Search

OBJECTIVE: To determine patient characteristics and dose titration patterns of real-world semaglutide (Wegovy) users. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used a population-based cohort study including Danish adults who filled semaglutide prescriptions from 12 December 2022 to 31 December 2023. Outcomes were patient characteristics, prescriber type, and dose titration patterns. RESULTS: We identified 110,748 individuals (median age 49 years; 70% female) filling 773,708 prescriptions for semaglutide. General practitioners initiated treatment in 86%. Common comorbidities included hypertension (30%), dyslipidemia (17%), and arthrosis (17%). Only 13% reached the maximum dose of 2.4 mg by their fifth prescription, while 5.7% stopped after the first prescription. Few users (10%) followed recommended dose increases every 4 weeks. Overall, 25% filled at least one prescription of 2.4 mg, while 33–48% continued with the 1.0-mg dosage from the fourth prescription onward. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world semaglutide users generally resembled trial participants, but few follow the dose titration schemes tested in premarket clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To describe utilization patterns, characteristics of users and prescribers of the new oral antiviral medication, molnupiravir, indicated for mild‐to‐moderate COVID‐19. Methods: Using nationwide registries, we identified all Danish adults who filled a prescription for molnupiravir from December 16th, 2021, to August 31st, 2022. We described weekly incidence rates and patient characteristics over time, prescriber characteristics as well as time between molnupiravir initiation and a positive SARs‐CoV‐2 test. Patient characteristics were compared to matched, untreated SARS‐CoV‐2 positive reference groups. Results: By August 31st, 2022, 5847 individuals had filled a prescription for molnupiravir. The incidence rate gradually increased to 16 weekly prescriptions per 1000 RT‐PCR SARS‐CoV‐2 positives. Users of molnupiravir were most often men (55% vs. 45% women). The majority (81%) had a positive RT‐PCR SARS‐CoV‐2 test and few (2.9%) redeemed molnupiravir outside the recommended window of 5 days from the positive test result. Compared to matched, untreated SARS‐CoV‐2 positive reference groups, users of molnupiravir had a median age of 74 years versus 49 years, a higher proportion resided in a nursing home (12% vs. 1.5%) and had a higher number of comorbidities (median of 3 vs. 0); most commonly hypertension (38%), chronic lung disease (35%), diabetes (20%) and mood disorders (20%). General practitioners were the primary prescribers of molnupiravir (91%). Conclusions: Molnupiravir was mainly prescribed by general practitioners to RT‐PCR SARS‐CoV‐2 positive individuals who had a potentially increased risk of severe COVID‐19. Though some off‐label prescribing occurred, our study indicates a high level of adherence to contemporary guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the occurrence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss following immunization with BNT162b2 (Comirnaty®; Pfizer BioNTech) or mRNA‐1273 (Spikevax®; Moderna) to the occurrence among unvaccinated individuals. Study Design: Cohort study. Setting: Nationwide Danish health care registers comprised all Danish residents living in Denmark on October 1, 2020, who were 18 years or older or turned 18 in 2021. Methods: We compared the occurrence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss following immunization with BNT162b2 (Comirnaty®; Pfizer BioNTech) or mRNA‐1273 (Spikevax®; Moderna) (first, second, or third dose) against unvaccinated person time. Secondary outcomes were a first‐ever hospital diagnosis of vestibular neuritis and a hearing examination, by an ear‐nose‐throat (ENT) specialist, followed by a prescription of moderate to high‐dose prednisolone. Results: BNT162b2 or mRNA‐1273 vaccine was not associated with an increased risk of receiving a discharge diagnosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.99, confidence interval [CI]: 0.59‐1.64) or vestibular neuritis (adjusted HR: 0.94, CI: 0.69‐1.24). We found a slightly increased risk (adjusted HR: 1.40, CI, 1.08‐1.81) of initiating moderate to high‐dose oral prednisolone following a visit to an ENT specialist within 21 days from receiving a messenger RNA (mRNA)‐based Covid‐19 vaccine. Conclusion: Our findings do not suggest an increased risk of sudden sensorineural hearing loss or vestibular neuritis following mRNA‐based COVID‐19 vaccination. mRNA‐Covid‐19 vaccination may be associated with a small excess risk of a visit to an ENT specialist visit followed by a prescription of moderate to high doses of prednisolone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The Danish authorities implemented a differential rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines where individuals at high risk of COVID-19 were prioritized. We describe the temporal uptake and characteristics of COVID-19 vaccine recipients in Denmark. Methods: Using nationwide healthcare registries, we identified all Danish residents ⩾5 years of age who received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine