/immune activated (BLIA) molecular subtypes showed a significant survival benefit when treated with low-dose CM [disease-free survival (DFS): HR, 0.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.28-0.89; Pinteraction = 0.018 and HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27-0.9; Pinteraction = 0.021]. Moreover, a high expression of regulatory T-cell immune signature was associated with a better prognosis in the CM arm, in line with a potential immunomodulating role of cyclophosphamide. In contrast, a worse outcome was observed in tumors with a mesenchymal (M) subtype treated with low-dose CM (DFS: HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3; Pinteraction = 0.0044)., Conclusions: Our results show a differential benefit of low-dose CM therapy across different TNBC subtypes. Low-dose CM therapy could be considered as a potential strategy for TNBC tumors with IM subtype in the early-disease setting., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Few tissue biomarkers exist to date that could enrich patient with cancer populations to benefit from immune checkpoint blockade by programmed cell death protein 1/ligand-1 (PD-/L-1) inhibitors. PD-L1 expression has value in this context in some tumor types but is an imperfect predictor of clinical benefit. In malignant pleural mesothelioma, PD-L1 expression is not predictive of the benefit from PD-1 blockade. We aimed to identify novel markers in malignant pleural mesothelioma to select patients better., Methods: We performed a multiplex-immune histochemistry analysis of tumor samples from the phase III PROMISE-meso study, which randomized 144 pretreated patients to receive either pembrolizumab or standard second-line chemotherapy. Our panel focused on CD8+T cell, CD68+macrophages, and the expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 on these and cancer cells. We analyzed single and double positive cells within cancer tissues (infiltrating immune cells) and in the stroma. In addition, we performed cell neighborhood analysis. The cell counts were compared with clinical outcomes, including responses, progression-free and overall survivals., Results: We confirmed the absence of predictive value for PD-L1 in this cohort of patients. Furthermore, total CD8 T cells, CD68+macrophages, or inflammatory subtypes (desert, excluded, inflamed) did not predict outcomes. In contrast, PD-1-expressing CD8+T cells (exhausted T cells) and PD-1-expressing CD68+macrophages were both independent predictors of progression-free survival benefit from pembrolizumab. Patients with tumors simultaneously harboring PD1+T cells and PD-1+macrophages benefited the most from immune therapy., Conclusion: We analyzed a large cohort of patients within a phase III study and found that not only PD-1+CD8 T cells but also PD-1+CD68+ macrophages are predictive. This data provides evidence for the first time for the existence of PD-1+macrophages in mesothelioma and their clinical relevance for immune checkpoint blockade., Competing Interests: Competing interests: KH: Grant support: MSD, Roche, BMS, Molecular Partners, Travel grant: BMS, MSD, Astra-Zeneca. MO: Ad boards for MSD and Roche. RS: Ad board for MSD, Merck and Pierre Fabre., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is an aggressive malignancy with increasing prevalence and poor prognosis. Real-life data are a unique approach to reflect the reality of PM epidemiology, treatment, and prognosis in Europe., Methods: A joint analysis of the European Thoracic Oncology Platform Mesoscape and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) databases was performed to better understand the characteristics and epidemiology of PM, including histologic subtype, staging, and treatment. Overall survival (OS) was assessed, adjusting for parameters of clinical interest., Results: The analysis included 2766 patients (Mesoscape: 497/10 centers/ESTS: 2269/77 centers). The primary histologic subtype was epithelioid (71%), with 57% patients on stages III to IV. Within Mesoscape, the patients received either multimodality (59%) or palliative intention treatment (41%). The median follow-up was 47.2 months, on the basis of 1103 patients (Mesoscape: 491/ESTS: 612), with 823 deaths, and median OS was 17.4 months. In multivariable analysis, female sex, epithelioid subtype, and lower stage were associated with longer OS, when stratifying by cohort, age, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status. Within Mesoscape, multimodality treatment including surgery was predictive of longer OS (hazard ratio = 0.56, 95% confidence interval: 0.45-0.69), adjusting for sex, histologic subtype, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status. Overall, surgical candidates with a macroscopic complete resection had a significantly longer median OS compared with patients with R2 (25.2 m versus 16.4 m; log-rank p < 0.001)., Conclusions: This combined European Thoracic Oncology Platform/ESTS database analysis offers one of the largest databases with detailed clinical and pathologic outcome. Our finding reflects a benefit for selected patients that undergo multimodality treatment, including macroscopic complete resection, and represents a valuable resource to inform the epidemiology and treatment options for individual patients., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Prospective data on the risk of recurrence among women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer who temporarily discontinue endocrine therapy to attempt pregnancy are lacking., Methods: We conducted a single-group trial in which we evaluated the temporary interruption of adjuvant endocrine therapy to attempt pregnancy in young women with previous breast cancer. Eligible women were 42 years of age or younger; had had stage I, II, or III disease; had received adjuvant endocrine therapy for 18 to 30 months; and desired pregnancy. The primary end point was the number of breast cancer events (defined as local, regional, or distant recurrence of invasive breast cancer or new contralateral invasive breast cancer) during follow-up. The primary analysis was planned to be performed after 1600 patient-years of follow-up. The prespecified safety threshold was the occurrence of 46 breast cancer events during this period. Breast cancer outcomes in this treatment-interruption group were compared with those in an external control cohort consisting of women who would have met the entry criteria for the current trial., Results: Among 516 women, the median age was 37 years, the median time from breast cancer diagnosis to enrollment was 29 months, and 93.4% had stage I or II disease. Among 497 women who were followed for pregnancy status, 368 (74.0%) had at least one pregnancy and 317 (63.8%) had at least one live birth. In total, 365 babies were born. At 1638 patient-years of follow-up (median follow-up, 41 months), 44 patients had a breast cancer event, a result that did not exceed the safety threshold. The 3-year incidence of breast cancer events was 8.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3 to 11.6) in the treatment-interruption group and 9.2% (95% CI, 7.6 to 10.8) in the control cohort., Conclusions: Among select women with previous hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer, temporary interruption of endocrine therapy to attempt pregnancy did not confer a greater short-term risk of breast cancer events, including distant recurrence, than that in the external control cohort. Further follow-up is critical to inform longer-term safety. (Funded by ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation and others; POSITIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02308085.