Search

Purpose: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a genetic neuromuscular disease causing progressive muscle weakness and reducing life expectancy. Risdiplam (Evrysdi; Genentech/F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland) is a drug approved for use in the treatment of patients with SMA. The ongoing global risdiplam Compassionate Use Program (CUP), initiated in November 2019, is the largest CUP in SMA, currently providing access to risdiplam for >2000 patients with type 1 or 2 SMA in 59 countries. Here, the challenges and learnings from the risdiplam CUP are presented., Methods: Enrolled patients (aged ≥2 months) had type 1 or 2 SMA and no alternative treatment options (ie, they were not medically eligible for approved SMA treatments, were unable to continue their SMA treatment due to medical reasons, were at risk for lack/loss of SMA treatment efficacy, or did not qualify for/had no access to SMA treatment within a clinical trial). Requests were made by the treating physicians via an end-to-end system., Findings: The risdiplam CUP highlighted the importance of collaborating with patient advocacy groups early to learn about patients' perspectives on unmet medical needs, understanding the sometimes-unique nature of local regulations and requirements, and adapting physician- and patient-eligibility criteria. Key learnings were obtained from enrolling patients from low- to middle-income countries and from countries without dedicated Compassionate Use regulations, and from operating the CUP during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic., Implications: The risdiplam CUP experience was successful in many ways and may help to design and implement future CUPs in rare diseases, as well as patients living in countries or in circumstances in which access to innovative treatments is a challenge., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest R.K. and L.V. are consultants of F. Hoffmann-La Roche. K.B., S.B.K., K.G., and I.M.O. are employees of, and hold stock options in, F. Hoffmann-La Roche. The sponsor (F. Hoffmann-La Roche) had a role in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors have indicated that they have no other conflicts of interest with regard to the content of this article., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: There is a lack of studies providing comprehensive data on the prevalence of mineral and bone disorders (MBD) laboratory abnormalities after kidney transplantation in Russia., Aim: to obtain real-world data on the prevalence of the main mineral abnormalities among kidney transplant recipients and to revise their concomitant MBD therapy., Method: This cross-sectional study included 236 patients with successful kidney transplantation. Their serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), total calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels were measured., Results: Only 6.2% of our cohort had all laboratory parameters within the target range, whereas persistent HPT along with hypercalcemia was noted in almost one third of the patients (31%). Normal iPTH levels were observed in 13% cases; 84% of the patients had hyperparathyroidism. The fraction of patients with target iPTH did not differ between the groups with normal and decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (p=0.118). Hypercalcemia was observed in 29% cases. The serum P level varied significantly in groups with different eGFR (p<0.0001), increasing with declining graft function. Furthermore, 40.7% of patients had ALP above the target range. While 123 patients received active vitamin D (alfacalcidol), 33 received monotherapy with inactive vitamin D (cholecalciferol). The control group consisted of 57 medication-naïve patients. The serum total Ca level varied significantly between the groups (p=0.0006), being higher in patients supplemented with cholecalciferol. The fraction of patients with normocalcemia was lowest in the cholecalciferol group (chi-square, р=0.0018)., Conclusion: The prevalence of biochemical abnormalities after kidney transplantation is high. Alfacalcidol usage may be safer than using cholecalciferol to prevent hypercalcemia development.