from 27 December 2020–29 January 2022. We charted the daily number of newly vaccinated individuals and the cumulative vaccine coverage over time, stratified by vaccine type, age groups and vaccination priority groups, and described characteristics of vaccine recipients during two-month-intervals and in vaccination priority groups. Results: By 29 January 2022, 88%, 86% and 64% of Danish residents ⩾5 years (n =5,562,008) had received a first, second and third dose, respectively, of a COVID-19 vaccine, most commonly the BNT162b2 vaccine (84%). Uptake ranged from 48% in 5–11-year-olds to 98% in 65–74-year-olds. Individuals vaccinated before June 2021 were older (median age 61–70 years vs 10–35 years in later periods) and had more comorbidities such as hypertension (22–28% vs 0.77–2.8% in later periods), chronic lung disease (9.4–15% vs 3.7–4.6% in later periods) and diabetes (9.3–12% vs 0.91–2.4% in later periods). Conclusions: We document substantial changes over time in, for example, age, sex and medical history of COVID-19 vaccine recipients. Though these results are related to the differential vaccine rollout in Denmark, similar findings are probable in other countries and should be considered when designing and interpreting studies on the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Short bowel syndrome is a disorder with several complications such as malnutrition and failure of drug therapy. Treatment with opioids is needed in many patients, and oral medication is preferred. However, optimal dosing is a difficult task as current guidelines are based on an intact gastrointestinal tract. Hence, the aim of this explorative case study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of orally administered oxycodone in patients with short bowel syndrome. Six patients with short bowel syndrome were administered 10 mg oral solution oxycodone after an overnight fast. Oxycodone plasma concentrations were determined over a 6-hour period. Pharmacokinetic profiles were visually inspected. Pharmacokinetic parameters: maximum plasma concentration, time of maximum concentration and area under the curve were calculated. Data were also compared to mean values obtained in healthy participants. A clinically relevant concentration of oxycodone was found in all patients, although with large inter-individual variation. The absorption fraction tended to correlate positively with total intestinal length. Additionally, preservation of some or the entire colon seemed further to increase the absorption fraction. Time of maximum concentration varied from 30 min to approximately 90 min. Oxycodone is absorbed in a clinically relevant extent in patients with short bowel syndrome, but bioavailability varies greatly between patients, which shall be taken into consideration. Absorption is related to functional small intestinal length, but preservation of colon is also beneficial. Still, optimal therapeutic dosing must be individualized, and other factors such as those related to malnutrition and motility shall also be taken into consideration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The physiological changes following Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery may impact drug release from mechanistically different controlled‐release tablets, making generic substitution inappropriate. This study aimed to characterise the pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic relationships of oxycodone from a lipid‐based and water‐swellable controlled‐release tablet in RYGB patients. Twenty RYGB patients received 10‐mg oral solution oxycodone or 20‐mg controlled‐release (water‐swellable or lipid‐based) oxycodone in a three‐way, randomised, semiblinded and cross‐over study. Blood sampling and pupillary recordings were conducted over a 24‐h period. A previously established pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic model of these three formulations in healthy volunteers was used in the analysis as a reference model. No differences in absorption kinetics were seen between controlled‐release formulations in patients. However, the absorption lag time was 11.5 min in patients vs 14 min in healthy volunteers for controlled‐release tablets (P < 0.001). Furthermore, oral bioavailability was 14.4% higher in patients compared to healthy volunteers regardless of formulation type (P < 0.001). Oxycodone pharmacodynamics were not significantly affected by formulation or patient status. However, baseline pupil diameter was inversely correlated with age (P < 0.001) and plasma concentrations of oxycodone at half‐maximum effect were 31% lower in males compared to females (P < 0.05). Generic substitution of monophasic lipid‐based and water‐swellable controlled‐release oxycodone tablets may be considered safe in RYGB patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and aims: Bariatric surgery remains a mainstay for treatment of morbid obesity. However, long-term adverse outcomes include chronic abdominal pain and persistent opioid use. The aim of this review was to assess the existing data on prevalence, possible mechanisms, risk factors, and outcomes regarding chronic abdominal pain and persistent opioid use after bariatric