Search

The role of antibiotics as adjunctive therapy in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis is uncertain. The aim of this systematic review of randomized controlled trials was to assess the efficacy of antibiotic therapy, local or systemic, as an adjunctive to the non-surgical therapy of peri-implantitis. Primary outcomes were: implant success rate and complications, changes in radiographic bone level, probing pocket depth (PPD), probing attachment level (PAL), bleeding on probing (BOP) and peri-implantitis resolution. Six studies were included: two using topical and four systemic antibiotics. Adjunctive local antibiotics improved PPD (mean difference (MD) = 0.6 mm; 95% CI 0.42–0.78), BOP (MD = 0.15% (95% CI 0.10, 0.19)) and the success rate (risk ratio = 9.89; 95% CI 2.39–40.84). No significant difference in bone level and success rate were found with the use of systemic antibiotics, although they appeared to improve PPD (MD = 1.15 mm; 95% CI 0.31–1.99) and PAL (MD = 1.10 mm; 95% CI 0.13–2.08). Within the limitations of this review, the adjunctive local antibiotics showed improved outcomes in terms of success rate, PPD and BOP, while adjunctive systemic antibiotics improved PPD and PAL only. Peri-implantitis resolution was about 20–30% using adjunctive local antibiotics, whilst it ranged from 2% to 65% with adjunctive systemic antibiotics. Findings are still controversial, since they are based on few studies with high heterogeneity, at the uncertain or high risk of bias and involve few patients. Non-surgical debridement and maintenance periodontal support therapy remain pivotal and the adjunctive use of antibiotics for peri-implantitis cannot be routinely recommended, even considering the increasing concern on antibiotic resistance.

Background: Treating extended alveolar defects is challenging for their irregular shape and lack of hard and soft tissues. Virtual planned guided bone regeneration (GBR) with customized meshes aims to optimize the treatment by reducing the risk of dehiscence. The mucosa characteristics are crucial in preserving the bone graft covering and vitality. Methods: Two three-dimensional and extended defects, a mandibular posterior and anterior maxillary atrophy were reconstructed with a particulate graft and a digitally customized scaffold. The workflow entailed merging the pre-operatory clinical related data from intra-oral scanning with the radiologic ones from cone beam-CT. A final ideal prediction of the soft tissue relationship with the implant-borne prosthesis was virtually elaborated, conditioning the design of the titanium membrane fitting the bone defects. Results: A good matching between the scaffold and the bone surface was intra-operatory noted; no complications were registered in the first months of healing with complete integrity of the soft tissues above the graft. Conclusions: A careful evaluation of the soft tissues and a forecast of their final relationship with the implant and prosthesis can improve digital mesh/membrane manufacturing with a suitable healing process up to implant placement and loading, favoring peri-implant tissue stability over time.