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical significance of RANK/L expression, in both a retrospective cohort of surgically resected stage I-III NSCLC (Lungscape) and a randomized clinical trial-cohort (SPLENDOUR) of advanced NSCLC treated with chemotherapy alone or in combination with denosumab., Methods: RANK-L expression was assessed on tissue microarrays (TMAs) in Lungscape and whole sections in SPLENDOUR, using immunohistochemistry, with H-scores values > 0 indicating positivity. Prevalence of RANK positivity and its association with clinicopathological characteristics, and patient outcome was explored in a subset of the ETOP Lungscape cohort and in SPLENDOUR. Also investigated were the prevalence of RANK overexpression (proportion of positive cancer cells ≥ 50%) in the Lungscape cohort, and RANK-L in the SPLENDOUR trial., Results: In the Lungscape cohort, RANK expression was assessed at a median follow-up of 46 months (N = 488 patients; 4 centers); 35% were female, 44/49/6% adenocarcinomas (AC)/squamous cell carcinomas (SCC)/other, 48/27/25% with stage I/II/III. Median RFS/TTR/OS were 58/Not reached/74 months. Prevalence of RANK expression was 31% (95%CI:27%-35%); significantly higher in AC: 50% (95%CI:43%-57%) vs SCC: 12% (95%CI:8%-16%) (p < 0.001); more frequent in females (42% vs 25%, p < 0.001) and tumors ≤ 4 cm (35.3% vs 23.3%, p = 0.0065). No association with outcome was found. In the SPLENDOUR trial (463 patients), the prevalence of membranous and cytoplasmic RANK positivity was 34% (95%CI:30%-38%) and 9% (95%CI:7%-12%), respectively, while prevalence for RANK-L was 5% (95%CI:3%-7%) and 36% (95%CI:31%-40%), respectively. Cytoplasmic RANK-L positivity was more common among females (47% vs 31%, p = 0.001) and in non-SCC histology (45% vs 10%, p < 0.0001). At the pre-specified 1% significance level, no prognostic or predictive effect was found., Conclusions: Both cohorts indicate that RANK expression is more common in adenocarcinoma/non-squamous NSCLC and in female patients. No prognostic effect is found, and in the clinical trial involving addition of denosumab to chemotherapy no predictive effect is detected., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: SP has received education grants,provided consultation, attended advisory boards and/or provided lecturesfor the following organizations, from whom she has received honoraria (all fees to institution): Consultation / Advisory role: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beigene, Biocartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, ecancer, Eli Lilly, Elsevier, Foundation Medicine, Illumina, Imedex, IQVIA, Incyte, Janssen,Medscape, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Merck Serono, Merrimack, Novartis, OncologyEducation, Pharma Mar, Phosplatin Therapeutics, PER, Pfizer, PRIME, Regeneron, RMEI, Roche/Genentech, RTP, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda. Talk in a company’s organized public event: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ecancer, Eli Lilly, Illumina, Imedex, Medscape, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, PER, Pfizer, Prime, Roche/Genentech, RTP, Sanofi, Takeda. Receipt of grants/research supports: (Sub)investigator in trials (institutional financial support for clinical trials) sponsored by Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biodesix, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis, GSK,Illumina,Lilly,Merck Sharp and Dohme, Merck Serono,Mirati,Novartis, and Pfizer,Phosplatin Therapeutics, Roche/Genentech. SD was involved in the SPLENDOUR trial as the clinical coordinator at EORTC. She has no financial conflict of interest. All other authors declared no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate tumor mutational burden (TMB), its associations with selected clinicopathological and molecular characteristics as well as its clinical significance, in a retrospective cohort of surgically resected stage I-II lung adenocarcinomas, subset of the ETOP Lungscape cohort., Methods: TMB was evaluated on tumor DNA extracted from resected primary lung adenocarcinomas, based on FoundationOne®CDx (F1CDx) genomic profiling, centrally performed at the University Hospital Zurich. The F1CDx test sequences the complete exons of 324 cancer-related genes and detects substitutions, insertions and deletions (indels), copy number alterations and gene rearrangements. In addition, the genomic biomarkers TMB and microsatellite instability (MSI) are analyzed., Results: In the Lungscape cohort, TMB was assessed in 78 surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas from two Swiss centers (62 % males, 55 %/45 % stage I/II). Median TMB was 7.6 Muts/Mb, with TMB high (≥10 Muts/Mb) in 40 % of cases (95 %CI:29 %-52 %). The most frequently mutated genes were TP53/KRAS/EGFR/MLL2 detected in 58 %/38 %/33 %/30 % of samples, respectively. TMB was significantly higher among males (TMB high: 50 % vs 23 % in females, p = 0.032), as well as among current/former smokers (TMB high: 44 % vs 8 % in never smokers, p = 0.023). Furthermore, TMB was significantly higher in TP53 mutated than in non-mutated patients (TMB high: 60 % vs 12 %, p < 0.001), while it was higher in EGFR non-mutated patients compared to EGFR mutated (TMB high: 48 % vs 23 %, p = 0.049). At a median follow-up time of 56.1 months (IQR:38.8-72.0), none of the three outcome variables (OS, RFS, TTR) differed significantly by TMB status (all p-values > 5 %). This was also true when adjusting for clinicopathological characteristics., Conclusions: While presence of TP53 mutations and absence of EGFR mutations are associated with high TMB, increased TMB had no significant prognostic impact in patients with resected stage I/II lung adenocarcinoma beyond T and N classification, in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. Although histology and pathologic stage are important prognostic factors, better prognostic biomarkers are needed. The ribosomal protein S6 is a downstream target of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway involved in protein synthesis and cell proliferation. In previous studies, low phosphorylated S6 (pS6) immunoreactivity was significantly correlated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in PM patients. We aimed to correlate pS6 expression to clinical data in a large multi-centre PM cohort as part of the European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP) Mesoscape project. Tissue Micro Arrays (TMAs) of PM were constructed and expression of pS6 was evaluated by a semi-quantitatively aggregate H-score. Expression results were correlated to patient characteristics as well as OS/PFS. pS6 IHC results of 364 patients from 9 centres, diagnosed between 1999 and 2017 were available. The primary histology of included tumours was epithelioid (70.3%), followed by biphasic (24.2%) and sarcomatoid (5.5%). TMAs included both treatment-naïve and tumour tissue taken after induction chemotherapy. High pS6 expression (181 patients with H-score>1.41) was significantly associated with less complete resection. In the overall cohort, OS/PFS were not significantly different between pS6-low and pS6-high patients. In a subgroup analysis non-epithelioid (biphasic and sarcomatoid) patients with high pS6 expression showed a significantly shorter OS (p < 0.001, 10.7 versus 16.9 months) and PFS (p < 0.001, 6.2 versus 10.8 months). In subgroup analysis, in non-epithelioid PM patients high pS6 expression was associated with significantly shorter OS and PFS. These exploratory findings suggest a clinically relevant PI3K pathway activation in non-epithelioid PM which might lay the foundation for future targeted treatment strategies., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Alectinib, a highly selective next generation ALK-inhibitor, has exhibited potent anti-tumour activity in RET-rearranged NSCLC in the preclinical stage., Methods: ALERT-lung is a single-arm, phase II trial evaluating the activity of alectinib for the treatment of pretreated RET-rearranged advanced NSCLC. Alectinib was administered orally, 600 mg, twice per day until progression, refusal or unacceptable toxicity (treatment could continue beyond progression, if patient was deriving clinical benefit). Patient recruitment closed prematurely due to discouraging results for alectinib in a phase I/II study in the same indication., Results: All 14 patients who enrolled until the premature accrual closure, received at lease one dose of alectinib. Among them, median age was 61 years, majority (71 %) was female, never smokers, of ECOG PS 1. No objective response (complete or partial response) was recorded. Of the 13 evaluable patients, three (23 %) achieved and maintained disease stabilisation for 24 weeks. Up to 31 March 2021 (median follow-up 15.9 months), 12 PFS-events (92 %) were observed, with median PFS of 3.7 months (95 % C.I.: 1.8 - 7.3 months). Overall, three deaths (23 %) were reported. Seven patients (50 %) experienced grade ≥ 3 adverse events, while three discontinued treatment due to erythema multiforme of grade 3, related to alectinib. No treatment-related serious adverse event was reported., Conclusions: Accrual into our trial was terminated early in response to other reports of limited activity of alectinib in patients with RET-fusion NSCLC and the emergence of more potent selective RET-inhibitors. Also in our trial, alectinib did not show the expected potential for anti-tumour activity in NSCLC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Enriqueta Felip reports grants for oncology innovation (GOI) from Merck Healthcare KGAa and Fundación Merck Salud, consulting fees from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daichii Sankyo, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Glaxo Smith Kline, Janssen, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda, payments or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Medical Trends, Medscape, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Peervoice, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, and Touch Oncology, she also reports to be an independent board member of GRÍFOLS. Urania Dafni reports a honorarium as Member of the Tumor Agnostic Evidence Generation working Group of Roche. Thierry Berghmans reports consulting fees from Inhatarget and reported participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for BMS, Bayer, Merck, Janssen, and Roche. Francesco Passiglia reports consulting fees from Merck Sharp and Dohme, Astrazeneca, Janssen, Amgen, and Beigene, payments or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Janssen, Amgen, Pfizer, and ThermoFisher Scientific, support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche and Amgen, he also reports participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Amgen and Janssen. Anne-Marie C. Dingemans reports grants or contracts from Amgen, Dutch Cancer Society, and HANART, consulting fees from Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi, and Roche, payments or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Janssen, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Lilly, and Takeda, reports participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Takeda and Roche, leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid as chair of EORTC LCG (unapaid). Santiago Viteri reports payments or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from MSD, BMS, TAKEDA, CURIO, and ROCHE, payments for expert testimony from REDDY PHARMA IBERIA, support for attending meetings and/or travel from OSE IMMUNOTHERAPEUTHICS, MSD, TAKEDA, and MERCK, reports participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for MERCK, JANSSEN, PUMA, ASTRA ZENECA, BMS, TAKEDA, and ROCHE. Christian Britschgi reports consulting fees from Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Janssen-Cilag, Boehringer-Ingelheim, support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca and Takeda. Sinead Cuffe reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from MSD, BMS, and Pfizer. Mariano Provencio reports grants or contracts from BMS, MSD, Lilly, AZ, and Takeda, consulting fees from BMS, MSD, Lilly, AZ, and Takeda, payments or honoraria for lectures from BMS, MSD, AZ, and Takeda, support for attending meetings from MSD and AZ. Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse reports payments or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, QuIP, Targos, Roche, Novartis, GSK, Molecular Health, Janssen, BMS, and MSD, support for attending meetings and/or travel from BMS, reports participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, GSK, Molecular Health, Janssen, Merck, Amgen, and Onkowissen. Solange Peters reports grants/research support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GSK,Merck Sharp and Dohme, and Roche/Genentech, consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Arcus, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beigene, Biocartis, BioInvent, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, ecancer, Eli Lilly, Elsevier, F-Star, Fishawack, Foundation Medicine, Genzyme, Gilead, GSK, Illumina, Imedex, IQVIA, Incyte, iTeos, Janssen,Medscape, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Merck Serono, Merrimack, Novartis, Novocure, OncologyEducation, Pharma Mar, Phosplatin Therapeutics, PER, Pfizer, PRIME, Regeneron, RMEI, Roche/Genentech, RTP, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, and Vaccibody, payments or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ecancer, Eli Lilly, Foundation Medicine, Illumina, Imedex, Medscape, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Mirati, Novartis, PER, Pfizer, Prime, Roche/Genentech, RTP, Sanofi, and Takeda. Jürgen Wolf reports participation on advisory boards for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Ignyta, Janssen, Lilly, Loxo, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics, and Takeda, reports lecture fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Ignyta, Janssen, Lilly, Loxo, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics, and Takeda, reports research support to institution from BMS, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Novartis, Pfizer. Rolf A. Stahel reports grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Celgene, Ipsen, Janssen, Mirati, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, and Roche. Consulting fees from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Novocure, Pfizer, and Roche, payments or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Blueprint, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, MSD, Roche, and Sandoz, he also reports participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Genentech/Roche, MSD, and Takeda. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Biomarkers for cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, such as palbociclib, for patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer are lacking. Thymidine kinase is a proliferation marker downstream of the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 pathway. We prospectively investigated the prognostic role of serum thymidine kinase activity (sTKa), in patients treated with Palbociclib + fulvestrant., Patients and Methods: PYTHIA was a phase II, single-arm, multicentre, trial that enrolled 124 post-menopausal women with endocrine-resistant hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Serum samples were collected pre-treatment (pre-trt; n = 122), at day 15 of cycle 1 (D15; n = 108), during the one week-off palbociclib before initiating cycle 2 (D28; n = 108) and at end of treatment (n = 76). sTKa was determined centrally using Divitum®, a refined ELISA-based assay with a limit of detection of 20 Divitum Units (Du)/L. The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival, assessed for its association with pre- and on-treatment sTKa., Results: Data from 122 women were analysed. Pre-treatment sTKa was not associated with clinical characteristics and moderately correlated with tissue Ki-67. Palbociclib + fulvestrant markedly suppressed sTKa levels at D15, with 83% of patients recording levels below limit of detection. At D28, sTKa showed a rebound in 60% of patients. At each timepoint, higher sTKa was associated with shorter progression-free survival (each p < 0.001), with the strongest effect at D15., Conclusions: STKa is an independent prognostic biomarker in patients treated with palbociclib. High pre-treatment sTKa and its incomplete suppression during treatment may identify patients with poorer prognosis and primary resistance. This warrants validation in prospective comparative trials. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Identifier: NCT02536742; EudraCT 2014-005387-15., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement L. Malorni reports receiving research grants (institution) from Novartis and Pfizer and serving an advisory board (honoraria) for Novartis, Seagen, Pfizer. F. Hilbers reports receiving funding (to previous Institution affiliated with) from Pfizer for conduct of the PYTHIA trial. M. Ignatiadis reports receiving research grants (to Institution) from Roche, Natera Inc, and Pfizer and serving an advisory board role (honoraria) for Novartis and Seattle Genetics. M. Colleoni reports receiving a research grant (to Institution) from Roche. G. Jerusalem reports grants (to Institution), personal fees and non-financial support from Novartis, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Pfizer, personal fees and non-financial support from Lilly, personal fees and non-financial support from Amgen, personal fees and non-financial support from BMS, personal fees and non-financial support from Astra-Zeneca, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from Abbvie, non-financial support from Medimmune, and non-financial support from Merck KGaA. K. Papadimitriou reports serving an advisory board role (honoraria) for Roche, Pfizer, Lilly, and Novartis. F.P. Duhoux reports serving an advisory role (support to Institution) for Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Pierre Fabre, Mundipharma, Seagen, and Teva. I. R. MacPherson reports serving as a consultant for Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Daiichi Sankyo, and Astrazeneca, and reports receiving travel/conference registration support from Roche, Eli Lilly, and Daichi Sankyo. A. Thomson reports receiving speaker fees from Novartis, Roche, Exact Sciences, and Lilly, reports serving on the advisory board for Novartis and MSD, and reports receiving support for attending conferences from BMS, Astellas, MSD, Ipsen, and EUSA. M. Bergqvist reports being an employee and holding stock in Biovica. G. Zoppoli reports receiving travel grants from Novartis and Roche, and reagents from ThermoFisher Scientific and Cytiva. J.M. Bliss reports receiving research funding from AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Puma Biotechnology, Clovis Oncology, Pfizer, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Roche, and Eli Lilly. H. De Swert reports receiving research funding (to Institution) from Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Servier, AstraZeneca, TESARO, and GSK. D. Fumagalli reports receiving research funding for the conduct of clinical trials (to Institution) from Pfizer, Biovica, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Servier, AstraZeneca, TESARO, and GSK. D. Cameron reports serving on the advisory board for AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lilly (to Institution), and IDMC (independent data monitoring committee) work (to Institution) for Lilly and unrelated research funding from Novartis. M. Piccart reports grants (to Institution) from AstraZeneca, Immunomedics, Lilly, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Radius, Roche-Genentech, Servier, and Synthon, reports receiving honoraria from AstraZeneca, Camel-IDS, Immunomedics, Lilly, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Odonate, Pfizer (funded the study conception & design component), Roche-Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Immutep, Seagen, and NBE Therapeutics, and reports serving on the Scientific Board of Oncolytics. M.M. Regan reports research funding (to Institution) from Novartis, Pfizer, Ipsen, TerSera, Pierre Fabre, Roche, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Bayer, and reports serving a consulting/advisory role for Ipsen (support to Institution), Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Tolmar Pharmaceuticals. No disclosures were reported by the other authors., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: KRAS mutations, the most frequent gain-of-function alterations in NSCLC, are currently emerging as potential predictive therapeutic targets. The role of KRAS-G12C (Kr&#95;G12C) is of special interest after the recent discovery and preclinical analyses of two different Kr&#95;G12C covalent inhibitors (AMG-510, MRTX849)., Methods: KRAS mutations were evaluated in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections by a microfluidic-based multiplex polymerase chain reaction platform as a component of the previously published European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape 003 Multiplex Mutation study, of clinically annotated, resected, stage I to III NSCLC. In this study, -Kr&#95;G12C mutation prevalence and its association with clinicopathologic characteristics, molecular profiles, and postoperative patient outcome (overall survival, relapse-free survival, time-to-relapse) were explored., Results: KRAS gene was tested in 2055 Lungscape cases (adenocarcinomas: 1014 [49%]) with I or II or III stage respective distribution of 53% or 24% or 22% and median follow-up of 57 months. KRAS mutation prevalence in the adenocarcinoma cohort was 38.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 35.0% to 41.0%), with Kr&#95;G12C mutation representing 17.0% (95% CI: 14.7% to 19.4%). In the "histologic-subtype" cohort, Kr&#95;G12C prevalence was 10.5% (95% CI: 9.2% to 11.9%). When adjusting for clinicopathologic characteristics, a significant negative prognostic effect of Kr&#95;G12C presence versus other KRAS mutations or nonexistence of KRAS mutation was identified in the adenocarcinoma cohort alone and in the "histologic-subtype" cohort. For overall survival in adenocarcinomas, hazard ratio (HR) G12C versus other KRAS is equal to 1.39 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.89, p = 0.031) and HR G12C versus no KRAS is equal to 1.32 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.69, p = 0.028) (both also significant in the "histologic-subtype" cohort). For time-to-relapse, HR G12C versus other KRAS is equal to 1.41 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.92, p = 0.030). In addition, among all patients, for relapse-free survival, HR G12C versus no KRAS is equal to 1.27 (95% CI: 1.04 to 1.54, p = 0.017)., Conclusions: In this large, clinically annotated stage I to III NSCLC cohort, the specific Kr&#95;G12C mutation is significantly associated with poorer prognosis (adjusting for clinicopathologic characteristics) among adenocarcinomas and in unselected NSCLCs., (Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancers have a persistent risk of relapse and biomarkers for late recurrence are needed. We sought to identify tumor genomic aberrations associated with increased late-recurrence risk., Experimental Design: In a secondary analysis of Study of Letrozole Extension trial, a case-cohort-like sampling selected 598 primary breast cancers for targeted next-generation sequencing analysis of gene mutations and copy-number gains (CNGs). Correlations of genomic aberrations with clinicopathologic factors and breast and distant recurrence-free intervals (BCFIs and DRFIs) were analyzed using weighted Cox models., Results: Analysis of mutations and CNGs was successfully performed for 403 and 350 samples, including 148 and 134 patients with breast cancer recurrences (median follow-up time, 5.2 years), respectively. The most frequent alterations were PIK3CA mutations (42%) and CNGs of CCND1 (15%), ERBB2 (10%), FGFR1 (8%), and MYC (8%). PIK3CA mutations and MYC CNGs were associated with lower ( P = 0.03) and higher ( P = 0.004) tumor grade, respectively; a higher Ki-67 was seen in tumor with CCND1, ERBB2 , and MYC CNGs ( P = 0.01, P < 0.001, and P = 0.03, respectively). FGFR1 CNG was associated with an increased risk of late events in univariate analyses [17/29 patients; BCFI: HR, 3.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.48-6.92; P = 0.003 and DRFI: HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.61-7.75; P = 0.002) and in multivariable models adjusted for clinicopathologic factors., Conclusions: Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer harboring FGFR1 CNG had an increased risk of late recurrence despite extended therapy. FGFR1 CNG may represent a useful prognostic biomarker for late recurrence and a therapeutic target., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

PD-L1, as assessed by immunohistochemistry, is a predictive biomarker for immuno-oncology treatment in lung cancer. Different scoring methods have been used to assess its status, resulting in a wide range of positivity rates. We use the European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape non-small cell lung carcinoma cohort to explore this issue. PD-L1 expression was assessed via immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays (up to four cores per case), using the DAKO 28-8 immunohistochemistry assay, following a two-round external quality assessment procedure. All samples were analyzed under the same protocol. Cross-validation of scoring between tissue microarray and whole sections was performed in 10% randomly selected samples. Cutoff points considered: ≥1, 50 (primarily), and 25%. At the two external quality assessment rounds, tissue microarray scoring agreement rates between pathologists were: 73% and 81%. There were 2008 cases with valid immunohistochemistry tissue microarray results (50% all cores evaluable). Concordant cases at 1, 25, and 50% were: 85, 91, and 93%. Tissue microarray core results were identical for 70% of cases. Sensitivity of the tissue microarray method for 1, 25, and 50% was: 80, 78, and 79% (specificity: 90, 95, 98%). Complete agreement between tissue microarrays and whole sections was achieved for 60% of the cases. Highest sensitivity rates for 1% and 50% cutoffs were detected for higher number of cores. Underestimation of PD-L1 expression on small samples is more common than overestimation. We demonstrated that classification of PD-L1 on small biopsy samples does not represent the overall expression of PD-L1 in all non-small cell cancer carcinoma cases, although the majority of cases are 'correctly' classified. In future studies, sampling more and larger biopsies, recording the biopsy size and tumor load may permit further refinement, increasing predictive accuracy.

