Search

Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI), is the result of an abnormal morphology of the hip joint. On the femoral side, asphericity of the head can be highlighted by an alpha angle measurement >50° on computed tomography or MRI. However, some particular cephalic asphericities can make it difficult to measure the alpha angle, leading to a diagnostic pitfall. While in the classic cam effect, the deformity is peripheral and can be treated by arthroscopic femoroplasty, an apical head deformity remains a therapeutic challenge. We present the case of a 17-year-old male patient with a femoral head deformity, corresponding to an ISHA zone 6 overhang, significantly improved in everyday and sports life by arthroscopic trapdoor technique to resect the focal central deformity while enabling concomitant treatment of central compartment pathology, in this case, a hypertrophic ligamentum teres and femoral head chondral flap. Etiology of this femoral head deformity remains uncertain but could be a particular cam deformity, sequelae to pediatric disease or instability with repeated traction of the ligament teres on the femoral head apical insertion during cephalic growth., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful procedures in orthopedic surgery. The most frequent THA indications are osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis, whereas symptomatic aseptic loosening is the most common indication to revision surgery. Chondrosarcoma (CS) is the most frequent bone sarcoma in adults, and proximal femur is the most prevalent location. Wide resection is the treatment of choice.We report 3 cases of unrecognized high-grade CS in the setting of primary or revision THA and reviewed the literature on this rare clinical presentation., Methods: A systematic literature review on CS in the setting of THA, published between 1980 and 2020, was performed on PubMed, Embase, Medline, Ovid SP, and Web of Science, using the guidelines set in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Mata-analyses (PRISMA)., Results: Case series: Three patients were referred to our sarcoma center after failure of THA due to unrecognized high-grade CS. All 3 had rapid fatal outcome. Literature review: Fifty-nine articles were identified, of which 8 were included in the study. They confirmed that primary or revision THA failure due to unrecognized CS is extremely rare, with only few cases reported in the literature., Conclusions: Before proceeding to primary or revision arthroplasty, diagnosis must be ascertained. Atypical presentation of a common pathology, such as osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, or aseptic loosening of an endoprosthesis, should raise suspicion for another cause to symptoms, and additional workup be performed. As our cases demonstrated, unrecognized or inadequately managed bone sarcoma may lead to poor or even fatal outcome., (© 2020 The Authors.)

Background: Treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) should only be initiated once the diagnosis is fully established. Resection of tumors of unknown nature should be avoided. Nevertheless, specialized centers continue to face numbers of unplanned excisions (UPE) in STS., Aim: To compare oncologic and functional outcomes, number of surgeries, length of hospital stay and treatment costs of UPE versus planned excision (PE) in STS., Method: A retrospective single tertiary center study was performed on 201 patients. Survival, local and distant recurrence rates were compared between PE (n = 137) and UPE (n = 64). In a subgroup analysis of 60 patients, functional outcome (MSTS and TESS scores), and socio-economic impact (number of surgeries, length of hospital stay and treatment costs) in "functional planned excision" (fPE) group (n = 30) and "functional unplanned excision" (fUPE) group (n = 29) were compared., Results: There was no significant difference in oncological outcome between PE and UPE. In the subgroup analysis, we found a non-significant difference in functional outcome. Patients in the fUPE had significantly more surgeries (3.5 vs. 1.4; p < 0.00001) and costs of their management was 64% higher than fPE (p = 0.048). Hospital stay was longer after fUPE but not statistically significant (18.3 days vs. 11.8 days; p = 0.13)., Conclusion: Even though oncological and functional outcomes are comparable after PE and UPE of STS, the number of surgeries, length of hospital stay and treatment costs were higher in patients with UPE. Our data underscore the importance of specialized STS treatment centers including multidisciplinary management., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Aging of the population results in an increase of the incidence of cancer and bone metastases. The proximal femur is one of the most frequent locations of bone metastases. A pathological fracture has a major impact on the quality of life and potentially on survival. In case of impending fracture, prophylactic fixation is therefore strongly recommended. The management of metastases of the proximal femur depends on multiple parameters, life expectancy and fracture risk being the most important ones. If survival is estimated to be less than 6 weeks, surgery is generally not indicated. Beyond 6 weeks, surgical indication essentially depends on location of the metastases on the proximal femur and the presence of a fracture., Competing Interests: Les auteurs n’ont déclaré aucun conflit d’intérêts en relation avec cet article.

Sarcomas are rare diseases, the treatment of which requires an appropriate technical plateform and a broad spectrum of multidisciplinary specialists. Many are initially treated by unplanned excision, and then referred to specialized centres. Secondary treatments may lead to higher complication rates and local recurrence, with lower functional outcome, life quality and possibly overall survival. In order to improve the accessibility for referral to a specialist centre, the coordination of clinical and research activities, and the quality of the management of sarcomas in general, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) has opened a Sarcoma centre on October 1st 2016. The objective of the present paper is to illustrate the concept and provide useful clinical recommendations., Competing Interests: Les auteurs n’ont déclaré aucun conflit d’intérêts en relation avec cet article.