surgery. Methods: PubMed was screened for relevant literature focusing on chronic abdominal pain, persistent opioid use and pharmacokinetic alterations of opioids after bariatric surgery. Relevant papers were cross-referenced to identify publications possibly not located during the ordinary screening. Results: Evidence regarding general chronic pain status after bariatric surgery is sparse. However, our literature review revealed that abdominal pain was the most prevalent complication to bariatric surgery, presented in 3–61% of subjects with health care contacts or readmissions 1–5 years after surgery. This could be explained by behavioral, anatomical, and/or functional disorders. Persistent opioid use and doses increased after bariatric surgery, and 4–14% initiated a persistent opioid use 1–7 years after the surgery. Persistent opioid use was associated with severe pain symptoms and was most prevalent among subjects with a lower socioeconomic status. Alteration of absorption and distribution after bariatric surgery may impact opioid effects and increase the risk of adverse events and development of addiction. Changes in absorption have been briefly investigated, but the identified alterations could not be separated from alterations caused solely by excessive weight loss, and medication formulation could influence the findings. Subjects with persistent opioid use after bariatric surgery achieved lower weight loss and less metabolic benefits from the surgery. Thus, remission from comorbidities and cost effectiveness following bariatric surgery may be limited in these subjects. Conclusions: Pain, especially chronic abdominal, and persistent opioid use were found to be prevalent after bariatric surgery. Physiological, anatomical, and pharmacokinetic changes are likely to play a role. However, the risk factors for occurrence of chronic abdominal pain and persistent opioid use have only been scarcely examined as have the possible impact of pain and persistent opioid use on clinical outcomes, and health-care costs. This makes it difficult to design targeted preventive interventions, which can identify subjects at risk and prevent persistent opioid use after bariatric surgery. Future studies could imply pharmacokinetic-, pharmacodynamics-, and physiological-based modelling of pain treatment. More attention to social, physiologic, and psychological factors may be warranted in order to identify specific risk profiles of subjects considered for bariatric surgery in order to tailor and optimize current treatment recommendations for this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oral controlled‐release formulations are playing an ever‐increasing role in opioid therapy; however, little is known about their influence on the relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The study aim was to characterize the pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamics of two controlled‐release tablet formulations and a liquid formulation of oxycodone in healthy, opioid‐naïve volunteers, which can serve as a reference for future patient studies. A semi‐double‐blinded, three‐way crossover study was conducted, with fifteen healthy volunteers receiving two differently designed 20 mg monophasic controlled‐release oxycodone tablets and 10 mg oral solution oxycodone in a randomized order. Venous plasma concentrations and pupil diameter were determined pre‐dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.33, 2.66, 3, 3.33, 3.66, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hour post‐dose. Oxycodone pharmacokinetics was best described by a two‐compartment model with first‐order absorption. The controlled‐release formulations had an absorption lag of 0.23 hour and a slower absorption rate constant (kaCR = 0.19 hour‐1) compared to the oral solution (kaSOL = 0.94 hour‐1). Effects on pupil diameter were delayed relative to plasma (14 minutes half‐life) for all formulations and were best described by a proportional Emax model. The plasma concentration of oxycodone at half‐maximum effect was lower in males (31.1 μg/L) compared to females (52.8 μg/L; P <.001). The absorption profile of controlled‐release oxycodone formulations provided a prolonged onset and offset of action compared to oral solution oxycodone. The controlled‐release formulations showed no differences in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters suggesting that both may be used interchangeably in human beings with normal gastrointestinal function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ongoing monitoring and targeted treatment are important to ensure the best blood-pressure control and thus prevent cardiovascular risks. In this review, we evaluate the findings of four clinical studies investigating the effects of morning versus bedtime dosing of antihypertensives. In three out of four studies, overwhelming results were found favouring bedtime dosing. The same studies have been criticized for mechanistic implausible results and multiple study biases. No harmful effects were reported in relation to bedtime dosing. Thus, antihypertensives can be taken as it is most convenient for the patient., (Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)