Search

BACKGROUND Niraparib, an inhibitor of po!y(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PART), has been associated with significantly increased progression-free survival among patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of the presence or absence of BRCA mutations. The efficacy of niraparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer after a response to firstline platinum-based chemotherapy is unknown. METHODS In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer in a 2:1 ratio to receive niraparib or placebo once daily after a response to platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival in patients who had tumors with homologousrecombination deficiency and in those in the overall population, as determined on hierarchical testing. A prespecified interim analysis for overall survival was conducted at the time of the primary analysis of progression-free survival. RESULTS Of the 733 patients who underwent randomization, 373 (50.9%) had tumors with homologous-recombination deficiency. Among the patients in this category, the median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the niraparib group than in the placebo group (21.9 months vs. 10.4 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.43; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.31 to 0.59; PcO.OOl). In the overall population, the corresponding progression-free survival was 13.8 months and 8.2 months (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% Cl, 0.50 to 0.76; P<0.001). At the 24-month interim analysis, the rate of overall survival was 84% in the niraparib group and 77% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% Cl, 0.44 to 1.11). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were anemia (in 31.0% of the patients), thrombocytopenia (in 28.7%), and neutropenia (in 12.8%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who had a response to platinum-based chemotherapy, those who received niraparib had significantly longer progression-free survival than those who received placebo, regardless of the presence or absence of homologous-recombination deficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of the oral progesterone antagonist onapristone extended release (onapristone-XR) in patients with recurrent progesterone receptor (PR)-positive adult-type granulosa cell tumor (aGCT), low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC), or endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC)., Methods: This single-institution phase II study included patients with PR-positive aGCT, LGSOC, or EEC who received ≥1 prior line of chemotherapy. Patients were enrolled from 5/2019-5/2020. PR status was evaluated via immunohistochemistry. Eligible patients had PR expression ≥1% on tissue collected within 3 years of enrollment. Patients received 50 mg of onapristone-XR twice daily until disease progression or treatment discontinuation. Adverse events were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Secondary endpoints were response duration, clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety., Results: Five patients with LGSOC and 1 with EEC enrolled, but both cohorts closed early due to slow accrual. Fourteen patients with aGCT enrolled and completed stage 1 accrual. No responses were observed. Four patients with LGSOC were evaluable, with median PFS of 4.4 months (range, 1.8-NE) and CBR of 50% (range, 6.8%-93.2%). All 14 patients with aGCT were evaluable, with median PFS of 2.8 months (range, 1.6-4.9), 6-month PFS rate of 21.4% (range, 5.2%-44.8%), 12-month PFS rate of 14.3% (range, 2.3%-36.6%), and a CBR of 35.7% (range, 12.8%-64.9%)., Conclusions: The study did not meet its primary endpoint. While onapristone-XR was well tolerated in all 3 arms, no objective responses were observed., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Alexia Iasonos reports consulting fees from Mylan. Chrisann Kyi reports grant funding from Conquer Cancer Foundation; grant funding paid to the institution from Merus, Gritstone, and BMS; and consulting fees from Scenic Immunology B.V. and OncLive. Rachel N. Grisham reports honoraria from GSK, AstraZeneca, Natera, Springworks, Corcept, MJH, and PER. Carol Aghajanian reports clinical trial funding paid to the institution from AstraZeneca; consulting fees (advisory board) from Eisai/Merck, Roche/Genentech, Abbvie, AstraZeneca/Merck, and Repare Therapeutics; advisory board participation (no fee) for Blueprint Medicine; and leadership/fiduciary roles for the GOG Foundation Board of Directors (travel cost reimbursement) and NRG Oncology Board of Directors (unpaid). Claire F. Friedman reports ongoing institutional research support from Merck, BMS, AstraZeneca, Mersana, Hotspot Therapeutics, Immunocore, Marengo and Volastra; consulting fees from BMS, Seagen, Aadi Biosciences, and Eli Lilly; honoraria for lectures from Onclive; meeting/travel support by Puma Biotechnology; and participation on Data Safety Monitoring or Advisory Board of Merck, Genentech, and Marengo (all uncompensated). Roisin E. O'Cearbhaill reports personal fees from Tesaro/GSK, Regeneron, R-PHARM, Seattle Genetics, Fresenius Kabi, Gynecologic Oncology Foundation, Bayer, Curio, Miltenyi, 2seventybio and Immunogen, and other from Hitech Health, all outside the submitted work. She is a non-compensated steering committee member for the PRIMA, Moonstone (Tesaro/GSK), and DUO-O (AstraZeneca) studies and non-compensated advisor for Carina Biotech. Her institute receives funding for clinical research from Bayer/Celgene/Juno, Gynecologic Oncology Foundation, Genentech, Kite Pharma, Tesaro/GSK, Ludwig Cancer Institute, TCR2 Therapeutics, Genmab/Seagen Therapeutics, MarkerTherapeutics, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Sellas Therapeutics, Abbvie/StemCentrx, Regeneron, Lyell Immunopharma, Acrivon, and Atara Biotherapeutics. Britta Weigelt reports a research grant from REPARE Therapeutics paid to the institution and has an immediate family member who is employed by AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Vicky Makker reports unpaid consulting/advisory roles with the following: Duality, Novartis, Morphosys, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Clovis Oncology, Karyopharm Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, ArQule, Cullinan, Faeth Therapeutics, Jazz, Immunocore, Iteos Therapeutics, Ideaya, Kartos Therapeutics, Lilly, Moreo, Prelude, Takeda, and Zymeworks; research funding from the following: Merck (Inst), Eisai (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Clovis Oncology (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Duality (Inst), Zymeworks (Inst), Karyopharm Therapeutics (Inst), Faeth Therapeutics (Inst), Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst), Lilly (Inst), and Cullinan (Inst); travel, accommodations, and expenses from the following: Eisai, Merck, AstraZeneca; and a relationship with IBM. Dennis S. Chi reports personal fees from Apyx Medical, Verthermia Inc., Biom ‘Up, and AstraZeneca, as well as recent or current stock/options ownership of Apyx Medical, Verthemia, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., TransEnterix, Inc., Doximity, Moderna, and BioNTech SE. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The phase III PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial met its primary endpoint. Niraparib first-line maintenance significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer that responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status. Final overall survival (OS) results are reported., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to niraparib or placebo, stratified by response to first-line treatment, receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and tumor HRD status. After reaching 60% target maturity, OS was evaluated via a stratified log-rank test using randomization stratification factors and summarized using Kaplan-Meier methodology. OS testing was hierarchical [overall population first, then the homologous recombination-deficient (HRd) population]. Other secondary outcomes and long-term safety were assessed; an updated, ad hoc analysis of investigator-assessed PFS was also conducted (cut-off date, 8 April 2024)., Results: The median follow-up was 73.9 months. In the overall population, the OS hazard ratio was 1.01 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.23; P = 0.8834] for niraparib (n = 487) versus placebo (n = 246). In the HRd (n = 373) and homologous recombination-proficient (n = 249) populations, the OS hazard ratios were 0.95 (95% CI 0.70-1.29) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.69-1.26), respectively. Subsequent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy was received by 11.7% and 15.8% of niraparib patients and 37.8% and 48.4% of placebo patients in the overall and HRd populations, respectively. The 5-year PFS rate numerically favored niraparib in the overall (niraparib, 22%; placebo, 12%) and HRd populations (niraparib, 35%; placebo, 16%). Myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia incidence was <2.5% (niraparib, 2.3%; placebo, 1.6%). No new safety signals were observed., Conclusions: In patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer at high risk of recurrence, there was no difference in OS between treatment arms. In the HRd population, patients alive at 5 years were two times as likely to be progression free with niraparib treatment than placebo. Long-term safety remained consistent with the established niraparib safety profile., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Mirvetuximab soravtansine may be a potentially effective therapeutic option for ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC), but the prevalence of folate receptor alpha (FRα) overexpression in this tumor type is unknown. We sought to characterize FRα expression in LGSC and its association with clinical and molecular features., Methods: FRα immunohistochemistry was performed on a tissue microarray comprised of 89 LGSCs and 42 ovarian serous borderline tumors (SBTs). Clinical tumor-normal panel-based sequencing was performed on 78 LGSCs. Associations between FRα-high status and clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes were examined., Results: Of 89 LGSCs, 36 (40%) were FRα-high (≥75% of viable tumor cells exhibiting moderate-to-strong membranous expression). Of 9 patients with LGSC and samples from different timepoints, 4 (44%) had discordant results, with conversion from FRα-negative to FRα-high in 3 (33%) cases. There was no association between FRα-high status with age, race, or progression-free/overall survival. A MAPK pathway genetic alteration, most commonly involving KRAS (n = 23), was present in 45 (58%) LGSCs. Those lacking MAPK pathway alterations were more likely to be FRα-high compared to MAPK-altered LGSCs (61% vs 20%, p < 0.001). In SBTs, FRα-high expression was associated with high-risk (micropapillary) histology and/or subsequent LGSC recurrence compared to conventional SBTs without malignant recurrence (53% vs 9%, p = 0.008)., Conclusions: Future studies of FRα-directed therapy in patients with LGSC are warranted. Discordant FRα status at recurrence suggests potential benefit for retesting. A biomarker-driven approach to direct treatment selection in LGSC is recommended. As high FRα expression is more common amongst tumors lacking MAPK pathway genetic alterations, FRα testing to determine eligibility for mirvetuximab soravtansine therapy is particularly recommended for this subgroup., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Y.L. Liu reports research funding from AstraZeneca, GSK, and Repare Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. A. Iasonos reports consulting fees from Mylan. D.S. Chi reports personal fees from Apyx Medical, Verthermia Inc., Biom ‘Up, and AstraZeneca, as well as recent or current stock/options ownership of Apyx Medical, Verthemia, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., TransEnterix, Inc., Doximity, Moderna, and BioNTech SE. C. Aghajanian reports grant support paid to the institution from Abbvie, Clovis, Genentech, and AstraZeneca; consulting fees from Eisai/Merck, Mersana Therapeutics, Roche/Genentech, Abbvie, AstraZeneca/Merck, and Repare Therapeutics; advisory board participation for Blueprint Medicine; and unpaid participation on the Board of Directors of the GOG Foundation and NRG Oncology. R.E. O'Cearbhaill reports personal fees from Tesaro/GSK, Regeneron, R-PHARM, Seattle Genetics, Fresenius Kabi, Gynecologic Oncology Foundation, Bayer, Curio, Miltenyi, 2seventybio and Immunogen, and other from Hitech Health, all outside the submitted work. She is a non-compensated steering committee member for the PRIMA, Moonstone (Tesaro/GSK), and DUO-O (AstraZeneca) studies and a non-compensated advisor for Carina Biotech. Her institute receives funding for clinical research from Bayer/Celgene/Juno, Tesaro/GSK, Merck, Ludwig Cancer Institute, Abbvie/StemCentrx, Regeneron, TCR2 Therapeutics, Atara Biotherapeutics, MarkerTherapeutics, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Genmab/Seagen Therapeutics, Sellas Therapeutics, Genentech, Kite Pharma, Acrivon, Lyell Immunopharma, and Gynecologic Oncology Foundation. K. Long Roche reports travel support from Intuitive Surgical. R.N. Grisham reports honoraria from GSK, AstraZeneca, Natera, Springworks, Corcept, MJH, and PER, outside the submitted work. M.H. Chui reports consulting fees from Verastem Oncology, outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Our understanding of the biologic heterogeneity of endometrial cancer has improved, but which patients benefit from single-agent versus combination immune checkpoint blockade remains unclear., Methods: We conducted a single-center, randomized, open-label, phase 2 study of durvalumab 1500 mg (Arm 1) versus durvalumab 1500 mg plus tremelimumab 75 mg every 4 weeks (Arm 2) in patients with endometrial carcinoma. The primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 24 weeks. Patients were stratified by mismatch repair (MMR) status and carcinosarcoma histology. Using a Simon two-stage minimax design, we determined 40 patients per arm would provide 90% power and Type 1 error of 10%., Results: Eighty-two patients were enrolled; 77 were evaluable for toxicity (Arm 1: 38, Arm 2: 39) and 75 evaluable for efficacy (Arm 1: 37, Arm 2: 38). Patient were stratified by MMR status (Arm 1: 5, Arm 2: 4 were MMR-deficient). The ORR in Arm 1 was 10.8% (one-sided 90% CI: 4.8-100%); the ORR in Arm 2 was 5.3% (one-sided 90% CI: 