1. Tuning the Functionality of Designer Translating Organelles with Orthogonal tRNA Synthetase/tRNA Pairs.
- Author
-
Sushkin ME, Jung M, and Lemke EA
- Subjects
- Amino Acids metabolism, Methanosarcina genetics, Methanosarcina enzymology, Methanosarcina metabolism, Amino Acyl-tRNA Synthetases metabolism, Amino Acyl-tRNA Synthetases genetics, RNA, Transfer metabolism, RNA, Transfer genetics, Genetic Code, Protein Biosynthesis, Organelles metabolism
- Abstract
Site-specific incorporation of noncanonical amino acids (ncAAs) can be realized by genetic code expansion (GCE) technology. Different orthogonal tRNA synthetase/tRNA (RS/tRNA) pairs have been developed to introduce a ncAA at the desired site, delivering a wide variety of functionalities that can be installed into selected proteins. Cytoplasmic expression of RS/tRNA pairs can cause a problem with background ncAA incorporation into host proteins. The application of orthogonally translating organelles (OTOs), inspired by the concept of phase separation, provides a solution for this issue in mammalian cells, allowing site-specific and protein-selective ncAA incorporation. So far, only Methanosarcina mazei (Mm) pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase (PylRS) has been used within OTOs, limiting the method's potential. Here, we explored the implementation of four other widely used orthogonal RS/tRNA pairs with OTOs, which, to our surprise, were unsuccessful in generating mRNA-selective GCE. Next, we tested several experimental solutions and developed a new chimeric phenylalanyl-RS/tRNA pair that enables ncAA incorporation in OTOs in a site-specific and protein-selective manner. Our work reveals unaccounted design constraints in the spatial engineering of enzyme functions using designer organelles and presents a strategy to overcome those in vivo. We then discuss current limitations and future directions of in-cell engineering in general and protein engineering using GCE specifically., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: “E.A.L. holds patents related to OTOs. M.E.S. and M.J. declare no competing interests.”., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF