Search

Background: Algorithms to automatically adjust atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) intervals in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices are common, but their clinical efficacy is unknown. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate automatic CRT algorithms in patients with heart failure for the reduction of mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, and clinical improvement. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with CRT using automatic algorithms that change AV and VV intervals dynamically without manual input, on a beat-to-beat basis. We performed a subgroup analysis including intracardiac electrogram-based (EGM) algorithms and contractility-based algorithms. Results: Nine RCTs with 8531 participants were included, of whom 4275 (50.1%) were randomized to automatic algorithm. Seven of the 9 trials used EGM-based algorithms, and 2 used contractility sensors. There was no difference in all-cause mortality (10.3% vs 11.3%; odds ratio [OR] 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–1.03; P = .13; I2 = 0%) or heart failure hospitalizations (15.0% vs 16.1%; OR 0.924; 95% CI 0.81–1.04; P = .194; I2 = 0%) between the automatic algorithm group and the control group. Study-defined clinical improvement was also not significantly different between groups (66.6% vs 63.3%; risk ratio 1.01; 95% CI 0.95–1.06; P = .82; I2 = 50%). In the contractility-based subgroup, there was a trend toward greater clinical improvement with the use of the automatic algorithm (75% vs 68.3%; OR 1.45; 95% CI 0.97–2.18; P = .07; I2 = 40%), which did not reach statistical significance. The overall risk of bias was low. Conclusion: Automatic algorithms that change AV or VV intervals did not improve mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, or cardiovascular symptoms in patients with heart failure and CRT.

BackgroundStereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a potential new therapy for patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). The arrhythmogenic substrate (target) is synthesized from clinical and electro-anatomical information. This study was designed to evaluate the baseline interobserver variability in target delineation for STAR.MethodsDelineation software designed for research purposes was used. The study was split into three phases. Firstly, electrophysiologists delineated a well-defined structure in three patients (spinal canal). Secondly, observers delineated the VT-target in three patients based on case descriptions. To evaluate baseline performance, a basic workflow approach was used, no advanced techniques were allowed. Thirdly, observers delineated three predefined segments from the 17-segment model. Interobserver variability was evaluated by assessing volumes, variation in distance to the median volume expressed by the root-mean-square of the standard deviation (RMS-SD) over the target volume, and the Dice-coefficient.ResultsTen electrophysiologists completed the study. For the first phase interobserver variability was low as indicated by low variation in distance to the median volume (RMS-SD range: 0.02–0.02 cm) and high Dice-coefficients (mean: 0.97 ± 0.01). In the second phase distance to the median volume was large (RMS-SD range: 0.52–1.02 cm) and the Dice-coefficients low (mean: 0.40 ± 0.15). In the third phase, similar results were observed (RMS-SD range: 0.51–1.55 cm, Dice-coefficient mean: 0.31 ± 0.21).ConclusionsInterobserver variability is high for manual delineation of the VT-target and ventricular segments. This evaluation of the baseline observer variation shows that there is a need for methods and tools to improve variability and allows for future comparison of interventions aiming to reduce observer variation, for STAR but possibly also for catheter ablation.

Background The objective of this international multicenter study was to investigate both early and late outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with a systemic right ventricle (SRV) and to identify predictors for congestive heart failure readmissions and mortality. Methods and Results This retrospective international multicenter study included 13 centers. The study population comprised 80 adult patients with SRV (48.9% women) with a mean age of 45±14 (range, 18–77) years at initiation of CRT. Median follow‐up time was 4.1 (25th–75th percentile, 1.3–8.3) years. Underlying congenital heart disease consisted of congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries and dextro‐transposition of the great arteries in 63 (78.8%) and 17 (21.3%) patients, respectively. CRT resulted in significant improvement in functional class (before CRT: III, 25th–75th percentile, II–III; after CRT: II, 25th–75th percentile, II–III; P=0.005) and QRS duration (before CRT: 176±27; after CRT: 150±24 milliseconds; P=0.003) in patients with pre‐CRT ventricular pacing who underwent an upgrade to a CRT device (n=49). These improvements persisted during long‐term follow‐up with a marginal but significant increase in SRV function (before CRT; 30%, 25th–75th percentile, 25–35; after CRT: 31%, 25th–75th percentile, 21–38; P=0.049). In contrast, no beneficial change in the above‐mentioned variables was observed in patients who underwent de novo CRT (n=31). A quarter of all patients were readmitted for heart failure during follow‐up, and mortality at latest follow‐up was 21.3%. Conclusions This international experience with CRT in patients with an SRV demonstrated that CRT in selected patients with SRV dysfunction and pacing‐induced dyssynchrony yielded consistent improvement in QRS duration and New York Heart Association functional status, with a marginal increase in SRV function.

BackgroundInitial studies of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) have demonstrated impressive efficacy. Follow-up analyses have found mixed results and the role of SBRT for refractory VT remains unclear. We performed palliative, cardiac radio ablation in patients with ventricular tachycardia refractory to ablation and medical management.MethodsArrhythmogenic regions were targeted by combining computed tomography imaging with electrophysiologic mapping with collaboration from a radiation oncologist, electrophysiologist and cardiac imaging specialist. Patients were treated with a single fraction 25 Gy. Total durations of VT, the quantity of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and shocks before and after treatment as recorded by implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) were analyzed. Follow-up extended until most recent device interrogation unless transplant, death or repeat ablation occurred sooner.ResultsFourteen patients (age 50–78, four females) were treated and had an average of two prior ablations. Nine had ACC/AHA Stage D heart failure and three had left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). Two patients died shortly after SBRT, one received a prompt heart transplant and another had significant VT durations in the following months that were inaccurately recorded by their device. Ten of the 14 patients remained with adequate data post SBRT for analysis with an average follow-up duration of 216 days. Seven of those 10 patients had a decrease in VT post SBRT. Comparing the 90 days before treatment to cumulative follow-up, patients had a 59% reduction in VT, 39% reduction in ATP and a 60% reduction in shocks. Four patients received repeat ablation following SBRT. Pneumonitis was the only complication, occurring in four of the fourteen patients.ConclusionSBRT may have value in advanced heart failure patients with refractory VT acutely but the utility over long-term follow-up appears modest. Prospective randomized data is needed to better clarify the role of SBRT in managing refractory VT.