Introduction: Longitudinal evaluation of mutations in blood samples was a prespecified secondary objective in the BELIEF trial of erlotinib and bevacizumab in advanced EGFR-positive NSCLC. Here, we report the testing results and explore the correlation of EGFR status in blood with clinical outcomes., Methods: Blood samples were prospectively collected from patients at baseline, at response evaluation, and at progression and sent to a central laboratory. Circulating free DNA was purified and EGFR mutations were analyzed with a validated real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay., Results: EGFR exon 19/21 mutations were detected in 55 of 91 baseline blood samples (60.4%) and correlated with a significantly worse progression-free survival: 11.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.0-14.8 mo) for the patients who were positive versus 22.9 months (95% CI: 9.5-33.9 mo) for those who were negative (log-rank p = 0.0020). Among the 74 samples at response, exon 19/21 mutations were detected only in three samples (4.1%). In contrast, 29 of 58 patients (50.0%) were exon 19/21 positive at progression and showed a significantly worse median overall survival of 21.7 months (95% CI: 17.0-30.9 mo) compared with 37.4 months (95% CI: 22.6-53.1 mo) for those who were negative (log-rank p = 0.011). Blood samples at the three time points were available for 48 patients. Of those, among 14 exon 19/21 EGFR-negative at presentation, 13 (93%) were persistently negative for the sensitizing mutations after progression and the p.T790M could only be detected in the blood of two patients., Conclusions: Longitudinal testing of EGFR mutations in blood can offer valuable clinical information. In patients of the BELIEF study, detection of EGFR mutations in circulating free DNA at presentation was associated with shorter progression-free survival, whereas positivity at progression correlated with shorter overall survival. Finally, patients negative in blood at presentation were almost invariably negative at relapse., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: EarlyR gene signature in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer is computed from the expression values of ESPL1 , SPAG5 , MKI67 , PLK1 , and PGR . EarlyR has been validated in multiple cohorts profiled using microarrays. This study sought to verify the prognostic features of EarlyR in a case-cohort sample from BIG 1-98, a randomized clinical trial of ER+ postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy (letrozole or tamoxifen)., Methods: Expression of EarlyR gene signature was estimated by Illumina cDNA-mediated Annealing, Selection, and Ligation assay of RNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary breast cancer tissues in a case-cohort subset of ER+ women (N = 1174; 216 cases of recurrence within 8 years) from BIG 1-98. EarlyR score and prespecified risk strata (≤25 = low, 26-75 = intermediate, >75 = high) were "blindly" computed. Analysis endpoints included distant recurrence-free interval and breast cancer-free interval at 8 years after randomization. Hazard ratios (HRs) and test statistics were estimated with weighted analysis methods., Results: The distribution of the EarlyR risk groups was 67% low, 19% intermediate, and 14% high risk in this ER+ cohort. EarlyR was prognostic for distant recurrence-free interval; EarlyR high-risk patients had statistically increased risk of distant recurrence within 8 years (HR = 1.73, 95% confidence interval = 1.14 to 2.64) compared with EarlyR low-risk patients. EarlyR was also prognostic of breast cancer-free interval (HR = 1.74, 95% confidence interval = 1.21 to 2.62)., Conclusions: This study confirmed the prognostic significance of EarlyR using RNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues from a case-cohort sample of BIG 1-98. EarlyR identifies a set of high-risk patients with relatively poor prognosis who may be considered for additional treatment. Further studies will focus on analyzing the predictive value of EarlyR signature., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Pre-analytical factors, such as fixation time, influence morphology of diagnostic and predictive immunohistochemical staining, which are increasingly used in the evaluation of lung cancer. Our aim was to investigate if variations in fixation time influence the outcome of immunohistochemical staining in lung cancer. From lung resections, specimen with tumor size bigger than 4 cm, 10 samples were obtained: 2 were put through the standard fixation protocol, 5 through the delayed, and 3 through the prolonged fixation protocol. After paraffin embedding, tissue microarrays (TMAs) were made. They were stained with 20 antibodies and scored for quality and intensity of staining. Samples with delay in fixation showed loss of TMA cores on glass slides and deterioration of tissue quality leading to reduction in the expression of CK 7, Keratin MNF116, CAM 5.2, CK 5/6, TTF-1, C-MET, Napsin A, D2-40, and PD-L1. Prolonged fixation had no influence on the performance of immunohistochemical stains. Delay of fixation negatively affects the expression of different immunohistochemical markers, influencing diagnostic (cytokeratins) and predictive (PD-L1) testing. These results emphasize the need for adequate fixation of resection specimen.

Purpose: Ki-67 has been clinically validated for risk assessment in breast cancer, but the analytical validation and cutpoint-definition remain a challenge. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) are a statistical parameter for Ki-67 interobserver performance. However, the maximum degree of variance among pathologists allowed for meaningful biomarker results has not been defined., Methods: Different amounts of variance were added to central pathology Ki-67 data (n = 9069) from three cohorts (IBCSGVIII + IX, BIG1-98, GeparTrio) by simulation of 4500 evaluations for each cohort, which were grouped by ICCs, ranging from excellent (ICC = 0.9) to poor concordance (ICC = 0.1). Endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and pathological complete response (pCR, GeparTrio)., Results: Ki-67 was a significant continuous prognostic marker for DFS over a wide range of cutpoints between 8% and 30% in all three cohorts. In our modelling approach, Ki-67 was a stable prognostic marker despite increased interpathologist variance. Even for a poor ICC of 0.5, one or more significant Ki-67 cutoffs were detected in 86.8% (GeparTrio), 92.4% (IBCSGVIII + IX) and 100% of analyses (BIG1-98). Similarly, in GeparTrio, even with an extremely low ICC of 0.2, 99.6% of analyses were significant for pCR., Conclusions: Our study shows that Ki-67 is a continuous marker which is extremely robust to pathologist variation. Even if only 50% of variance is attributable to true Ki-67-based proliferation (ICC = 0.5), this information is sufficient to obtain statistically significant differences in clinical cohorts. This stable performance explains the observation that many Ki-67 studies achieve significant results despite relevant interobserver variance and points to a high clinical validity of this biomarker. For clinical decisions based on analysis of individual patient data, ongoing efforts to further reduce interobserver variability, including ring trials and standardized guidelines as well as image analysis approaches, should be continued.

