Search

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To establish the diagnostic accuracy of the Brazilian version of the General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG-Br) compared to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in individuals with low educational level. METHODS Ninety-three patients (≥ 60 years old) from Brazilian primary care units provided sociodemographic, cognitive, and functional data. Receiver operating characteristics, areas under the curve (AUC) and logistic regressions were conducted. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients with 0–4 years of education. Cases (n = 44) were older (p = 0.006) and performed worse than controls (n = 49) on all cognitive or functional measures (p < 0.001). The GPCOG-Br demonstrated similar diagnostic accuracy to the MMSE (AUC = 0.90 and 0.91, respectively) and similar positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV, respectively: 0.79/0.86 for GPCOG-Br and 0.79/0.81 for MMSE). Adjusted cut-points displayed high sensitivity (all 86%) and satisfactory specificity (65%–80%). Lower educational level predicted lower cognitive performance. CONCLUSIONS The GPCOG-Br is clinically well-suited for use in primary care.

ABSTRACT Executive functions (EF) refer to the cognitive skills necessary to formulate a goal, plan, execute plans effectively, and to perform self-monitoring and self-correction. Several aspects of EF change during the normal aging process. Objectives: To train skills associated with executive functions in the elderly and to detect possible impact on objective EF tests and self-reports of functional status. Methods: A cross-sectional study involving an intervention and pre and post testing was carried out. Study participants included 26 seniors assigned to an experimental group (EG) and given six sessions of cognitive intervention, and 17 seniors assigned to a control group (CG) who completed pre and post testing only. All participants were enrolled in an Open University for the Third Age. The following tests were used to measure outcome: the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the Story subtest of the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test (RBMT) (versions A and B), semantic verbal fluency fruit category, and verbal fluency with phonological constraints (FAS), WAIS-III Digit Span, Clock Drawing Test (CDT), Trail Making Part A and the Pfeffer Functional Assessment Questionnaire (PFAQ). Delta scores were calculated (post-test score minus pretest score) to assess the impact of the intervention. Results: In the post test, the CG showed significant improvement on the RBMT Story recall and Digit Span but a decline in verbal fluency. The EG remained stable in terms of pre and post test scores. Conclusions: The intervention did not enhance performance on the EF tests. It is noteworthy that the EG received only a small number of sessions which may not have been sufficient to generate improvement. Alternatively, the lack of group differences observed could be associated to participation in other workshops offered at the university.

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a multiple intervention programme for the prevention of falls in older adults from a University of the Third Age (U3A). Method: A quasi-experimental, non-controlled, longitudinal and quantitative study was performed. 69 older adults were allocated into three groups: Control (CG), Physical Exercise (PEG) and Multiple Intervention (MIG). The instruments/tests used were: sociodemographic questionnaire, Geriatric Depression Scale (15-items), Mini-Mental State Examination, Timed-Up and Go (TUG), Sit-to-Stand and Hand-Grip Strength, Falls Efficacy Scale-International and Falls Risk Awareness Questionnaire (FRAQ).The PEG and MIG groups underwent physical training (walking, muscular resistance, and balance) for 16 weeks (2x/week, 60 min/session). In the same period, the MIG also participated in educational sessions (1x/week, 60min/session). Covariance analysis was used for group comparisons. The effect size of the interventions was also calculated. The level of significance was set at p

Background: The Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument - Short (CASI-S) is a brief cognitive screening test. However, there is limited information regarding its applicability in primary care.Objectives: To ascertain whether the CASI-S differentiates between dementia patients and normal controls in primary care; to examine its correlation with other cognitive instruments, to analyze its internal consistency, test-retest stability, and diagnostic accuracy.Methods: In a case-control study, carried out at two Primary Care Units (PCUs) in the eastern region of the city of São Paulo, 47 older adults were diagnosed with dementia according to DSM-IV criteria (mean age = 76.81 ± 7.03 years), and 55 were classified as normal controls (mean age = 72.78 ± 7.37 years), by a multidisciplinary panel which had access to results from a comprehensive cognitive battery and the patients' health data. The present analyses included results from the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The CASI-S was not used to determine diagnostic status.Results: The CASI-S was easily applied in the primary care setting. There was a significant performance difference (p < 0.001) between dementia patients (15.57 ± 7.40) and normal controls (26.67 ± 3.52) on the CASI-S. CASI-S scores correlated with age (ρ = -0.410, p < 0.001), educational level (ρ = 0.373, p < 0.001), and MMSE score (ρ = 0.793, p < 0.001). The internal consistency of the CASI-S was high (α = 0.848) and the correlation between test and retest was 0.688, suggesting adequate temporal stability. In the ROC curve analyses, scores of 22/23 generated an area under the curve of 0.907, with sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 81%.Conclusions: The CASI-S can be useful for dementia screening in primary care in Brazil. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]