Search

In this paper, we consider the problem of modeling the timing error process in magnetic recording systems. We propose a discrete-valued Markov model for the timing error process, and design two methods (data-aided and nondata-aided), based on the Baum-Welch algorithm, to extract the model parameters from the readback waveforms. The channel model we consider is an intersymbol interference (ISI) channel with additive Gaussian noise. The continuous-time readback signal at the output of the channel is sampled at baud-rate. Simulation results show that the estimated parameters are close to the actual values and the convergence is attained in a few iterations of the Baum-Welch algorithm. We also demonstrate the usefulness of the accurate model extraction by comparing a fine-tuned Markov timing recovery loop to the standard Mueller and Muller detector with a tuned second-order loop filter. Index Terms--Baum-Welch algorithm, cycle-slip, intersymbol interference, synchronization, timing recovery.

The oversampled filterbanks for robust transmission of multimedia signals over erasure channels is studied. Using image signals, the theoretical results are validated for a number of erasure patterns, considering unequal error protection enabled tree-structured decompositions.

In a parallel concatenated convolutional code, an information sequence is encoded by a convolutional encoder, and an interleaved version of the information sequence is encoded by another convolutional encoder. We discuss the situation in which we require both convolutional encoders to end in the all-zero state. To do so, we have to split an information word in two parts. One part contains the true information bits, and the second part contains the so-called tail bits, which are special bits with values computed such that both encoders end in the all-zero state. Depending on the interleaver, a different number of tail bits are needed. By using a constructive method, we give a characterization of all interleavers for a prescribed number of tail bits. We explain the method of encoding. In addition, simulations have been carried out to investigate the performance of codes resulting from simultaneous zero-tailing. This shows that simultaneous zero-tailing is similar in performance as compared to previously known zero-tailing methods (but with fewer trellis termination bits) and that it is better than zero-tailing just one of the encoders. Index--Parallel concatenated codes, zero-tailing.

The digital universe is doubling every two years and expected to reach an unwieldy 44 zettabytes into the next decade. To cope with the ever increasing need for storing, transmitting and retrieving huge amounts of data, cloud storage, data centers and other massively distributed storage networks have emerged. These rely on efficient memory technologies at the physical level for speed, reliability and energy efficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Random I/O (RIO) codes, recently introduced by Sharon and Alrod, is a coding scheme to improve the random input/output performance of flash memories. Multilevel flash memories require, on the average, more than a single read threshold in order to read a single logical page. This number is important to be optimized since it sets the read latency of flash memories. An $(n,M,t)$ RIO code assumes that $t$ pages are stored in $n$ cells with $t+1$ levels. The first page is read by applying a read threshold between levels $t$ and $t+1$. Similarly, the second page is read by applying a read threshold between levels $t-1$ and $t$, and so on. As a consequence, if a cell reads as bit 1 for a page (say page $m$), the cell also reads as bit 1 for all the successive pages ($m+1, m+2 \cdots$). Therefore, Sharon and Alrod showed that the design of RIO codes is equivalent to the design of WOM codes. The latter family of codes attracted substantial attention in recent years in order to improve the lifetime of flash memories by allowing writing multiple messages to the memory without the need for an erase operation. In this paper, we notice two important distinctions between RIO codes and WOM codes. While in WOM codes, the messages are received one after the other and thus are not known all in advance, in RIO codes the information of all logical pages can be known in advance when programming the cells. Even though this knowledge does not improve the maximum sum-rate of RIO codes, it allows the design of efficient high-rate codes with a moderate block length, which do not exist for WOM codes. We also study another family of RIO codes, called here partial RIO codes, that allow to find even more efficient codes while allowing to sense more than a single threshold to read some pages. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]