1.4-100%). Since the primary endpoint of ORR was not met, 24-week PFS was not compared to historical controls per protocol specification. No new safety signals were identified., Conclusions: In these patients with predominantly MMR-proficient endometrial cancer, there was limited response with single-agent and combined immune checkpoint blockade. The pre-specified efficacy thresholds were not met for further evaluation. A deeper understanding of potential mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy in MMR-proficient endometrial cancer is needed for the development of novel therapeutic approaches., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Rubinstein reports grant support paid to the institution from Merck, Zentalis, and AstraZeneca. Dr. Iasonos reports consulting fees from Mylan. Dr. Friedman reports grant support paid to the institution from Genentech/Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Merck, AstraZeneca, and Daiichi; consulting fees from Seagen and BMS; and waived compensation for advisory board participation from Merck and Genentech. Dr. O'Cearbhaill reports meeting/travel support from the Gynecologic Oncology Foundation, Curio, and Hitech Health; participation in the advisory boards of Tesaro/GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Regeneron, Seattle Genetics, Fresenius Kabi, Bayer, and CarinaBiotech (non-compensated); non-compensated steering committee participation for Tesaro/GSK and AstraZeneca; and grant support paid to the institution from Bayer/Celgene/Juno, Tesaro/GSK, Merck, the Ludwig Cancer Institute, Abbvie/StemCentrx, Regeneron, TCR2 Therapeutics, Marker Therapeutics, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Genmab/Seagen Therapeutics, Sellas Therapeutics, Genentech, KitePharma, and the Gynecologic Oncology Foundation. Dr. Cadoo reports grant support paid to the institution from The Irish Cancer Society, MSD, and Immunogen; consulting fees from Nextcure, MJH Life Sciences, and GSK; honoraria from SGK, AstraZeneca, and MSD; meeting/travel support from Roche, Pfizer, and MSD; and board/committee participation for MSD, AstraZeneca, GSK, Eisai, The National Cancer Control Programme Ireland (voluntary), and the ARC Cancer Support Centers (voluntary). Dr. Kyi reports grant support paid to the institution from Merus, Gritstone, and BMS; consulting fees from Scenic Immunology BV and OncLive; and meeting/travel support from the Conquer Cancer Foundation and Gritstone. Dr. Zamarin reports grant support paid to the institution from AstraZeneca, Roche, Plexxikon, and Synthekine; patents from Merck and Newcastle Disease Virus for Cancer Therapy; consulting fees from Memgen, Celldex, Agenus, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Crown Biosciences, Roche, GSK, Hookipa, ImmunOS, Kalivir, Synologic Therapeutics, Synthekine, Takeda, Targovax, Tessa Therapeutics, and Xencor; and stock options from Accurius Therapeutics, ImmunOS Therapeutics, and Calidi Biotherapeutics. Dr. Aghajanian reports grant support paid to the institution from Abbvie, Clovis, Genentech, and AstraZeneca; consulting fees from Eisai/Merck, Mersana Therapeutics, Roche/Genentech, Abbvie, AstraZeneca/Merck, and Repare Therapeutics; advisory board participation for Blueprint Medicine; and unpaid participation on the Board of Directors of the GOG Foundation and NRG Oncology. Dr. Billinson reports stock ownership in Abbvie and Johnson and Johnson. Dr. Makker reports unpaid board participation for Eisai, Merck, Clovis, Faeth, Duality, Morphyes, Karyopharm, Novartis, Lilly and Immunocore. The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. O'Cearbhaill reports honoraria from GSK, Bayer, Regeneron, Immunogen, MJH, SeaGen, Fresenius Kabi, and Curio, all outside the submitted work. Dr. Eskander reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Myriad, personal fees from GOG Partners, grants and personal fees from Clovis Oncology, personal fees from GSK/Tesaro, personal fees from Merck, grants from Genentech Roche, personal fees from Iovance, all outside the submitted work. Dr. Gaillard reports grants from Abbvie, grants from Pfizer, grants from PharmaMar, grants from Iovance, grants from Tesaro, grants from Genentech/Roche, grants from Rigel, grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Immunogen, personal fees from Sermonix, personal fees from Elevar Therapeutics, all outside the submitted work. In addition, Dr. Gaillard has a patent US 16/341,033 licensed, and a patent PCT/US2019/026669 licensed. All other authors have nothing to disclose.

Objective: Antineoplastic agents can cause hypersensitivity reactions that may preclude further treatment, possibly compromising patient outcome if the tumor remains sensitive to such agent. Although desensitization protocols can be used to re-introduce agents after the development of a hypersensitivity reaction, these protocols vary across institutions. Our study evaluated the safety and efficacy of our desensitization protocol., Methods: All patients who underwent desensitization to platinum, taxane, liposomal doxorubicin, or trastuzumab between November 2016 and May 2021 after a prior hypersensitivity reaction to the specific agent were included in a retrospective review. The 12-step, outpatient desensitization protocol included pretreatment with a leukotriene receptor antagonist, antihistamines, and corticosteroids, as well as extended infusion times. Successful desensitization was defined as the completion of ≥3 cycles without discontinuation of the agent due to a hypersensitivity reaction., Results: A total of 186 eligible patients were included. Median age was 59.5 years (range 26-87). 155 (83%) patients were treated with platinum. 55 (30%) patients were treated for colorectal cancer and 52 (28%) for ovarian cancer. 104 (56%) patients completed ≥3 cycles of therapy during desensitization. The median infusion time was 380 min (range 325-360 min). The median number of desensitization cycles was 3, with 694 cycles completed among all patients. A total of 79 (42%) patients had a breakthrough hypersensitivity reaction during desensitization, 4 of whom required epinephrine, and 84 (45%) patients discontinued the agent undergoing desensitization due to progression of disease., Conclusions: Our outpatient 12-step, institutional desensitization protocol for antineoplastic therapy proved safe and efficacious, with 56% of patients successfully completing ≥3 cycles and not requiring an inpatient admission., Competing Interests: Competing interests: REO reports personal fees from Tesaro/GSK, Regeneron, Seattle Genetics, Fresenius Kabi, the Gynecologic Oncology Foundation, Bayer, Immunogen, MJH Sciences and Curio, as well as others from AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals (meal) and Hitech Health (travel). REO is also a non-compensated steering committee member for the PRIMA, Moonstone (Tesaro/GSK), DUO-O (AstraZeneca) studies, and Carina Biotech. Her institute receives funding for clinical research from Bayer/Celgene/Juno, Tesaro/GSK, Ludwig Cancer Institute, Abbvie/StemCentrx, Regeneron, TCR2 Therapeutics, Atara Biotherapeutics, MarkerTherapeutics, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Genmab/Seagen Therapeutics, Sellas Therapeutics, Genentech, Kite Pharma, and the Gynecologic Oncology Foundation., (© IGCS and ESGO 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

