Search

Copyright of JMD: Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Report: Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Im Zentrum dieses Beitrags stehen Ergebnisse der Messung pädagogischer Kompetenzen Studierender der Theologie, die das Praxissemester in Deutschland absolviert haben. Das bildungswissenschaftliche Wissen, Kompetenzselbsteinschätzungen und ihre Entwicklung sowie die Einschätzung der im Praxissemester erreichten Ziele Studierender werden dabei unter Berücksichtigung der Ausrichtung des Lehramtsstudiums auf eine Schulform betrachtet. Um die Ergebnisse der Messung bildungswissenschaftlichen Wissens und die der Messung von Kompetenzselbsteinschätzungen zu kontextualisieren (N = 304), wird zuerst die Relevanz des (bildungswissenschaftlichen) Wissens als Ausgangspunkt des Könnens herausgearbeitet. Daran anschließend werden Befunde zur schulformspezifischen Professionalisierung resümiert. Anschließend werden Hypothesen hergeleitet, die Anlage der Studie sowie die Testinstrumente vorgestellt, die Ergebnisse präsentiert und diskutiert. Die Ergebnisse zeigen wider Erwarten, dass sich weder das bildungswissenschaftliche Wissen, die Kompetenzselbsteinschätzungen und ihre Entwicklung noch die Einschätzung der im Praxissemester erreichten Ziele angehender Lehrkräfte in Abhängigkeit der Schulformen unterscheiden. Die Diskussion bezieht sich u.a. auf die Struktur der Lehramtsstudiengänge, die Denkfiguren zur Entwicklung von Können und die Konzeption der Messinstrumente.

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Report: Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal for Religion in Education / Religionspädagogische Beiträge is the property of Arbeitsgemeinschaft Katholische Religionspadagogik & Katechetik (AKRK) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Im Zentrum dieses Beitrags stehen Ergebnisse der Messung pädagogischer Kompetenzen Studierender, die das Praxissemester absolviert haben. Das bildungswissenschaftliche Wissen, Kompetenzselbsteinschätzungen sowie die Einschätzung der im Praxissemester erreichten Ziele Studierender werden dabei unter Berücksichtigung ihrer individuellen Voraussetzungen (Ausrichtung des Lehramtsstudiums auf eine Schulform; Geschlecht; Alter; Abitur- und Bachelornote) betrachtet (N = 2 008). Bevor die Hypothesen abgeleitet, die Anlage der Studie sowie die Testinstrumente vorgestellt, die Ergebnisse präsentiert und diskutiert werden, stehen u. a. exemplarische Forschungsbefunde zur schulformspezifischen Professionalisierung sowie Annahmen zur Relevanz von Wissen für Lehrerhandeln im Fokus. Die Ergebnisse zeigen u. a. (1) signifikante Mittelwertsunterschiede in den Studiengängen bezüglich des Geschlechts, des Alters, der Abitur- und Bachelornote, (2) dass das Geschlecht, die Abitur- und Bachelornote signifikante Prädiktoren für das bildungswissenschaftliche Wissen sind, (3) dass sich die Kompetenzselbsteinschätzungen insbesondere in Abhängigkeit der Ausrichtung des Lehramtsstudiums auf eine Schulform unterscheiden und (4) dass die Einschätzung der im Praxissemester erreichten Ziele in Abhängigkeit des Geschlechts differiert.

This work investigates the German version of the Kalamazoo Communication Skills Assessment Form (KCSAFd) for three assessment methods: students' self-assessment (KCSAFd-self), assessment by standardised patients (KCSAFd-sPat) and video-assessment by trained raters (KCSAFd-video). Videotaped simulated patient consultations of N = 163 medical students from the first (n = 97) and the final clinical years (n = 66) were rated using the KCSAFd. Investigating the psychometric properties of the instrument, we found a two factor-construct with interpersonal and conversational competence. All methods showed good internal consistency and acceptable model fit values. Additionally, we found plausible relationships between the three methods and meaningful differences between the two groups of students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Unterrichtswissenschaft (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.) is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

One of the aspects of diversity in the context of school and education and therefore a facet of inclusion is migration-related multilingualism. That is the reason why the professionalization of well-qualified teachers in the field of teaching multilingual learners is more important than ever. This article shows if and how satisfied the participating teachers are with the course program. It also indicates how far the competencies and beliefs regarding multilingual learners in the professional development program »German as a foreign and second language and multilingualism« develop throughout the program. A survey on satisfaction has been conducted. Data concerning competencies have been collected with a paper and pencil test, beliefs with a questionnaire. The article provides content-related and conceptual insights for different learning settings and their evaluation and therefore serves the demand for innovative and effective course concepts. Hence, it offers new ideas and impulses for (further) development of learning opportunities for professional development and also teacher training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Unterrichtswissenschaft (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.) is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal for Educational Research Online / Journal für Bildungsforschung Online is the property of Waxmann Verlag GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In this paper an analysis of the database of the Hungarian national assessment of core skills is used to differentiate the performance of religious schools in the Hungarian system and to identify the migratory tendencies in the religious school system. The goal of the paper is to provide an overview of the comparison of students' test results from schools funded by various church organisations using data from the school years from 2010 to 2013. The research has identified tendencies in the test results of students at schools funded by various church organisations as well as factors of the socioeconomic and institutional context which may be responsible for these findings. Using linear regression analysis and a multivariate variance analysis, a significant difference between groups of schools funded by traditional churches and new churches was found. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Unterrichtswissenschaft (Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa) is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Unterrichtswissenschaft (Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa) is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Unterrichtswissenschaft (Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa) is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Unterrichtswissenschaft (Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa) is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Pädagogik is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Pädagogik is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Pädagogik is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Pädagogik is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Pädagogik is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Pädagogik is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Pädagogik is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of JMD: Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Arbeit is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

[english] Introduction: While preparing a graduate survey for medical education in 2008 we realized that no instrument existed that would be suitable to evaluate whether the learning outcomes outlined in the Medical Licensure Act (ÄAppO) would be met. Therefore we developed the (Freiburger Fragebogen zur Erfassung von Kompetenzen in der Medizin, FKM) which has been revised and extended several times since then.Currently the FKM includes 45 items which are assigned to nine domains that correspond to the CanMEDS roles: medical expertise, communication, team-work, health and prevention, management, professionalism, learning, scholarship, and personal competencies.Methods: In order to test the reliability and validity of the questionnaire we have repeatedly surveyed medical students and residents since May 2008. In this article we report on the results of a cross-sectional study with 698 medical students from the preclinical and clinical years. In addition, we report the results of a survey of 514 residents who were up to two years into their residency.Results and conclusions: In summary, results show that the scales of the FKM are reliable (Cronbach’s α between .68 and .97). Significant differences in means between selected groups of students support the measure’s construct validity. Furthermore, there is evidence that the FKM might be used as a screening tool e.g. in graduate surveys to identify weaknesses in the medical education curriculum.[german] Einführung: Bei der Vorbereitung einer Absolventenbefragung im Fach Humanmedizin wurde deutlich, dass ein Verfahren fehlte, mit dem erfasst werden kann, ob die in der ÄAppO aufgeführten Lehr- und Lernziele erreicht werden. Aus diesem Grund wurde der von einer Arbeitsgruppe an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universität Freiburg entwickelt. Der FKM wurde seitdem mehrmals überarbeitet und erweitert. Er umfasst derzeit 45 Items, die neun Kompetenzbereichen zugeordnet werden. Diese Kompetenzbereiche stimmen im Wesentlichen mit den CanMEDS-Rollen überein. Methode: Um die Reliabilität und Validität des Fragebogens zu überprüfen, wurden seit Mai 2008 mehrfach Studierende und Assistenzärzte befragt. In dem vorliegenden Beitrag werden die Ergebnisse einer Querschnittsstudie berichtet, in der 698 Studierende des ersten und zweiten Studienabschnitts den FKM beantwortet haben. Des Weiteren werden die Ergebnisse von 514 Assistenzärzten mit bis zu zwei Jahren Berufserfahrung beschrieben, die den FKM im Rahmen einer Absolventenbefragung ausgefüllt haben.Ergebnisse und Schlussfolgerungen: Die bisherigen Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die einzelnen Kompetenzskalen des FKM hinreichend reliabel sind (Cronbach's α=.68 bis .97). Mittelwertunterschiede zwischen ausgewählten Gruppen von Studierenden stützen die Annahme der Konstruktvalidität des Verfahrens. Zudem gibt es Hinweise darauf, dass der FKM zumindest ab dem 2. Abschnitt des Studiums der Humanmedizin und im Rahmen von Absolventenstudien als Screening-Instrument eingesetzt werden kann, um Schwächen in der Ausbildung festzustellen.

Auf dem Weg zu einem strategischen Personalmanagement von akademischen Lehrenden in der Nutzung von ICT - Ansätze zur Messung von eCompetence Die eCompetence von akademischen Lehrenden stellt einen Aspekt der technologiebasierten Innovation von Universitäten dar. Während konzeptionelle Ansätze für eCompetence und eine Reihe von Maßnahmen für Personalentwicklung von Lehrenden in der Nutzung neuer Technologien entwickelt worden sind, gibt es einen Bedarf für zusätzliche Forschung zu angemessenen Methoden und Instrumenten der Kompetenzdiagnostik und Kompetenzbewertung. Dieser Beitrag vergleicht auf Basis einer Desktop-Studie eine Reihe von Methoden, um die eCompetence von akademischen Lehrenden einzuschätzen und zu messen. 20.09.2007 | Dirk Schneckenberg (Rennes)

Copyright of Journal for Educational Research Online / Journal für Bildungsforschung Online is the property of Waxmann Verlag GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal for Educational Research Online / Journal für Bildungsforschung Online is the property of Waxmann Verlag GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal for Educational Research Online / Journal für Bildungsforschung Online is the property of Waxmann Verlag GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)