Background: The concept of the formation of immunological tolerance is a promising direction for correcting the renal transplant rejection. One of these methods is extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP), however, according to the literature, there is no single concept of its mechanisms of action in the formation of immunological tolerance in transplantology., Aim: To assess the effect of the preventive use of extracorporeal photochemotherapy on the factors of cellular immunity that contribute to the development of long-term tolerance in patients after kidney transplantation., Materials and Methods: A total of 24 patients after a cadaveric kidney transplantation with group matching were included in the study. During the first six months after transplantation, 15 patients of the main group (MG) underwent 10 sessions of ECP in combination with the standard immunosuppression protocol, and 9 patients of the control group (CG) received only standard immunosuppressive therapy. Immunological studies were carried out by the 3rd year after transplantation. The number of cells expressing the antigens CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, CD16 and CD56, the expression of co-stimulating molecules CD25, CD28 on T-lymphocytes, the number of T-regulatory cells with the CD3+ CD4+ CD25+ (hi) CD127- phenotype was evaluated., Results: Compared with early post-transplant period, the number of naive CD3+CD4+CD45RO-CD28+ T-cells and CD28+ antigen expression was not different between two groups by 3 years after transplantation and with a group of otherwise healthy individuals (p=0.47 and p=0.26, respectively). Three years after transplantation, the T-helper lymphocyte count (CD3+CD4+) in MG were significantly higher than in CG (48.5+/-7.3% vs. 43.0+/-4.6%, respectively; p=0,04), cytotoxic T-lymphocytes count (CD3+CD8+) was 29.5+/-8.9% in MG, compared to 36.1+/-8.6% in CG (p=0.09), the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ in MG was significantly higher (1.83+/-0.72) than in CG (1.29+/-0.49) (p=0.04). CD19+ lymphocytes count was significantly below normal values in both groups, but in the CG it was more pronounced than in the MG (5.06+/-2.1% and 7.73+/-3%, respectively, (p=0.02) In the long-term period, CD3+CD4+CD25+(hi)CD127- T-regulatory cells count in MG was significantly higher than in CG (20.6+/-10.76*106/L and 12.9+/-4.97*106/l, respectively) (p=0.04)., Conclusion: ECP initiates immunological tolerance through the activation of a second co-activation pathway between B-7 and CTLA-4 molecules in the early period after kidney transplantation. As a result, a clone of tolerogenic CD3+CD4+ T-lymphocytes is formed, which differentiates into T-regulatory cells and maintains immunological tolerance in the long-term period. Using ECP as a part of combination therapy allows to normalize the indicators of cellular immunity in the long-term period., Background: The concept of the formation of immunological tolerance is a promising direction for correcting the renal transplant rejection. One of these methods is extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP), however, according to the literature, there is no single concept of its mechanisms of action in the formation of immunological tolerance in transplantology., Aim: To assess the effect of the preventive use of extracorporeal photochemotherapy on the factors of cellular immunity that contribute to the development of long-term tolerance in patients after kidney transplantation., Materials and Methods: A total of 24 patients after a cadaveric kidney transplantation with group matching were included in the study. During the first six months after transplantation, 15 patients of the main group (MG) underwent 10 sessions of ECP in combination with the standard immunosuppression protocol, and 9 patients of the control group (CG) received only standard immunosuppressive therapy. Immunological studies were carried out by the 3rd year after transplantation. The number of cells expressing the antigens CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, CD16 and CD56, the expression of co-stimulating molecules CD25, CD28 on T-lymphocytes, the number of T-regulatory cells with the CD3+ CD4+ CD25+ (hi) CD127- phenotype was evaluated., Results: Compared with early post-transplant period, the number of naive CD3+CD4+CD45RO-CD28+ T-cells and CD28+ antigen expression was not different between two groups by 3 years after transplantation and with a group of otherwise healthy individuals (p=0.47 and p=0.26, respectively). Three years after transplantation, the T-helper lymphocyte count (CD3+CD4+) in MG were significantly higher than in CG (48.5+/-7.3% vs. 43.0+/-4.6%, respectively; p=0,04), cytotoxic T-lymphocytes count (CD3+CD8+) was 29.5+/-8.9% in MG, compared to 36.1+/-8.6% in CG (p=0.09), the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ in MG was significantly higher (1.83+/-0.72) than in CG (1.29+/-0.49) (p=0.04). CD19+ lymphocytes count was significantly below normal values in both groups, but in the CG it was more pronounced than in the MG (5.06+/-2.1% and 7.73+/-3%, respectively, (p=0.02) In the long-term period, CD3+CD4+CD25+(hi)CD127- T-regulatory cells count in MG was significantly higher than in CG (20.6+/-10.76*106/L and 12.9+/-4.97*106/l, respectively) (p=0.04)., Conclusion: ECP initiates immunological tolerance through the activation of a second co-activation pathway between B-7 and CTLA-4 molecules in the early period after kidney transplantation. As a result, a clone of tolerogenic CD3+CD4+ T-lymphocytes is formed, which differentiates into T-regulatory cells and maintains immunological tolerance in the long-term period. Using ECP as a part of combination therapy allows to normalize the indicators of cellular immunity in the long-term period.

Aim: to evaluate the influence of prophylactic use of photopheresis on the risk of long-term infective complications after kidney transplantation., Materials and Methods: The open cohort randomized study was conducted. A total of 60 recipients after cadaveric kidney allotransplantation from 30 donors were assessed. The patients were randomized into two groups (n=30). All transplants were paired, and one kidney was transplanted to patient in intervention group and the another one was transplanted to patient in control group. In the intervention group all patients received standard immunosuppression therapy (tacrolimus, mycophenolate, prednisone) and 10-15 sessions of photopheresis during first 6 months after the transplantation. In the control group only the immunosuppression therapy was given. The follow-up period ranged from 2 to 7 years, an average 4.5+/-2.0 years., Results: The rate infective complications in the both groups gradually decreased as the postoperative period increased exponentially, but it was lower in the intervention group than in the control group. The rate of respiratory infection, asymptomatic bacteriuria and viremia, verified by the genetic amplification was 4, 2 and 1.5 times lower in the intervention group. The risk of clinically meaningful infection was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group: IRR 0.3888 (95% CI 0.2754; 0.5445; <0.0001). 6-year survival in the intervention group was 100% in comparison to 82.8% in the control group (95% CI 51.6; 93.16)., Conclusion: The prophylactic use of the photopheresis allows to decrease the risk of infective complications after the kidney transplantation.

Previous comparative reviews of add-on therapies for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) with an inadequate response to antidepressants have not used meta-analytic techniques to compare different drug classes and have included non-licensed therapies. This meta-analysis reviewed all published peer-reviewed evidence for the efficacy of EU-licensed therapies in patients with MDD and an inadequate response to antidepressant monotherapy. Papers concerning randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were identified using criteria from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Add-on therapies reviewed were antidepressants, quetiapine XR, lithium, and S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAMe). Seven RCTs that reported response and remission in a way that allowed quantitative analysis were included in this meta-analysis. Comparison of the different drug classes indicated that most interventions had similar efficacy. The likelihood of response was significantly greater with SAMe versus placebo and lithium and with quetiapine XR versus placebo. Most add-on interventions demonstrated comparable efficacy in patients with MDD and an inadequate response to initial antidepressants. However, there is currently a paucity of high-quality data regarding the use of add-on treatments in patients with MDD who are inadequate responders to antidepressants, with quetiapine XR presenting the most comprehensive evidence base to date.