With the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of four CD19- and one BCMA-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) therapy for B cell malignancies, CAR T cell therapy has finally reached the status of a medicinal product. The successful manufacturing of autologous CAR T cell products is a key requirement for this promising treatment modality. By analyzing the composition of 214 apheresis products from 210 subjects across eight disease indications, we found that high CD14 + cell content poses a challenge for manufacturing CAR T cells, especially in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma caused by the non-specific phagocytosis of the magnetic beads used to activate CD3 + T cells. We demonstrated that monocyte depletion via rapid plastic surface adhesion significantly reduces the CD14 + monocyte content in the apheresis products and simultaneously boosts the CD3 + content. We established a 40% CD14 + threshold for the stratification of apheresis products across nine clinical trials and demonstrated the effectiveness of this procedure by comparing manufacturing runs in two phase 1 clinical trials. Our study suggests that CD14 + content should be monitored in apheresis products, and that the manufacturing of CAR T cells should incorporate a step that lessens the CD14 + cell content in apheresis products containing more than 40% to maximize the production success., Competing Interests: P.S.A. has received research funding from ATARA Biotherapeutics; has served on the Scientific Advisory Board or as consultant to ATARA Biotherapeutics, Bayer, Carisma Therapeutics, Imugene, and Takeda Therapeutics; and has patents, royalties, and intellectual property on mesothelin-targeted CARs and other T cell therapies, method for detection of cancer cells using virus, and pending patent applications on T cell therapies. E.L.S. has patents, royalties, and intellectual property on BCMA-targeted CARs and serves as consultant for BMS. I.R. has intellectual property rights from Juno Therapeutics., (© 2021.)

It is estimated that 604,127 patients were diagnosed with cervical cancer worldwide in 2020. While a small percentage of patients will have metastatic disease at diagnosis, a large percentage (15-61%) later develop advanced disease. For this cohort, treatment with systemic chemotherapy remains the standard of care, with a static 5-year survival rate over the last thirty years. Data on targetable molecular alterations in cervical cancer have lagged behind other more common tumor types thus stunting the development of targeted agents. In recent years, tumor genomic testing has been increasingly incorporated into our clinical practice, opening the door for a potential new era of personalized treatment for advanced cervical cancer. The interim results from the NCI-MATCH study reported an actionability rate of 28.4% for the cervical cancer cohort, suggesting a subset of patients may harbor mutations which that are targetable. This review sets out to summarize the key targeted agents currently under exploration either alone or in combination with existing treatments for cervical cancer., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate how women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), dichotomized by BRCA status, tolerate intravenous (IV) or intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy given with veliparib and bevacizumab (bev) on a GOG phase I study (GOG 9923, NCT00989651)., Methods: This is an unplanned, post hoc analysis of an IRB approved, multi-institutional, prospective study (GOG 9923). Clinical characteristics and toxicity data based on BRCA status were evaluated and descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline patient characteristics and toxicities. The Kaplan Meier method was used to generate survival estimates., Results: Four hundred twenty-four patients were evaluable. Patients were treated with IV carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bev every 21 days (regimen 1), weekly IV paclitaxel with carboplatin and bev (regimen 2) or IV paclitaxel and bev with IP cisplatin (regimen 3). Bev was continued as maintenance in all arms. Within each of these regimens, veliparib was given either twice daily for the entirety of each cycle (continuous) or on days -2 to 5 (intermittent). Ten percent of patients treated on regimen 1, 12% on regimen 2, and 19.8% on regimen 3 had BRCA-associated tumors. Patients with BRCA-associated tumors, when compared to wild type, experienced similar rates of anemia, febrile neutropenia (, abdominal pain, colonic perforation, nausea, vomiting, and peripheral sensory neuropathy. Median progression free survival (PFS) was not significantly different between BRCA-associated and wild type cancers (HR 0.96, CI 0.65-1.42), though this study's primary aim was not to evaluate outcomes., Conclusions: Germline BRCA mutations positively affect chemosensitivity in EOC, but whether differences in toxicities among BRCA-associated and BRCA wild type tumors existed was previously not reported. In this population with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer no differences in reported toxicity between the two groups was observed., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mounting evidence suggests disproportionate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalizations and deaths because of racial disparities. The association of race in a cohort of gynecologic oncology patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 infection is unknown., Methods: Data were abstracted from gynecologic oncology patients with COVID-19 infection among 8 New York City area hospital systems. A multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression model accounting for county clustering was used to analyze COVID-19-related hospitalization and mortality., Results: Of 193 patients who had gynecologic cancer and COVID-19, 67 (34.7%) were Black, and 126 (65.3%) were non-Black. Black patients were more likely to require hospitalization compared with non-Black patients (71.6% [48 of 67] vs 46.0% [58 of 126]; P = .001). Of 34 (17.6%) patients who died from COVID-19, 14 (41.2%) were Black. Among those who were hospitalized, compared with non-Black patients, Black patients were more likely to: have ≥3 comorbidities (81.1% [30 of 37] vs 59.2% [29 of 49]; P = .05), to reside in Brooklyn (81.0% [17 of 21] vs 44.4% [12 of 27]; P = .02), to live with family (69.4% [25 of 36] vs 41.6% [37 of 89]; P = .009), and to have public insurance (79.6% [39 of 49] vs 53.4% [39 of 73]; P = .006). In multivariable analysis, among patients aged <65 years, Black patients were more likely to require hospitalization compared with non-Black patients (odds ratio, 4.87; 95% CI, 1.82-12.99; P = .002)., Conclusions: Although Black patients represented only one-third of patients with gynecologic cancer, they accounted for disproportionate rates of hospitalization (>45%) and death (>40%) because of COVID-19 infection; younger Black patients had a nearly 5-fold greater risk of hospitalization. Efforts to understand and improve these disparities in COVID-19 outcomes among Black patients are critical., (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)