Introduction: Mutations in erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (HER2) oncogene are observed in approximately 3% of lung adenocarcinomas or mixed tumors with adenocarcinoma component. Activity of various biologically distinct HER2 inhibitors, including the pan-HER inhibitor afatinib, has been reported in several retrospective trials or small series in advanced pretreated NSCLC with HER2 mutations. We report the first prospective evaluation of afatinib for the treatment of this molecularly defined entity., Methods: NICHE, a single-arm phase II trial using a two-stage Simon's design, explored the potential of afatinib to control disease in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC harboring HER2 exon 20 mutations. A total of 13 patients entered the trial and were treated with afatinib 40 mg/day until tumor progression or lack of tolerability., Results: The first-stage stopping boundary was crossed when five of nine patients did not achieve disease control at 12 weeks. The accrual into the trial was stopped with total 13 patients enrolled, with 7 (53.8%) achieving disease control at 12 weeks. Except for 1 patient with early death, progression was documented for all patients, with median progression-free survival of 15.9 weeks (95% confidence interval: 6.0-35.4), and median overall survival of 56.0 weeks (95% confidence interval: 16.3- upper limit not estimable). The toxicity profile was in the expected range., Conclusions: Afatinib did not show the expected potential for disease control in NSCLC. However, more than half of the patients in the full cohort achieved disease control at 12 weeks., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The PD-L1 biomarker is an important factor in selecting patients with non-small cell lung cancer for immunotherapy. While several reports suggest that PD-L1 positivity is linked to a poor prognosis, others suggest that PD-L1 positive status portends a good prognosis., Methods: PD-L1 positivity prevalence, assessed via immunohistochemistry (IHC) on tissue microarrays (TMAs), and its association with clinicopathological characteristics, molecular profiles and patient outcome- Relapse-free Survival (RFS), Time-to-Relapse (TTR) and Overall Survival (OS)- is explored in the ETOP Lungscape cohort of stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tumors are considered positive if they have ≥1/5/25/50% neoplastic cell membrane staining., Results: PD-L1 expression was assessed in 2182 NSCLC cases (2008 evaluable, median follow-up 4.8 years, 54.6% still alive), from 15 ETOP centers. Adenocarcinomas represent 50.9% of the cohort (squamous cell: 42.4%). Former smokers are 53.7% (current: 31.6%, never: 10.5%). PD-L1 positivity prevalence is present in more than one third of the Lungscape cohort (1%/5% cut-offs). It doesn't differ between adenocarcinomas and squamous cell histologies, but is more frequently detected in higher stages, never smokers, larger tumors (1/5/25% cut-offs). With ≥1% cut-off it is significantly associated with IHC MET overexpression, expression of PTEN, EGFR and KRAS mutation (only for adenocarcinoma). Results for 5%, 25% and 50% cut-offs were similar, with MET being significantly associated with PD-L1 positivity both for AC (p < 0.001, 5%/25%/50% cut-offs) and SCC (p < 0.001, 5% & 50% cut-offs and p = 0.0017 for 25%). When adjusting for clinicopathological characteristics, a significant prognostic effect was identified in adenocarcinomas (adjusted p-values: 0.024/0.064/0.063 for RFS/TTR/OS 1% cut-off, analogous for 5%/25%, but not for 50%). Similar results obtained for the model including all histologies, but no effect was found for the squamous cell carcinomas., Conclusion: PD-L1 positivity, when adjusted for clinicopathological characteristics, is associated with a better prognosis for non-metastatic adenocarcinoma patients., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: HER2-positive breast cancers usually contain large amounts of T-cell infiltrate. We hypothesised that trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer could be mediated by immune mechanisms. We assessed the safety and anti-tumour activity of pembrolizumab, a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, added to trastuzumab in trastuzumab-resistant, advanced HER2-positive breast cancer., Methods: We did this single-arm, multicentre, phase 1b-2 trial in 11 centres based in five countries. Eligible participants were women aged 18 years or older, who had advanced, histologically confirmed, HER2-positive breast cancer; documented progression during previous trastuzumab-based therapy; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; and a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded metastatic tumour biopsy for central assessment of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. In phase 1b, we enrolled patients with PD-L1-positive tumours in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation of intravenous pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg, every 3 weeks) plus 6 mg/kg of intravenous trastuzumab. The primary endpoint of the phase 1b study was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity and recommended phase 2 dose; however, a protocol amendment on Aug 28, 2015, stipulated a flat dose of pembrolizumab of 200 mg every 3 weeks in all Merck-sponsored trials. In phase 2, patients with PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative tumours were enrolled in parallel cohorts and received the flat dose of pembrolizumab plus standard trastuzumab. The primary endpoint of the phase 2 study was the proportion of PD-L1-positive patients achieving an objective response. This trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02129556, and with EudraCT, number 2013-004770-10, and is closed., Findings: Between Feb 2, 2015, and April 5, 2017, six patients were enrolled in phase 1b (n=3 received 2 mg/kg pembrolizumab, n=3 received 10 mg/kg pembrolizumab) and 52 patients in phase 2 (n=40 had PD-L1-positive tumours, n=12 had PD-L1-negative tumours). The data cutoff for this analysis was Aug 7, 2017. During phase 1b, there were no dose-limiting toxicities in the dose cohorts tested. Median follow-up for the phase 2 cohort was 13·6 months (IQR 11·6-18·4) for patients with PD-L1-positive tumours, and 12·2 months (7·9-12·2) for patients with PD-L1-negative tumours. Six (15%, 90% CI 7-29) of 40 PD-L1-positive patients achieved an objective response. There were no objective responders among the PD-L1-negative patients. The most common treatment-related adverse event of any grade was fatigue (12 [21%] of 58 patients). Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 29 (50%) of patients, treatment-related grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 17 (29%), and serious adverse events occurred in 29 (50%) patients. The most commonly occurring serious adverse events were dyspnoea (n=3 [5%]), pneumonitis (n=3 [5%]), pericardial effusion (n=2 [3%]), and upper respiratory infection (n=2 [3%]). There was one treatment-related death due to Lambert-Eaton syndrome in a PD-L1-negative patient during phase 2., Interpretation: Pembrolizumab plus trastuzumab was safe and showed activity and durable clinical benefit in patients with PD-L1-positive, trastuzumab-resistant, advanced, HER2-positive breast cancer. Further studies in this breast cancer subtype should focus on a PD-L1-positive population and be done in less heavily pretreated patients., Funding: Merck, International Breast Cancer Study Group., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The androgen receptor (AR) is an emerging prognostic marker and therapeutic target in breast cancer. AR is expressed in 60-80% of breast cancers, with higher prevalence among estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumors. Androgen treatment inhibits ER signaling in ER+/AR+ breast cancer cell lines, and AR expression is associated with improved survival for this subtype in epidemiologic studies. However, whether AR expression modifies the efficacy of selective ER modulators or aromatase inhibitors for ER+ cancers remains unclear., Methods: We evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of AR expression among 3021 postmenopausal ER+ breast cancer patients in the Breast International Group (BIG) trial 1-98. The BIG 1-98 study was a four-armed, double-blind, phase III randomized clinical trial that compared 5 years of tamoxifen or letrozole monotherapy, or sequences of 2 years and 3 years treatment with one drug and then the other. AR expression was measured by immunohistochemistry and the percentage of AR-positive nuclei was quantified. The association between AR expression and prognosis was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. Continuous AR-by-treatment interactions were assessed using Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plots (STEPP)., Results: Eighty-two percent of patients had AR+ (≥ 1%) tumors. Patients with AR+ cancers were more likely to have smaller, lower-grade tumors, with higher expression of ER and PR. AR expression was not associated with breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) (415 events) over a median 8.0 years of follow-up (p = 0.12, log-rank test). In multivariable-adjusted models, AR expression was not associated with BCFI (HR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.83-1.36, p = 0.60). The letrozole versus tamoxifen monotherapy treatment effect did not significantly differ for AR+ tumors (HR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.75, p = 0.003) and AR- tumors (HR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.21-0.72, p = 0.002) (p-heterogeneity = 0.16). STEPP analysis also suggested no heterogeneity of the treatment effect across the continuum of AR expression., Conclusions: AR expression was not associated with prognosis, nor was there heterogeneity of the letrozole versus tamoxifen treatment effect by AR expression. These findings suggest that AR expression may not be an informative biomarker for the selection of adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with ER+ breast cancers., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00004205, Registered 27 January 2003-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT00004205 .

