Search

Brian C Cumbie, Kathie L HermayerDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Medical Genetics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USAAbstract: Microvascular complications characterized by retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy are highly prevalent among diabetics. Glycemic control has long been the mainstay for preventing progression of these complications; however, such control is not easily achieved. Currently, alternative adjunctive approaches to treating and preventing microvascular damage are being undertaken by targeting the molecular pathogenesis of diabetic complications. This review summarizes the specific pathogenic mechanisms of microvascular complications for which clinical therapies have been developed, including the polyol pathway, advanced glycation end products, protein kinase c, vascular epithelium growth factor, and the superoxide pathway. The review further focuses on therapies for these targets that are currently available or are undergoing late-stage clinical trials.Keywords: diabetes, aldose reductase inhibitor, advanced glycation end products, protein kinase C inhibitor, vascular epithelium growth factor inhibitor, antioxidants

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to examine whether a web-based, on-line intravenous insulin (IVI) infusion calculator (IVIIC) program for the delivery of IVI therapy in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients was superior to a prior IVI protocol used in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit at our institution.MethodsThe study included 97 CABG patients studied from October 2004 to February 2005 pre-protocol (type 2 diabetes) and October 2005 to February 2006 post-protocol (with or without type 2 diabetes). The IVIIC was programmed to resemble an algorithm whereby any patient with type 2 diabetes or a blood glucose (BG) greater than 120 mgdL was started on IVI with an insulin sensitivity factor, a multiplier of 0.03. The calculator used the following mathematical formula rate of insulin infusionhour (current BG – 60 mgdL) × 0.03.ResultsPre- and post-protocol groups for patients with type 2 diabetes were similar in all demographics measured, including initial age, mean age, percentage female, and percentage African-American. Significant differences were observed between pre- and post-protocol groups in mean BG recorded over a 48-h period (P< 0.0001), percentage not at target within 48 h (P< 0.0001), mean hours to first BG between 80 to 120 mgdL (P< 0.0001), mean hours to target (three consecutive BGs 80–120 mgdL) (P< 0.0001), and hyperglycemic index (P< 0.0001). The incidence of hypoglycemia (percentage BG < 70 mgdL) was not significantly increased in the post-protocol groups (P 0.2581).ConclusionsWe conclude that the IVIIC is a safe nurse-driven protocol with excellent BG outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We previously reported that compared to standard glycemic control [blood glucose (BG): 70-180 mg/dL], patients randomized to intensive glycemic control (BG: 70-110 mg/dL) were at increased risk of graft rejection in renal transplantation. However, the underlying mechanisms that associate the effect of intensive glycemic control with renal transplant outcomes have not been identified., Methods: A secondary data analysis of 93 participants (n=44 intensive, n=49 control) was conducted using data from a previous randomized controlled clinical trial. We examined inflammatory biomarkers, glycemic variability, hypoglycemia, and hyperglycemia as potential contributing etiologies by assessing the effect of intensive glycemic control on these characteristics, and evaluate the association of these variables with graft rejection., Results: Intensive glycemic control had no appreciable effect on highly sensitive C-reactive protein, interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor alpha, IL-1β, or IL-10 levels at all time points after transplantation. Moreover, neither inflammatory biomarkers nor increased glycemic variability were associated with graft rejection. However, intensive treatment increased the risk of hypoglycemia (BG <70 mg/dL, 84% vs. 25%, P<0.001). In sub-analysis, compared to non-rejecters, rejecters demonstrated higher rates of blood glucose below 70 mg/dL (90% vs. 49%, P=0.02)., Conclusion: Inflammatory biomarkers and increased glycemic variability lack correlation with clinical outcomes in renal transplant, but importantly, increased perioperative hypoglycemic episodes (BG <70mg/dL) may be a salient etiology that contributed to the increased risk for acute allograft rejection related to intensive glycemic control. Further research is needed to confirm a causal association.