Objective: Elevated inflammatory markers are predictive of COVID-19 infection severity and mortality. It is unclear if these markers are associated with severe infection in patients with cancer due to underlying tumor related inflammation. We sought to further understand the inflammatory response related to COVID-19 infection in patients with gynecologic cancer., Methods: Patients with a history of gynecologic cancer hospitalized for COVID-19 infection with available laboratory data were identified. Admission laboratory values and clinical outcomes were abstracted from electronic medical records. Severe infection was defined as infection requiring ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, or resulting in death., Results: 86 patients with gynecologic cancer were hospitalized with COVID-19 infection with a median age of 68.5 years (interquartile range (IQR), 59.0-74.8). Of the 86 patients, 29 (33.7%) patients required ICU admission and 25 (29.1%) patients died of COVID-19 complications. Fifty (58.1%) patients had active cancer and 36 (41.9%) were in remission. Patients with severe infection had significantly higher ferritin (median 1163.0 vs 624.0 ng/mL, p < 0.01), procalcitonin (median 0.8 vs 0.2 ng/mL, p < 0.01), and C-reactive protein (median 142.0 vs 62.3 mg/L, p = 0.02) levels compared to those with moderate infection. White blood cell count, lactate, and creatinine were also associated with severe infection. D-dimer levels were not significantly associated with severe infection (p = 0.20)., Conclusions: The inflammatory markers ferritin, procalcitonin, and CRP were associated with COVID-19 severity in gynecologic cancer patients and may be used as prognostic markers at the time of admission., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Maria Smith, Olivia D. Lara, Anne Knisely, Jennifer McEachron, Lisa Gabor, Caitlin Carr, Stephanie Blank, Monica Prasad-Hayes, Melissa Frey, Julia Fehniger, Yi-chun Lee, Sara Isani, and Yuyan Wang have nothing to disclose. Roisin O'Cearbhaill reports personal fees from Tesaro, personal fees from Glaxosmithkline, personal fees from Regeneron, other from Genentech USA, outside the submitted work; and Non-compensated steering committee member for the PRIMA, Moonstone (Tesaro/GSK) and DUO-O (AstraZeneca) studies. Justin Jee reports a patent 16/686,663, 2020 licensed to MDSeq Inc. Jason D. Wright receives research funding from Merck and is a consultant for Clovis Oncology. Bhavana Pothuri reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support outside the submitted work; institutional PI for industry sponsored trials from Tesaro/GSK, AstraZeneca, Merck, Genentech/ Roche, and Clovis Oncology. Compensated advisory boards include Tesaro/GSK, AstraZeneca, Merck, Mersana and Eisai., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: Although trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer use 3 neoadjuvant cycles, real-world practice varies. We sought to evaluate the influence of increasing pre-operative cycles on survival, accounting for surgical outcomes., Methods: We identified 199 women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer recommended for neoadjuvant chemotherapy who underwent interval debulking surgery from July 2015 to December 2018. Non-parametric tests were used to compare clinical characteristics by neoadjuvant cycles. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate differences in progression-free and overall survival. The log-rank test was used to assess the relationship of covariates to outcome., Results: The median number of neoadjuvant cycles was 4 (range 3-8), with 56 (28%) women receiving ≥5 cycles. Compared with those receiving 3 or 4, women with ≥5 neoadjuvant cycles received fewer or no post-operative cycles (p<0.001) but had no other differences in clinical factors (p>0.05). Complete gross resection rates were similar among those receiving 3, 4, and ≥5 neoadjuvant cycles (68.5%, 70%, and 71.4%, respectively, p=0.96). There were no significant differences in progression-free or overall survival when comparing 3 versus 4 neoadjuvant cycles. However, more cycles (≥5 vs 4) were associated with worse progression-free survival, even after adjustment for BRCA status and complete gross resection (HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.45 to 3.33, p<0.001), and worse overall survival, even after adjustment for histology, response on imaging, and complete gross resection rates (HR 2.78, 95% CI 1.37 to 5.63, p=0.016). The most common reason for receiving ≥5 cycles was extent of disease requiring more neoadjuvant chemotherapy., Conclusions: Despite maximal cytoreduction, patients receiving ≥ 5 neoadjuvant cycles have a poorer prognosis than those receiving 3-4 cycles. Future studies should focus on reducing surgical morbidity and optimizing novel therapies in this high-risk group., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: We sought to evaluate whether provider volume or other factors are associated with chemotherapy guideline compliance in elderly patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)., Methods: We queried the SEER-Medicare database for patients ≥66 years, diagnosed with FIGO stage II-IV EOC from 2004 to 2013 who underwent surgery and received chemotherapy within 7 months of diagnosis. We compared NCCN guideline compliance (6 cycles of platinum-based doublet) and chemotherapy-related toxicities across provider volume tertiles. Factors associated with guideline compliance and chemotherapy-related toxicities were assessed using logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) was compared across volume tertiles and Cox proportional-hazards model was created to adjust for case-mix., Results: 1924 patients met inclusion criteria. The overall rate of guideline compliance was 70.3% with a significant association between provider volume and compliance (64.5% for low-volume, 72.2% for medium-volume, 71.7% for high-volume, p = .02). In the multivariate model, treatment by low-volume providers and patient age ≥ 80 years were independently associated with worse chemotherapy-guideline compliance. In the survival analysis, there was a significant difference in median OS across provider volume tertiles with median survival of 32.8 months (95%CI 29.6, 36.4) low-volume, 41.9 months (95%CI 37.5, 46.7) medium-volume, 42.1 months (95%CI 38.8, 44.2) high-volume providers, respectively (p < .01). After adjusting for case-mix, low-volume providers were independently associated with higher rates of mortality (aHR 1.25, 95%CI: 1.08, 1.43)., Conclusions: In a modern cohort of elderly Medicare patients with advanced EOC, we found higher rates of non-compliant care and worse survival associated with treatment by low-volume Medicare providers. Urgent efforts are needed to address this volume-outcomes disparity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None declared., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have shown have activity in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Previous studies documented activity in patients with germline (gBRCA) and tumor (tBRCA) BRCA mutations (BRCAm) for treatment in lieu of chemotherapy as well as in recurrent ovarian cancer as maintenance therapy. The recent data from four randomized