Purpose: To evaluate endocrine activity in terms of ovarian function suppression (OFS) of degarelix (a gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist) versus triptorelin (a GnRH agonist) in premenopausal patients receiving letrozole as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer., Patients and Methods: Premenopausal women with stage cT2 to 4b, any N, M0; estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor greater than 50%; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to triptorelin 3.75 mg administered intramuscularly on day 1 of every cycle or degarelix 240 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) on day 1 of cycle 1 then 80 mg SC on day 1 of cycles 2 through 6, both with letrozole 2.5 mg/day for six 28-day cycles. Surgery was performed 2 to 3 weeks after the last injection. Serum was collected at baseline, after 24 and 72 hours, at 7 and 14 days, and then before injections on cycles 2 through 6. The primary end point was time to optimal OFS (time from the first injection to first assessment of centrally assessed estradiol level ≤ 2.72 pg/mL [≤ 10 pmol/L] during neoadjuvant therapy). The trial had 90% power to detect a difference using a log-rank test with a two-sided α of .05. Secondary end points included response, tolerability, and patient-reported endocrine symptoms., Results: Between February 2014 and January 2017, 51 patients were enrolled (n = 26 received triptorelin plus letrozole; n = 25 received degarelix plus letrozole). Time to optimal OFS was three times faster for patients assigned to degarelix and letrozole than to triptorelin and letrozole (median, 3 v 14 days; hazard ratio, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.65 to 5.65; P < .001). Furthermore, OFS was maintained during subsequent cycles for all patients assigned to receive degarelix and letrozole, whereas 15.4% of patients assigned to receive triptorelin and letrozole had suboptimal OFS after cycle 1 (six events during 127 measurements). Adverse events as a result of both degarelix plus letrozole and triptorelin plus letrozole were as expected., Conclusion: In premenopausal women receiving letrozole for neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, OFS was achieved more quickly and maintained more effectively with degarelix than with triptorelin.

Introduction: Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss is frequently observed in NSCLC and associated with both phosphoinositide 3-kinase activation and tumoral immunosuppression. PTEN immunohistochemistry is a valuable readout, but lacks standardized staining protocol and cutoff value., Methods: After an external quality assessment using SP218, 138G6 and 6H2.1 anti-PTEN antibodies, scored on webbook and tissue microarray, the European Thoracic Oncology Platform cohort samples (n = 2245 NSCLC patients, 8980 tissue microarray cores) were stained with SP218. All cores were H-scored by pathologists and by computerized pixel-based intensity measurements calibrated by pathologists., Results: All three antibodies differentiated six PTEN+ versus six PTEN- cases on external quality assessment. For 138G6 and SP218, high sensitivity and specificity was found for all H-score threshold values including prospectively defined 0, calculated 8 (pathologists), and calculated 5 (computer). High concordance among pathologists in setting computer-based intensities and between pathologists and computer in H-scoring was observed. Because of over-integration of the human eye, pixel-based computer H-scores were overall 54% lower. For all cutoff values, PTEN- was associated with smoking history, squamous cell histology, and higher tumor stage (p < 0.001). In adenocarcinomas, PTEN- was associated with poor survival., Conclusion: Calibration of immunoreactivity intensities by pathologists following computerized H-score measurements has the potential to improve reproducibility and homogeneity of biomarker detection regarding epitope validation in multicenter studies., (Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: A range of somatic driver alterations has been described in estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative (ER+/HER2-) early breast cancer (BC); however, the clinical relevance is unknown., Objective: To investigate associations of driver alterations with prognosis and the role of PIK3CA mutations in prediction of benefit associated with endocrine therapy in postmenopausal patients with ER+/HER2- early BC treated with tamoxifen or letrozole., Design, Setting, and Participants: The Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 trial randomized 8010 postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, operable, invasive BC to monotherapy with letrozole, tamoxifen, or a sequential strategy for 5 years. Driver alterations were characterized using next-generation sequencing in primary tumors from a subset of 764 patients from 7329 eligible patients with ER+/HER2- BC, with 841 distant recurrences after a median of 8.1 years of follow-up. To correct for the oversampling of distant recurrences, weighted analysis methods were used. This analysis was conducted from April 4, 2016, to November 30, 2016., Main Outcomes and Measures: The prevalence of driver alterations, associations with clinicopathologic factors, distant recurrence-free interval, and treatment interactions were analyzed. Multivariable analyses were performed to adjust for clinicopathologic factors., Results: Of 764 samples, 538 (70.4%), including 140 distant recurrence events, were successfully sequenced. Nineteen driver alterations were observed with 5% or greater frequency, with a mean of 4 alterations (range, 0-15) per tumor. PIK3CA mutations were the most common (49%) and were significantly associated with reduction in the risk for distant recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.85; P = .006). TP53 mutations (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.21-3.04; P = .006), amplifications on 11q13 (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.36-3.37; P = .001) and 8p11 (HR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.88-4.84; P < .001), and increasing number of driver alterations (HR per additional alteration, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.11-1.25; P < .001) were associated with significantly greater risk. Amplifications on 11q13 and 8p11 remained significant predictors in multivariable analysis, but not PIK3CA and TP53 mutations. Patients with tumors harboring kinase or helical domain PIK3CA mutations derived significantly greater benefit from letrozole over tamoxifen than patients whose tumors did not (P interaction = .002)., Conclusions and Relevance: In ER+/HER2- postmenopausal, early-stage BC, amplifications on 11q13 and 8p11 were significantly associated with increased risk for distant recurrence and PIK3CA mutations were predictive of greater magnitude of benefit from letrozole. With these findings, DNA-based classification may aid adjuvant treatment decision making in this setting., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00004205.

Purpose: We investigated the occurrence and the prognostic and predictive relationship of a selected number of somatic mutations in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients having known clinical outcomes treated within the IBCSG Trial 22-00., Methods: A matched case-control sampling selected patients enrolled in the IBCSG Trial 22-00 who had TNBC tumors, based on local assessment. Cases had invasive breast cancer recurrence (at local, regional, or distant site) according to the protocol definition. Matched controls had not recurred. Mutational analysis was performed with OncoCarta panel v1.0 using Mass Array System. The panel includes 19 genes belonging to different functional pathways as PI3K pathway, receptor tyrosine kinase, and cell cycle-metabolic group. Conditional logistic regression assessed the association of mutation status with breast cancer recurrence., Results: Mutation assessment was successful for 135 patients (49 cases, 86 controls). A total of 37 (27.4%) of the 135 patients had at least one mutation in the selected genes. PIK3CA was the most common mutated gene (18/135; 13.3%), followed by BRAF, KIT and PDGFRA (each 4/135, 3.0%) and AKT1 (3/135; 2.2%). TNBC patients with at least one mutation had increased odds of recurrence compared with those with wild-type tumors (odds ratio (OR) 2.28; 95% CI 0.88-5.92), though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). We found no evidence that these mutations were predictive for the value of maintenance metronomic chemotherapy., Conclusions: Mutations in the tested oncogenes were not associated with breast cancer recurrence in this TNBC subset of patients. The question of whether any of these mutated genes (e.g., PIK3CA) may represent a useful therapeutic target in TNBC may be answered by ongoing clinical trials and/or larger dataset analysis.

