Search

Background: Advances in SNP arrays and reference genome assemblies have significantly transformed cattle genomics, particularly for Bos taurus indicus (Zebu cattle). Many commercial SNP arrays were originally designed for Bos taurus taurus, leading to ascertainment bias and the exclusion of crucial SNPs specific to Zebu populations. This review assesses progress in SNP array and reference genome development, with a focus on efforts tailored to Zebu populations and their impact on genomic selection and breeding efficiency. Methods: We reviewed the relevant literature on the development of SNP arrays, reference genome assemblies, and SNP genotyping techniques used for Zebu cattle. Emphasis was placed on SNP arrays specifically designed for Zebu breeds, evaluating their contributions to genomic evaluations and identifying limitations in prediction accuracy. Results: Recent advancements, such as GeneSeek's low- and high-density SNP panels, have aimed to reduce ascertainment bias and include key SNPs for Zebu populations by providing breed-specific panels. These panels have been instrumental in identifying genomic regions associated with economically important traits in Nellore cattle. Studies show that tailored SNP arrays and breed-specific reference genomes can enhance genetic diversity assessment and improve genomic predictions, supporting more effective breeding programs for Zebu cattle. Conclusions: Improved SNP arrays and breed-specific reference genomes are crucial for accurate genomic selection in Zebu cattle. Future efforts should prioritize expanding de novo genome assemblies, reducing ascertainment bias, and developing cost-effective genotyping solutions tailored to Zebu populations. Targeted genomic tools will ultimately enable more efficient breeding practices and enhance genomic selection for economically important traits in B. t. indicus cattle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As the swine industry continues to explore pork quality traits alongside growth, feed efficiency and carcass leanness traits, it becomes imperative to understand their underlying genetic relationships. Due to this increase in the number of desirable traits, animal breeders must also consider methods to efficiently perform direct genetic changes for each trait and evaluate alternative selection indexes with different sets of phenotypic measurements. Principal component analysis (PCA) and genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) can be combined to understand the genetic architecture and biological mechanisms by defining biological types (biotypes) that relate these valuable traits. Therefore, the main objectives of this study were to: (1) estimate genomic‐based genetic parameters; (2) define animal biotypes utilizing PCA; and (3) utilize GWAS to link the biotypes to candidate genes and quantitative trait loci (QTL). The phenotypic dataset included 2583 phenotypic records from female Duroc pigs from a terminal sire line. The pedigree file contained 193,764 animals and the genotype file included 21,309 animals with 35,651 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Eight principal components (PCs), accounting for a total of 99.7% of the population variation, were defined for three growth, eight conventional carcass, 10 pork quality and 18 novel carcass traits. The eight biotypes defined from the PCs were found to be related to growth rate, maturity, meat quality and body structure, which were then related to candidate genes. Of the 175 candidate genes found, six of them [LDHA (SSC1), PIK3C3 (SSC6), PRKAG3 (SSC15), VRTN (SSC7), DLST (SSC7) and PAPPA (SSC1)] related to four PCs were found to be associated with previously defined QTL, linking the biotypes with biological processes involved with muscle growth, fat deposition, glycogen levels and skeletal development. Further functional analyses helped to make connections between biotypes, relating them through common KEGG pathways and gene ontology (GO) terms. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the genetic relationships between growth, carcass and meat quality traits in Duroc pigs, enabling breeders to better understand the biological mechanisms underlying the phenotypic expression of these traits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The decision of premature culling cows directly impacts the profitability of dairy farms. A comprehensive characterization of the primary causes of culling reasons would greatly improve both management and selection objectives in dairy cattle breeding programs. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the temporal frequencies of 34 culling reasons in Canadian Holstein cows. After data editing and quality control, records from 3,096,872 cows culled from 9,683 herds spread across Canada were used for the analyses covering the periods from 1996 to 2020. Reproductive issues were the main culling reason accounting for 23.02%, followed by milk production (20.82%), health (20.39%), conformation problems (13.69%), economic factors (13.10%), accidents (5.67%), age-related causes (1.67%), and workability (1.63%). Nearly fifty-eight percent of cows were culled after 47 months of age. The observed frequencies of culling due to economic factors were lower than expected from 1996 to 2014 and higher than expected between 2015 and 2020. Reproduction issues had the highest culling frequencies during fall (24.54%), winter (24.02%), and spring (22.51%), while health issues were the most frequent (22.51%) culling reason in the summer season. Health issues (25.50%) and milk production (27.71%) were the most frequent culling reasons in the provinces of Quebec and Ontario, respectively. Reproductive issues showed the highest frequency across climates based on the Köppen climate classification, except for Csb (Dry-summer subtropical or Mediterranean climate) and Bsk (Middle latitude steppe climate), which correspond to small regions in Canada, where production was the most frequent culling reason (29.42% and 21.56%, respectively). Reproductive and milk performance issues were the two main culling reasons in most ecozones, except in Boreal Shield and Atlantic Marine, where health issues had the highest frequencies (25.12 and 23.75%, respectively). These results will contribute to improving management practices and selective decisions to reduce involuntary culling of Holstein cows. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The goal of this study was to assess the feasibility of across‐country genomic predictions in Norwegian White Sheep (NWS) and New Zealand Composite (NZC) sheep populations with similar development history. Different training populations were evaluated (i.e., including only NWS or NZC, or combining both populations). Predictions were performed using the actual phenotypes (normalized) and the single‐step GBLUP via Bayesian inference. Genotyped NWS animals born in 2016 (N = 267) were used to assess the accuracy and bias of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) predicted for birth weight (BW), weaning weight (WW), carcass weight (CW), EUROP carcass classification (EUC), and EUROP fat grading (EUF). The accuracy and bias of GEBVs differed across traits and training population used. For instance, the GEBV accuracies ranged from 0.13 (BW) to 0.44 (EUC) for GEBVs predicted including only NWS, from 0.06 (BW) to 0.15 (CW) when including only NZC, and from 0.10 (BW) to 0.41 (EUC) when including both NWS and NZC animals in the training population. The regression coefficients used to assess the spread of GEBVs (bias) ranged from 0.26 (BW) to 0.64 (EUF) for only NWS, 0.10 (EUC) to 0.52 (CW) for only NZC, and from 0.42 (WW) to 2.23 (EUC) for both NWS and NZC in the training population. Our findings suggest that across‐country genomic predictions based on ssGBLUP might be possible for NWS and NZC, especially for novel traits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]