phase 3 trials have established an important role for frontline PARPi maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer. While SOLO-1 only included BRCAm patients, PRIMA, VELIA, and PAOLA-1 enrolled broader patient populations. The magnitude of benefit of PARPi in these studies was consistently greatest in the BRCAm patients (germline or tumor). PARPi treatment also improved PFS in the HRD cohort but to a lesser degree than in patients with BRCAm. In secondary analyses, the overall impact of PARPi treatment in HR proficient patients, which comprise about 50% of ovarian cancers, was more limited than in the other subgroups. Data for overall survival, also a secondary endpoint, is currently immature for these four trials. Fatigue, hematologic, and GI toxicities are the most commonly noted adverse events with PARPi therapy. The recent FDA approvals of PARPi in the maintenance setting will enable clinicians to incorporate these into frontline armamentarium of ovarian cancer treatment., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) is diagnosed at advanced stage in the majority of women and, despite being initially chemosensitive, eventually recurs and develops resistance to known therapies. SC-003 is a pyrrolobenzodiazepine-based antibody-drug conjugate targeting dipeptidase 3 (DPEP3), a membrane-bound dipeptidase associated with tumor-initiating cells in patient-derived EOC xenograft models. This first-in-human phase 1a/1b study evaluated the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of SC-003 alone or in combination with budigalimab (formerly ABBV-181), an antibody targeting PD-1, in patients with platinum-resistant/refractory EOC (NCT02539719)., Methods: Patients received SC-003 at 1 of 6 dose levels (0.025-0.4 mg/kg) every 3 weeks (Q3W), utilizing a standard 3 + 3 design (dose-limiting toxicity [DLT] period: 21 days). Patients with DPEP3-positive tumors were enrolled in the dose-expansion phase of the study and treated with SC-003 monotherapy or in combination with budigalimab., Results: Seventy-four patients (n = 29, dose escalation; n = 45, dose expansion; n = 3 budigalimab combination) were enrolled and received ≥1 dose of study drug. One DLT occurred (grade 3 ileus) but was considered unrelated to study drug. The MTD for the Q3W schedule was 0.3 mg/kg and the SC-003 doses selected for the dose-expansion phase of the study were 0.3 mg/kg and 0.2 mg/kg. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue, nausea, decreased appetite, pleural effusion, abdominal pain, and peripheral edema. The overall response rate was low (4%), and responses were not durable. Post-hoc examination of antitumor activity suggested a higher response rate in patients with higher DPEP3 expression., Conclusions: SC-003 lacked the requisite safety profile and antitumor activity to warrant further development., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Erika Hamilton: Consulting/advisory roles for Pfizer, Genentech/Roche, Flatiron Health, Lilly, Puma Biotechnology, Daiichi Sankyo, Mersana, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Silverback Therapeutics; institutional research funding from Seattle Genetics, Puma, AstraZeneca, Hutchison MediPharma, OncoMed, MedImmune, StemcentRx, Genentech/Roche, Curis, Verastem, Zymeworks, Syndax, Lycera, Rgenix, Novartis, Mersana, Millennium, TapImmune Inc., Lilly, BerGenBio, Medivation, Pfizer, Tesaro, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eisai, H3 Biomedicine, Radius Health, Acerta Pharma, Takeda, MacroGenics, AbbVie, Immunomedics, Fujifilm, eFFECTOR Therapeutics, Merus, NuCana, Regeneron, Leap Therapeutics, Taiho Pharmaceutical, EMD Serono, Daiichi Sankyo, ArQule, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Clovis Oncology, CytomX Therapeutics, InventisBio, Deciphera, Unum Therapeutics, Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Sutro, Aravive, Zenith Epigenetics, Arvinas, Harpoon, Fochon, Black Diamond, Orinove, Molecular Templates, Silverback Therapeutics, Compugen, G1 Therapeutics, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Torque Therapeutics. David O'Malley: Reports personal fees and other from AstraZeneca, personal fees and other from Clovis, personal fees and other from Tesaro, personal fees and other from ImmunoGen, personal fees from Ambry, personal fees and other from Janssen/J&J, personal fees and other from AbbVie, personal fees and other from Regeneron, personal fees and other from Amgen, personal fees from Novocure, personal fees and other from Genentech/Roche, other from VentiRx, other from Array BioPharma, other from EMD Serono, other from Ergomed, other from Ajinomoto Inc., other from Ludwig Cancer Research, other from Stemcentrx, Inc., other from Cerulean Pharma personal fees and other from GOG Foundation, other from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, other from Serono Inc., other from TRACON Pharmaceuticals, other from Yale University, other from New Mexico Cancer Care Alliance, other from INC Research, Inc., other from inVentiv Health Clinical, other from Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc., other from PRA Intl, personal fees from Myriad Genetics, personal fees and other from Eisai, personal fees and other from Agenus, personal fees and other from GSK, personal fees from Tarveda, personal fees and other from Merck. Roisin O'Cearbhaill: Research support from NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748); honoraria from Clovis, TESARO, Inc., and GlaxoSmithKline. Mihaela Cristea: Consultant for AbbVie, Inc., speaker/consultant for AstraZeneca. Gini Fleming: Advisory board for GSK; honoraria from Curio Science, UpToDate; research support (institutional) from Corcept, AbbVie, Genentech, Tesaro, Syndax, Forty Seven, Inc., Iovance, Syros, Astex, Merck, Sanofi, Sermonix, Compugen, Incyte, Leap Therapeutics, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Eisai, Sanofi. Bilal Tariq: Former employee of AbbVie and may own stock. Kathleen Moore: Consultant/advisory role for AstraZeneca, Genentech/Roche, ImmunoGen, Clovis, Tesaro, Pfizer, Janssen, Aravive, VBL Therapeutics, Onco Med, Samumed, Eisai, GSK, Vavotar, Tarveda, AbbVie; institutional research funding from Genentech/Roche, ImmunoGen, Clovis, Tesaro, Lilly. A. Fong, D. French, M. Rossi, D. Brickman: AbbVie employees and may own stock., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is a lack of data exploring the use and optimal timing of immunotherapy and chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in node-positive cervical cancer. Further translational research into mechanisms of response and resistance to immunotherapy in advanced cervical cancer is warranted., Primary Objectives: To determine if sequencing of atezolizumab and CRT result in differential immune activation, as determined by clonal expansion of T cell receptor beta (TCRB) repertoires in peripheral blood on day 21., Study Hypothesis: There is a difference for clonal expansion of T cell receptor beta repertoires in the peripheral blood at day 21 between the priming and concurrent atezolizumab and CRT in Arm A vs the concurrent atezolizumab and CRT in Arm B., Trial Design: Locally advanced cervical cancer patients with lymph node-positive disease will be randomized on this open-label, randomized