Introduction: The reported prevalence of ALK receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK) rearrangement in NSCLC ranges from 2% to 7%. The primary standard diagnostic method is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Recently, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has also proved to be a reproducible and sensitive technique. Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has also been advocated, and most recently, the advent of targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) for ALK and other fusions has become possible. This study compares anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) evaluation with all four techniques in resected NSCLC from the large European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape cohort., Methods: A total of 96 cases from the European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape iBiobank, with any ALK immunoreactivity were examined by FISH, central RT-PCR, and NGS. An H-score higher than 120 defines IHC positivity. RNA was extracted from the same formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. For RT-PCR, primers covered the most frequent ALK translocations. For NGS, the Oncomine Solid Tumour Fusion Transcript Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) was used. The concordance was assessed using the Cohen κ coefficient (two-sided α ≤ 5%)., Results: NGS provided results for 77 of the 95 cases tested (81.1%), whereas RT-PCR provided results for 77 of 96 (80.2%). Concordance occurred in 55 cases of the 60 cases tested with all four methods (43 ALK negative and 12 ALK positive). Using ALK copositivity for IHC and FISH as the criterion standard, we derived a sensitivity for RT-PCR/NGS of 70.0%/85.0%, with a specificity of 87.1%/79.0%. When either RT-PCR or NGS was combined with IHC, the sensitivity remained the same, whereas the specificity increased to 88.7% and 83.9% respectively., Conclusion: NGS evaluation with the Oncomine Solid Tumour Fusion transcript kit and RT-PCR proved to have high sensitivity and specificity, advocating their use in routine practice. For maximal sensitivity and specificity, ALK status should be assessed by using two techniques and a third one in discordant cases. We therefore propose a customizable testing algorithm. These findings significantly influence existing testing paradigms and have clear clinical and economic impact., (Copyright © 2017 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Identification of single-gene biomarkers that are prognostic of outcome can shed new insights on the molecular mechanisms that drive breast cancer and other cancers., Methods: Exploratory analysis of 20,464 single-gene messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) discovery cohort indicates that low expression of FGD3 mRNA is prognostic for poor outcome. Prognostic significance of faciogenital dysplasia 3 (FGD3), SUSD3, and other single-gene proliferation markers was evaluated in breast cancer and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohorts., Results: A meta-analysis of Cox regression of FGD3 mRNA as a continuous variable for overall survival of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive samples in METABRIC discovery, METABRIC validation, TCGA breast cancer, and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Women With Breast Cancer (E2197) cohorts resulted in a combined hazard ratio (HR) of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.75), indicating better outcome with high expression. In the ER-negative samples, the combined meta-analysis HR was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.82), suggesting that FGD3 is prognostic regardless of ER status. The potential of FGD3 as a biomarker for freedom from recurrence was evaluated in the Breast International Group 1-98 (BIG 1-98; Letrozole or Tamoxifen in Treating Postmenopausal Women With Breast Cancer) study (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.93) for breast cancer-free interval. In the Hungarian Academy of Science (HAS) breast cancer cohort, splitting on the median had an HR of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.58) for recurrence-free survival. A comparison of the Stouffer P value in five ER-positive cohorts showed that FGD3 ( P = 3.8 E-14 ) outperformed MKI67 ( P = 1.06 E-8 ) and AURKA ( P = 2.61 E-5 ). A comparison of the Stouffer P value in four ER-negative cohorts showed that FGD3 ( P = 3.88 E-5 ) outperformed MKI67 ( P = .477) and AURKA ( P = .820)., Conclusion: FGD3 was previously shown to inhibit cell migration. FGD3 mRNA is regulated by ESR1 and is associated with favorable outcome in six distinct breast cancer cohorts and four TCGA cancer cohorts. This suggests that FGD3 is an important clinical biomarker., Competing Interests: The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or po.ascopubs.org/site/ifc. Scooter WillisNo relationship to discloseYuliang SunNo relationship to discloseMark AbramovitzNo relationship to discloseTeng FeiNo relationship to discloseBrandon YoungNo relationship to discloseXiaoqian LinNo relationship to discloseMin NiNo relationship to discloseJustin AchuaEmployment: Avera Mckennan HospitalMeredith M. ReganConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck, Ipsen (Inst) Research Funding: Veridex (Inst), OncoGenex (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Ipsen (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Merck (Inst), Ferring (Inst), Celgene (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Pierre Fabre (Inst), Ipsen (Inst)Kathryn P. GrayStock and Other Ownership Interests: MDGNRobert GrayResearch Funding: Abbott Molecular, Agios, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Genentech, Genomic Health, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, ImClone Systems, Janssen-Ortho, Kanisa, Millennium, Nodality, Onyx, OSI Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sequenta, Syndax, NovartisVictoria WangNo relationship to discloseBradley LongNo relationship to discloseRoswitha KammlerNo relationship to discloseJoseph A. SparanoStock and Other Ownership Interests: Metastat Consulting or Advisory Role: Genentech, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Celldex, Pfizer, Prescient Therapeutics, Juno Therapeutics, Merrimack Research Funding: Prescient Therapeutics (Inst), Deciphera (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Merck (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Merrimack (Inst)Casey WilliamsResearch Funding: Takeda (Inst), Tesaro (Inst)Lori J. GoldsteinHonoraria: Genentech, Roche Pharma AG, Puma Biotechnology, Pfizer, Glenmark Consulting or Advisory Role: Genentech, Dompé Farmaceutici, Roche Pharma AG, Puma Biotechnology, Pfizer, Merck, AstraZeneca Research Funding: Merck (Inst), Genentech (Inst) Other Relationship: Roche Pharma AGRoberto SalgadoTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: RocheSherene LoiResearch Funding: Genentech (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Merck (Inst), Puma Biotechnology (Inst), Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst) Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: PI3K pathway gene signature granted by the European and US patent offices (Inst)Giancarlo PruneriNo relationship to discloseGiuseppe VialeHonoraria: MSD Oncology Consulting or Advisory Role: Dako, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astellas Pharma Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, CelgeneMyles BrownConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, GTx Research Funding: Novartis Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property:: As part of my work at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute I have made invention disclosures and the institute is filing patents on technology related to endocrine resistance in breast cancer and improved CRISPR dual sgRNA library design. Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: GTxBrian Leyland-JonesStock and Other Ownership Interests: Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Progenix, Puma Biotechnology, Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, ARIAD, Zogenix Consulting or Advisory Role: GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen Speakers’ Bureau: Genentech, Exelixis Research Funding: Takeda, Tesaro Expert Testimony: Amgen, (© 2017 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)