trial with two experimental arms. Arm A will get one dose of atezolizumab prior to cisplatin CRT, and then two subsequent doses of atezolizumab during the CRT, and Arm B will get three doses during CRT. Patients will be followed for 2 years to assess outcomes., Major Inclusion/exclusion Criteria: Patients must have histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed advanced cervical cancer (squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous cell carcinoma): FIGO 2009 clinical stages IB2/IIA with positive para-aortic nodes, or FIGO 2009 clinical stages IIB/IIIB/IVA with positive pelvic or para-aortic lymph nodes. Exclusion criteria include those who had a prior hysterectomy or lymph node dissection., Primary Endpoints: Clonal expansion of TCRB) repertoires in peripheral blood on day 21., Sample Size: The sample size will be 40 patients., Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting Results: We estimate accrual to finish by the summer of 2020 with presentation of results to follow in 2021., Trial Registration: NCT03738228., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To assess fitness and outcomes in older women undergoing cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer (OC)., Methods: A prospective study of OC patients referred to Geriatrics Clinic for preoperative evaluation. All completed the electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment (eRFA) and were followed by Geriatrics Service during inpatient postoperative course, co-managed by Surgical Service. Outcomes were 30-day Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, emergency room (ER) visit, readmission, mortality, adverse surgical events. Descriptive statistics were used., Results: Forty-two women (median age 79, range 74-88), 38 with newly diagnosed advanced OC, 4 with recurrent OC, underwent cytoreductive surgery between 5/2015 and 1/2018. Preoperative age-related impairments per eRFA: high level of distress (71%), functional dependency (59%), limited social activity (59%), depression (57%), slow Time Up and Go (54%), Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) ≤ 80 (41%), poor social support (43%), polypharmacy (35%), weight loss>10 lbs. (25%), fall history (244%), cognitive impairment (13%). Median number of comorbid conditions = 3. Among 38 newly diagnosed women, 26 (68%) had stage IIIC, 11 (29%) stage IV. Sixteen (42%) underwent primary debulking surgery, 22 (58%) neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. Median duration of surgery = 245.5 min (range 95-621); median hospital length of stay = 6 days (range 0-22). Optimal debulking rate = 97%, complete gross resection rate = 63%. One patient was admitted to ICU, 26% had 30-day ER visit, 10% were readmitted. Any complication, minor complication, major complication occurred in 58%, 55%, 8%, respectively. Median time from surgery to postoperative chemotherapy = 34.5 days (range 19-66). Median follow-up = 15.7 months (range 3.7-38.0), 12-month survival = 93.3%. There was no 180-day mortality., Conclusion: Cytoreductive surgery among older women with advanced OC and frailty can be performed safely in a tertiary care center with preoperative/postoperative geriatric and surgical co-management., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We described progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with primary mucinous ovarian cancer receiving adjuvant gynecologic versus gastrointestinal chemotherapy regimens., Methods: We identified all primary mucinous ovarian cancer patients receiving adjuvant gynecologic or gastrointestinal chemotherapy regimens at a single institution from 1994 to 2016. Gynecologic pathologists using strict pathologic/clinical criteria determined diagnosis. Adjuvant therapy was coded as gynecologic or gastrointestinal based on standard agents and schedules. Clinical/pathologic/treatment characteristics were recorded. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables, and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Progression-free and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, applying landmark analysis., Results: Of 62 patients identified, 21 received adjuvant chemotherapy: 12 gynecologic, 9 gastrointestinal. Median age (in years) at diagnosis: 58 (range 25-68) gynecologic cohort, 38 (range 32-68) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.13). Median body mass index at first post-operative visit: 25 kg/m 2 (range 18-31) gynecologic cohort, 23 kg/m 2 (range 18-31) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.23). History of smoking: 6/12 (50%) gynecologic cohort, 3/9 (33%) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.66). Stage distribution in gynecologic and gastrointestinal cohorts, respectively: stage I: 9/12 (75%) and 3/9 (33%); stage II: 2/12 (17%) and 1/9 (11%); stage III: 1/12 (8%) and 5/9 (56%) (p=0.06). Grade distribution in gynecologic and gastrointestinal cohorts, respectively: grade 1: 8/12 (67%) and 1/9 (13%); grade 2/3: 4/12 (33%) and 7/9 (88%) (p=0.03). Three-year progression-free survival: 90.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 98.7 %) gynecologic, 53.3% (95% CI 17.7% to 79.6%) gastrointestinal. Three-year overall survival: 90.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 98.7%) gynecologic, 76.2% (95% CI 33.2% to 93.5%) gastrointestinal., Conclusion: Ongoing international collaborative research may further define associations between chemotherapy regimens and survival., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Awareness of disease status has been identified as a factor in the treatment decision-making process. Women with recurrent ovarian cancer are facing the challenge of making treatment decisions throughout the disease trajectory. It is not understood how women with ovarian cancer perceive their disease and subsequently make treatment decisions., Purpose: The purpose of this phenomenological study was to understand the lived experience of women with recurrent ovarian cancer, how they understood their disease and made their treatment decisions., Methods: A qualitative design with a descriptive phenomenological method was used to conduct 2 in-depth interviews with 12 women (n = 24 interviews). Each interview was ∼60 minutes and was digitally recorded and professionally transcribed. Data collection focused on patients' understanding of their disease and how patients participated in treatment decisions. A modified version of Colaizzi's method of phenomenological reduction guided data analysis., Results: Three themes emerged to describe the phenomenon of being aware of disease status: (1) perceiving recurrent ovarian cancer as a chronic illness, (2) perceived inability to make treatment decisions, and (3) enduring emotional distress., Conclusions and Implications: This study revealed how 12 women conceptualized recurrent ovarian cancer as a chronic disease and their perceived inability to make treatment decisions because of lack of information and professional qualifications, resulting in enduring emotional distress. Future research should replicate the study to confirm the persistence of the themes for racially, ethnically, and religiously diverse patient samples and to improve understanding of awareness of disease status and decision-making processes of patients.

Background: The American Joint Commission Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual 8th edition introduced a breast cancer (BC) Prognostic Stage (PS) that combines tumour grade, oestrogen (ER), progesterone (PgR), and human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2) receptor status with Anatomic TNM Stage (AS). In a further modification, patients with early BC and an Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score (RS) < 11 are assigned to PS 1A irrespective of grade and size up to 5 cm. This study profiles the impact of these changes on staging in patients with early BC and RS < 11., Methods: A total of 127 patients, with primary BC and RS < 11, were identified from a consecutive series of 729 patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, lymph node-negative, primary BC whose tumours were tested using the Oncotype DX® 21 multigene assay. Each patient was assigned AS, PS, and RS-modified PS, and staging categories were compared., Results: Applying AS, 100 patients were stage IA and 27 IIA. Applying PS, 89 were stage IA, 33 IB, 4 IIA, and 1 IIB. All patients were IA according to RS-modified PS. Comparing PS to AS, 26.7% of patients (n = 34) changed stage, 9.4% (n = 12) to a higher and 17.3% (n = 22) to a lower stage. RS-modified PS versus AS resulted in downstaging in 21.3% (n = 27). Comparing PS modified by RS to PS alone, 29.9% (n = 38) were downstaged., Conclusion: Application of PS and RS-modified PS results in tumour downstaging in approximately 20% of patients with early BC. Upstaging was observed in 9% of patients when staged according to PS and was primarily due to the impact of high histological grade., (© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Replication-competent retrovirus (RCR) is a safety concern for individuals treated with retroviral gene therapy. RCR detection assays are used to detect RCR in manufactured vector, transduced cell products infused into research subjects, and in the research subjects after treatment. In this study, we reviewed 286 control (n = 4) and transduced cell products (n = 282) screened for RCR in the National Gene Vector Biorepository. The transduced cell samples were submitted from 14 clinical trials. All vector products were previously shown to be negative for RCR prior to use in cell transduction. After transduction, all 282 transduced cell products were negative for RCR. In addition, 241 of the clinical trial participants were also screened for RCR by analyzing peripheral blood at least 1 month after infusion, all of which were also negative for evidence of RCR infection. The majority of vector products used in the clinical trials were generated in the PG13 packaging cell line. The findings suggest that screening of the retroviral vector product generated in PG13 cell line may be sufficient and that further screening of transduced cells does not provide added value.

Objective: To explore the impact of primary debulking surgery (PDS) to minimal but gross residual disease (RD) in women with bulky stage IIIC ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with the aforementioned diagnosis who underwent PDS at our institution from 01/2001-12/2010. Those with disease of non-epithelial histology or borderline tumors were excluded. Clinicopathologic data were abstracted, and appropriate statistical tests were used., Results: We identified 496 eligible patients. Median age was 62years; 91% had disease of serous histology. Patients were grouped by RD status: no gross RD, 184 (37%); RD of 1-5mm, 127 (26%); RD of 6-10mm, 54 (11%); and RD >10mm, 131 (26%). With a median follow-up of 53months, the median progression-free survivals (PFS) were: 26.7, 20.7, 16.2, and 13.6months, respectively (p<0.001). The median overall survivals (OS) were 83.4, 54.5, 43.8, and 38.9months, respectively (p<0.001). Among patients with RD following PDS, those with RD of 1-10mm had improved PFS (p<0.001) and OS (p=0.001) compared with those with RD >10mm. Patients with RD 1-10mm who received intravenous/intraperitoneal (IV/IP) chemotherapy were younger and had prolonged OS compared with those solely exposed to IV chemotherapy (p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively)., Conclusions: PDS to no gross RD was associated with the longest PFS and OS. However, cytoreduction to 1-10mm of RD was also associated with better survival outcomes compared with cytoreduction to >10mm of RD. We conclude that PDS remains an appropriate option for patients with a high likelihood of achieving RD 1-10mm, especially for younger patients who can receive IV/IP chemotherapy after PDS., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer has no curative options, necessitating the development of novel treatments, including immunotherapy., Rationale: Patient-derived T cells can be genetically modified to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) specific to tumor-associated antigens in an HLA-independent manner, with promising preclinical results. MUC16(ecto) is highly expressed on most epithelial ovarian carcinomas but at low levels on normal tissues, offering an excellent immunotherapeutic target for this cancer. CAR T cells further modified to secrete IL-12 show enhanced cytotoxicity, persistence, and modulation of the tumor microenvironment., Design: We propose a dose escalation phase I clinical trial for patients with recurrent MUC-16(ecto+) ovarian cancer to test the safety of intravenous and intraperitoneal administration and the preliminary efficacy of autologous IL-12 secreting, MUC-16(ecto) CAR T cells containing a safety elimination gene., Innovation: This trial targets MUC-16(ecto), a novel and promising tumor-associated antigen. This will be the first time CAR T cells are injected intraperitoneally directly into the site of the tumor within the abdomen in humans. Furthermore, the ability of genetically modified cells to secrete IL-12 will potentially enhance CAR T cell persistence and modulate the tumor microenvironment. For safety purposes, an elimination gene has been incorporated into the CAR T cells to mitigate any on-target, off-tumor or other unforeseen toxicity.

Objective: To determine whether cytoreduction is associated with improved outcome in patients newly diagnosed with metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS)., Methods: We retrospectively identified all patients treated at our institution for high-grade uterine LMS with extrauterine disease at the time of initial diagnosis from 7/1/82 to 7/31/07. Pattern of disease spread was classified as intraperitoneal (IP) or extraperitoneal (EP). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined from date of initial surgery using Kaplan-Meier estimates., Results: We identified 96 cases. Median age was 54 years (range, 23-81). IP disease was seen in 48 (50%) and EP in 48 (50%). A complete gross resection of all tumor was achieved in 41/84 (49%). Recurrence or progression was noted in 93 (97%); 81 (84%) have died. Median PFS and OS for the entire cohort was 9.7 months (range, 6.7-10.9) and 20.2 months (range, 15.5-24.8), respectively. All 8 non-surgical cases died within 30 months of diagnosis. Median PFS was 14.2 months (range, 11.4-16.9) for those with a complete gross resection versus 6.8 months (range, 4.1-9.5) for those with any residual disease (P=0.002). Median OS was 31.9 months (range, 3.3-60.4) versus 20.2 months (range, 11.8-28.6), respectively (P=0.04). On multivariate analysis, no residual disease was independently associated with PFS when adjusting for disease distribution (IP vs EP) and the use of chemotherapy but not OS., Conclusions: Surgical cytoreduction of metastatic uterine LMS was independently associated with PFS but not OS in cases selected for surgery. The improvement in PFS must be weighed against the morbidity of surgery., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)